volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

How to keep voltage stable in the sub-100nV range?

D
David
Wed, Nov 2, 2016 2:50 PM

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:11:24 +0100, you wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:44:18 -0500
David davidwhess@gmail.com wrote:

Charles pretty much covered it but I am not sure that polypropylene is
always worse than polystyrene.  Some of the other plastic films are
pretty good also but polypropylene is the most common high performance
option.  Teflon is the best but is also expensive and has poor
availablity.

Polyphenyle sulfide (PPS) seems to be the new kid on the block
with quite good performance values (dielectric absorbtion, moisture
and temperature dependence) and quite readily available.

As with all film capacitors: be carefull and quick when handsoldering.

		Attila Kinali

I don't know; the datasheets I checked for PPS capacitors did not list
dielectric absorption other than "low", which is always worrying, and
specified 1/2 to 1/3rd the insulation resistance of polypropylene.

In practice practically nobody is going to specify capacitors for
applications like this so the only way to really know is to test and
grade them yourself.  This is what I have always ended up doing in the
past; the datasheets were just a starting point for finding suitable
candidates.

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:11:24 +0100, you wrote: >On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:44:18 -0500 >David <davidwhess@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Charles pretty much covered it but I am not sure that polypropylene is >> always worse than polystyrene. Some of the other plastic films are >> pretty good also but polypropylene is the most common high performance >> option. Teflon is the best but is also expensive and has poor >> availablity. > >Polyphenyle sulfide (PPS) seems to be the new kid on the block >with quite good performance values (dielectric absorbtion, moisture >and temperature dependence) and quite readily available. > >As with all film capacitors: be carefull and quick when handsoldering. > > Attila Kinali I don't know; the datasheets I checked for PPS capacitors did not list dielectric absorption other than "low", which is always worrying, and specified 1/2 to 1/3rd the insulation resistance of polypropylene. In practice practically nobody is going to specify capacitors for applications like this so the only way to really know is to test and grade them yourself. This is what I have always ended up doing in the past; the datasheets were just a starting point for finding suitable candidates.
OE
Orin Eman
Wed, Nov 2, 2016 4:33 PM

The Russian K72P teflon capacitors on ebay are really good and not
expensive.  They are however, huge!

I was investigating replacing the integration capacitor in an HP 3455A (it
is responsible for the +/- 2 digit jitter in auto-cal mode).  I have now
replaced the original polypro 82nF with two K72P 39nF in parallel and the
reduce the jitter to less than one digit.  Unfortunately, physically, the
K72Ps don't fit and dangle over the edge of the AtoD board.  The 82nF K72P
I tried was worse!

I built Bob Pease's dielectric absorption circuit and tested several
capacitors.  More details here:

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/hp-3455a-last-digit-jitter-in-hi-res-auto-cal-mode/

There are a couple of oscilloscope screenshots of the absorption of the
original capacitor and the K72P.  I've not found anything better than the
original capacitor other than the K72Ps and I've tried polypro,
polystyrene, C0G etc..

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dk
wrote:


In message f3847ee8-a5ec-099c-91b1-d7c0b17599d4@mounty.de, Andreas
Bergmann writes:

On 02.11.2016 14:44, David wrote:

Teflon is the best but is also expensive and has poor
availablity.

Quick check on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/bhp/teflon-capacitor

One pair for $150.-? wohooo ....
Is this a part of the audiophoolery community?

Yes, they are very much in demand for audiohomoepathy, up to the
point where people actually roll their own.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The Russian K72P teflon capacitors on ebay are really good and not expensive. They are however, huge! I was investigating replacing the integration capacitor in an HP 3455A (it is responsible for the +/- 2 digit jitter in auto-cal mode). I have now replaced the original polypro 82nF with two K72P 39nF in parallel and the reduce the jitter to less than one digit. Unfortunately, physically, the K72Ps don't fit and dangle over the edge of the AtoD board. The 82nF K72P I tried was worse! I built Bob Pease's dielectric absorption circuit and tested several capacitors. More details here: http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/hp-3455a-last-digit-jitter-in-hi-res-auto-cal-mode/ There are a couple of oscilloscope screenshots of the absorption of the original capacitor and the K72P. I've not found anything better than the original capacitor other than the K72Ps and I've tried polypro, polystyrene, C0G etc.. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > In message <f3847ee8-a5ec-099c-91b1-d7c0b17599d4@mounty.de>, Andreas > Bergmann writes: > >On 02.11.2016 14:44, David wrote: > >> Teflon is the best but is also expensive and has poor > >> availablity. > > > >Quick check on ebay: > >http://www.ebay.com/bhp/teflon-capacitor > > > >One pair for $150.-? wohooo .... > >Is this a part of the audiophoolery community? > > Yes, they are very much in demand for audiohomoepathy, up to the > point where people actually roll their own. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >