time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Thunderbolt Harmonics

RD
Rhys D
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 2:40 AM

Hi all,

Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so
please be gentle.

I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather
surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the
10Mhz signal.

Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here?
Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to
filter these before going to my distribution amplifier?

Thanks for any light you can shed.

R

Hi all, Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so please be gentle. I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the 10Mhz signal. Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here? Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to filter these before going to my distribution amplifier? Thanks for any light you can shed. R ​
TC
Tom Curlee
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 5:43 AM

I'm not sure what the Thunderbolt specs state for harmonics, but -60 dB seems quite good to me.

  From: Rhys D <heyrhys@gmail.com>

To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:40 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Harmonics

Hi all,

Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so
please be gentle.

I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather
surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the
10Mhz signal.

Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here?
Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to
filter these before going to my distribution amplifier?

Thanks for any light you can shed.

R


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I'm not sure what the Thunderbolt specs state for harmonics, but -60 dB seems quite good to me. From: Rhys D <heyrhys@gmail.com> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:40 PM Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Harmonics Hi all, Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so please be gentle. I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the 10Mhz signal. Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here? Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to filter these before going to my distribution amplifier? Thanks for any light you can shed. R ​ _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
CS
Charles Steinmetz
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 10:21 AM

Rhys wrote:

I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather
surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the
10Mhz signal.

Welcome to the world of RF.  Loudest harmonic at ~ -60dBc (dB with
respect to carrier) is actually pretty good for a commercial product.
Very few distribution amplifiers do this well.  For that matter, many
good laboratory RF generators are specified with harmonics only below
-35 to -45 dBc.  We do not generally expect RF sources or amplifiers to
get down to the -80 to -90 dBc range (although amplifiers with harmonics
< -80dBc at 10MHz/1Vrms/50 ohms are possible), and certainly not the
-100 to -120dBc that we expect from high fidelity audio sources and
amplifiers.

Even harmonics (which make the carrier asymmetrical) can cause phase
errors that are harmful in high-precision systems [1], so I am a vocal
supporter of distribution amplifiers with harmonics < -80dBc.

Note that cleaning up the Tbolt output to < -80dBc would probably
require a crystal filter (a filter with a sharp corner very close to
10MHz, in any case), which means its phase response changes very rapidly
with the filter frequency.  Sharp filters shift frequency with
temperature, which causes temperature-dependent phase shifts.  Unless
the filter is maintained in an isothermal environment (like a good
oven), this can cause problems in sensitive applications.

Best regards,

Charles

[1]  F.L. Walls (NIST), F.G. Ascarrunz (SpectraDynamics), The Effect of
Harmonic Distortion on Phase Errors in Frequency Distribution and
Synthesis (year unknown, probably late '90s).

Rhys wrote: > I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather > surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the > 10Mhz signal. Welcome to the world of RF. Loudest harmonic at ~ -60dBc (dB with respect to carrier) is actually pretty good for a commercial product. Very few distribution amplifiers do this well. For that matter, many good laboratory RF generators are specified with harmonics only below -35 to -45 dBc. We do not generally expect RF sources or amplifiers to get down to the -80 to -90 dBc range (although amplifiers with harmonics < -80dBc at 10MHz/1Vrms/50 ohms are possible), and certainly not the -100 to -120dBc that we expect from high fidelity audio sources and amplifiers. Even harmonics (which make the carrier asymmetrical) can cause phase errors that are harmful in high-precision systems [1], so I am a vocal supporter of distribution amplifiers with harmonics < -80dBc. Note that cleaning up the Tbolt output to < -80dBc would probably require a crystal filter (a filter with a sharp corner very close to 10MHz, in any case), which means its phase response changes very rapidly with the filter frequency. Sharp filters shift frequency with temperature, which causes temperature-dependent phase shifts. Unless the filter is maintained in an isothermal environment (like a good oven), this can cause problems in sensitive applications. Best regards, Charles [1] F.L. Walls (NIST), F.G. Ascarrunz (SpectraDynamics), The Effect of Harmonic Distortion on Phase Errors in Frequency Distribution and Synthesis (year unknown, probably late '90s).
BC
Bob Camp
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 11:59 AM

Hi

If you look at the FCC transmitter regs, -60 dbc is “ok” for many transmitters.

Bob

On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:40 PM, Rhys D heyrhys@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all,

Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so
please be gentle.

I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather
surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the
10Mhz signal.

Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here?
Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to
filter these before going to my distribution amplifier?

Thanks for any light you can shed.

R


<10MhzRef.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi If you look at the FCC transmitter regs, -60 dbc is “ok” for many transmitters. Bob > On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:40 PM, Rhys D <heyrhys@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so > please be gentle. > > I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather > surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the > 10Mhz signal. > > Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here? > Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to > filter these before going to my distribution amplifier? > > Thanks for any light you can shed. > > R > > > ​ > <10MhzRef.png>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
CS
Charles Steinmetz
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 12:06 PM

I suppose I should have said that Trimble specifies the Tbolt with
harmonics -40dBc max, according to the User Guide v.5.0 (2003).

Best regards,

Charles

I suppose I should have said that Trimble specifies the Tbolt with harmonics -40dBc max, according to the User Guide v.5.0 (2003). Best regards, Charles
AM
Artek Manuals
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 12:33 PM

R

Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency
is the "harmonic" ?

How are you measuring this ? (Spectrum analyzer ? make/model?)

More importantly and at the risk of displaying my naivety, what is the
application that you are using the 10MHz source to feed and why if this
harmonic is 60db down (or even only 40db down, the quoted spec) why
would one care? What is the predicted error you will get in your
application as a result?

Dave

manuals@artekmanuals.com

On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:40 PM, Rhys D heyrhys@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all,

Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so
please be gentle.

I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather
surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the
10Mhz signal.

Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here?
Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to
filter these before going to my distribution amplifier?

Thanks for any light you can shed.

R


<10MhzRef.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
Dave
Manuals@ArtekManuals.com
www.ArtekManuals.com


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

R Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency is the "harmonic" ? How are you measuring this ? (Spectrum analyzer ? make/model?) More importantly and at the risk of displaying my naivety, what is the application that you are using the 10MHz source to feed and why if this harmonic is 60db down (or even only 40db down, the quoted spec) why would one care? What is the predicted error you will get in your application as a result? Dave manuals@artekmanuals.com >> On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:40 PM, Rhys D <heyrhys@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Before I start, let me say I'm rather a newbie at this sort of stuff so >> please be gentle. >> >> I was looking at the output of my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO and was rather >> surprised to see really "loud" harmonics in there. ~ 60dB down from the >> 10Mhz signal. >> >> Can anyone here shed some light on what I am seeing here? >> Surely this isn't what it is supposed to look like? Should I be trying to >> filter these before going to my distribution amplifier? >> >> Thanks for any light you can shed. >> >> R >> >> >> ​ >> <10MhzRef.png>_______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
J
jimlux
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 1:07 PM

On 1/18/17 2:21 AM, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

Rhys wrote:

[1]  F.L. Walls (NIST), F.G. Ascarrunz (SpectraDynamics), The Effect of
Harmonic Distortion on Phase Errors in Frequency Distribution and
Synthesis (year unknown, probably late '90s).

9th Euro Freq & Time Forum
1995
Besancon

http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1437.pdf

On 1/18/17 2:21 AM, Charles Steinmetz wrote: > Rhys wrote: > > [1] F.L. Walls (NIST), F.G. Ascarrunz (SpectraDynamics), The Effect of > Harmonic Distortion on Phase Errors in Frequency Distribution and > Synthesis (year unknown, probably late '90s). > 9th Euro Freq & Time Forum 1995 Besancon http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1437.pdf
CS
Charles Steinmetz
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 2:10 PM

Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency
is the "harmonic" ?

The OP attached a spectrum analyzer screen shot to his initial post --
go back and have a look.

It shows the harmonic series from 1 to 7, with H6 close to the noise
level.  Loudest harmonic is H2 at ~ -60dBc.

Charles

> Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency > is the "harmonic" ? The OP attached a spectrum analyzer screen shot to his initial post -- go back and have a look. It shows the harmonic series from 1 to 7, with H6 close to the noise level. Loudest harmonic is H2 at ~ -60dBc. Charles
J
jimlux
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 2:44 PM

On 1/18/17 4:33 AM, Artek Manuals wrote:

R

Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency
is the "harmonic" ?

How are you measuring this ? (Spectrum analyzer ? make/model?)

More importantly and at the risk of displaying my naivety, what is the
application that you are using the 10MHz source to feed and why if this
harmonic is 60db down (or even only 40db down, the quoted spec) why
would one care? What is the predicted error you will get in your
application as a result?

One application that needs low harmonic content is where you are
measuring the harmonic generating (or lack thereof) of a downstream
component.

I have an application where we're measuring the performance of a RF
chain followed by a digitizer.  An easy test is to feed in a nice sine
wave (at a frequency that is NOT a submultiple of the samplerate) and
look for harmonics in the power spectrum of the sampled data stream.

the first time we ran the test (using a Keysight 33622 signal generator)
we saw significant 2nd and 3rd harmonics (50-60 dB down, but easily
detectable).  A quick review of the data sheet.. Oh, the signal
generator spec is only -43 dBc for frequencies above 10 MHz.

Another case where low harmonic content is when doing two tone IMD tests

  • if the sources have significant harmonic content, you might be seeing
    intermod between the harmonics of the source, rather than intermods
    between the fundamental of the source.

