time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Poor man's oven

R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 12:57 AM

On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do
not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert.

Bob

Exactly right Bob.  The 10811 guys used to go nuts
about keeping water out of their vacuum system.
There were certain temperatures known as "water
points" at which some water was released.
The retained water was in spite of the temperature
already being above 100 degrees C (boiling).
It has something to do with monolayers of
water molecules not boiling away.

Rick N6RK

On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do > not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. > > Bob > Exactly right Bob. The 10811 guys used to go nuts about keeping water out of their vacuum system. There were certain temperatures known as "water points" at which some water was released. The retained water was in spite of the temperature already being above 100 degrees C (boiling). It has something to do with monolayers of water molecules not boiling away. Rick N6RK
CS
Charles Steinmetz
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 6:55 AM

Bob wrote:

In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do
not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert.

The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and
tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel.  And
the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero.
The problem is far from insurmountable, even at that huge scale.
Dealing with it should be very much easier at a scale of cubic centimeters.

They use condensers to remove the water during the hydrogen purge cycle,
which (for mains alternators) lasts several weeks.  I watched the
procedure several times 25 years ago, but I don't recall the particulars
now.

Best regards,

Charles

Bob wrote: > In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do > not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel. And the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero. The problem is far from insurmountable, even at that huge scale. Dealing with it should be very much easier at a scale of cubic centimeters. They use condensers to remove the water during the hydrogen purge cycle, which (for mains alternators) lasts several weeks. I watched the procedure several times 25 years ago, but I don't recall the particulars now. Best regards, Charles
DJ
Didier Juges
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 12:25 PM

The difficulty with hydrogen is to keep it where you want it. It does not
take very much for it to leak out (or in, as the case may be)

On Jun 8, 2017 4:58 PM, "Alan Melia" alan.melia@btinternet.com wrote:

Hi Bob, it also depends on what you allow to leak into the vacuum.
Hydrogen is a pretty effective remover of heat :-))
Alan
G3NYK

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob kb8tq" kb8tq@n1k.org
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

Hi

If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the
conductivity
comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact
on Q.

Bob

On Jun 8, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:55:07 -0400
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

The simple answer is that the backfill is done because it does matter in

a lot of
cases.

This raises the question, why there is backfill (just for thermal
conductivity?)
and how much it affects the Q of the crystal.

Attila Kinali

--
You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
facts that needs altering.  -- The Doctor


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The difficulty with hydrogen is to keep it where you want it. It does not take very much for it to leak out (or in, as the case may be) On Jun 8, 2017 4:58 PM, "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com> wrote: > Hi Bob, it also depends on what you allow to leak into the vacuum. > Hydrogen is a pretty effective remover of heat :-)) > Alan > G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob kb8tq" <kb8tq@n1k.org> > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" < > time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 9:19 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven) > > > Hi >> >> If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the >> conductivity >> comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact >> on Q. >> >> Bob >> >> On Jun 8, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:55:07 -0400 >>> Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: >>> >>> The simple answer is that the backfill is done because it does matter in >>>> a lot of >>>> cases. >>>> >>> >>> This raises the question, why there is backfill (just for thermal >>> conductivity?) >>> and how much it affects the Q of the crystal. >>> >>> Attila Kinali >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. >>> They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to >>> fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the >>> facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m >>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m >> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m > ailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
J
jimlux
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 1:13 PM

On 6/8/17 1:19 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity
comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact
on Q.

basically, when the mean free path gets to be shorter than the distance
to the wall, the thermal conductivity drops off.

MFP = 65 nm at 1013 hPa = 760 torr

So at 10-4 Pa/0.75E-3 micron (start of very high vacuum) the MFP is 65 cm

High vacuum usually starts around 0.1 Pa (close to 1 micron), where the
MFP is 65 mm - this is where the MFP is comparable to the size of the
stuff you're pumping down, and where you can't use a "pump", but rather
you need something that flings the air molecules toward the exit
(diffusion or turbo molecular pump) or something that is like flypaper
for molecules (sorption, cold finger, etc.)

If you've got a "refrigeration" vacuum pump, they pull down to about
30-40 microns - MFP is a few millimeters

On 6/8/17 1:19 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity > comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact > on Q. > basically, when the mean free path gets to be shorter than the distance to the wall, the thermal conductivity drops off. MFP = 65 nm at 1013 hPa = 760 torr So at 10-4 Pa/0.75E-3 micron (start of very high vacuum) the MFP is 65 cm High vacuum usually starts around 0.1 Pa (close to 1 micron), where the MFP is 65 mm - this is where the MFP is comparable to the size of the stuff you're pumping down, and where you can't use a "pump", but rather you need something that flings the air molecules toward the exit (diffusion or turbo molecular pump) or something that is like flypaper for molecules (sorption, cold finger, etc.) If you've got a "refrigeration" vacuum pump, they pull down to about 30-40 microns - MFP is a few millimeters
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 1:55 PM

Hi

My guess is that crystals are more sensitive to moisture than the alternators…. The level of “clean”
you need in a precision crystal enclosure is way beyond what is required in a number of other areas.
One layer of water molecules is way to much in a modern crystal.  can and do use crystals as detectors
of low levels of “stuff” for this very reason.

Bob

On Jun 9, 2017, at 2:55 AM, Charles Steinmetz csteinmetz@yandex.com wrote:

Bob wrote:

In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do
not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert.

The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel.  And the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero. The problem is far from insurmountable, even at that huge scale. Dealing with it should be very much easier at a scale of cubic centimeters.

They use condensers to remove the water during the hydrogen purge cycle, which (for mains alternators) lasts several weeks.  I watched the procedure several times 25 years ago, but I don't recall the particulars now.

Best regards,

Charles


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi My guess is that crystals are more sensitive to moisture than the alternators…. The level of “clean” you need in a precision crystal enclosure is way beyond what is required in a number of other areas. One layer of water molecules is way to much in a modern crystal. can and do use crystals as detectors of low levels of “stuff” for this very reason. Bob > On Jun 9, 2017, at 2:55 AM, Charles Steinmetz <csteinmetz@yandex.com> wrote: > > Bob wrote: > >> In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do >> not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. > > The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel. And the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero. The problem is far from insurmountable, even at that huge scale. Dealing with it should be very much easier at a scale of cubic centimeters. > > They use condensers to remove the water during the hydrogen purge cycle, which (for mains alternators) lasts several weeks. I watched the procedure several times 25 years ago, but I don't recall the particulars now. > > Best regards, > > Charles > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 1:58 PM

Hi

Cold traps and vac-ion pumps were very common on precision crystal seal setups 50 years ago.
They have gotten better since then….

Bob

On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:13 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/8/17 1:19 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity
comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact
on Q.

basically, when the mean free path gets to be shorter than the distance to the wall, the thermal conductivity drops off.

MFP = 65 nm at 1013 hPa = 760 torr

So at 10-4 Pa/0.75E-3 micron (start of very high vacuum) the MFP is 65 cm

High vacuum usually starts around 0.1 Pa (close to 1 micron), where the MFP is 65 mm - this is where the MFP is comparable to the size of the stuff you're pumping down, and where you can't use a "pump", but rather you need something that flings the air molecules toward the exit (diffusion or turbo molecular pump) or something that is like flypaper for molecules (sorption, cold finger, etc.)

If you've got a "refrigeration" vacuum pump, they pull down to about 30-40 microns - MFP is a few millimeters


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Cold traps and vac-ion pumps were very common on precision crystal seal setups 50 years ago. They have gotten better since then…. Bob > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:13 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > > On 6/8/17 1:19 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> >> If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity >> comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact >> on Q. >> > > basically, when the mean free path gets to be shorter than the distance to the wall, the thermal conductivity drops off. > > MFP = 65 nm at 1013 hPa = 760 torr > > So at 10-4 Pa/0.75E-3 micron (start of very high vacuum) the MFP is 65 cm > > High vacuum usually starts around 0.1 Pa (close to 1 micron), where the MFP is 65 mm - this is where the MFP is comparable to the size of the stuff you're pumping down, and where you can't use a "pump", but rather you need something that flings the air molecules toward the exit (diffusion or turbo molecular pump) or something that is like flypaper for molecules (sorption, cold finger, etc.) > > > If you've got a "refrigeration" vacuum pump, they pull down to about 30-40 microns - MFP is a few millimeters > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 8:05 PM

In message 593A4677.5080509@yandex.com, Charles Steinmetz writes:

The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and
tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel.  And
the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero.

