time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

GPS for Nixie Clock

MS
Mark Sims
Mon, Jul 11, 2016 5:24 AM

The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched to Zodiac.  It talks at 9600:8:N:1
Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor antenna.  I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA output and a 1PPS signal.  They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work indoors and can be had for dirt cheap.  Most have an on-board ceramic patch antenna.  Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors.

NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output.  6 for $36 or one free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector).  It speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1  or can be setup for 9600 baud.

The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent.  Usually it is small enough to not be noticeable.  Some receivers send the message before the 1PPS, others after it.  You can compensate for the differences/delays in software.

The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched to Zodiac. It talks at 9600:8:N:1 Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor antenna. I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA output and a 1PPS signal. They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work indoors and can be had for dirt cheap. Most have an on-board ceramic patch antenna. Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors. NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output. 6 for $36 or one free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector). It speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1 or can be setup for 9600 baud. The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent. Usually it is small enough to not be noticeable. Some receivers send the message before the 1PPS, others after it. You can compensate for the differences/delays in software.
CA
Chris Albertson
Tue, Jul 12, 2016 4:01 PM

What kind of micro processor are you using to run the Nixie tube clock?  If
that processor could run NTP you would not need GPS.  But of course you
could always do both.  GPS requires a view of the sky and maybe that is
not available in a multi story building unless near a window.  NTP would be
available any place there is WiFi.    Even without network connection, NTP
is a good way to interface the GPS as it knows how to talk to most GPSes
made. can handle GPS outages (like when the clock is moved away from a
window)

That said, you are likely not using a uP big enough to run NTP as a setup
like that is about $40 vs. using a bare AVR chip for about $3.  But even
with the smaller uP you might think about having the chip keep it's own
internal time and using GPS to discipline that internal time, much like the
way NTP works.  Basically the uP has a flywheel and GPS regulates it's
speed.  Let's you handle holdover gracefully.

If using NMEA sentences from GPS, remember that the NMEA standard allows
those senates to come out at any time during the second to which they
apply.  In other words the sentence itself can be up to almost a second
"off".

If you are looking for a GPS for use indoors I think you don't care about
anything other then receiver sensitivity.  Without that you have nothing,
no signal.  It is more important than a few less nanoseconds of uncertainty
in the time solution.  So those ublox receivers look good.  I'm looking
to buy some for another application, mobile robots, I'll use GPS for gross
level navigation and it would be nice if it still worked indoors

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mark Sims holrum@hotmail.com wrote:

The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched to
Zodiac.  It talks at 9600:8:N:1
Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor
antenna.  I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA output
and a 1PPS signal.  They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work indoors
and can be had for dirt cheap.  Most have an on-board ceramic patch
antenna.  Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors.

NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output.  6 for $36 or one
free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector).  It
speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1  or can be setup for 9600 baud.

The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent.  Usually it is
small enough to not be noticeable.  Some receivers send the message before
the 1PPS, others after it.  You can compensate for the differences/delays
in software.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

What kind of micro processor are you using to run the Nixie tube clock? If that processor could run NTP you would not need GPS. But of course you could always do both. GPS requires a view of the sky and maybe that is not available in a multi story building unless near a window. NTP would be available any place there is WiFi. Even without network connection, NTP is a good way to interface the GPS as it knows how to talk to most GPSes made. can handle GPS outages (like when the clock is moved away from a window) That said, you are likely not using a uP big enough to run NTP as a setup like that is about $40 vs. using a bare AVR chip for about $3. But even with the smaller uP you might think about having the chip keep it's own internal time and using GPS to discipline that internal time, much like the way NTP works. Basically the uP has a flywheel and GPS regulates it's speed. Let's you handle holdover gracefully. If using NMEA sentences from GPS, remember that the NMEA standard allows those senates to come out at any time during the second to which they apply. In other words the sentence itself can be up to almost a second "off". If you are looking for a GPS for use indoors I think you don't care about anything other then receiver sensitivity. Without that you have nothing, no signal. It is more important than a few less nanoseconds of uncertainty in the time solution. So those ublox receivers look good. I'm looking to buy some for another application, mobile robots, I'll use GPS for gross level navigation and it would be nice if it still worked indoors On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote: > The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched to > Zodiac. It talks at 9600:8:N:1 > Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor > antenna. I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA output > and a 1PPS signal. They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work indoors > and can be had for dirt cheap. Most have an on-board ceramic patch > antenna. Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors. > > NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output. 6 for $36 or one > free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector). It > speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1 or can be setup for 9600 baud. > > The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent. Usually it is > small enough to not be noticeable. Some receivers send the message before > the 1PPS, others after it. You can compensate for the differences/delays > in software. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
V
Vlad
Tue, Jul 12, 2016 5:50 PM

In addition, even MCU has not enough resources to handle TCP/IP, DHCP
and NTP, it is some solutions available to outsource it to dedicated
chips. I was using WIZ5100 (assembled as a modules) with great success.

