time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Hints on PPS Buffer design...

HM
Hal Murray
Sat, Jun 17, 2017 9:01 AM

Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of the
chosen resistors?

It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time.
If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1
GHz.  So, yes, you want low inductance.  That includes the power to the chip
as well as the resistors.  Surface mount is your friend.  So are ground/power
planes.

How good is your scope?

Q:  Why does everyone pick FIVE x 100 Ohm resistors?  That's 20 Ohm out, not
counting the gate impedance on the hex inverter...

The FIVE is 6-1.  The one is for isolation.  The 5 is the rest of the
package.  You might as well use them all as drivers.  You don't want to use
them for another signal (even if it is supposed to be identical) or you will
get minor crosstalk when you do things like plug or unplug a cable.

I don't know why you are saying "gate impedance".  That's over on the input
side.  I would have said "output impedance" or "driver impedance" of the chip
or section.

I'm not sure why they picked 100 ohms.  Assume the net source impedance is 25
ohms.  Suppose the far end is terminated with 50 ohms.  There won't be any
reflections so the source value doesn't matter.  25 ohms will provide a
higher voltage at the far end than 50.  If you have a CMOS driver and a CMOS
receiver, 1/2 the voltage at the receiver is nasty.  It might be OK if you
have HT type receivers.

I would suggest a bit of lab work.  What are you going to use on the far end?

Lots of gear has 1000 ohms rather than 50 so a 50 ohm source impedance takes
care of the reflections and leaves (almost) the full voltage at the receiver.

cautery@montac.com said:

thus I can only include that I need to use something slightly more than 250
Ohms on a 5 gate parallel setup)

More than 250 divided by 5 and rounded up a bit for the output impedance of
the chip will be more than 50 ohms.  I'd do some experiments.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

cautery@montac.com said: > Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of the > chosen resistors? It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time. If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1 GHz. So, yes, you want low inductance. That includes the power to the chip as well as the resistors. Surface mount is your friend. So are ground/power planes. How good is your scope? > Q: Why does everyone pick FIVE x 100 Ohm resistors? That's 20 Ohm out, not > counting the gate impedance on the hex inverter... The FIVE is 6-1. The one is for isolation. The 5 is the rest of the package. You might as well use them all as drivers. You don't want to use them for another signal (even if it is supposed to be identical) or you will get minor crosstalk when you do things like plug or unplug a cable. I don't know why you are saying "gate impedance". That's over on the input side. I would have said "output impedance" or "driver impedance" of the chip or section. I'm not sure why they picked 100 ohms. Assume the net source impedance is 25 ohms. Suppose the far end is terminated with 50 ohms. There won't be any reflections so the source value doesn't matter. 25 ohms will provide a higher voltage at the far end than 50. If you have a CMOS driver and a CMOS receiver, 1/2 the voltage at the receiver is nasty. It might be OK if you have HT type receivers. I would suggest a bit of lab work. What are you going to use on the far end? Lots of gear has 1000 ohms rather than 50 so a 50 ohm source impedance takes care of the reflections and leaves (almost) the full voltage at the receiver. cautery@montac.com said: > thus I can only include that I need to use something slightly more than 250 > Ohms on a 5 gate parallel setup) More than 250 divided by 5 and rounded up a bit for the output impedance of the chip will be more than 50 ohms. I'd do some experiments. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
G/
Graham / KE9H
Sat, Jun 17, 2017 12:43 PM

Read the spec sheet on the part you are using for a driver.
The size of the resistor on the paralleled driver side will be set by the
maximum current of the devices.

Decide how conservative a design you want.
Do you want it to drive into a shorted load and survive?
[If each output is rated at 20 mA, in a 5 Volt system, then R=E/I, = 250
Ohms]

Or do you only want it to work into a 50 Ohm load (to ground)?

Or perhaps only a Thevenin load? 50 Ohm load, but 100 Ohms up to +V, and
100 Ohms to ground.

Remember that 50 Ohms in a 5 Volt system will draw 100 mA on the 'High'
which can be a lot of current
for a modern IC.

--- Graham

==

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:

Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of

the

chosen resistors?

It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time.
If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1
GHz.  So, yes, you want low inductance.  That includes the power to the
chip
as well as the resistors.  Surface mount is your friend.  So are
ground/power
planes.

How good is your scope?

Q:  Why does everyone pick FIVE x 100 Ohm resistors?  That's 20 Ohm out,

not

counting the gate impedance on the hex inverter...

The FIVE is 6-1.  The one is for isolation.  The 5 is the rest of the
package.  You might as well use them all as drivers.  You don't want to use
them for another signal (even if it is supposed to be identical) or you
will
get minor crosstalk when you do things like plug or unplug a cable.

I don't know why you are saying "gate impedance".  That's over on the input
side.  I would have said "output impedance" or "driver impedance" of the
chip
or section.

I'm not sure why they picked 100 ohms.  Assume the net source impedance is
25
ohms.  Suppose the far end is terminated with 50 ohms.  There won't be any
reflections so the source value doesn't matter.  25 ohms will provide a
higher voltage at the far end than 50.  If you have a CMOS driver and a
CMOS
receiver, 1/2 the voltage at the receiver is nasty.  It might be OK if you
have HT type receivers.

I would suggest a bit of lab work.  What are you going to use on the far
end?

Lots of gear has 1000 ohms rather than 50 so a 50 ohm source impedance
takes
care of the reflections and leaves (almost) the full voltage at the
receiver.

cautery@montac.com said:

thus I can only include that I need to use something slightly more than

250

Ohms on a 5 gate parallel setup)

More than 250 divided by 5 and rounded up a bit for the output impedance of
the chip will be more than 50 ohms.  I'd do some experiments.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Read the spec sheet on the part you are using for a driver. The size of the resistor on the paralleled driver side will be set by the maximum current of the devices. Decide how conservative a design you want. Do you want it to drive into a shorted load and survive? [If each output is rated at 20 mA, in a 5 Volt system, then R=E/I, = 250 Ohms] Or do you only want it to work into a 50 Ohm load (to ground)? Or perhaps only a Thevenin load? 50 Ohm load, but 100 Ohms up to +V, and 100 Ohms to ground. Remember that 50 Ohms in a 5 Volt system will draw 100 mA on the 'High' which can be a lot of current for a modern IC. --- Graham == On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > cautery@montac.com said: > > Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of > the > > chosen resistors? > > It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time. > If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1 > GHz. So, yes, you want low inductance. That includes the power to the > chip > as well as the resistors. Surface mount is your friend. So are > ground/power > planes. > > How good is your scope? > > > > Q: Why does everyone pick FIVE x 100 Ohm resistors? That's 20 Ohm out, > not > > counting the gate impedance on the hex inverter... > > The FIVE is 6-1. The one is for isolation. The 5 is the rest of the > package. You might as well use them all as drivers. You don't want to use > them for another signal (even if it is supposed to be identical) or you > will > get minor crosstalk when you do things like plug or unplug a cable. > > I don't know why you are saying "gate impedance". That's over on the input > side. I would have said "output impedance" or "driver impedance" of the > chip > or section. > > I'm not sure why they picked 100 ohms. Assume the net source impedance is > 25 > ohms. Suppose the far end is terminated with 50 ohms. There won't be any > reflections so the source value doesn't matter. 25 ohms will provide a > higher voltage at the far end than 50. If you have a CMOS driver and a > CMOS > receiver, 1/2 the voltage at the receiver is nasty. It might be OK if you > have HT type receivers. > > I would suggest a bit of lab work. What are you going to use on the far > end? > > Lots of gear has 1000 ohms rather than 50 so a 50 ohm source impedance > takes > care of the reflections and leaves (almost) the full voltage at the > receiver. > > > cautery@montac.com said: > > thus I can only include that I need to use something slightly more than > 250 > > Ohms on a 5 gate parallel setup) > > More than 250 divided by 5 and rounded up a bit for the output impedance of > the chip will be more than 50 ohms. I'd do some experiments. > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
CA
Clay Autery
Sat, Jun 17, 2017 1:14 PM

On 6/17/2017 4:01 AM, Hal Murray wrote:

Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of the
chosen resistors?

It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time.
If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1
GHz.  So, yes, you want low inductance.  That includes the power to the chip
as well as the resistors.  Surface mount is your friend.  So are ground/power
planes.

How good is your scope?

Not nearly good enough, as I don't have one.  Have to borrow.  Thank you
for pointing me in the right direction on bandwidth...

Q:  Why does everyone pick FIVE x 100 Ohm resistors?  That's 20 Ohm out, not
counting the gate impedance on the hex inverter...

The FIVE is 6-1.  The one is for isolation.  The 5 is the rest of the
package. You might as well use them all as drivers.  You don't want to use
them for another signal (even if it is supposed to be identical) or you will
get minor crosstalk when you do things like plug or unplug a cable.

Yes, I got this part... At least I generally get something.  ;-)

I don't know why you are saying "gate impedance".  That's over on the input
side.  I would have said "output impedance" or "driver impedance" of the chip
or section.

Apologize, was parroting the term used in the archived Time Nuts post I
found referencing the need to address the "driver impedance" in
selecting series resistors when trying to set the output impedance.

I'm not sure why they picked 100 ohms.  Assume the net source impedance is 25
ohms.  Suppose the far end is terminated with 50 ohms.  There won't be any
reflections so the source value doesn't matter.  25 ohms will provide a
higher voltage at the far end than 50.  If you have a CMOS driver and a CMOS
receiver, 1/2 the voltage at the receiver is nasty.  It might be OK if you
have HT type receivers.

OK... I'll have to try and study this some more, because for a simpleton
like me, and impedance mismatch between the PPS out port on the Nortel
and the device to which it is connected of 25:50 ohms, reduces to 1:2,
flipped around is a 2:1 VSWR, which means a fairly significant power
loss...  Maybe it doesn't matter much with a short cable.. but the cable
is also tiny/lossy.

I would suggest a bit of lab work.  What are you going to use on the far end?
Lots of gear has 1000 ohms rather than 50 so a 50 ohm source impedance takes
care of the reflections and leaves (almost) the full voltage at the receiver.

Yes, I intend to do extensive testing.  I was just trying to trim away
some of the waste up front... time, materials, et al.  :-)

thus I can only include that I need to use something slightly more than 250
Ohms on a 5 gate parallel setup)

More than 250 divided by 5 and rounded up a bit for the output impedance of
the chip will be more than 50 ohms.  I'd do some experiments.

Yep... gonna need some more instruments asap...  I may just have to wing
it and accept "good enough" until I can round up the rest of the
required instrumentation.

Thanks for your assistance and not brutalizing me for my lack of
knowledge.  I'm trying to learn.

  • C. Autery
On 6/17/2017 4:01 AM, Hal Murray wrote: >> Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of the >> chosen resistors? > It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time. > If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1 > GHz. So, yes, you want low inductance. That includes the power to the chip > as well as the resistors. Surface mount is your friend. So are ground/power > planes. > > How good is your scope? Not nearly good enough, as I don't have one. Have to borrow. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction on bandwidth... >> Q: Why does everyone pick FIVE x 100 Ohm resistors? That's 20 Ohm out, not >> counting the gate impedance on the hex inverter... > The FIVE is 6-1. The one is for isolation. The 5 is the rest of the > package. You might as well use them all as drivers. You don't want to use > them for another signal (even if it is supposed to be identical) or you will > get minor crosstalk when you do things like plug or unplug a cable. Yes, I got this part... At least I generally get something. ;-) > I don't know why you are saying "gate impedance". That's over on the input > side. I would have said "output impedance" or "driver impedance" of the chip > or section. Apologize, was parroting the term used in the archived Time Nuts post I found referencing the need to address the "driver impedance" in selecting series resistors when trying to set the output impedance. > I'm not sure why they picked 100 ohms. Assume the net source impedance is 25 > ohms. Suppose the far end is terminated with 50 ohms. There won't be any > reflections so the source value doesn't matter. 25 ohms will provide a > higher voltage at the far end than 50. If you have a CMOS driver and a CMOS > receiver, 1/2 the voltage at the receiver is nasty. It might be OK if you > have HT type receivers. OK... I'll have to try and study this some more, because for a simpleton like me, and impedance mismatch between the PPS out port on the Nortel and the device to which it is connected of 25:50 ohms, reduces to 1:2, flipped around is a 2:1 VSWR, which means a fairly significant power loss... Maybe it doesn't matter much with a short cable.. but the cable is also tiny/lossy. > I would suggest a bit of lab work. What are you going to use on the far end? > Lots of gear has 1000 ohms rather than 50 so a 50 ohm source impedance takes > care of the reflections and leaves (almost) the full voltage at the receiver. Yes, I intend to do extensive testing. I was just trying to trim away some of the waste up front... time, materials, et al. :-) >> thus I can only include that I need to use something slightly more than 250 >> Ohms on a 5 gate parallel setup) > More than 250 divided by 5 and rounded up a bit for the output impedance of > the chip will be more than 50 ohms. I'd do some experiments. Yep... gonna need some more instruments asap... I may just have to wing it and accept "good enough" until I can round up the rest of the required instrumentation. Thanks for your assistance and not brutalizing me for my lack of knowledge. I'm trying to learn. - C. Autery