This is close to to being "not even wrong".

There is no requirement for "a relative humidity of absolute zero",
which is theoretically impossible if there is any iron around.

There are however stringent requirements for non-corrosion, dielectric
potential, cooling, corona behaviour etc. etc.

Cooling the stator is a no-brainer, it is almost always water-cooled.

If they could afford to use helium to cool the rotor, they would
jump on it instantly, but the cost is prohibitive at their leakage
rates.

Pure water would also be workable, but its high density means
it cannot be used to cool the rotor without a serious hit to
efficiency.

Next down the line is hydrogen, which comes with a shitload of issues.

Apart from all the obvious issues, lube-oil degradation, polymer
degradation, fire-risk, risk of explosion, health-risk etc.  hydrogen
has "interesting" solubility in metals.

If you want to purify hydrogen, you press it trhough a filter
consisting of a solid slab of palladium, and that takes a lot less
pressure than you would expect.

For iron in particular, hydrogen means embrittlement, so a
major focus in rotor design is to keep the hydrogen away from
the iron.

If you Google "generator hydrogen seal" and and you will find
little love for hydrogen cooling.

In 1993 Siemens put the first 170MVA air-cooled generator optimized
by computer simulations of the flow-fields and since then the
hydrogen cooling has been confined to an ever-decreasing top tier
of name-plate power.

Today fan cooling will take you to approx 400MVA and pressured air
cooling will take you to about 600MVA.

Above that, you are, almost by definition, in a nuclear power plant,
and all problems from hydrogen cooling of your single huge generator
pale in comparison to having a handful of smaller generators in
parallel.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

-------- In message <593A4677.5080509@yandex.com>, Charles Steinmetz writes: >The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and >tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel. And >the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero. This is close to to being "not even wrong". There is no requirement for "a relative humidity of absolute zero", which is theoretically impossible if there is any iron around. There are however stringent requirements for non-corrosion, dielectric potential, cooling, corona behaviour etc. etc. Cooling the stator is a no-brainer, it is almost always water-cooled. If they could afford to use helium to cool the rotor, they would jump on it instantly, but the cost is prohibitive at their leakage rates. Pure water would also be workable, but its high density means it cannot be used to cool the rotor without a serious hit to efficiency. Next down the line is hydrogen, which comes with a shitload of issues. Apart from all the obvious issues, lube-oil degradation, polymer degradation, fire-risk, risk of explosion, health-risk etc. hydrogen has "interesting" solubility in metals. If you want to purify hydrogen, you press it trhough a filter consisting of a solid slab of palladium, and that takes a lot less pressure than you would expect. For iron in particular, hydrogen means embrittlement, so a major focus in rotor design is to keep the hydrogen away from the iron. If you Google "generator hydrogen seal" and and you will find little love for hydrogen cooling. In 1993 Siemens put the first 170MVA air-cooled generator optimized by computer simulations of the flow-fields and since then the hydrogen cooling has been confined to an ever-decreasing top tier of name-plate power. Today fan cooling will take you to approx 400MVA and pressured air cooling will take you to about 600MVA. Above that, you are, almost by definition, in a nuclear power plant, and all problems from hydrogen cooling of your single huge generator pale in comparison to having a handful of smaller generators in parallel. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
CS
Charles Steinmetz
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 9:08 PM

Poul-Henning wrote:

Next down the line is hydrogen, which comes with a shitload of issues.

No argument there.  But other methods all have their own shitloads -- it
just depends on which shitload the designers dislike the least.

you will find little love for hydrogen cooling [today]

In 1993 Siemens put the first 170MVA air-cooled generator optimized
by computer simulations of the flow-fields and since then
hydrogen cooling has been confined to an ever-decreasing top tier
of name-plate power.