Regards,
Vlad

On 2016-07-12 12:01, Chris Albertson wrote:

What kind of micro processor are you using to run the Nixie tube clock?
If
that processor could run NTP you would not need GPS.  But of course
you
could always do both.  GPS requires a view of the sky and maybe that
is
not available in a multi story building unless near a window.  NTP
would be
available any place there is WiFi.    Even without network connection,
NTP
is a good way to interface the GPS as it knows how to talk to most
GPSes
made. can handle GPS outages (like when the clock is moved away from a
window)

That said, you are likely not using a uP big enough to run NTP as a
setup
like that is about $40 vs. using a bare AVR chip for about $3.  But
even
with the smaller uP you might think about having the chip keep it's own
internal time and using GPS to discipline that internal time, much like
the
way NTP works.  Basically the uP has a flywheel and GPS regulates it's
speed.  Let's you handle holdover gracefully.

If using NMEA sentences from GPS, remember that the NMEA standard
allows
those senates to come out at any time during the second to which they
apply.  In other words the sentence itself can be up to almost a second
"off".

If you are looking for a GPS for use indoors I think you don't care
about
anything other then receiver sensitivity.  Without that you have
nothing,
no signal.  It is more important than a few less nanoseconds of
uncertainty
in the time solution.  So those ublox receivers look good.  I'm
looking
to buy some for another application, mobile robots, I'll use GPS for
gross
level navigation and it would be nice if it still worked indoors

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mark Sims holrum@hotmail.com wrote:

The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched
to
Zodiac.  It talks at 9600:8:N:1
Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor
antenna.  I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA
output
and a 1PPS signal.  They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work
indoors
and can be had for dirt cheap.  Most have an on-board ceramic patch
antenna.  Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors.

NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output.  6 for $36 or
one
free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector).  It
speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1  or can be setup for 9600 baud.

The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent.  Usually it
is
small enough to not be noticeable.  Some receivers send the message
before
the 1PPS, others after it.  You can compensate for the
differences/delays
in software.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
WBW,

V.P.

In addition, even MCU has not enough resources to handle TCP/IP, DHCP and NTP, it is some solutions available to outsource it to dedicated chips. I was using WIZ5100 (assembled as a modules) with great success. Regards, Vlad On 2016-07-12 12:01, Chris Albertson wrote: > What kind of micro processor are you using to run the Nixie tube clock? > If > that processor could run NTP you would not need GPS. But of course > you > could always do both. GPS requires a view of the sky and maybe that > is > not available in a multi story building unless near a window. NTP > would be > available any place there is WiFi. Even without network connection, > NTP > is a good way to interface the GPS as it knows how to talk to most > GPSes > made. can handle GPS outages (like when the clock is moved away from a > window) > > That said, you are likely not using a uP big enough to run NTP as a > setup > like that is about $40 vs. using a bare AVR chip for about $3. But > even > with the smaller uP you might think about having the chip keep it's own > internal time and using GPS to discipline that internal time, much like > the > way NTP works. Basically the uP has a flywheel and GPS regulates it's > speed. Let's you handle holdover gracefully. > > If using NMEA sentences from GPS, remember that the NMEA standard > allows > those senates to come out at any time during the second to which they > apply. In other words the sentence itself can be up to almost a second > "off". > > If you are looking for a GPS for use indoors I think you don't care > about > anything other then receiver sensitivity. Without that you have > nothing, > no signal. It is more important than a few less nanoseconds of > uncertainty > in the time solution. So those ublox receivers look good. I'm > looking > to buy some for another application, mobile robots, I'll use GPS for > gross > level navigation and it would be nice if it still worked indoors > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched >> to >> Zodiac. It talks at 9600:8:N:1 >> Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor >> antenna. I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA >> output >> and a 1PPS signal. They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work >> indoors >> and can be had for dirt cheap. Most have an on-board ceramic patch >> antenna. Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors. >> >> NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output. 6 for $36 or >> one >> free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector). It >> speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1 or can be setup for 9600 baud. >> >> The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent. Usually it >> is >> small enough to not be noticeable. Some receivers send the message >> before >> the 1PPS, others after it. You can compensate for the >> differences/delays >> in software. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> -- WBW, V.P.
CJ
Clint Jay
Tue, Jul 12, 2016 7:23 PM

I've used the wiznet module,  these days I'd consider the esp8266,
powerful little module that can be had for a couple of dollars complete
with WiFi capabilities and enough GPIO to interface GPS and some sort of
serial nixie interface.
On 12 Jul 2016 20:11, "Vlad" time@patoka.org wrote:

In addition, even MCU has not enough resources to handle TCP/IP, DHCP and
NTP, it is some solutions available to outsource it to dedicated chips. I
was using WIZ5100 (assembled as a modules) with great success.

Regards,
Vlad

On 2016-07-12 12:01, Chris Albertson wrote:

What kind of micro processor are you using to run the Nixie tube clock?
If
that processor could run NTP you would not need GPS.  But of course you
could always do both.  GPS requires a view of the sky and maybe that is
not available in a multi story building unless near a window.  NTP would
be
available any place there is WiFi.    Even without network connection,
NTP
is a good way to interface the GPS as it knows how to talk to most GPSes
made. can handle GPS outages (like when the clock is moved away from a
window)

That said, you are likely not using a uP big enough to run NTP as a setup
like that is about $40 vs. using a bare AVR chip for about $3.  But even
with the smaller uP you might think about having the chip keep it's own
internal time and using GPS to discipline that internal time, much like
the
way NTP works.  Basically the uP has a flywheel and GPS regulates it's
speed.  Let's you handle holdover gracefully.

If using NMEA sentences from GPS, remember that the NMEA standard allows
those senates to come out at any time during the second to which they
apply.  In other words the sentence itself can be up to almost a second
"off".

If you are looking for a GPS for use indoors I think you don't care about
anything other then receiver sensitivity.  Without that you have nothing,
no signal.  It is more important than a few less nanoseconds of
uncertainty
in the time solution.  So those ublox receivers look good.  I'm looking
to buy some for another application, mobile robots, I'll use GPS for gross
level navigation and it would be nice if it still worked indoors

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mark Sims holrum@hotmail.com wrote:

The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched to

Zodiac.  It talks at 9600:8:N:1
Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor
antenna.  I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA output
and a 1PPS signal.  They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work
indoors
and can be had for dirt cheap.  Most have an on-board ceramic patch
antenna.  Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors.

NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output.  6 for $36 or
one
free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector).  It
speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1  or can be setup for 9600 baud.

The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent.  Usually it is
small enough to not be noticeable.  Some receivers send the message
before
the 1PPS, others after it.  You can compensate for the
differences/delays
in software.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
WBW,

V.P.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I've used the wiznet module, these days I'd consider the esp8266, powerful little module that can be had for a couple of dollars complete with WiFi capabilities and enough GPIO to interface GPS and some sort of serial nixie interface. On 12 Jul 2016 20:11, "Vlad" <time@patoka.org> wrote: > > In addition, even MCU has not enough resources to handle TCP/IP, DHCP and > NTP, it is some solutions available to outsource it to dedicated chips. I > was using WIZ5100 (assembled as a modules) with great success. > > Regards, > Vlad > > On 2016-07-12 12:01, Chris Albertson wrote: > >> What kind of micro processor are you using to run the Nixie tube clock? >> If >> that processor could run NTP you would not need GPS. But of course you >> could always do both. GPS requires a view of the sky and maybe that is >> not available in a multi story building unless near a window. NTP would >> be >> available any place there is WiFi. Even without network connection, >> NTP >> is a good way to interface the GPS as it knows how to talk to most GPSes >> made. can handle GPS outages (like when the clock is moved away from a >> window) >> >> That said, you are likely not using a uP big enough to run NTP as a setup >> like that is about $40 vs. using a bare AVR chip for about $3. But even >> with the smaller uP you might think about having the chip keep it's own >> internal time and using GPS to discipline that internal time, much like >> the >> way NTP works. Basically the uP has a flywheel and GPS regulates it's >> speed. Let's you handle holdover gracefully. >> >> If using NMEA sentences from GPS, remember that the NMEA standard allows >> those senates to come out at any time during the second to which they >> apply. In other words the sentence itself can be up to almost a second >> "off". >> >> If you are looking for a GPS for use indoors I think you don't care about >> anything other then receiver sensitivity. Without that you have nothing, >> no signal. It is more important than a few less nanoseconds of >> uncertainty >> in the time solution. So those ublox receivers look good. I'm looking >> to buy some for another application, mobile robots, I'll use GPS for gross >> level navigation and it would be nice if it still worked indoors >> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> The Jupiter receiver defaults to Motorola output, but can be switched to >>> Zodiac. It talks at 9600:8:N:1 >>> Frankly, it is the wrong receiver to use, particularly with an indoor >>> antenna. I would go with a modern GPS receiver with standard NMEA output >>> and a 1PPS signal. They are MUCH more sensitive and usually work >>> indoors >>> and can be had for dirt cheap. Most have an on-board ceramic patch >>> antenna. Ublox receivers seem to work well indoors. >>> >>> NAVSPARK makes a tiny little GPS board with 1PPS output. 6 for $36 or >>> one >>> free for $10 shipping (no antenna supplied, has a U.FL connector). It >>> speaks NMEA at 115,200:8:N:1 or can be setup for 9600 baud. >>> >>> The delay between message and 1PPS is receiver dependent. Usually it is >>> small enough to not be noticeable. Some receivers send the message >>> before >>> the 1PPS, others after it. You can compensate for the >>> differences/delays >>> in software. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >>> > -- > WBW, > > V.P. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >