I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards running by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large heatsink on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I bolt them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after they lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if this is good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a lot of help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
Jerry
You have some EG&G RBs. Thats great news. Now I am not alone. I have 2 also
that work. I have found little details on them.
That said I believe they are intended to be mounted on a heat sink. One end
surely looks like that whats would be done.
I believe mine are LCR-10-T. Might have to double check that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards running
by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large heatsink
on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I bolt
them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after they
lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t
allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if this is
good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of
months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a lot of
help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Paul, The units Gilbert gave me were TS-RFS. They are fairly large. The physics end is about 5”x2”x2" and overall length about 9”. They lock pretty quickly now that I’ve replace the caps. They can drive 50ohms pretty hard, outputting a square wave. I’m thinking of bolting on some fins to the physics end. Just two points: 1) it would be nice to dial them in closer; and 2) I wish I had equipment to test them more accurately. I’m working on building one of the Tight PLL test sets to solve #2. Gilbert suggested we look to see if we could tap into the field current somehow to set the frequency more accurately.
On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:44 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
You have some EG&G RBs. Thats great news. Now I am not alone. I have 2 also
that work. I have found little details on them.
That said I believe they are intended to be mounted on a heat sink. One end
surely looks like that whats would be done.
I believe mine are LCR-10-T. Might have to double check that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards running
by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large heatsink
on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I bolt
them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after they
lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t
allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if this is
good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of
months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a lot of
help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Jerry
I have some dribs and drabs of details on the units I have. Happy to send
whatever I have to you directly. Suspect its to large for FEBO. What I can
tell is they must have been considered quite good and for military use. I
haven't run mine alot because I was concerned about the temp like you. Nor
have I really dug in. They just worked from day one.
Granted maybe better if I look at the caps. The good thing about the unit
is the connector is clearly labeled with the pin functions. So I was able
to operate them right out of the hamfest. As I recall these were very very
inexpensive.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
Paul, The units Gilbert gave me were TS-RFS. They are fairly large. The
physics end is about 5”x2”x2" and overall length about 9”. They lock
pretty quickly now that I’ve replace the caps. They can drive 50ohms
pretty hard, outputting a square wave. I’m thinking of bolting on some
fins to the physics end. Just two points: 1) it would be nice to dial them
in closer; and 2) I wish I had equipment to test them more accurately. I’m
working on building one of the Tight PLL test sets to solve #2. Gilbert
suggested we look to see if we could tap into the field current somehow to
set the frequency more accurately.
On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:44 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
You have some EG&G RBs. Thats great news. Now I am not alone. I have 2
also
that work. I have found little details on them.
That said I believe they are intended to be mounted on a heat sink. One
end
surely looks like that whats would be done.
I believe mine are LCR-10-T. Might have to double check that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards
running
by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large
heatsink
on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I
bolt
them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after
they
lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t
allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if this
is
good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of
months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a lot
of
help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Paul, send whatever you have to clist mailto:clist@hanler.com at hanler (without the D) dot com
Also, the caps we replaced were only 4 electrolytics. 3 x 470uf 25v and a 270uf at 16V. I used a 330uf 25v for the later.
I’ve seen them for like $30 Canadian. I think they are inexpensive due to the failure of the caps, no rs232, no docs, etc. I get great lamp voltage on mine, all over 10V if that says anything. They seem stable but I don’t have the test setup needed or much to compare them to except my GPSDOs. I hope to have a Cesium standard by end of year and I am building the TPLL test set. But it seemed like there was some decent work done on the physics package. Looks like it was all assembled by hand, then taped-up, sealed twice and clamped.
Thanks.
Jerry
On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:24 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
I have some dribs and drabs of details on the units I have. Happy to send
whatever I have to you directly. Suspect its to large for FEBO. What I can
tell is they must have been considered quite good and for military use. I
haven't run mine alot because I was concerned about the temp like you. Nor
have I really dug in. They just worked from day one.
Granted maybe better if I look at the caps. The good thing about the unit
is the connector is clearly labeled with the pin functions. So I was able
to operate them right out of the hamfest. As I recall these were very very
inexpensive.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
Paul, The units Gilbert gave me were TS-RFS. They are fairly large. The
physics end is about 5”x2”x2" and overall length about 9”. They lock
pretty quickly now that I’ve replace the caps. They can drive 50ohms
pretty hard, outputting a square wave. I’m thinking of bolting on some
fins to the physics end. Just two points: 1) it would be nice to dial them
in closer; and 2) I wish I had equipment to test them more accurately. I’m
working on building one of the Tight PLL test sets to solve #2. Gilbert
suggested we look to see if we could tap into the field current somehow to
set the frequency more accurately.
On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:44 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
You have some EG&G RBs. Thats great news. Now I am not alone. I have 2
also
that work. I have found little details on them.
That said I believe they are intended to be mounted on a heat sink. One
end
surely looks like that whats would be done.
I believe mine are LCR-10-T. Might have to double check that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards
running
by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large
heatsink
on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I
bolt
them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after
they
lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t
allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if this
is
good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of
months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a lot
of
help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Will forward tomorrow. Yes I recall my lamp voltage is also very good.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
Paul, send whatever you have to clist mailto:clist@hanler.com at hanler
(without the D) dot com
Also, the caps we replaced were only 4 electrolytics. 3 x 470uf 25v and a
270uf at 16V. I used a 330uf 25v for the later.
I’ve seen them for like $30 Canadian. I think they are inexpensive due to
the failure of the caps, no rs232, no docs, etc. I get great lamp voltage
on mine, all over 10V if that says anything. They seem stable but I don’t
have the test setup needed or much to compare them to except my GPSDOs. I
hope to have a Cesium standard by end of year and I am building the TPLL
test set. But it seemed like there was some decent work done on the
physics package. Looks like it was all assembled by hand, then taped-up,
sealed twice and clamped.
Thanks.
Jerry
On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:24 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
I have some dribs and drabs of details on the units I have. Happy to send
whatever I have to you directly. Suspect its to large for FEBO. What I
can
tell is they must have been considered quite good and for military use. I
haven't run mine alot because I was concerned about the temp like you.
Nor
have I really dug in. They just worked from day one.
Granted maybe better if I look at the caps. The good thing about the unit
is the connector is clearly labeled with the pin functions. So I was able
to operate them right out of the hamfest. As I recall these were very
very
inexpensive.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
Paul, The units Gilbert gave me were TS-RFS. They are fairly large.
The
physics end is about 5”x2”x2" and overall length about 9”. They lock
pretty quickly now that I’ve replace the caps. They can drive 50ohms
pretty hard, outputting a square wave. I’m thinking of bolting on some
fins to the physics end. Just two points: 1) it would be nice to dial
them
in closer; and 2) I wish I had equipment to test them more accurately.
I’m
working on building one of the Tight PLL test sets to solve #2. Gilbert
suggested we look to see if we could tap into the field current somehow
to
set the frequency more accurately.
On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:44 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
You have some EG&G RBs. Thats great news. Now I am not alone. I have 2
also
that work. I have found little details on them.
That said I believe they are intended to be mounted on a heat sink. One
end
surely looks like that whats would be done.
I believe mine are LCR-10-T. Might have to double check that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com
wrote:
I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards
running
by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large
heatsink
on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I
bolt
them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after
they
lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t
allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if this
is
good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of
months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a lot
of
help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
With some humor as I looked inside my egg I had replaced the caps also. So
it is a common failure.
Also note the chip is not a micro but an array or at least a state machine.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:47 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Will forward tomorrow. Yes I recall my lamp voltage is also very good.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
Paul, send whatever you have to clist mailto:clist@hanler.com at
hanler (without the D) dot com
Also, the caps we replaced were only 4 electrolytics. 3 x 470uf 25v and
a 270uf at 16V. I used a 330uf 25v for the later.
I’ve seen them for like $30 Canadian. I think they are inexpensive due
to the failure of the caps, no rs232, no docs, etc. I get great lamp
voltage on mine, all over 10V if that says anything. They seem stable but
I don’t have the test setup needed or much to compare them to except my
GPSDOs. I hope to have a Cesium standard by end of year and I am building
the TPLL test set. But it seemed like there was some decent work done on
the physics package. Looks like it was all assembled by hand, then
taped-up, sealed twice and clamped.
Thanks.
Jerry
On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:24 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
I have some dribs and drabs of details on the units I have. Happy to
send
whatever I have to you directly. Suspect its to large for FEBO. What I
can
tell is they must have been considered quite good and for military use.
I
haven't run mine alot because I was concerned about the temp like you.
Nor
have I really dug in. They just worked from day one.
Granted maybe better if I look at the caps. The good thing about the
unit
is the connector is clearly labeled with the pin functions. So I was
able
to operate them right out of the hamfest. As I recall these were very
very
wrote:
Paul, The units Gilbert gave me were TS-RFS. They are fairly large.
The
physics end is about 5”x2”x2" and overall length about 9”. They lock
pretty quickly now that I’ve replace the caps. They can drive 50ohms
pretty hard, outputting a square wave. I’m thinking of bolting on some
fins to the physics end. Just two points: 1) it would be nice to dial
them
in closer; and 2) I wish I had equipment to test them more
accurately. I’m
working on building one of the Tight PLL test sets to solve #2.
Gilbert
suggested we look to see if we could tap into the field current
somehow to
set the frequency more accurately.
On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:44 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry
You have some EG&G RBs. Thats great news. Now I am not alone. I have 2
also
that work. I have found little details on them.
That said I believe they are intended to be mounted on a heat sink.
One
end
surely looks like that whats would be done.
I believe mine are LCR-10-T. Might have to double check that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com
wrote:
I was able to get all 5 of these EG&G Rubidium Frequency Standards
running
by replacing the caps as another member found. They have a large
heatsink
on them, no fins, and are running at 43C. Is that too hot? Should I
bolt
them down to a larger heatsink? They consume a little over 9w after
they
lock, about double that while warming up.
The only other issue I see is that the 8bit frequency setting doesn’t
allow me to set the frequency closer than 5E-11. I don’t know if
this
is
good for these units and RFS in general or not.
Thanks.
Jerry
[/begin buttkissing]
PS: I have learned quite a bit from this group in the past couple of
months. John Miles, Gilbert, Mark Sims, Bob, etc, etc have been a
lot
of
help and have added a lot of enjoyment to my hobby.
[/end buttkissing]
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.