BC
Brooke Clarke
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 2:13 AM
Hi:
When listening to a broadcast station using an analog receiver you just tune back and forth near the station frequency
until you hear it, but that does not work for military radios where most of the time there is no transmission. Hence
the need for frequency or wavemeters like the BC-221 and the LM series to set them on the assigned frequency. The
calibration books for these meters were machine generated for each serial number unit. This was long before computers.
The later FR-149B/USM-159A Frequency Meter uses a long 35mm film strip and an optical readout to get the 0.01% accuracy,
and again is custom made for each serial number meter. But the need for them has almost gone away with the advent of
synthesized radios. But there must still be some analog radios in use since the manual for mine has a date of March
2006. Note they are accurate signal generators (to set receivers) and have a hetrodyne capability to set transmitters.
http://www.prc68.com/I/USM159.html
When working at a microwave company we used cavity wavemeters where at resonance there was a suck out.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
-------- Original Message --------
In a word,Wavemeters. Classic US onwas the BC221 with built in 100kHz crystal calibrator
http://radionerds.com/index.php/BC-221
British was the "Class D"http://www.royalsignals.org.uk/photos/classDno1.htm
For UHF and Microwave it was Lecher lines or cavity wavemeters.
Robert G8RPI.
From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017, 6:08
Subject: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement
I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
how frequency measurement was done before counters.
Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one approach.
Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi:
When listening to a broadcast station using an analog receiver you just tune back and forth near the station frequency
until you hear it, but that does not work for military radios where most of the time there is no transmission. Hence
the need for frequency or wavemeters like the BC-221 and the LM series to set them on the assigned frequency. The
calibration books for these meters were machine generated for each serial number unit. This was long before computers.
The later FR-149B/USM-159A Frequency Meter uses a long 35mm film strip and an optical readout to get the 0.01% accuracy,
and again is custom made for each serial number meter. But the need for them has almost gone away with the advent of
synthesized radios. But there must still be some analog radios in use since the manual for mine has a date of March
2006. Note they are accurate signal generators (to set receivers) and have a hetrodyne capability to set transmitters.
http://www.prc68.com/I/USM159.html
When working at a microwave company we used cavity wavemeters where at resonance there was a suck out.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
-------- Original Message --------
> In a word,Wavemeters. Classic US onwas the BC221 with built in 100kHz crystal calibrator
> http://radionerds.com/index.php/BC-221
> British was the "Class D"http://www.royalsignals.org.uk/photos/classDno1.htm
>
> For UHF and Microwave it was Lecher lines or cavity wavemeters.
> Robert G8RPI.
>
>
> From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com>
> Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017, 6:08
> Subject: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement
>
> I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
> how frequency measurement was done before counters.
>
> Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one approach.
>
> Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
AH
Alan Hochhalter
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 2:13 AM
I have a General Radio Type CAG-60098-A Precision Wave Meter made for Navy
Department - Bureau of Ships according to the nameplate. According to
Wikipedia that would date it between 1940 (when bureau of ships was
created) and 1966 (when abolished). It has an inductor in sort of a
"hockey puck" labeled 16-50 kc that plugs into a socket on the front panel.
Inside is a very nicely made variable capacitor with a vernier drive. It
has been a while since I had it apart, but there is a diode in series with
the meter and not much else as I recall. The meter scale is 0-200
(microamp?) and the capacitor scale is 0-75 with no other marking. I have
no manual, but I assume there were other inductors for different frequency
ranges with a calibration chart to interpret the 0-75 reading. It must
have been made to test transmitters by tuning for peak reading on the meter
and determining the frequency from the dial reading.
a different Alan (KE7AXC)
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Alan Melia alan.melia@btinternet.com
wrote:
Hi Dan yes that is 5e-6 about all an unstabilised (temp) AT could hold for
any period. I guess there were no WWV or MSF signals around then. When a
good source was available off-air it was possible to do better than that.
In service it was probably "dont waste time trying to better the minimum
requirement. The transmitter you are looking for wont be that accurate or
stable"
In 1960s I saw several BC-221s in the racks at the Rugby LF and HF
stations acting as standby frequency sources (VFO) for rapidly running up a
transmitter on an unusual frequency (not a normal route) for which they did
not have a crystal available.
Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Rae" danrae@verizon.net
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement
To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
Things have come a ways since!
Dan
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I have a General Radio Type CAG-60098-A Precision Wave Meter made for Navy
Department - Bureau of Ships according to the nameplate. According to
Wikipedia that would date it between 1940 (when bureau of ships was
created) and 1966 (when abolished). It has an inductor in sort of a
"hockey puck" labeled 16-50 kc that plugs into a socket on the front panel.
Inside is a very nicely made variable capacitor with a vernier drive. It
has been a while since I had it apart, but there is a diode in series with
the meter and not much else as I recall. The meter scale is 0-200
(microamp?) and the capacitor scale is 0-75 with no other marking. I have
no manual, but I assume there were other inductors for different frequency
ranges with a calibration chart to interpret the 0-75 reading. It must
have been made to test transmitters by tuning for peak reading on the meter
and determining the frequency from the dial reading.
a different Alan (KE7AXC)
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> Hi Dan yes that is 5e-6 about all an unstabilised (temp) AT could hold for
> any period. I guess there were no WWV or MSF signals around then. When a
> good source was available off-air it was possible to do better than that.
> In service it was probably "dont waste time trying to better the minimum
> requirement. The transmitter you are looking for wont be that accurate or
> stable"
>
> In 1960s I saw several BC-221s in the racks at the Rugby LF and HF
> stations acting as standby frequency sources (VFO) for rapidly running up a
> transmitter on an unusual frequency (not a normal route) for which they did
> not have a crystal available.
>
> Alan
> G3NYK
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Rae" <danrae@verizon.net>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
> time-nuts@febo.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 11:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement
>
>
> To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
>> adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
>>
>> Things have come a ways since!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
DD
Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 2:19 AM
I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
how frequency measurement was done before counters.
Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one approach.
Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
How about the diffraction grating? Natural ones have probably existed
billions of years, but they were made by man in the 18th century. These are
still in use today in instruments like optical spectrum analyzers.
The wavemeter must have been around a long time too. These are still used
at THz wavelengths.
Dave.
On 12 February 2017 at 06:08, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
> how frequency measurement was done before counters.
>
> Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one approach.
>
> Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
>
How about the diffraction grating? Natural ones have probably existed
billions of years, but they were made by man in the 18th century. These are
still in use today in instruments like optical spectrum analyzers.
The wavemeter must have been around a long time too. These are still used
at THz wavelengths.
Dave.
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 2:26 AM
Hi
Ok, so how does that make a BC-221 a wave meter?
Bob
On Feb 12, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Wes wes@triconet.org wrote:
On 2/12/2017 12:51 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
Maybe I’ve been wrong for the last many decades …
To me a wave meter is a tuned circuit device that tells you the frequency by a resonance
peak. They are a very common old school item for microwave frequency measurement in
a teaching setting.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/wavemeter
Bob
As I said before, there were cavity wavemeters used in industry. I've attached a couple of pictures that show some in action. In both photos I (with the tie) and my partner are working on a prototype IMPATT diode power amplifier for the AIM-54C Phoenix Missile. This used 16 matched IMPATT diodes in an X-band cavity. At this point it is actually a free-running, pulsed oscillator. In the final usage it was injection locked to a three diode oscillator which in turn was driven by a single diode that was locked to a GUNN oscillator. These were all connected via a five-port circulator. The GUNN was phase locked to VCXOs at about 100 MHz, multiplied 96 times to X-Band.
Since this was free-running the frequency measurement accuracy of a cavity wavemeter was adequate. In photo 2 the wavemeter is the grey cylinder with the black top just in front of the lab notebook. In operation it was tuned and caused an amplitude notch that was detected with a waveguide-mounted diode.
In the other photo there is another wavemeter on the test station behind me among some waveguide attenuators and phase shifters. Maybe of interest to frequency nuts is the transmitter-receiver unit from the production AIM-54A missile. It is just "above" the bend of my elbow. There were seven, pie shaped VCXO circuit cards in a temperature-controlled chassis. Maintaining frequency accuracy under launch shock and the vibration from hanging on the wing of an F14 at Mach 2 was lots of fun.
Wes
<Wes_Roy_Hughes_2.jpg><Wes_Roy_Hughes_1.jpg>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Ok, so how does that make a BC-221 a wave meter?
Bob
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Wes <wes@triconet.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/12/2017 12:51 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Maybe I’ve been wrong for the last many decades …
>>
>> To me a wave meter is a tuned circuit device that tells you the frequency by a resonance
>> peak. They are a very common old school item for microwave frequency measurement in
>> a teaching setting.
>>
>> https://www.britannica.com/technology/wavemeter
>>
>> Bob
>>
> As I said before, there were cavity wavemeters used in industry. I've attached a couple of pictures that show some in action. In both photos I (with the tie) and my partner are working on a prototype IMPATT diode power amplifier for the AIM-54C Phoenix Missile. This used 16 matched IMPATT diodes in an X-band cavity. At this point it is actually a free-running, pulsed oscillator. In the final usage it was injection locked to a three diode oscillator which in turn was driven by a single diode that was locked to a GUNN oscillator. These were all connected via a five-port circulator. The GUNN was phase locked to VCXOs at about 100 MHz, multiplied 96 times to X-Band.
>
> Since this was free-running the frequency measurement accuracy of a cavity wavemeter was adequate. In photo 2 the wavemeter is the grey cylinder with the black top just in front of the lab notebook. In operation it was tuned and caused an amplitude notch that was detected with a waveguide-mounted diode.
>
> In the other photo there is another wavemeter on the test station behind me among some waveguide attenuators and phase shifters. Maybe of interest to frequency nuts is the transmitter-receiver unit from the production AIM-54A missile. It is just "above" the bend of my elbow. There were seven, pie shaped VCXO circuit cards in a temperature-controlled chassis. Maintaining frequency accuracy under launch shock and the vibration from hanging on the wing of an F14 at Mach 2 was lots of fun.
>
> Wes
> <Wes_Roy_Hughes_2.jpg><Wes_Roy_Hughes_1.jpg>_______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 2:31 AM
Hi
If you look at a typical BC-221 in use, it goes from “calibrated” in a nice warm hut to the back
of a jeep. It heads out to an ice cold flight line and the switch turns the batteries back on again.
It bumps in and out of a batch of B-17’s setting each one up for the day’s net frequencies. You
would be doing very well to hold 50 ppm under those circumstances. That was indeed adequate
for the purpose.
Bob
On Feb 12, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
Well 5 cycles per second is more than accurate enough. That translates to a 150 Hz error at 30 MHz, definitely negligible for the uses of all these gear. There was no official Time Nuts group at the time, although many of us had the spirit. Yet the capability of the BC-221 far exceeded its specification if you could receive WWV.
I noted immediately that zero beat of WWV at 5 MHz was not as precise as at 15 MHz. In those days there was even a 30 MHz WWV but it got shut down a long time ago. And there were CHU and JJY.
Bob
On Sunday, February 12, 2017 4:02 PM, Dan Rae <danrae@verizon.net> wrote:
To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
Things have come a ways since!
Dan
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
If you look at a typical BC-221 in use, it goes from “calibrated” in a nice warm hut to the back
of a jeep. It heads out to an ice cold flight line and the switch turns the batteries back on again.
It bumps in and out of a batch of B-17’s setting each one up for the day’s net frequencies. You
would be doing very well to hold 50 ppm under those circumstances. That was indeed adequate
for the purpose.
Bob
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
>
> Well 5 cycles per second is more than accurate enough. That translates to a 150 Hz error at 30 MHz, definitely negligible for the uses of all these gear. There was no official Time Nuts group at the time, although many of us had the spirit. Yet the capability of the BC-221 far exceeded its specification if you could receive WWV.
>
> I noted immediately that zero beat of WWV at 5 MHz was not as precise as at 15 MHz. In those days there was even a 30 MHz WWV but it got shut down a long time ago. And there were CHU and JJY.
>
> Bob
>
>
> On Sunday, February 12, 2017 4:02 PM, Dan Rae <danrae@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
> adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
>
> Things have come a ways since!
>
> Dan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 3:08 AM
Hi
The GR is a classical wave meter that works off of a tuned circuit and a broadband
detector. The BC-221 works on an entirely different principle and has no ability at all
to run in the mode that the GR operates in.
Bob
On Feb 12, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Alan Hochhalter alanh137@gmail.com wrote:
I have a General Radio Type CAG-60098-A Precision Wave Meter made for Navy
Department - Bureau of Ships according to the nameplate. According to
Wikipedia that would date it between 1940 (when bureau of ships was
created) and 1966 (when abolished). It has an inductor in sort of a
"hockey puck" labeled 16-50 kc that plugs into a socket on the front panel.
Inside is a very nicely made variable capacitor with a vernier drive. It
has been a while since I had it apart, but there is a diode in series with
the meter and not much else as I recall. The meter scale is 0-200
(microamp?) and the capacitor scale is 0-75 with no other marking. I have
no manual, but I assume there were other inductors for different frequency
ranges with a calibration chart to interpret the 0-75 reading. It must
have been made to test transmitters by tuning for peak reading on the meter
and determining the frequency from the dial reading.
a different Alan (KE7AXC)
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Alan Melia alan.melia@btinternet.com
wrote:
Hi Dan yes that is 5e-6 about all an unstabilised (temp) AT could hold for
any period. I guess there were no WWV or MSF signals around then. When a
good source was available off-air it was possible to do better than that.
In service it was probably "dont waste time trying to better the minimum
requirement. The transmitter you are looking for wont be that accurate or
stable"
In 1960s I saw several BC-221s in the racks at the Rugby LF and HF
stations acting as standby frequency sources (VFO) for rapidly running up a
transmitter on an unusual frequency (not a normal route) for which they did
not have a crystal available.
Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Rae" danrae@verizon.net
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement
To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
Things have come a ways since!
Dan
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
The GR is a classical wave meter that works off of a tuned circuit and a broadband
detector. The BC-221 works on an entirely different principle and has no ability at all
to run in the mode that the GR operates in.
Bob
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Alan Hochhalter <alanh137@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a General Radio Type CAG-60098-A Precision Wave Meter made for Navy
> Department - Bureau of Ships according to the nameplate. According to
> Wikipedia that would date it between 1940 (when bureau of ships was
> created) and 1966 (when abolished). It has an inductor in sort of a
> "hockey puck" labeled 16-50 kc that plugs into a socket on the front panel.
> Inside is a very nicely made variable capacitor with a vernier drive. It
> has been a while since I had it apart, but there is a diode in series with
> the meter and not much else as I recall. The meter scale is 0-200
> (microamp?) and the capacitor scale is 0-75 with no other marking. I have
> no manual, but I assume there were other inductors for different frequency
> ranges with a calibration chart to interpret the 0-75 reading. It must
> have been made to test transmitters by tuning for peak reading on the meter
> and determining the frequency from the dial reading.
>
> a different Alan (KE7AXC)
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan yes that is 5e-6 about all an unstabilised (temp) AT could hold for
>> any period. I guess there were no WWV or MSF signals around then. When a
>> good source was available off-air it was possible to do better than that.
>> In service it was probably "dont waste time trying to better the minimum
>> requirement. The transmitter you are looking for wont be that accurate or
>> stable"
>>
>> In 1960s I saw several BC-221s in the racks at the Rugby LF and HF
>> stations acting as standby frequency sources (VFO) for rapidly running up a
>> transmitter on an unusual frequency (not a normal route) for which they did
>> not have a crystal available.
>>
>> Alan
>> G3NYK
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Rae" <danrae@verizon.net>
>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
>> time-nuts@febo.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 11:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vintage Frequency Measurement
>>
>>
>> To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
>>> adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
>>>
>>> Things have come a ways since!
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
BB
Bill Byrom
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 4:02 AM
The BC-221 was mentioned in a Time-Nuts thread from December, 2015.
Copying from my post in that old thread:
Back in the early 1970's I took my BC-221 and added a TTL divide by
1,000 (or 2,000 or 4,000 or 8,000) external circuit to generate very
precise audio test tones from the RF oscillator. The BC-221 had two
output frequency ranges: LOW: 125 to 250 kHz HIGH: 2 to 4 MHz By using
the appropriate range and divide ratio I could generate 15.625 Hz to 4
kHz (and multiples) with very smooth continuous tuning and great
accuracy (typically better than 0.005%). This was very useful for
adjusting and measuring audio filters and circuits, such as 2125/2295
Hz AFSK terminal units I was using on 2 Meter AM and with SSB rigs for
HF FSK. I could tune up my filters built with 88 mH telephone surplus
toroidial inductors. I could also use the audio source to compare by
ear the beat note between harmonics of my divided-down 5 MHz commercial
surplus precision oven oscillator and RF signals (such as during the
ARRL Frequency Measuring Test). The anti-backlash gear mechanism,
large dial with high resolution interpolation scale, and well-built
variable capacitor were difficult to find in other commonly available
radio related equipment. In my opinion the BC-221 was a technically
beautiful precision instrument. It was the time-nuts tool of choice for
several decades!
Bill Byrom N5BB
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017, at 08:31 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
If you look at a typical BC-221 in use, it goes from “calibrated” in a
nice warm hut to the back
of a jeep. It heads out to an ice cold flight line and the
switch turns
the batteries back on again.
It bumps in and out of a batch of B-17’s setting each one up for the
day’s net frequencies. You
would be doing very well to hold 50 ppm under those
circumstances. That
was indeed adequate
On Feb 12, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts <time-
nuts@febo.com> wrote:
Well 5 cycles per second is more than accurate enough. That
translates to a 150 Hz error at 30 MHz, definitely negligible for the
uses of all these gear. There was no official Time Nuts group at the
time, although many of us had the spirit. Yet the capability of the
BC-221 far exceeded its specification if you could receive WWV.
I noted immediately that zero beat of WWV at 5 MHz was not as precise
as at 15 MHz. In those days there was even a 30 MHz WWV but it got
shut down a long time ago. And there were CHU and JJY.
To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
Things have come a ways since!
and follow the instructions there.
The BC-221 was mentioned in a Time-Nuts thread from December, 2015.
Copying from my post in that old thread:
Back in the early 1970's I took my BC-221 and added a TTL divide by
1,000 (or 2,000 or 4,000 or 8,000) external circuit to generate very
precise audio test tones from the RF oscillator. The BC-221 had two
output frequency ranges: LOW: 125 to 250 kHz HIGH: 2 to 4 MHz By using
the appropriate range and divide ratio I could generate 15.625 Hz to 4
kHz (and multiples) with very smooth continuous tuning and great
accuracy (typically better than 0.005%). This was very useful for
adjusting and measuring audio filters and circuits, such as 2125/2295
Hz AFSK terminal units I was using on 2 Meter AM and with SSB rigs for
HF FSK. I could tune up my filters built with 88 mH telephone surplus
toroidial inductors. I could also use the audio source to compare by
ear the beat note between harmonics of my divided-down 5 MHz commercial
surplus precision oven oscillator and RF signals (such as during the
ARRL Frequency Measuring Test). The anti-backlash gear mechanism,
large dial with high resolution interpolation scale, and well-built
variable capacitor were difficult to find in other commonly available
radio related equipment. In my opinion the BC-221 was a technically
beautiful precision instrument. It was the time-nuts tool of choice for
several decades!
--
Bill Byrom N5BB
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017, at 08:31 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you look at a typical BC-221 in use, it goes from “calibrated” in a
> nice warm hut to the back
> of a jeep. It heads out to an ice cold flight line and the
> switch turns
> the batteries back on again.
> It bumps in and out of a batch of B-17’s setting each one up for the
> day’s net frequencies. You
> would be doing very well to hold 50 ppm under those
> circumstances. That
> was indeed adequate
> for the purpose.
>
> Bob
>
>
>> On Feb 12, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts <time-
>> nuts@febo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well 5 cycles per second is more than accurate enough. That
>> translates to a 150 Hz error at 30 MHz, definitely negligible for the
>> uses of all these gear. There was no official Time Nuts group at the
>> time, although many of us had the spirit. Yet the capability of the
>> BC-221 far exceeded its specification if you could receive WWV.
>>
>> I noted immediately that zero beat of WWV at 5 MHz was not as precise
>> as at 15 MHz. In those days there was even a 30 MHz WWV but it got
>> shut down a long time ago. And there were CHU and JJY.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, February 12, 2017 4:02 PM, Dan Rae <danrae@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> To put BC-221 things in perspective, the 1 Mc/s reference crystal was
>> adjusted, according to the manual, to within 5 c/s...
>>
>> Things have come a ways since!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _________________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
W
Wes
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 5:10 AM
This reminds me.
Many years ago the Titan Missile sites around here in Tucson were being
decommissioned. The people at Davis Monthan AFB who maintained them were going
to be out of work but had an opportunity to bump into something else on base if
they got some more training. I and a coworker, who had quit a tenured position
at the U of A, were both teaching part time at the local Jr college. The AF
approached the college to request a class be developed to help their people
prepare for the new work. The college in turn approached my PhD friend. He was
happy to do the lecture part of a course but wanted nothing to do with teaching
lab work. He asked me to share the job with him.
I don't remember all of the particulars but I do remember that after each lab
session the AF folks removed all of the lab gear from the work benches and
locked it away in storage cabinets before wiping down the benches and mopping
the floors. This included unplugging an HP-5245L and tucking it away. I
admonished them about this practice and actually taught them about crystal
aging, etc and the need for time for stabilization. This was years before GPS.
I had one woman Sgt confess to me that when she went to a silo to check some
frequency or the other, she was supposed to use a piece of equipment that took
hours to stabilize. From the sound of it it was some WWVB phase comparison
equipment. Instead of this process, she grabbed the frequency counter from the
lab, threw it in the PU and hauled it 50 miles to the missile site, plugged it
in and tweaked the widget using the counter. I had visions of a Titan Missile
targeted to hit Vladivostok landing on Tokyo instead.
Wes Stewart
2/12/2017 7:31 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
If you look at a typical BC-221 in use, it goes from “calibrated” in a nice warm hut to the back
of a jeep. It heads out to an ice cold flight line and the switch turns the batteries back on again.
It bumps in and out of a batch of B-17’s setting each one up for the day’s net frequencies. You
would be doing very well to hold 50 ppm under those circumstances. That was indeed adequate
for the purpose.
Bob
This reminds me.
Many years ago the Titan Missile sites around here in Tucson were being
decommissioned. The people at Davis Monthan AFB who maintained them were going
to be out of work but had an opportunity to bump into something else on base if
they got some more training. I and a coworker, who had quit a tenured position
at the U of A, were both teaching part time at the local Jr college. The AF
approached the college to request a class be developed to help their people
prepare for the new work. The college in turn approached my PhD friend. He was
happy to do the lecture part of a course but wanted nothing to do with teaching
lab work. He asked me to share the job with him.
I don't remember all of the particulars but I do remember that after each lab
session the AF folks removed all of the lab gear from the work benches and
locked it away in storage cabinets before wiping down the benches and mopping
the floors. This included unplugging an HP-5245L and tucking it away. I
admonished them about this practice and actually taught them about crystal
aging, etc and the need for time for stabilization. This was years before GPS.
I had one woman Sgt confess to me that when she went to a silo to check some
frequency or the other, she was supposed to use a piece of equipment that took
hours to stabilize. From the sound of it it was some WWVB phase comparison
equipment. Instead of this process, she grabbed the frequency counter from the
lab, threw it in the PU and hauled it 50 miles to the missile site, plugged it
in and tweaked the widget using the counter. I had visions of a Titan Missile
targeted to hit Vladivostok landing on Tokyo instead.
Wes Stewart
2/12/2017 7:31 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you look at a typical BC-221 in use, it goes from “calibrated” in a nice warm hut to the back
> of a jeep. It heads out to an ice cold flight line and the switch turns the batteries back on again.
> It bumps in and out of a batch of B-17’s setting each one up for the day’s net frequencies. You
> would be doing very well to hold 50 ppm under those circumstances. That was indeed adequate
> for the purpose.
>
> Bob
>
MN
Mike Naruta AA8K
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 5:24 AM
On 02/12/2017 01:08 AM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
how frequency measurement was done before counters.
Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one approach.
Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
Hi Scott. That Lampkin 105 is a sophisticated design. I did
some research that you might be interested:
For the 2015 November ARRL Frequency Measuring Test, I fired up
my old Lampkin frequency meter. For their 100th Anniversary,
QST was encouraging the use of “vintage” equipment for the FMT,
and the Lampkin was designed in the 1930s.
I (AA8K) did surprisingly well, coming within 322 Hertz on 40
meters, 202 Hertz on 80 meters, and 18 Hertz on 160 meters.
The Lampkin 105-B was designed by Guy Forest Lampkin BSEE, who
got his first ham license in 1924. In 1933 he was selling the
model 102, that was checked with the Federal Radio Commission
and commercial laboratories to be within 3 to 15 cycles at 1,712
kc. He was also selling a “foundation unit” of the Precision
Micrometer, Band Spread condenser, Special Isolantite coil form,
Temperature compensator, Adjustable pad condenser, and complete
circuit details for $14.50. Lampkin Laboratories moved from 146
West McMillian Street, Cincinnati, Ohio to 8400 Ninth Avenue
N.W., Bradenton, Florida 33506 in 1935. It was incorporated in
1942. Precise Power Corporation had acquired Lampkin
Laboratories in 1971/Oct. At that time Lampkin Labs had 17
employees and wasn't advertising their 107B Digital Frequency
Meter because they were selling as fast as they could make them.
The last known address was 12297 US Highway 41 North,
Palmetto, Florida 34221. Voluntary Dissolution 2007/April/27.
The 105-B is a fascinating design, able to measure frequency to
0.0025%. Signals can be measured from 100 KHz to 175 MHz. It
works similarly to the later World War II BC-221 frequency
meter. It can receive, or transmit the internal oscillator
2330-2670 KHz. A diode generates harmonics that can beat
against the signal to be measured.
The variable condenser has a precision-machined tubular stator
and a tapered, conical rotor. They are made from steel and
brass and copper plated. The parts are proportioned such that,
due to the differential thermal expansion, the temperature
coefficient of capacity is a few parts per million per degree
Celsius at all positions of the rotor. The rotor is moved in
and out of the stator on a micrometer screw. The large dial and
turns counter give a dial band spread of 8,000 divisions over 42
feet! The inductor is wound on a six-ribbed form of
polystyrene. Since the thermal expansion of polystyrene is
greater than copper, as coil temperature increases, the turns
are pulled from circular to hexagonal, and the average diameter
of the coil decreases.
Thermal design is utmost in the Lampkin MFM. In addition to the
L/C circuit, the vacuum tubes and circuitry are mounted on the
rear, with the chassis cut-away to keep it from heating the
front where the L/C and calibration crystal are mounted. Wires
connecting the L/C and crystal are very small diameter to reduce
the thermal path. Even the power transformer is bolted to the
outside of the cabinet. The 7.5 MHz calibration crystal (no
oven) is held against the front panel. There is a glass
thermometer mounted to the front panel. It is custom-marked
with a correction factor for that specific unit. I left the
Lampkin turned on from October, but the temperature soon
stabilized. The metal 6J7 tube has the Bakelite cap removed, to
eliminate changes due to moisture absorption in the Bakelite.
Striking features of the Lampkin are: The very smooth tuning
with almost zero backlash. Turning the dial clockwise lowers
the frequency, but that is because the micrometer screw is a
right-hand thread and moves the rotor into the stator,
increasing capacitance and lowering frequency. Increasing
frequency moves the micrometer post outwards through the center
of the dial, like Pinocchio's nose growing. The outboard
transformer looks clunky at first, until you realize why he did
it.
Modifications. I replaced the 1 ampere line fuse with a 0.5
ampere for additional protection. (I have been wary of
unattended equipment ever since an un-fused Radio Manufacturing
Engineers receiver monitoring RTTY autostart almost burned our
house down in the 1960s.) Measuring frequency requires table
look-ups and correction math. Since I did not have the original
manual with calibration data, and the end-stop was nowhere near
000 on the counter dial, I decided to calibrate it myself. At
the same time, I added ferrite inside the coil to drop the
oscillator frequency down into the 160 meter band. Using my
OpenHPSDR, I calibrated by noting the Lampkin dial reading for
every 100 Hertz on the HPSDR. During the FMT, I used a Collins
75A-4 receiver in AM mode and adjusted the Lampkin 105-B to
zero-beat the signal. Using the Lampkin dial reading and
looking it up in the table, I could interpolate for the
frequency between the two calibration values.
During the test, I noticed that the Lampkin was varying because
the line voltage was changing. The next time I will build the
recommended line voltage regulator using two 0C3 (VR-105) tubes
and a 60 Watt ballast lamp.
I uploaded my mods, photos of the inside, and a scan of the
manual to mods.dk. I tried to ftp and email the manual to
BAMA/eDebris without success.
See attachments
On 02/12/2017 01:08 AM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
> I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
> how frequency measurement was done before counters.
>
> Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one approach.
>
> Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
>
Hi Scott. That Lampkin 105 is a sophisticated design. I did
some research that you might be interested:
For the 2015 November ARRL Frequency Measuring Test, I fired up
my old Lampkin frequency meter. For their 100th Anniversary,
QST was encouraging the use of “vintage” equipment for the FMT,
and the Lampkin was designed in the 1930s.
I (AA8K) did surprisingly well, coming within 322 Hertz on 40
meters, 202 Hertz on 80 meters, and 18 Hertz on 160 meters.
The Lampkin 105-B was designed by Guy Forest Lampkin BSEE, who
got his first ham license in 1924. In 1933 he was selling the
model 102, that was checked with the Federal Radio Commission
and commercial laboratories to be within 3 to 15 cycles at 1,712
kc. He was also selling a “foundation unit” of the Precision
Micrometer, Band Spread condenser, Special Isolantite coil form,
Temperature compensator, Adjustable pad condenser, and complete
circuit details for $14.50. Lampkin Laboratories moved from 146
West McMillian Street, Cincinnati, Ohio to 8400 Ninth Avenue
N.W., Bradenton, Florida 33506 in 1935. It was incorporated in
1942. Precise Power Corporation had acquired Lampkin
Laboratories in 1971/Oct. At that time Lampkin Labs had 17
employees and wasn't advertising their 107B Digital Frequency
Meter because they were selling as fast as they could make them.
The last known address was 12297 US Highway 41 North,
Palmetto, Florida 34221. Voluntary Dissolution 2007/April/27.
The 105-B is a fascinating design, able to measure frequency to
0.0025%. Signals can be measured from 100 KHz to 175 MHz. It
works similarly to the later World War II BC-221 frequency
meter. It can receive, or transmit the internal oscillator
2330-2670 KHz. A diode generates harmonics that can beat
against the signal to be measured.
The variable condenser has a precision-machined tubular stator
and a tapered, conical rotor. They are made from steel and
brass and copper plated. The parts are proportioned such that,
due to the differential thermal expansion, the temperature
coefficient of capacity is a few parts per million per degree
Celsius at all positions of the rotor. The rotor is moved in
and out of the stator on a micrometer screw. The large dial and
turns counter give a dial band spread of 8,000 divisions over 42
feet! The inductor is wound on a six-ribbed form of
polystyrene. Since the thermal expansion of polystyrene is
greater than copper, as coil temperature increases, the turns
are pulled from circular to hexagonal, and the average diameter
of the coil decreases.
Thermal design is utmost in the Lampkin MFM. In addition to the
L/C circuit, the vacuum tubes and circuitry are mounted on the
rear, with the chassis cut-away to keep it from heating the
front where the L/C and calibration crystal are mounted. Wires
connecting the L/C and crystal are very small diameter to reduce
the thermal path. Even the power transformer is bolted to the
outside of the cabinet. The 7.5 MHz calibration crystal (no
oven) is held against the front panel. There is a glass
thermometer mounted to the front panel. It is custom-marked
with a correction factor for that specific unit. I left the
Lampkin turned on from October, but the temperature soon
stabilized. The metal 6J7 tube has the Bakelite cap removed, to
eliminate changes due to moisture absorption in the Bakelite.
Striking features of the Lampkin are: The very smooth tuning
with almost zero backlash. Turning the dial clockwise lowers
the frequency, but that is because the micrometer screw is a
right-hand thread and moves the rotor into the stator,
increasing capacitance and lowering frequency. Increasing
frequency moves the micrometer post outwards through the center
of the dial, like Pinocchio's nose growing. The outboard
transformer looks clunky at first, until you realize why he did
it.
Modifications. I replaced the 1 ampere line fuse with a 0.5
ampere for additional protection. (I have been wary of
unattended equipment ever since an un-fused Radio Manufacturing
Engineers receiver monitoring RTTY autostart almost burned our
house down in the 1960s.) Measuring frequency requires table
look-ups and correction math. Since I did not have the original
manual with calibration data, and the end-stop was nowhere near
000 on the counter dial, I decided to calibrate it myself. At
the same time, I added ferrite inside the coil to drop the
oscillator frequency down into the 160 meter band. Using my
OpenHPSDR, I calibrated by noting the Lampkin dial reading for
every 100 Hertz on the HPSDR. During the FMT, I used a Collins
75A-4 receiver in AM mode and adjusted the Lampkin 105-B to
zero-beat the signal. Using the Lampkin dial reading and
looking it up in the table, I could interpolate for the
frequency between the two calibration values.
During the test, I noticed that the Lampkin was varying because
the line voltage was changing. The next time I will build the
recommended line voltage regulator using two 0C3 (VR-105) tubes
and a 60 Watt ballast lamp.
I uploaded my mods, photos of the inside, and a scan of the
manual to mods.dk. I tried to ftp and email the manual to
BAMA/eDebris without success.
See attachments
SS
Scott Stobbe
Mon, Feb 13, 2017 3:35 PM
Hi Mike,
First of all, Wow what an interesting read, thanks for sharing some of the
history and your experiences with the 105. A second thanks for uploading
the manual, which I found to be a great read, as with most old test &
measurement product manuals, they are far from just marketing fluff.
Bare with me, I'm not well versed in early radio history, but, I also found
it neat they choose to crystal calibrate on the 3rd harmonic of the VFO to
help prevent injection lock and for increased sensitivity (but that may be
true of all frequency meters of the era, don't know).
Based on the manual, the thermometer is thermally mounted to crystal
holder, allowing one to temperature compensate the crystal calibration
point. I didn't see a mention as to what crystal cut they used. I would
guess it is one with a flat tempCo with no turning points for the linear
thermometer scale to be used effectively.
Attached is a plot taken from the manual, the VFO stability strip-chart
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Mike Naruta AA8K aa8k@comcast.net wrote:
On 02/12/2017 01:08 AM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
how frequency measurement was done before counters.
Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one
approach.
Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
Hi Scott. That Lampkin 105 is a sophisticated design. I did some
research that you might be interested:
For the 2015 November ARRL Frequency Measuring Test, I fired up my old
Lampkin frequency meter. For their 100th Anniversary, QST was encouraging
the use of “vintage” equipment for the FMT, and the Lampkin was designed in
the 1930s.
I (AA8K) did surprisingly well, coming within 322 Hertz on 40 meters, 202
Hertz on 80 meters, and 18 Hertz on 160 meters.
The Lampkin 105-B was designed by Guy Forest Lampkin BSEE, who got his
first ham license in 1924. In 1933 he was selling the model 102, that was
checked with the Federal Radio Commission and commercial laboratories to be
within 3 to 15 cycles at 1,712 kc. He was also selling a “foundation unit”
of the Precision Micrometer, Band Spread condenser, Special Isolantite coil
form, Temperature compensator, Adjustable pad condenser, and complete
circuit details for $14.50. Lampkin Laboratories moved from 146 West
McMillian Street, Cincinnati, Ohio to 8400 Ninth Avenue N.W., Bradenton,
Florida 33506 in 1935. It was incorporated in 1942. Precise Power
Corporation had acquired Lampkin Laboratories in 1971/Oct. At that time
Lampkin Labs had 17 employees and wasn't advertising their 107B Digital
Frequency Meter because they were selling as fast as they could make them.
The last known address was 12297 US Highway 41 North, Palmetto, Florida
34221. Voluntary Dissolution 2007/April/27.
The 105-B is a fascinating design, able to measure frequency to 0.0025%.
Signals can be measured from 100 KHz to 175 MHz. It works similarly to
the later World War II BC-221 frequency meter. It can receive, or transmit
the internal oscillator 2330-2670 KHz. A diode generates harmonics that
can beat against the signal to be measured.
The variable condenser has a precision-machined tubular stator and a
tapered, conical rotor. They are made from steel and brass and copper
plated. The parts are proportioned such that, due to the differential
thermal expansion, the temperature coefficient of capacity is a few parts
per million per degree Celsius at all positions of the rotor. The rotor is
moved in and out of the stator on a micrometer screw. The large dial and
turns counter give a dial band spread of 8,000 divisions over 42 feet! The
inductor is wound on a six-ribbed form of polystyrene. Since the thermal
expansion of polystyrene is greater than copper, as coil temperature
increases, the turns are pulled from circular to hexagonal, and the average
diameter of the coil decreases.
Thermal design is utmost in the Lampkin MFM. In addition to the L/C
circuit, the vacuum tubes and circuitry are mounted on the rear, with the
chassis cut-away to keep it from heating the front where the L/C and
calibration crystal are mounted. Wires connecting the L/C and crystal are
very small diameter to reduce the thermal path. Even the power transformer
is bolted to the outside of the cabinet. The 7.5 MHz calibration crystal
(no oven) is held against the front panel. There is a glass thermometer
mounted to the front panel. It is custom-marked with a correction factor
for that specific unit. I left the Lampkin turned on from October, but the
temperature soon stabilized. The metal 6J7 tube has the Bakelite cap
removed, to eliminate changes due to moisture absorption in the Bakelite.
Striking features of the Lampkin are: The very smooth tuning with almost
zero backlash. Turning the dial clockwise lowers the frequency, but that
is because the micrometer screw is a right-hand thread and moves the rotor
into the stator, increasing capacitance and lowering frequency. Increasing
frequency moves the micrometer post outwards through the center of the
dial, like Pinocchio's nose growing. The outboard transformer looks clunky
at first, until you realize why he did it.
Modifications. I replaced the 1 ampere line fuse with a 0.5 ampere for
additional protection. (I have been wary of unattended equipment ever
since an un-fused Radio Manufacturing Engineers receiver monitoring RTTY
autostart almost burned our house down in the 1960s.) Measuring frequency
requires table look-ups and correction math. Since I did not have the
original manual with calibration data, and the end-stop was nowhere near
000 on the counter dial, I decided to calibrate it myself. At the same
time, I added ferrite inside the coil to drop the oscillator frequency down
into the 160 meter band. Using my OpenHPSDR, I calibrated by noting the
Lampkin dial reading for every 100 Hertz on the HPSDR. During the FMT, I
used a Collins 75A-4 receiver in AM mode and adjusted the Lampkin 105-B to
zero-beat the signal. Using the Lampkin dial reading and looking it up in
the table, I could interpolate for the frequency between the two
calibration values.
During the test, I noticed that the Lampkin was varying because the line
voltage was changing. The next time I will build the recommended line
voltage regulator using two 0C3 (VR-105) tubes and a 60 Watt ballast lamp.
I uploaded my mods, photos of the inside, and a scan of the manual to
mods.dk. I tried to ftp and email the manual to BAMA/eDebris without
success.
See attachments
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Mike,
First of all, Wow what an interesting read, thanks for sharing some of the
history and your experiences with the 105. A second thanks for uploading
the manual, which I found to be a great read, as with most old test &
measurement product manuals, they are far from just marketing fluff.
Bare with me, I'm not well versed in early radio history, but, I also found
it neat they choose to crystal calibrate on the 3rd harmonic of the VFO to
help prevent injection lock and for increased sensitivity (but that may be
true of all frequency meters of the era, don't know).
Based on the manual, the thermometer is thermally mounted to crystal
holder, allowing one to temperature compensate the crystal calibration
point. I didn't see a mention as to what crystal cut they used. I would
guess it is one with a flat tempCo with no turning points for the linear
thermometer scale to be used effectively.
Attached is a plot taken from the manual, the VFO stability strip-chart
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Mike Naruta AA8K <aa8k@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2017 01:08 AM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
>
>> I was inspired recently coming across a Lampkin 105 frequency meter, as to
>> how frequency measurement was done before counters.
>>
>> Certainly zero-beating a dial calibrated oscillator, would be one
>> approach.
>>
>> Is there a standout methodology or instrument predating counters?
>>
>>
> Hi Scott. That Lampkin 105 is a sophisticated design. I did some
> research that you might be interested:
>
> For the 2015 November ARRL Frequency Measuring Test, I fired up my old
> Lampkin frequency meter. For their 100th Anniversary, QST was encouraging
> the use of “vintage” equipment for the FMT, and the Lampkin was designed in
> the 1930s.
>
> I (AA8K) did surprisingly well, coming within 322 Hertz on 40 meters, 202
> Hertz on 80 meters, and 18 Hertz on 160 meters.
>
> The Lampkin 105-B was designed by Guy Forest Lampkin BSEE, who got his
> first ham license in 1924. In 1933 he was selling the model 102, that was
> checked with the Federal Radio Commission and commercial laboratories to be
> within 3 to 15 cycles at 1,712 kc. He was also selling a “foundation unit”
> of the Precision Micrometer, Band Spread condenser, Special Isolantite coil
> form, Temperature compensator, Adjustable pad condenser, and complete
> circuit details for $14.50. Lampkin Laboratories moved from 146 West
> McMillian Street, Cincinnati, Ohio to 8400 Ninth Avenue N.W., Bradenton,
> Florida 33506 in 1935. It was incorporated in 1942. Precise Power
> Corporation had acquired Lampkin Laboratories in 1971/Oct. At that time
> Lampkin Labs had 17 employees and wasn't advertising their 107B Digital
> Frequency Meter because they were selling as fast as they could make them.
> The last known address was 12297 US Highway 41 North, Palmetto, Florida
> 34221. Voluntary Dissolution 2007/April/27.
>
> The 105-B is a fascinating design, able to measure frequency to 0.0025%.
> Signals can be measured from 100 KHz to 175 MHz. It works similarly to
> the later World War II BC-221 frequency meter. It can receive, or transmit
> the internal oscillator 2330-2670 KHz. A diode generates harmonics that
> can beat against the signal to be measured.
>
> The variable condenser has a precision-machined tubular stator and a
> tapered, conical rotor. They are made from steel and brass and copper
> plated. The parts are proportioned such that, due to the differential
> thermal expansion, the temperature coefficient of capacity is a few parts
> per million per degree Celsius at all positions of the rotor. The rotor is
> moved in and out of the stator on a micrometer screw. The large dial and
> turns counter give a dial band spread of 8,000 divisions over 42 feet! The
> inductor is wound on a six-ribbed form of polystyrene. Since the thermal
> expansion of polystyrene is greater than copper, as coil temperature
> increases, the turns are pulled from circular to hexagonal, and the average
> diameter of the coil decreases.
>
> Thermal design is utmost in the Lampkin MFM. In addition to the L/C
> circuit, the vacuum tubes and circuitry are mounted on the rear, with the
> chassis cut-away to keep it from heating the front where the L/C and
> calibration crystal are mounted. Wires connecting the L/C and crystal are
> very small diameter to reduce the thermal path. Even the power transformer
> is bolted to the outside of the cabinet. The 7.5 MHz calibration crystal
> (no oven) is held against the front panel. There is a glass thermometer
> mounted to the front panel. It is custom-marked with a correction factor
> for that specific unit. I left the Lampkin turned on from October, but the
> temperature soon stabilized. The metal 6J7 tube has the Bakelite cap
> removed, to eliminate changes due to moisture absorption in the Bakelite.
>
> Striking features of the Lampkin are: The very smooth tuning with almost
> zero backlash. Turning the dial clockwise lowers the frequency, but that
> is because the micrometer screw is a right-hand thread and moves the rotor
> into the stator, increasing capacitance and lowering frequency. Increasing
> frequency moves the micrometer post outwards through the center of the
> dial, like Pinocchio's nose growing. The outboard transformer looks clunky
> at first, until you realize why he did it.
>
> Modifications. I replaced the 1 ampere line fuse with a 0.5 ampere for
> additional protection. (I have been wary of unattended equipment ever
> since an un-fused Radio Manufacturing Engineers receiver monitoring RTTY
> autostart almost burned our house down in the 1960s.) Measuring frequency
> requires table look-ups and correction math. Since I did not have the
> original manual with calibration data, and the end-stop was nowhere near
> 000 on the counter dial, I decided to calibrate it myself. At the same
> time, I added ferrite inside the coil to drop the oscillator frequency down
> into the 160 meter band. Using my OpenHPSDR, I calibrated by noting the
> Lampkin dial reading for every 100 Hertz on the HPSDR. During the FMT, I
> used a Collins 75A-4 receiver in AM mode and adjusted the Lampkin 105-B to
> zero-beat the signal. Using the Lampkin dial reading and looking it up in
> the table, I could interpolate for the frequency between the two
> calibration values.
>
> During the test, I noticed that the Lampkin was varying because the line
> voltage was changing. The next time I will build the recommended line
> voltage regulator using two 0C3 (VR-105) tubes and a 60 Watt ballast lamp.
>
> I uploaded my mods, photos of the inside, and a scan of the manual to
> mods.dk. I tried to ftp and email the manual to BAMA/eDebris without
> success.
>
> See attachments
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>