time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Moving GPSDO

JG
Joseph Gray
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 4:19 AM

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I
don't care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't care about the UTC time. Joe Gray W5JG
BH
Bill Hawkins
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 5:08 AM

The Motorola receivers in Lucent gear won't output a time signal if they
don't have an initial survey.

I make this assertion because the RFTG I had would not lock. The
Motorola bag of bits decodes to say there's no position fix because
enough satellites have not been acquired. Too bad I lived in a valley.

Let us know how this turns out, starting from an initial survey.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Gray
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:20 PM

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't
care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG

The Motorola receivers in Lucent gear won't output a time signal if they don't have an initial survey. I make this assertion because the RFTG I had would not lock. The Motorola bag of bits decodes to say there's no position fix because enough satellites have not been acquired. Too bad I lived in a valley. Let us know how this turns out, starting from an initial survey. Bill Hawkins -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Gray Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:20 PM I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't care about the UTC time. Joe Gray W5JG
JG
Joseph Gray
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 6:02 AM

Bill,

My question was more generally about any GPSDO, but it's good to know
about the Motorola/Lucent.

What about this scenario - the GPSDO has a fixed position on initial
powerup, but then it is moved periodically or even continuously,
without updating the GPS coordinates. The distance from the original
coordinates could be anywhere from close by, to across the state.
Periodically, a new survey could be run to keep things from getting
too far out in left field.

At some point, I'll have to do some field testing, but I wanted to get
the list wisdom first.

Joe Gray
W5JG

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Bill Hawkins bill.iaxs@pobox.com wrote:

The Motorola receivers in Lucent gear won't output a time signal if they
don't have an initial survey.

I make this assertion because the RFTG I had would not lock. The
Motorola bag of bits decodes to say there's no position fix because
enough satellites have not been acquired. Too bad I lived in a valley.

Let us know how this turns out, starting from an initial survey.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Gray
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:20 PM

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't
care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Bill, My question was more generally about any GPSDO, but it's good to know about the Motorola/Lucent. What about this scenario - the GPSDO has a fixed position on initial powerup, but then it is moved periodically or even continuously, without updating the GPS coordinates. The distance from the original coordinates could be anywhere from close by, to across the state. Periodically, a new survey could be run to keep things from getting too far out in left field. At some point, I'll have to do some field testing, but I wanted to get the list wisdom first. Joe Gray W5JG On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Bill Hawkins <bill.iaxs@pobox.com> wrote: > The Motorola receivers in Lucent gear won't output a time signal if they > don't have an initial survey. > > I make this assertion because the RFTG I had would not lock. The > Motorola bag of bits decodes to say there's no position fix because > enough satellites have not been acquired. Too bad I lived in a valley. > > Let us know how this turns out, starting from an initial survey. > > Bill Hawkins > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Gray > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:20 PM > > I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output > while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't > care about the UTC time. > > Joe Gray > W5JG > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
MD
Magnus Danielson
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 7:56 AM

Joe,

In T-mode, the location in X, Y and Z is assumed known so those values
is used as constants in producing the T difference between a satellite
and the GPSDO. As you now move your receiver from the original X, Y and
Z those location errors will translate into time errors. The worst of
this will the T-RAIM hopefully clip out, but for the remaining the
errors might drive the receiver all over the place, and as it shifts
around so will the frequency. It won't be a pretty picture.

What you should do, if you can, is to go out of T-mode into normal
tracking. Choosing the speed-grade of your movement can be worth some
effort. Far from all GPSDOs can do this, since they typically is
intended for fixed locations.

Potentially can aiding by IMU help some, but very few GPSDOs come close
to support it. When moving you have to consider other factors of a
dynamic environment.

I know of only a handful of GPSDOs for dynamic platforms.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 10/17/2016 08:02 AM, Joseph Gray wrote:

Bill,

My question was more generally about any GPSDO, but it's good to know
about the Motorola/Lucent.

What about this scenario - the GPSDO has a fixed position on initial
powerup, but then it is moved periodically or even continuously,
without updating the GPS coordinates. The distance from the original
coordinates could be anywhere from close by, to across the state.
Periodically, a new survey could be run to keep things from getting
too far out in left field.

At some point, I'll have to do some field testing, but I wanted to get
the list wisdom first.

Joe Gray
W5JG

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Bill Hawkins bill.iaxs@pobox.com wrote:

The Motorola receivers in Lucent gear won't output a time signal if they
don't have an initial survey.

I make this assertion because the RFTG I had would not lock. The
Motorola bag of bits decodes to say there's no position fix because
enough satellites have not been acquired. Too bad I lived in a valley.

Let us know how this turns out, starting from an initial survey.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Gray
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:20 PM

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't
care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Joe, In T-mode, the location in X, Y and Z is assumed known so those values is used as constants in producing the T difference between a satellite and the GPSDO. As you now move your receiver from the original X, Y and Z those location errors will translate into time errors. The worst of this will the T-RAIM hopefully clip out, but for the remaining the errors might drive the receiver all over the place, and as it shifts around so will the frequency. It won't be a pretty picture. What you should do, if you can, is to go out of T-mode into normal tracking. Choosing the speed-grade of your movement can be worth some effort. Far from all GPSDOs can do this, since they typically is intended for fixed locations. Potentially can aiding by IMU help some, but very few GPSDOs come close to support it. When moving you have to consider other factors of a dynamic environment. I know of only a handful of GPSDOs for dynamic platforms. Cheers, Magnus On 10/17/2016 08:02 AM, Joseph Gray wrote: > Bill, > > My question was more generally about any GPSDO, but it's good to know > about the Motorola/Lucent. > > What about this scenario - the GPSDO has a fixed position on initial > powerup, but then it is moved periodically or even continuously, > without updating the GPS coordinates. The distance from the original > coordinates could be anywhere from close by, to across the state. > Periodically, a new survey could be run to keep things from getting > too far out in left field. > > At some point, I'll have to do some field testing, but I wanted to get > the list wisdom first. > > Joe Gray > W5JG > > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Bill Hawkins <bill.iaxs@pobox.com> wrote: >> The Motorola receivers in Lucent gear won't output a time signal if they >> don't have an initial survey. >> >> I make this assertion because the RFTG I had would not lock. The >> Motorola bag of bits decodes to say there's no position fix because >> enough satellites have not been acquired. Too bad I lived in a valley. >> >> Let us know how this turns out, starting from an initial survey. >> >> Bill Hawkins >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joseph Gray >> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:20 PM >> >> I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output >> while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I don't >> care about the UTC time. >> >> Joe Gray >> W5JG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 11:48 AM

Hi

Is the OCXO in your GPSDO acceleration compensated? If not then the acceleration
involved in your “moving around” will get into the OCXO at around 1x10^-9 / g. Some
OCXO’s are compensated to the 1x10^-11 / g level. Some low cost crystals are up
around 2x10^-8. Often vibration is an issue as well, since it is an acceleration, the same
stuff applies.

How well temperature controlled is your moving environment? Your oscillator can have
all sorts of temperature coefficients,. It will respond to dynamic change as well as static
change. The sensitivity can be just about anything over the 1x10^-12 / C up to 1x10^-7 / C
depending on the part.

None of that has anything at all to do with GPS, all of it is something the GPSDO will
have to deal with in addition to any GPS errors. Unless you want a very coarse output
(1x10^-9 to 2x10^-8 / second) you will need some sort of loop filter. If it is in the traditional

200 seconds range, the stuff above can become very apparent in the output.  The loop

does not eliminate error at the (say) 200 seconds point, it only gets going by then.

Does your moving around include tunnels? If so, how long will you be in a tunnel? Urban
canyons also count in this respect. Once you go down to < 3 sats, you are in big trouble
for timing in motion. Even with 3, your fix and time performance is degraded. Chugging
in and out of holdover has it’s impact.

Do you want to use multiple systems? If you are running a mixed mode system, you can go
from 100% GPS to 100% GLONASS to 100% BEID0U due to viewing angle.  That tosses
a whole bunch of issues into the mix.

