time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] J06 HP-59992A time interval calibrator for HP-531xxcounters

HM
Hal Murray
Sat, Jul 8, 2017 9:53 PM

The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the
PCB and wiring design.

What does "good" mean?

I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to
measure.

Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse
linear with supply voltage.

The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a
nearby pin.  That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would
probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

tvb@LeapSecond.com said: > The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the > PCB and wiring design. What does "good" mean? I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to measure. Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse linear with supply voltage. The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a nearby pin. That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Sat, Jul 8, 2017 11:18 PM

Hi

Good means whatever the 5313x needs for calibration. If that is four signals that are
crossing zero within < 10 ps of the “correct time” then that is the definition of good in this case.

Rise time delay, fall time delay are rarely the same in logic gates. Propagation inside a chip to
point A may well be different by nanoseconds relative to the propagation to a very similar
point B. All of that would mess up a signal that might need to be 50/50 to within 10 ps  or
a second signal that must cross zero half way in-between (also to within 10 ps).

If you want to have a lot of fun with this, pull out the timing analysis tool for your favorite
FPGA and start fiddling around.

Bob

On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:

tvb@LeapSecond.com said:

The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the
PCB and wiring design.

What does "good" mean?

I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to
measure.

Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse
linear with supply voltage.

The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a
nearby pin.  That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would
probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Good means whatever the 5313x needs for calibration. If that is four signals that are crossing zero within < 10 ps of the “correct time” then that is the definition of good in this case. Rise time delay, fall time delay are rarely the same in logic gates. Propagation inside a chip to point A may well be different by nanoseconds relative to the propagation to a very similar point B. All of that would mess up a signal that *might* need to be 50/50 to within 10 ps or a second signal that must cross zero half way in-between (also to within 10 ps). If you want to have a lot of fun with this, pull out the timing analysis tool for your favorite FPGA and start fiddling around. Bob > On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > > tvb@LeapSecond.com said: >> The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the >> PCB and wiring design. > > What does "good" mean? > > I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to > measure. > > Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse > linear with supply voltage. > > The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a > nearby pin. That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would > probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies. > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Sat, Jul 8, 2017 11:37 PM

The simplest solution to the divider and clock shaper is perhaps to use an LTC6954. The LTC6954 offers PECL/CMOS and LVDS outputs together with a low jitter (sub ps) programmable (SPI) divider (1-63).A couple of coax relays like those from Dow Key microwave together with some hardline and a couple of splitters could be used to implement the signal switching.

 On 09 July 2017 at 09:53 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote:

 tvb@LeapSecond.com said:
     The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the
     PCB and wiring design.
 What does "good" mean?

 I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to
 measure.

 Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse
 linear with supply voltage.

 The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a
 nearby pin. That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would
 probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies.

 --
 These are my opinions. I hate spam.

 _______________________________________________
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
The simplest solution to the divider and clock shaper is perhaps to use an LTC6954. The LTC6954 offers PECL/CMOS and LVDS outputs together with a low jitter (sub ps) programmable (SPI) divider (1-63).A couple of coax relays like those from Dow Key microwave together with some hardline and a couple of splitters could be used to implement the signal switching. > > On 09 July 2017 at 09:53 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > tvb@LeapSecond.com said: > > > > > > The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the > > PCB and wiring design. > > > > > > What does "good" mean? > > I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to > measure. > > Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse > linear with supply voltage. > > The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a > nearby pin. That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would > probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies. > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Jul 9, 2017 4:41 AM

Hi,

The J06 P-59992A time interval calibrator is not only there to calibrate
time offsets, but also offsets in trigger point. HP has a nice patent
which describes it all.

I also got one, found it on ebay.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 07/09/2017 01:18 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

Good means whatever the 5313x needs for calibration. If that is four signals that are
crossing zero within < 10 ps of the “correct time” then that is the definition of good in this case.

Rise time delay, fall time delay are rarely the same in logic gates. Propagation inside a chip to
point A may well be different by nanoseconds relative to the propagation to a very similar
point B. All of that would mess up a signal that might need to be 50/50 to within 10 ps  or
a second signal that must cross zero half way in-between (also to within 10 ps).

If you want to have a lot of fun with this, pull out the timing analysis tool for your favorite
FPGA and start fiddling around.

Bob

On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:

tvb@LeapSecond.com said:

The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the
PCB and wiring design.

What does "good" mean?

I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to
measure.

Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse
linear with supply voltage.

The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a
nearby pin.  That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would
probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi, The J06 P-59992A time interval calibrator is not only there to calibrate time offsets, but also offsets in trigger point. HP has a nice patent which describes it all. I also got one, found it on ebay. Cheers, Magnus On 07/09/2017 01:18 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > Good means whatever the 5313x needs for calibration. If that is four signals that are > crossing zero within < 10 ps of the “correct time” then that is the definition of good in this case. > > Rise time delay, fall time delay are rarely the same in logic gates. Propagation inside a chip to > point A may well be different by nanoseconds relative to the propagation to a very similar > point B. All of that would mess up a signal that *might* need to be 50/50 to within 10 ps or > a second signal that must cross zero half way in-between (also to within 10 ps). > > If you want to have a lot of fun with this, pull out the timing analysis tool for your favorite > FPGA and start fiddling around. > > Bob > >> On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: >> >> >> tvb@LeapSecond.com said: >>> The PIC dividers are good to a couple ps. I suspect the larger issue is the >>> PCB and wiring design. >> >> What does "good" mean? >> >> I'd expect the variations due to power or temperature would be easy to >> measure. >> >> Delay through classic CMOS is linear with absolute temperature and inverse >> linear with supply voltage. >> >> The classic way to get time-nuts level noise on FPGA outputs is to wiggle a >> nearby pin. That shouldn't be a problem with a dedicated PIC but would >> probably show up if you are generating multiple frequencies. >> >> >> -- >> These are my opinions. I hate spam. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >