time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Vintage Frequency Measurement

SS
Scott Stobbe
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 1:15 AM

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I think what you would find is that it is a fairly normal AT cut and the
data book
that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
crystal in
the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will
be pretty linear.

Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is
roughly 65 degC.

One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum
tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the
C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic
capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a
one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would
be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). Which is a
convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum
tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency,
I wouldn't think so...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > > > I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and the > data book > that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific > crystal in > the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will > be pretty linear. > Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is roughly 65 degC. One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). Which is a convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency, I wouldn't think so...
SS
Scott Stobbe
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 1:31 AM

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Mike Naruta AA8K aa8k@comcast.net wrote:

Did you see the photos that I uploaded to Mods.DK?  I like that variable
capacitor used for calibration.  Simple, but effective.

I hit the view limit... "You have view 2 pictures today, and can view 0
more pictures day."

The link for the phots is:
http://www.mods.dk/picture.php?brandid=1&model=lampkin_laboratories_/_105-b

The cal capacitor is an absolute jem. Mike's Img is attached.

I would imagine you would need a decently sized pad of paper to keep track
of all the details when measuring an unknown signal.

Just, zero-beat the 50th harmonic of the VFO -- as you do. When measuring
on the low end of the frequency scale its Mth harmonic of the DUT against
the Nth harmonic of the VFO... Plus tempCo.

Were there slide rules, pinwheels, or alternate to make frequencies
measurements a little easier?

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Mike Naruta AA8K <aa8k@comcast.net> wrote: > >> > Did you see the photos that I uploaded to Mods.DK? I like that variable > capacitor used for calibration. Simple, but effective. > I hit the view limit... "You have view 2 pictures today, and can view 0 more pictures day." The link for the phots is: http://www.mods.dk/picture.php?brandid=1&model=lampkin_laboratories_/_105-b The cal capacitor is an absolute jem. Mike's Img is attached. I would imagine you would need a decently sized pad of paper to keep track of all the details when measuring an unknown signal. Just, zero-beat the 50th harmonic of the VFO -- as you do. When measuring on the low end of the frequency scale its Mth harmonic of the DUT against the Nth harmonic of the VFO... Plus tempCo. Were there slide rules, pinwheels, or alternate to make frequencies measurements a little easier?
BC
Bob Camp
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 3:11 AM

Hi

On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com wrote:

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I think what you would find is that it is a fairly normal AT cut and the
data book
that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
crystal in
the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will
be pretty linear.

Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is
roughly 65 degC.

Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM
scale there isn’t much way to be sure.

One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum
tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the
C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic
capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a
one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would
be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ).

Except you do have miller effect which pretty much messes things up
for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues.

Which is a
convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum
tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency,
I wouldn't think so…

Umm… errrr …. check it out :)
Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot
the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a weird
thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with microwave tubes
that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ???  Pretty strange stuff if
you ask me.

The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage.
Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up
oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit equilibrium
before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four).

Bob

<Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi > On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > >> >> >> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and the >> data book >> that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific >> crystal in >> the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will >> be pretty linear. >> > > Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is > roughly 65 degC. Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM scale there isn’t much way to be sure. > > One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum > tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the > C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic > capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a > one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would > be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). Except you *do* have miller effect which pretty much messes things up for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues. > Which is a > convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum > tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency, > I wouldn't think so… Umm… errrr …. check it out :) Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a weird thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with microwave tubes that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ??? Pretty strange stuff if you ask me. The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage. Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit equilibrium before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four). Bob > <Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
AP
Alex Pummer
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 4:19 AM

just be careful, because if you under-heat the cathode you could kill it

73

Alex

On 2/13/2017 7:11 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com wrote:

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I think what you would find is that it is a fairly normal AT cut and the
data book
that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
crystal in
the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will
be pretty linear.

Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is
roughly 65 degC.

Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM
scale there isn’t much way to be sure.

One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum
tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the
C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic
capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a
one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would
be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ).

Except you do have miller effect which pretty much messes things up
for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues.

Which is a
convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum
tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency,
I wouldn't think so…

Umm… errrr …. check it out :)
Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot
the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a weird
thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with microwave tubes
that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ???  Pretty strange stuff if
you ask me.

The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage.
Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up
oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit equilibrium
before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four).

Bob

<Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4756/13950 - Release Date: 02/13/17

just be careful, because if you under-heat the cathode you could kill it 73 Alex On 2/13/2017 7:11 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > >> On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and the >>> data book >>> that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific >>> crystal in >>> the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will >>> be pretty linear. >>> >> Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is >> roughly 65 degC. > Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM > scale there isn’t much way to be sure. > >> One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum >> tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the >> C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic >> capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a >> one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would >> be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). > Except you *do* have miller effect which pretty much messes things up > for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues. > >> Which is a >> convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum >> tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency, >> I wouldn't think so… > Umm… errrr …. check it out :) > Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot > the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a weird > thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with microwave tubes > that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ??? Pretty strange stuff if > you ask me. > > The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage. > Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up > oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit equilibrium > before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four). > > Bob > > > >> <Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>_______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4756/13950 - Release Date: 02/13/17
R
Raj
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 4:23 AM

I have a Marconi T.F. 643 C, in Megacycles !

VHF Absorbtion wave meter. It has an audio out too.

Emacs!

I have a Marconi T.F. 643 C, in Megacycles ! VHF Absorbtion wave meter. It has an audio out too. Emacs!
PV
Peter Vince
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 10:29 AM

On 14 February 2017 at 04:23, Raj vu2zap@gmail.com wrote:

I have a Marconi T.F. 643 C, in Megacycles !

Ah, a sensible, descriptive name for the unit.  Some of these modern units
really do Hert(z) :-)

 Peter
On 14 February 2017 at 04:23, Raj <vu2zap@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a Marconi T.F. 643 C, in Megacycles ! > Ah, a sensible, descriptive name for the unit. Some of these modern units really do Hert(z) :-) Peter
BC
Bob Camp
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 11:45 AM

Hi

That was one of the reasons I was a bit amazed high school students
were doing it as a lab exercise. The presence of high voltage here and
there is something that you simply would not see in a similar school
today …

Bob

On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:19 PM, Alex Pummer alex@pcscons.com wrote:

just be careful, because if you under-heat the cathode you could kill it

73

Alex

On 2/13/2017 7:11 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com wrote:

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I think what you would find is that it is a fairly normal AT cut and the
data book
that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
crystal in
the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will
be pretty linear.

Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is
roughly 65 degC.

Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM
scale there isn’t much way to be sure.

One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum
tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the
C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic
capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a
one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would
be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ).

Except you do have miller effect which pretty much messes things up
for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues.

Which is a
convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum
tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency,
I wouldn't think so…

Umm… errrr …. check it out :)
Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot
the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a weird
thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with microwave tubes
that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ???  Pretty strange stuff if
you ask me.

The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage.
Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up
oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit equilibrium
before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four).

Bob

<Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4756/13950 - Release Date: 02/13/17


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi That was one of the reasons I was a bit amazed high school students were doing it as a lab exercise. The presence of high voltage here and there is something that you simply would not see in a similar school today … Bob > On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:19 PM, Alex Pummer <alex@pcscons.com> wrote: > > just be careful, because if you under-heat the cathode you could kill it > > 73 > > Alex > > > On 2/13/2017 7:11 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> >>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and the >>>> data book >>>> that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific >>>> crystal in >>>> the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot will >>>> be pretty linear. >>>> >>> Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is >>> roughly 65 degC. >> Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM >> scale there isn’t much way to be sure. >> >>> One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum >>> tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have the >>> C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic >>> capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for a >>> one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator would >>> be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). >> Except you *do* have miller effect which pretty much messes things up >> for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues. >> >>> Which is a >>> convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the vacuum >>> tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on frequency, >>> I wouldn't think so… >> Umm… errrr …. check it out :) >> Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot >> the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a weird >> thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with microwave tubes >> that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ??? Pretty strange stuff if >> you ask me. >> >> The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage. >> Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up >> oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit equilibrium >> before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four). >> >> Bob >> >> >> >>> <Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>_______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4756/13950 - Release Date: 02/13/17 > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
SS
Scott Stobbe
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 4:20 PM

Taking a second look in the manual, they specifically call out that its not
an AT or BT, so I'm not sure what it would be.

Interestingly they describe the thermometer as space-saving and trouble
free alternative to a heater and thermostat apparatus (I guess they weren't
called ovens yet?)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com

wrote:

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I think what you would find is that it is a fairly normal AT cut and

the

data book
that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
crystal in
the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot

will

be pretty linear.

Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is
roughly 65 degC.

Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM
scale there isn’t much way to be sure.

One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum
tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have

the

C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic
capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for

a

one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator

would

be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ).

Except you do have miller effect which pretty much messes things up
for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues.

Which is a
convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the

vacuum

tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on

frequency,

I wouldn't think so…

Umm… errrr …. check it out :)
Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot
the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a
weird
thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with
microwave tubes
that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ???  Pretty strange
stuff if
you ask me.

The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage.
Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up
oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit
equilibrium
before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four).

Bob

<Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>______________________________


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/

mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Taking a second look in the manual, they specifically call out that its not an AT or BT, so I'm not sure what it would be. Interestingly they describe the thermometer as space-saving and trouble free alternative to a heater and thermostat apparatus (I guess they weren't called ovens yet?) On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > Hi > > > > On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and > the > >> data book > >> that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific > >> crystal in > >> the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot > will > >> be pretty linear. > >> > > > > Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is > > roughly 65 degC. > > Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM > scale there isn’t much way to be sure. > > > > > One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum > > tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have > the > > C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic > > capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for > a > > one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator > would > > be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). > > Except you *do* have miller effect which pretty much messes things up > for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues. > > > Which is a > > convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the > vacuum > > tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on > frequency, > > I wouldn't think so… > > Umm… errrr …. check it out :) > Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot > the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a > weird > thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with > microwave tubes > that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ??? Pretty strange > stuff if > you ask me. > > The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage. > Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up > oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit > equilibrium > before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four). > > Bob > > > > > <Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>______________________________ > _________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Tue, Feb 14, 2017 6:51 PM

HI

What frequency is the crystal and what sized package is it in?

Bob

On Feb 14, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com wrote:

Taking a second look in the manual, they specifically call out that its not
an AT or BT, so I'm not sure what it would be.

Interestingly they describe the thermometer as space-saving and trouble
free alternative to a heater and thermostat apparatus (I guess they weren't
called ovens yet?)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com

wrote:

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I think what you would find is that it is a fairly normal AT cut and

the

data book
that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific
crystal in
the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot

will

be pretty linear.

Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is
roughly 65 degC.

Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM
scale there isn’t much way to be sure.

One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum
tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have

the

C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic
capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for

a

one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator

would

be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ).

Except you do have miller effect which pretty much messes things up
for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues.

Which is a
convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the

vacuum

tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on

frequency,

I wouldn't think so…

Umm… errrr …. check it out :)
Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot
the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a
weird
thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with
microwave tubes
that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ???  Pretty strange
stuff if
you ask me.

The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage.
Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up
oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit
equilibrium
before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four).

Bob

<Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>______________________________


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/

mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

<Lampkin105_CrystalText.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

HI What frequency is the crystal and what sized package is it in? Bob > On Feb 14, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> wrote: > > Taking a second look in the manual, they specifically call out that its not > an AT or BT, so I'm not sure what it would be. > > Interestingly they describe the thermometer as space-saving and trouble > free alternative to a heater and thermostat apparatus (I guess they weren't > called ovens yet?) > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think what you would find is that it *is* a fairly normal AT cut and >> the >>>> data book >>>> that came with the instrument plotted out the data for the specific >>>> crystal in >>>> the device. The usable temperature range was fairly small, so the plot >> will >>>> be pretty linear. >>>> >>> >>> Attached is a plot of crystal calibrators temperature stability. Span is >>> roughly 65 degC. >> >> Which eyeballs out to be pretty close to an AT. Without knowing the PPM >> scale there isn’t much way to be sure. >> >>> >>> One of the other aspects I think is intriguing is the DC PSRR of a vacuum >>> tube crystal oscillator. In the case of a bjt based oscillator you have >> the >>> C-V relation for depletion capacitance and the base-emitter dynamic >>> capacitance as a function of collector current. I would suspect that for >> a >>> one active device oscillator, tube vs bjt, a tube crystal oscillator >> would >>> be less sensitive to small power supply variations (+- 10% ). >> >> Except you *do* have miller effect which pretty much messes things up >> for a triode. A pentode is a bit less sensitive, but you still have issues. >> >>> Which is a >>> convenient attribute for a poorly/unregulated battery supply in the >> vacuum >>> tube case. Unless filament current has an appreciable impact on >> frequency, >>> I wouldn't think so… >> >> Umm… errrr …. check it out :) >> Oddly enough, I remember a high school physics lab where they had us plot >> the effect of filament voltage on plate current and gain. Seemed like a >> weird >> thing to do to me at the time. Turns out the teacher grew up with >> microwave tubes >> that were tuned by varying the filament. Who knew ??? Pretty strange >> stuff if >> you ask me. >> >> The bigger issue is the tubes get hot. The heat varies with supply voltage. >> Temperature change is the result. That temperature change messes up >> oscillator stability. You pretty much have to wait for things to hit >> equilibrium >> before you do useful stuff ( = let it warm up for an hour or four). >> >> Bob >> >> >> >>> <Lampkin105_CrystalTempCo.png>______________________________ >> _________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > <Lampkin105_CrystalText.png>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
RA
Robert Atkinson
Wed, Feb 15, 2017 7:28 AM

Hi,Sorry if I caused confusion by calling the SCR/BC221 a wavemeter. Clearly it's not in the wider usage of the term, and the manual and front panel call it a frequency meter. However the similar British device was called a wavemeter "Wavemeter Class D" http://www.vmarsmanuals.co.uk/archive/724_Wavemeter_Class_D_No2_Working_Instructions.pdfSo here in the UK the 221 was often also called a wavemeter. Classic wavemeters were also available for example the Marconi TF975.
Robert G8RPI.

  From: Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org>

To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2017, 23:46
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement

Hi

With a VFO running, you have a heterodyne frequency meter. That is (at least to me)
a very different device than an absorption wave meter. I know way to put power into
a BC-221 and use it as an absorption device.

I’m not in any way saying that the LM or the 221 are less useful. They are still to this day
great little boxes. The just aren’t (by my understanding) wave meters. That term describes
a different device that works a different way.

Bob

On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:52 PM, John Miles john@miles.io wrote:

Hi,Sorry if I caused confusion by calling the SCR/BC221 a wavemeter. Clearly it's not in the wider usage of the term, and the manual and front panel call it a frequency meter. However the similar British device was called a wavemeter "Wavemeter Class D" http://www.vmarsmanuals.co.uk/archive/724_Wavemeter_Class_D_No2_Working_Instructions.pdfSo here in the UK the 221 was often also called a wavemeter. Classic wavemeters were also available for example the Marconi TF975. Robert G8RPI. From: Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2017, 23:46 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement Hi With a VFO running, you have a heterodyne frequency meter. That is (at least to me) a very different device than an absorption wave meter. I know way to put power into a BC-221 and use it as an absorption device. I’m not in any way saying that the LM or the 221 are less useful. They are still to this day great little boxes. The just aren’t (by my understanding) wave meters. That term describes a different device that works a different way. Bob > On Feb 13, 2017, at 5:52 PM, John Miles <john@miles.io> wrote: >