Certainly there are other ways, and hydrogen cooling may have decreased
in popularity in the decades since I was paying attention (I consulted
for a turbine generator manufacturer in the late '80s). But there are
lots of hydrogen-cooled alternators in service, and it appears that they
are still being built.

Best regards,

Charles

Poul-Henning wrote: > Next down the line is hydrogen, which comes with a shitload of issues. No argument there. But other methods all have their own shitloads -- it just depends on which shitload the designers dislike the least. > you will find little love for hydrogen cooling [today] > > In 1993 Siemens put the first 170MVA air-cooled generator optimized > by computer simulations of the flow-fields and since then > hydrogen cooling has been confined to an ever-decreasing top tier > of name-plate power. Certainly there are other ways, and hydrogen cooling may have decreased in popularity in the decades since I was paying attention (I consulted for a turbine generator manufacturer in the late '80s). But there are lots of hydrogen-cooled alternators in service, and it appears that they are still being built. Best regards, Charles
NM
Neville Michie
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 11:38 PM

My memory of high vacuum work is that you need to pump for 4 hours
at 300C to remove the water monolayer from glass.
On top of the that water monolayer is another water monolayer that comes off more easily,
and on top of that another………..

cheers,
Neville Michie

On 9 Jun 2017, at 10:57 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist richard@karlquist.com wrote:

On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi
In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do
not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert.
Bob

Exactly right Bob.  The 10811 guys used to go nuts
about keeping water out of their vacuum system.
There were certain temperatures known as "water
points" at which some water was released.
The retained water was in spite of the temperature
already being above 100 degrees C (boiling).
It has something to do with monolayers of
water molecules not boiling away.

Rick N6RK


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

My memory of high vacuum work is that you need to pump for 4 hours at 300C to remove the water monolayer from glass. On top of the that water monolayer is another water monolayer that comes off more easily, and on top of that another……….. cheers, Neville Michie > On 9 Jun 2017, at 10:57 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com> wrote: > > > > On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do >> not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. >> Bob > > Exactly right Bob. The 10811 guys used to go nuts > about keeping water out of their vacuum system. > There were certain temperatures known as "water > points" at which some water was released. > The retained water was in spite of the temperature > already being above 100 degrees C (boiling). > It has something to do with monolayers of > water molecules not boiling away. > > Rick N6RK > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 9, 2017 11:52 PM

Hi

You can’t quite process a crystal at 300C, but you can get close.

Bob

On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:38 PM, Neville Michie namichie@gmail.com wrote:

My memory of high vacuum work is that you need to pump for 4 hours
at 300C to remove the water monolayer from glass.
On top of the that water monolayer is another water monolayer that comes off more easily,
and on top of that another………..

cheers,
Neville Michie

On 9 Jun 2017, at 10:57 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist richard@karlquist.com wrote:

On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi
In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do
not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert.
Bob

Exactly right Bob.  The 10811 guys used to go nuts
about keeping water out of their vacuum system.
There were certain temperatures known as "water
points" at which some water was released.
The retained water was in spite of the temperature
already being above 100 degrees C (boiling).
It has something to do with monolayers of
water molecules not boiling away.

Rick N6RK


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi You can’t quite process a crystal at 300C, but you can get close. Bob > On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:38 PM, Neville Michie <namichie@gmail.com> wrote: > > My memory of high vacuum work is that you need to pump for 4 hours > at 300C to remove the water monolayer from glass. > On top of the that water monolayer is another water monolayer that comes off more easily, > and on top of that another……….. > > cheers, > Neville Michie > > >> On 9 Jun 2017, at 10:57 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: >>> Hi >>> In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do >>> not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. >>> Bob >> >> Exactly right Bob. The 10811 guys used to go nuts >> about keeping water out of their vacuum system. >> There were certain temperatures known as "water >> points" at which some water was released. >> The retained water was in spite of the temperature >> already being above 100 degrees C (boiling). >> It has something to do with monolayers of >> water molecules not boiling away. >> >> Rick N6RK >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.