Hi Bob, For that receiver, you have a pretty good result. If you haven't moved your antenna, the average result should be fine. However, with a cesium around you can experiment with minor adjustments of position. Best would be to build carrier phase pseudo-range measurements and compare with the time-difference to see if there is a correlation and then fine-tune that way. I don't recall what you get out of the LEA-6T. You sure has some outdoor temperature variations right now. It would be interesting to do an outdoor and indoor temperature log and try to see the correlation there. Cheers, Magnus On 04/29/2017 04:35 PM, Bob Stewart wrote: > Hi Magnus, > > OK, a couple of things about my location. I'm in West Houston, and it's > not summer yet, so there's a lot of variation in temperature from day to > day. Some nights it's in the 40sF and some nights it's in the high 70s > or low 80sF. Lots of variation in the days, as well. My antenna is not > optimal, at all. The best I could do was to remove the dish from an > unused DishTV antenna and install my GPS antenna on top of the little > mast they use. It's about the best I can do. In fact, it's better than > I expected. > > The receiver is a LEA-6T that was put through a 24 hour survey and the > position was saved in flash memory. However, there have been lots of > power cycles since that survey. Whether or not that affects the result, > I don't know. > > Still, the point of the test was to understand why I'm not getting these > large phase swings. And I think Bob Camp's explanation was good. Maybe > in another 5 years the sunspots will be back up and I can see the > comparison to now. > > Bob > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Magnus Danielson <magnus@rubidium.se> > *To:* Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>; Discussion of Precise Time and > Frequency Measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > *Cc:* magnus@rubidium.se > *Sent:* Saturday, April 29, 2017 6:45 AM > *Subject:* Re: [time-nuts] Three-cornered hat on timelab? > > Hi Bob, > > On 04/27/2017 06:48 PM, Bob Stewart wrote: >> Hi Magnus, >> >> Try as I might, the weather and the local power company had other ideas >> about my long term capture. I'm running everything but the 5370 from a >> UPS. I guess I'm going to have to get batteries for my other UPS and >> run the 5370 from that. A one second power loss was all it took to stop >> the test. > > Annoying, but you got some good values never the less. > >> Anyway, I did manage to get 376,238 points of data. The data is >> captured on a 5370A. The external clock input and the STOP channel are >> fed by the 10MHz from my PRS-45A. The START channel is fed by the 10MHz >> from one of my GPSDOs. The EXT channel is fed by the 1PPS from another >> of my GPSDO units. "EXT ARM" is enabled. So, essentially, at every >> 1PPS pulse, the phase difference between the two 10MHz feeds is captured. > > OK, this seems like a good setup. > >> I've attached a screenshot of the phase plot which can also be found here: >> http://evoria.net/AE6RV/Timelab/Screenshot.png >> >> I've also made the timelab file (compressed by 7z) available here: >> http://evoria.net/AE6RV/Timelab/GFSvsCS.4.22.17.7z > > Thank you for providing the data, I downloaded it so I can play around > with it, which I naturally did. :) > >> So, back to my question: Where are the large ionospheric phase moves? >> This question has been causing me doubt since I started on this >> project. Or don't I still have enough data collected for this to happen? > > Your data seems to be more affected by constellation shifts, as the > period of about 43080 s seems to be a period of the constellation. > You either have averaged out to a somewhat incorrect position of your > antenna or you have sub-optimal position of your antenna. > > It gives you a peak-to-peak amplitude of about 10 ns or so. > > The ionospheric errors has a period of 86400s, so to get a clear > separation of these would take more data. However, playing around with > the data in TimeLab allowed me to filter out some of the other systematics. > > The day-to-day variations is noticeable. I wonder how much of that is > thermal though. The building variations was filtered out in the process. > > One has to identify a number of these potential disturbances, estimate > their size in order to more clearly see other things. TimeLab has a > notch filter to notch out a particular frequency. It would be nice if an > alternative approach would be to give the notch a period. > > One has to recall that even and odd harmonics to a disturbance frequency > can be there, as it is not always a pure sine disturbance. > > > Cheers, > Magnus > >