time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] State of the art of crystal oscillator measurements

K
KA2WEU@aol.com
Thu, Aug 11, 2016 9:37 PM

NO, the maximum  possible noise dynamic range is ( 177 +  Pout)  [dBm]  -
Transistor large signal NF ( dB),
the signal to noise ration is dimensionless !!!!

In a message dated 8/11/2016 5:00:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
john@miles.io writes:

Or  rather -(177+DUT output power in dBm).  The minus sign makes the
difference between the thermal floor and a nuclear war!

-- john,  KE5FX
Miles Design LLC

Remember that L(f) is expressed in  dBc/Hz, not dBm/Hz.  If it were

dBm/Hz,

then kT would be the  limit.  But in dBc/Hz terms, the limit is 177 + the

DUT's

output  power in  dBm.


time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

NO, the maximum possible noise dynamic range is ( 177 + Pout) [dBm] - Transistor large signal NF ( dB), the signal to noise ration is dimensionless !!!! In a message dated 8/11/2016 5:00:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, john@miles.io writes: Or rather -(177+DUT output power in dBm). The minus sign makes the difference between the thermal floor and a nuclear war! -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC > Remember that L(f) is expressed in dBc/Hz, not dBm/Hz. If it were dBm/Hz, > then kT would be the limit. But in dBc/Hz terms, the limit is 177 + the DUT's > output power in dBm. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
JM
John Miles
Thu, Aug 11, 2016 10:47 PM

Right, I'm speaking specifically of L(f).  The device being driven by the oscillator doesn't care about the NF of the driver stage, only what a PN analyzer would measure at the output jack.

For any 50-ohm source, the practical L(f) floor is -177 dBm/Hz - the carrier power in dBm.  No oscillator with an output of 0 dBm can be quieter than -177 dBc/Hz at any offset, but an oscillator that puts out +20 dBm could approach -197 dBc/Hz.

Given a proverbial black box containing a +17 dBm oscillator that measures -195 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, the interesting question is, "What's in the box?"  There could be a passive resonator that's shaving off the broadband noise after the last active stage without contributing additive noise of its own.  Another possibility might be cross-spectral collapse due to correlated thermal noise from the splitter.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of KA2WEU--

  • via time-nuts
    Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:37 PM
    To: time-nuts@febo.com
    Subject: Re: [time-nuts] State of the art of crystal oscillator measurements

NO, the maximum  possible noise dynamic range is ( 177 +  Pout)  [dBm]  -
Transistor large signal NF ( dB),
the signal to noise ration is dimensionless !!!!

Right, I'm speaking specifically of L(f). The device being driven by the oscillator doesn't care about the NF of the driver stage, only what a PN analyzer would measure at the output jack. For any 50-ohm source, the practical L(f) floor is -177 dBm/Hz - the carrier power in dBm. No oscillator with an output of 0 dBm can be quieter than -177 dBc/Hz at any offset, but an oscillator that puts out +20 dBm could approach -197 dBc/Hz. Given a proverbial black box containing a +17 dBm oscillator that measures -195 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, the interesting question is, "What's in the box?" There could be a passive resonator that's shaving off the broadband noise after the last active stage without contributing additive noise of its own. Another possibility might be cross-spectral collapse due to correlated thermal noise from the splitter. -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of KA2WEU-- > - via time-nuts > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:37 PM > To: time-nuts@febo.com > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] State of the art of crystal oscillator measurements > > NO, the maximum possible noise dynamic range is ( 177 + Pout) [dBm] - > Transistor large signal NF ( dB), > the signal to noise ration is dimensionless !!!! >
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Fri, Aug 12, 2016 1:27 AM

On 8/11/2016 3:47 PM, John Miles wrote:

Right, I'm speaking specifically of L(f).  The device being driven by the oscillator doesn't care about the NF of the driver stage, only what a PN analyzer would measure at the output jack.

For any 50-ohm source, the practical L(f) floor is -177 dBm/Hz - the carrier power in dBm.  No oscillator with an output of 0 dBm can be quieter than -177 dBc/Hz at any offset, but an oscillator that puts out +20 dBm could approach -197 dBc/Hz.

Given a proverbial black box containing a +17 dBm oscillator that measures -195 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, the interesting question is, "What's in the box?"  There could be a passive resonator that's shaving off the broadband noise after the last active stage without contributing additive noise of its own.  Another possibility might be cross-spectral collapse due to correlated thermal noise from the splitter.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC

If the oscillator output is thru the resonator, then at large offsets,
the source impedance is reactive.  It can easily have an effective
temperature less than room temperature.  If this "source" is then
used with a low noise temperature preamp, it is entirely possible
to go beyond these supposed theoretical limits that are based
on T=300K.

Rick

On 8/11/2016 3:47 PM, John Miles wrote: > Right, I'm speaking specifically of L(f). The device being driven by the oscillator doesn't care about the NF of the driver stage, only what a PN analyzer would measure at the output jack. > > For any 50-ohm source, the practical L(f) floor is -177 dBm/Hz - the carrier power in dBm. No oscillator with an output of 0 dBm can be quieter than -177 dBc/Hz at any offset, but an oscillator that puts out +20 dBm could approach -197 dBc/Hz. > > Given a proverbial black box containing a +17 dBm oscillator that measures -195 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, the interesting question is, "What's in the box?" There could be a passive resonator that's shaving off the broadband noise after the last active stage without contributing additive noise of its own. Another possibility might be cross-spectral collapse due to correlated thermal noise from the splitter. > > -- john, KE5FX > Miles Design LLC > If the oscillator output is thru the resonator, then at large offsets, the source impedance is reactive. It can easily have an effective temperature less than room temperature. If this "source" is then used with a low noise temperature preamp, it is entirely possible to go beyond these supposed theoretical limits that are based on T=300K. Rick
JM
John Miles
Fri, Aug 12, 2016 2:25 AM

If the oscillator output is thru the resonator, then at large offsets,
the source impedance is reactive.  It can easily have an effective
temperature less than room temperature.  If this "source" is then
used with a low noise temperature preamp, it is entirely possible
to go beyond these supposed theoretical limits that are based
on T=300K.

Sure, until you try to measure it with a Zo=50R instrument, or otherwise do something that involves putting real power into a load.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC

> If the oscillator output is thru the resonator, then at large offsets, > the source impedance is reactive. It can easily have an effective > temperature less than room temperature. If this "source" is then > used with a low noise temperature preamp, it is entirely possible > to go beyond these supposed theoretical limits that are based > on T=300K. Sure, until you try to measure it with a Zo=50R instrument, or otherwise do something that involves putting real power into a load. -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC