If anyone has the time & inclination, a document comparing different time interval counters would be useful to budding time nuts. There are quite a few different models at prices that are affordable to many.
I have had a HP 5370B and a Stanford Research SR620, but have neither now. I regretted selling the HP, but then after buying the SR620, I swapped that and a 4.2 GHz HP signal generator for an HP 4291B 1.8 GHz impedance and material analyzer.
I was looking for something cheap, but see a used Keysight 53230A on eBay for considerably more than a new one from Keysight. It had a "make offer" so I could not resist pointing out a new one is much less, and making a redicously low offer of $1000. I doubt it will be accepted, but one never knows. I once got a current Ketsight product for 2% of the current price, so anything is possible.
But a comparison of TI counters, and a discussion of the important specifications would be njce.
.Dave.
Hi
Once you get into used gear that is many decades old, the actual performance of your counter
is likely to be different than the performance of mine. If you are willing to go through all of the
detailed alignment steps (and possibly replace parts) yours will work better than mine. How much
better will be a “that depends” sort of thing. Best guess is quite a bit better.
Even in sparkling new condition with everything working, you still have a very basic “are you
after frequency or after time?” question. The newer counters (I would toss the CNT-90 into the
batch) have various tricks in them to improve frequency estimation. The older stuff simply did
not have the horsepower to do some of this. Time wise some of the older counters did pretty well.
So, is a 53132 worth more than a 5335? Sure it is. Is a 53230 worth more than a 53132? Yes.
Are they worth the delta that people charge? That depends a lot on how much cash you have
lying around. If you have a $200K lab already and your yearly spend on gear is $50K that is very
different than a yearly spend of < $1,000. If you can afford the newer stuff, it comes with nice things
like replacement parts / factory repair. On the older gear, purchase of a “parts donor” unit may
be the only way to do a repair.
On the new stuff (as you have already noted) the auction sites may not be your best source. The
price Keysight charges for a demo unit may be your best deal. A local (= in country) equipment
rental guy might also be a better source. Neither one are likely to give you a great deal today. In
both cases it’s a “let them know” sort of thing. You might or might not get a call back in the next
couple of months.
Lots of issues and not much clarity in terms of do this or do that — sorry !
Bob
On Nov 19, 2016, at 8:55 PM, Dr. David Kirkby drkirkby@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone has the time & inclination, a document comparing different time interval counters would be useful to budding time nuts. There are quite a few different models at prices that are affordable to many.
I have had a HP 5370B and a Stanford Research SR620, but have neither now. I regretted selling the HP, but then after buying the SR620, I swapped that and a 4.2 GHz HP signal generator for an HP 4291B 1.8 GHz impedance and material analyzer.
I was looking for something cheap, but see a used Keysight 53230A on eBay for considerably more than a new one from Keysight. It had a "make offer" so I could not resist pointing out a new one is much less, and making a redicously low offer of $1000. I doubt it will be accepted, but one never knows. I once got a current Ketsight product for 2% of the current price, so anything is possible.
But a comparison of TI counters, and a discussion of the important specifications would be njce.
.Dave.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I had a 53230 the last few years I worked for Agilent.
The oven oscillator in it is inferior to a 10811.
Its only claim to fame IMHO is that it can measure
Allan Deviation. Turns out that we really needed
Hadamard, but it doesn't do that. It is very expensive.
The old Santa Clara Division with the counter expertise
has now been gone nearly 20 years. The counter line
has been offshored. The expertise over there is
a complete unknown.
Rick
On 11/19/2016 5:55 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If anyone has the time & inclination, a document comparing different time interval counters would be useful to budding time nuts. There are quite a few different models at prices that are affordable to many.
I have had a HP 5370B and a Stanford Research SR620, but have neither now. I regretted selling the HP, but then after buying the SR620, I swapped that and a 4.2 GHz HP signal generator for an HP 4291B 1.8 GHz impedance and material analyzer.
I was looking for something cheap, but see a used Keysight 53230A on eBay for considerably more than a new one from Keysight. It had a "make offer" so I could not resist pointing out a new one is much less, and making a redicously low offer of $1000. I doubt it will be accepted, but one never knows. I once got a current Ketsight product for 2% of the current price, so anything is possible.
But a comparison of TI counters, and a discussion of the important specifications would be njce.
.Dave.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
With both counters running on the same external standard (and no internal OCXO), the 53230
beats the 53132 both on frequency and time. It also has slightly better isolation of the 10 MHz
internals so the “dead zone” at 10 MHz is not quite as bad. I have no idea how either one
works with the OCXO option … I’ve never seen either one with an OCXO.
Bob
On Nov 21, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist richard@karlquist.com wrote:
I had a 53230 the last few years I worked for Agilent.
The oven oscillator in it is inferior to a 10811.
Its only claim to fame IMHO is that it can measure
Allan Deviation. Turns out that we really needed
Hadamard, but it doesn't do that. It is very expensive.
The old Santa Clara Division with the counter expertise
has now been gone nearly 20 years. The counter line
has been offshored. The expertise over there is
a complete unknown.
Rick
On 11/19/2016 5:55 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If anyone has the time & inclination, a document comparing different time interval counters would be useful to budding time nuts. There are quite a few different models at prices that are affordable to many.
I have had a HP 5370B and a Stanford Research SR620, but have neither now. I regretted selling the HP, but then after buying the SR620, I swapped that and a 4.2 GHz HP signal generator for an HP 4291B 1.8 GHz impedance and material analyzer.
I was looking for something cheap, but see a used Keysight 53230A on eBay for considerably more than a new one from Keysight. It had a "make offer" so I could not resist pointing out a new one is much less, and making a redicously low offer of $1000. I doubt it will be accepted, but one never knows. I once got a current Ketsight product for 2% of the current price, so anything is possible.
But a comparison of TI counters, and a discussion of the important specifications would be njce.
.Dave.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
On 11/21/2016 1:10 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
With both counters running on the same external standard (and no internal OCXO), the 53230
beats the 53132 both on frequency and time. It also has slightly better isolation of the 10 MHz
internals so the “dead zone” at 10 MHz is not quite as bad. I have no idea how either one
works with the OCXO option … I’ve never seen either one with an OCXO.
Bob
I remember when the 10 MHz section of the 53132 was designed.
The designers had little knowledge of how to do that correctly.
It wasn't their fault; it was the fault of the manager who
assigned the task to them.
Rick
On 21 November 2016 at 21:10, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
With both counters running on the same external standard (and no internal
OCXO), the 53230
beats the 53132 both on frequency and time. It also has slightly better
isolation of the 10 MHz
internals so the “dead zone” at 10 MHz is not quite as bad. I have no idea
how either one
works with the OCXO option … I’ve never seen either one with an OCXO.
Bob
This sort of information is useful. Perhaps a Wiki is the best document,
where people can put comments like this. I don't have a Wiki set up myself,
but I'd guess the sort of information one would want would be:
Description
Described what a TI counter is
Uses
No doubt with an emphasis on time nuts uses, but I don't see any need to
restrict it just to that. (I did consider using one of mine to record the
speed of the traffic near my house!)
Understanding the specifications and their importance.
Lots of them.
Items to be considered when purchasing new vs used.
Description of model X
Include any options that are available for model X.
Also any known issues - e.g. for both the SR620 and 8970B, they do in my
experience run quite warm.
Description of model Y
Description of model Z
Table comparing specifications between all models
Models worth considering if your budget is < $250
Models worth considering if your budget is < $500
Models worth considering if your budget is < $1000
Models worth considering if your budget is < $2000
Models worth considering if you budget is unlimited.
Conclusions.
Dave
Hi
In a market that only has two competitors doing new gear and each only has a single high end
counter …. there’s not a lot to talk about. At this point it’s not really clear if the Pendulum designs
have a future at all. That would get you down to one still doing new designs.
Sorting out surplus will always be a matter of “the new one is better” (as long as it’s higher priced).
Bob
On Nov 23, 2016, at 5:47 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) drkirkby@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk wrote:
On 21 November 2016 at 21:10, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
With both counters running on the same external standard (and no internal
OCXO), the 53230
beats the 53132 both on frequency and time. It also has slightly better
isolation of the 10 MHz
internals so the “dead zone” at 10 MHz is not quite as bad. I have no idea
how either one
works with the OCXO option … I’ve never seen either one with an OCXO.
Bob
This sort of information is useful. Perhaps a Wiki is the best document,
where people can put comments like this. I don't have a Wiki set up myself,
but I'd guess the sort of information one would want would be:
Description
Described what a TI counter is
Uses
No doubt with an emphasis on time nuts uses, but I don't see any need to
restrict it just to that. (I did consider using one of mine to record the
speed of the traffic near my house!)
Understanding the specifications and their importance.
Lots of them.
Items to be considered when purchasing new vs used.
Description of model X
Include any options that are available for model X.
Also any known issues - e.g. for both the SR620 and 8970B, they do in my
experience run quite warm.
Description of model Y
Description of model Z
Table comparing specifications between all models
Models worth considering if your budget is < $250
Models worth considering if your budget is < $500
Models worth considering if your budget is < $1000
Models worth considering if your budget is < $2000
Models worth considering if you budget is unlimited.
Conclusions.
Dave
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.