How fast are you going? Moving around can involve move 100’, stop and wait for a day or
it can involve something moving at mach 3. By far the most common for a GPSDO is some
sort of car, truck, or military vehicle on the highway. There are many other possibilities.

Lots of variables. Lots of things to get into the mix in addition to the basic nav math.

Bob

On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Joseph Gray jgray@zianet.com wrote:

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I
don't care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Is the OCXO in your GPSDO acceleration compensated? If not then the acceleration involved in your “moving around” will get into the OCXO at around 1x10^-9 / g. Some OCXO’s are compensated to the 1x10^-11 / g level. Some low cost crystals are up around 2x10^-8. Often vibration is an issue as well, since it is an acceleration, the same stuff applies. How well temperature controlled is your moving environment? Your oscillator can have all sorts of temperature coefficients,. It will respond to dynamic change as well as static change. The sensitivity can be just about anything over the 1x10^-12 / C up to 1x10^-7 / C depending on the part. None of that has anything at all to do with GPS, all of it is something the GPSDO will have to deal with in addition to any GPS errors. Unless you want a very coarse output (1x10^-9 to 2x10^-8 / second) you will need some sort of loop filter. If it is in the traditional > 200 seconds range, the stuff above can become very apparent in the output. The loop does not eliminate error at the (say) 200 seconds point, it only gets going by then. Does your moving around include tunnels? If so, how long will you be in a tunnel? Urban canyons also count in this respect. Once you go down to < 3 sats, you are in big trouble for timing in motion. Even with 3, your fix and time performance is degraded. Chugging in and out of holdover has it’s impact. Do you want to use multiple systems? If you are running a mixed mode system, you can go from 100% GPS to 100% GLONASS to 100% BEID0U due to viewing angle. That tosses a whole *bunch* of issues into the mix. How fast are you going? Moving around can involve move 100’, stop and wait for a day or it can involve something moving at mach 3. By far the most common for a GPSDO is some sort of car, truck, or military vehicle on the highway. There are many other possibilities. Lots of variables. Lots of things to get into the mix in addition to the basic nav math. Bob > On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Joseph Gray <jgray@zianet.com> wrote: > > I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output > while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I > don't care about the UTC time. > > Joe Gray > W5JG > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
CC
Cube Central
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 1:25 PM

I had run across this just yesterday:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zILwgQhjC_Q

He talks about how crystal oscillators are sensitive to movement and changes in gravity.  An interesting watch!

-Randal
	(at CubeCentral)

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 05:48
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Moving GPSDO

Hi

Is the OCXO in your GPSDO acceleration compensated? If not then the acceleration involved in your “moving around” will get into the OCXO at around 1x10^-9 / g. Some OCXO’s are compensated to the 1x10^-11 / g level. Some low cost crystals are up around 2x10^-8. Often vibration is an issue as well, since it is an acceleration, the same stuff applies.

How well temperature controlled is your moving environment? Your oscillator can have all sorts of temperature coefficients,. It will respond to dynamic change as well as static change. The sensitivity can be just about anything over the 1x10^-12 / C up to 1x10^-7 / C depending on the part.

None of that has anything at all to do with GPS, all of it is something the GPSDO will have to deal with in addition to any GPS errors. Unless you want a very coarse output
(1x10^-9 to 2x10^-8 / second) you will need some sort of loop filter. If it is in the traditional

200 seconds range, the stuff above can become very apparent in the
output.  The loop

does not eliminate error at the (say) 200 seconds point, it only gets going by then.

Does your moving around include tunnels? If so, how long will you be in a tunnel? Urban canyons also count in this respect. Once you go down to < 3 sats, you are in big trouble for timing in motion. Even with 3, your fix and time performance is degraded. Chugging in and out of holdover has it’s impact.

Do you want to use multiple systems? If you are running a mixed mode system, you can go from 100% GPS to 100% GLONASS to 100% BEID0U due to viewing angle.  That tosses a whole bunch of issues into the mix.

How fast are you going? Moving around can involve move 100’, stop and wait for a day or it can involve something moving at mach 3. By far the most common for a GPSDO is some sort of car, truck, or military vehicle on the highway. There are many other possibilities.

Lots of variables. Lots of things to get into the mix in addition to the basic nav math.

Bob

On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Joseph Gray jgray@zianet.com wrote:

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I
don't care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I had run across this just yesterday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zILwgQhjC_Q He talks about how crystal oscillators are sensitive to movement and changes in gravity. An interesting watch! -Randal (at CubeCentral) -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Camp Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 05:48 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Moving GPSDO Hi Is the OCXO in your GPSDO acceleration compensated? If not then the acceleration involved in your “moving around” will get into the OCXO at around 1x10^-9 / g. Some OCXO’s are compensated to the 1x10^-11 / g level. Some low cost crystals are up around 2x10^-8. Often vibration is an issue as well, since it is an acceleration, the same stuff applies. How well temperature controlled is your moving environment? Your oscillator can have all sorts of temperature coefficients,. It will respond to dynamic change as well as static change. The sensitivity can be just about anything over the 1x10^-12 / C up to 1x10^-7 / C depending on the part. None of that has anything at all to do with GPS, all of it is something the GPSDO will have to deal with in addition to any GPS errors. Unless you want a very coarse output (1x10^-9 to 2x10^-8 / second) you will need some sort of loop filter. If it is in the traditional > 200 seconds range, the stuff above can become very apparent in the > output. The loop does not eliminate error at the (say) 200 seconds point, it only gets going by then. Does your moving around include tunnels? If so, how long will you be in a tunnel? Urban canyons also count in this respect. Once you go down to < 3 sats, you are in big trouble for timing in motion. Even with 3, your fix and time performance is degraded. Chugging in and out of holdover has it’s impact. Do you want to use multiple systems? If you are running a mixed mode system, you can go from 100% GPS to 100% GLONASS to 100% BEID0U due to viewing angle. That tosses a whole *bunch* of issues into the mix. How fast are you going? Moving around can involve move 100’, stop and wait for a day or it can involve something moving at mach 3. By far the most common for a GPSDO is some sort of car, truck, or military vehicle on the highway. There are many other possibilities. Lots of variables. Lots of things to get into the mix in addition to the basic nav math. Bob > On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Joseph Gray <jgray@zianet.com> wrote: > > I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output > while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I > don't care about the UTC time. > > Joe Gray > W5JG > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 2:01 PM

Hi

In addition to TimeNuts, there are actually are people who get nutty about measuring
changes in gravity. That’s a bit different than what he’s talking about in the video. Local
variations in the earth’s mass cause variations in gravity (think mountains or similar…).
They also are one of the things that cause GPS orbits to be “bumpy” rather than the nice
smooth curves we tend to think of them as being.

Bob

On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Cube Central cubecentral@gmail.com wrote:

I had run across this just yesterday:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zILwgQhjC_Q

He talks about how crystal oscillators are sensitive to movement and changes in gravity.  An interesting watch!

-Randal
	(at CubeCentral)

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 05:48
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Moving GPSDO

Hi

Is the OCXO in your GPSDO acceleration compensated? If not then the acceleration involved in your “moving around” will get into the OCXO at around 1x10^-9 / g. Some OCXO’s are compensated to the 1x10^-11 / g level. Some low cost crystals are up around 2x10^-8. Often vibration is an issue as well, since it is an acceleration, the same stuff applies.

How well temperature controlled is your moving environment? Your oscillator can have all sorts of temperature coefficients,. It will respond to dynamic change as well as static change. The sensitivity can be just about anything over the 1x10^-12 / C up to 1x10^-7 / C depending on the part.

None of that has anything at all to do with GPS, all of it is something the GPSDO will have to deal with in addition to any GPS errors. Unless you want a very coarse output
(1x10^-9 to 2x10^-8 / second) you will need some sort of loop filter. If it is in the traditional

200 seconds range, the stuff above can become very apparent in the
output.  The loop

does not eliminate error at the (say) 200 seconds point, it only gets going by then.

Does your moving around include tunnels? If so, how long will you be in a tunnel? Urban canyons also count in this respect. Once you go down to < 3 sats, you are in big trouble for timing in motion. Even with 3, your fix and time performance is degraded. Chugging in and out of holdover has it’s impact.

Do you want to use multiple systems? If you are running a mixed mode system, you can go from 100% GPS to 100% GLONASS to 100% BEID0U due to viewing angle.  That tosses a whole bunch of issues into the mix.

How fast are you going? Moving around can involve move 100’, stop and wait for a day or it can involve something moving at mach 3. By far the most common for a GPSDO is some sort of car, truck, or military vehicle on the highway. There are many other possibilities.

Lots of variables. Lots of things to get into the mix in addition to the basic nav math.

Bob

On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Joseph Gray jgray@zianet.com wrote:

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I
don't care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi In addition to TimeNuts, there are actually *are* people who get nutty about measuring changes in gravity. That’s a bit different than what he’s talking about in the video. Local variations in the earth’s mass cause variations in gravity (think mountains or similar…). They also are one of the things that cause GPS orbits to be “bumpy” rather than the nice smooth curves we tend to think of them as being. Bob > On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Cube Central <cubecentral@gmail.com> wrote: > > I had run across this just yesterday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zILwgQhjC_Q > > He talks about how crystal oscillators are sensitive to movement and changes in gravity. An interesting watch! > > -Randal > (at CubeCentral) > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Camp > Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 05:48 > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Moving GPSDO > > Hi > > Is the OCXO in your GPSDO acceleration compensated? If not then the acceleration involved in your “moving around” will get into the OCXO at around 1x10^-9 / g. Some OCXO’s are compensated to the 1x10^-11 / g level. Some low cost crystals are up around 2x10^-8. Often vibration is an issue as well, since it is an acceleration, the same stuff applies. > > How well temperature controlled is your moving environment? Your oscillator can have all sorts of temperature coefficients,. It will respond to dynamic change as well as static change. The sensitivity can be just about anything over the 1x10^-12 / C up to 1x10^-7 / C depending on the part. > > None of that has anything at all to do with GPS, all of it is something the GPSDO will have to deal with in addition to any GPS errors. Unless you want a very coarse output > (1x10^-9 to 2x10^-8 / second) you will need some sort of loop filter. If it is in the traditional >> 200 seconds range, the stuff above can become very apparent in the >> output. The loop > does not eliminate error at the (say) 200 seconds point, it only gets going by then. > > Does your moving around include tunnels? If so, how long will you be in a tunnel? Urban canyons also count in this respect. Once you go down to < 3 sats, you are in big trouble for timing in motion. Even with 3, your fix and time performance is degraded. Chugging in and out of holdover has it’s impact. > > Do you want to use multiple systems? If you are running a mixed mode system, you can go from 100% GPS to 100% GLONASS to 100% BEID0U due to viewing angle. That tosses a whole *bunch* of issues into the mix. > > How fast are you going? Moving around can involve move 100’, stop and wait for a day or it can involve something moving at mach 3. By far the most common for a GPSDO is some sort of car, truck, or military vehicle on the highway. There are many other possibilities. > > Lots of variables. Lots of things to get into the mix in addition to the basic nav math. > > Bob > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Joseph Gray <jgray@zianet.com> wrote: >> >> I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output >> while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I >> don't care about the UTC time. >> >> Joe Gray >> W5JG >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
AK
Attila Kinali
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 2:44 PM

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:25:34 -0600
"Cube Central" cubecentral@gmail.com wrote:

I had run across this just yesterday:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zILwgQhjC_Q

He talks about how crystal oscillators are sensitive to movement and changes in gravity.  An interesting watch!

As usual with EEVblog, there are several things wrong with what he presents.

  1. As Bob wrote, the acceleration sensitivity of crystals vary a lot more
    than the rough number Dave gave.

  2. The acceleration sensitivity has very little to do with the cut.
    Even though there is some cut related effect on acceleration, it is
    very very small. The by far most dominant effect comes from the
    mechanical stress of the holder onto the crystal. It is probably
    obvious that the crystal and the holders bend upon acceleration.
    This bending will cause the crystal to change its frequency due
    to stress on the lattice. Now, why are AT cuts worse than SC cuts?
    The reason is simple, SC cuts are usually ment for high stability
    applications and people tend to take more care with the mounting
    and the crystal shape, than for regular AT cuts.

  3. Rb vapor standards have very low acceleration effects. As Dave
    said, the control loop will kill most of the effects inside the
    loop frequency. The loop frequency is relatively fast, in the
    order of couple of 100Hz to a couple of 10kHz, depending on the
    exact build of the Rb standard and what type of crystal they used.
    Contrary to what he says, there are no acceleration dependent
    diffusion effects. The vapor cell is is heated and the gas atoms
    in there are pretty fast, any acceleration of them will be negligible
    compared to what they do upon collision. The relativistic red shift due
    to acceleration is way too low to measure (much lower than the intrinsic
    noise). The only mechanical effect that is possible, is bending of
    the microwave cavity or the parts inside. But given that the cavity
    is several mm thick aluminium and everything is mounted rigidly,
    I very much doubt that there is any significant effect.

  4. If you think that the tilting your frequency counter will have
    a significant effect, you are severly underestimating temperature
    and aging effects. Just in comparison, a good SC cut DOCXO has an
    aging of a few parts in 10^-9. So each week will affect on your crystal
    more than a 1g of acceleration. And that's with a slow aging DOCXO.
    Temperature effects are in the order of 1x10^-10/°C to 1x10^-7/°C.
    So depending on how good the OCXO is, a single degree of temperature
    will cause a larger shift than 1g of acceleration. Etc.pp.

     	Attila Kinali
    

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:25:34 -0600 "Cube Central" <cubecentral@gmail.com> wrote: > I had run across this just yesterday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zILwgQhjC_Q > > He talks about how crystal oscillators are sensitive to movement and changes in gravity. An interesting watch! As usual with EEVblog, there are several things wrong with what he presents. 1) As Bob wrote, the acceleration sensitivity of crystals vary a lot more than the rough number Dave gave. 2) The acceleration sensitivity has very little to do with the cut. Even though there is some cut related effect on acceleration, it is very very small. The by far most dominant effect comes from the mechanical stress of the holder onto the crystal. It is probably obvious that the crystal and the holders bend upon acceleration. This bending will cause the crystal to change its frequency due to stress on the lattice. Now, why are AT cuts worse than SC cuts? The reason is simple, SC cuts are usually ment for high stability applications and people tend to take more care with the mounting and the crystal shape, than for regular AT cuts. 3) Rb vapor standards have very low acceleration effects. As Dave said, the control loop will kill most of the effects inside the loop frequency. The loop frequency is relatively fast, in the order of couple of 100Hz to a couple of 10kHz, depending on the exact build of the Rb standard and what type of crystal they used. Contrary to what he says, there are no acceleration dependent diffusion effects. The vapor cell is is heated and the gas atoms in there are pretty fast, any acceleration of them will be negligible compared to what they do upon collision. The relativistic red shift due to acceleration is way too low to measure (much lower than the intrinsic noise). The only mechanical effect that is possible, is bending of the microwave cavity or the parts inside. But given that the cavity is several mm thick aluminium and everything is mounted rigidly, I very much doubt that there is any significant effect. 4) If you think that the tilting your frequency counter will have a significant effect, you are severly underestimating temperature and aging effects. Just in comparison, a good SC cut DOCXO has an aging of a few parts in 10^-9. So each week will affect on your crystal more than a 1g of acceleration. And that's with a slow aging DOCXO. Temperature effects are in the order of 1x10^-10/°C to 1x10^-7/°C. So depending on how good the OCXO is, a single degree of temperature will cause a larger shift than 1g of acceleration. Etc.pp. Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
NS
Nick Sayer
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 5:38 PM

Speaking for my GPSDOs specifically, you can’t disable the survey mode with the Venus838 receiver (well, you can, but it requires you to talk to the module with SkyTraq’s software, which requires disabling the GPSDO’s controller - possible to do, but annoying). I haven’t attempted to see what it would do if it were moved after the survey is completed (if you move during the survey, then the survey will fail and repeat).

The older GPSDOs that had PA6H receivers were navigation receivers that didn’t have a survey mode.

In either case, without a surveyed position, PPS stability will suffer if/when the constellation degrades due to poor reception, which can happen if, say, the unit is in a moving vehicle in interesting terrain. Poor PPS stability will have an impact on the PLL, obviously.

On Oct 16, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Joseph Gray jgray@zianet.com wrote:

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I
don't care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Speaking for my GPSDOs specifically, you can’t disable the survey mode with the Venus838 receiver (well, you can, but it requires you to talk to the module with SkyTraq’s software, which requires disabling the GPSDO’s controller - possible to do, but annoying). I haven’t attempted to see what it would do if it were moved after the survey is completed (if you move during the survey, then the survey will fail and repeat). The older GPSDOs that had PA6H receivers were navigation receivers that didn’t have a survey mode. In either case, without a surveyed position, PPS stability will suffer if/when the constellation degrades due to poor reception, which can happen if, say, the unit is in a moving vehicle in interesting terrain. Poor PPS stability will have an impact on the PLL, obviously. > On Oct 16, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Joseph Gray <jgray@zianet.com> wrote: > > I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output > while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I > don't care about the UTC time. > > Joe Gray > W5JG > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Oct 17, 2016 5:53 PM

Hi

Survey is pretty much a bad thing while in motion :)

Some (but not all) GPS modules allow you to set up in a “mobile / do not survey” mode. This is one area that the
newer ( = not 1997 era) devices do much better at. It also is something that SBAS / EGNOS / WAAS may indeed
help you out on. You may be changing many settings on the part to make it behave in a mobile setting. There
are a few bugs you just may turn up while doing this ….

Bob

On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

Speaking for my GPSDOs specifically, you can’t disable the survey mode with the Venus838 receiver (well, you can, but it requires you to talk to the module with SkyTraq’s software, which requires disabling the GPSDO’s controller - possible to do, but annoying). I haven’t attempted to see what it would do if it were moved after the survey is completed (if you move during the survey, then the survey will fail and repeat).

The older GPSDOs that had PA6H receivers were navigation receivers that didn’t have a survey mode.

In either case, without a surveyed position, PPS stability will suffer if/when the constellation degrades due to poor reception, which can happen if, say, the unit is in a moving vehicle in interesting terrain. Poor PPS stability will have an impact on the PLL, obviously.

On Oct 16, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Joseph Gray jgray@zianet.com wrote:

I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output
while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I
don't care about the UTC time.

Joe Gray
W5JG


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Survey is pretty much a bad thing while in motion :) Some (but not all) GPS modules allow you to set up in a “mobile / do not survey” mode. This is one area that the newer ( = not 1997 era) devices do much better at. It also is something that SBAS / EGNOS / WAAS may indeed help you out on. You may be changing *many* settings on the part to make it behave in a mobile setting. There are a few bugs you just may turn up while doing this …. Bob > On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > > Speaking for my GPSDOs specifically, you can’t disable the survey mode with the Venus838 receiver (well, you can, but it requires you to talk to the module with SkyTraq’s software, which requires disabling the GPSDO’s controller - possible to do, but annoying). I haven’t attempted to see what it would do if it were moved after the survey is completed (if you move during the survey, then the survey will fail and repeat). > > The older GPSDOs that had PA6H receivers were navigation receivers that didn’t have a survey mode. > > In either case, without a surveyed position, PPS stability will suffer if/when the constellation degrades due to poor reception, which can happen if, say, the unit is in a moving vehicle in interesting terrain. Poor PPS stability will have an impact on the PLL, obviously. > >> On Oct 16, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Joseph Gray <jgray@zianet.com> wrote: >> >> I'm curious to know how accurately a GPSDO will keep its 10 MHz output >> while moving. No initial survey to set a position would be done. I >> don't care about the UTC time. >> >> Joe Gray >> W5JG >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.