For 10 MHz, you can get minicircuits filters for 10.7 MHz that are
fairly wideband and work pretty well... about 20-30 dB of harmonic
suppression per filter I'd use the low pass flavor

SBP-10.7
loss at 20MHz is 26.84
loss at 40MHz is 41.22
loss at 50MHz is 46
est loss at 30 is 35?

SLP-10.7
loss at 10 is 0.65 spec
loss at 20 is 31.35 spec measured -33
loss at 30 measured -60
loss at 34 is 47.26 spec
loss at 40 measured -77
loss at 67.5 is 69.85 spec

Yeah, they might have a significant tempco, but you're running all this
stuff in an underground lair with small temperature variations, right?
It only looks like a small volcano from the outside.

On 1/18/17 4:33 AM, Artek Manuals wrote: > R > > Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency > is the "harmonic" ? > > How are you measuring this ? (Spectrum analyzer ? make/model?) > > More importantly and at the risk of displaying my naivety, what is the > application that you are using the 10MHz source to feed and why if this > harmonic is 60db down (or even only 40db down, the quoted spec) why > would one care? What is the predicted error you will get in your > application as a result? > One application that needs low harmonic content is where you are measuring the harmonic generating (or lack thereof) of a downstream component. I have an application where we're measuring the performance of a RF chain followed by a digitizer. An easy test is to feed in a nice sine wave (at a frequency that is NOT a submultiple of the samplerate) and look for harmonics in the power spectrum of the sampled data stream. the first time we ran the test (using a Keysight 33622 signal generator) we saw significant 2nd and 3rd harmonics (50-60 dB down, but easily detectable). A quick review of the data sheet.. Oh, the signal generator spec is only -43 dBc for frequencies above 10 MHz. Another case where low harmonic content is when doing two tone IMD tests - if the sources have significant harmonic content, you might be seeing intermod between the harmonics of the source, rather than intermods between the fundamental of the source. For 10 MHz, you can get minicircuits filters for 10.7 MHz that are fairly wideband and work pretty well... about 20-30 dB of harmonic suppression per filter I'd use the low pass flavor SBP-10.7 loss at 20MHz is 26.84 loss at 40MHz is 41.22 loss at 50MHz is 46 est loss at 30 is 35? SLP-10.7 loss at 10 is 0.65 spec loss at 20 is 31.35 spec measured -33 loss at 30 measured -60 loss at 34 is 47.26 spec loss at 40 measured -77 loss at 67.5 is 69.85 spec Yeah, they might have a significant tempco, but you're running all this stuff in an underground lair with small temperature variations, right? It only looks like a small volcano from the outside.
BC
Bob Camp
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 4:56 PM

HI

On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:44 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 1/18/17 4:33 AM, Artek Manuals wrote:

R

Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency
is the "harmonic" ?

How are you measuring this ? (Spectrum analyzer ? make/model?)

More importantly and at the risk of displaying my naivety, what is the
application that you are using the 10MHz source to feed and why if this
harmonic is 60db down (or even only 40db down, the quoted spec) why
would one care? What is the predicted error you will get in your
application as a result?

One application that needs low harmonic content is where you are measuring the harmonic generating (or lack thereof) of a downstream component.

I have an application where we're measuring the performance of a RF chain followed by a digitizer.  An easy test is to feed in a nice sine wave (at a frequency that is NOT a submultiple of the samplerate) and look for harmonics in the power spectrum of the sampled data stream.

the first time we ran the test (using a Keysight 33622 signal generator) we saw significant 2nd and 3rd harmonics (50-60 dB down, but easily detectable).  A quick review of the data sheet.. Oh, the signal generator spec is only -43 dBc for frequencies above 10 MHz.

So even a pretty expensive signal generator still has “loud” harmonics if judged at the -60 dbc level ….

Another case where low harmonic content is when doing two tone IMD tests - if the sources have significant harmonic content, you might be seeing intermod between the harmonics of the source, rather than intermods between the fundamental of the source.

Which is one of the reasons a lot of IMD test setups have a variety of filters in them.

For 10 MHz, you can get minicircuits filters for 10.7 MHz that are fairly wideband and work pretty well... about 20-30 dB of harmonic suppression per filter I'd use the low pass flavor

SBP-10.7
loss at 20MHz is 26.84
loss at 40MHz is 41.22
loss at 50MHz is 46
est loss at 30 is 35?

SLP-10.7
loss at 10 is 0.65 spec
loss at 20 is 31.35 spec measured -33
loss at 30 measured -60
loss at 34 is 47.26 spec
loss at 40 measured -77
loss at 67.5 is 69.85 spec

These also are a pretty common item on eBay, at ham fest, and in your typical RF junk box. 10.7 MHz IF filter cans can fairly
easily be tuned down to 10 MHz to custom roll bandpass filters.

Bob

Yeah, they might have a significant tempco, but you're running all this stuff in an underground lair with small temperature variations, right? It only looks like a small volcano from the outside.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

HI > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:44 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > > On 1/18/17 4:33 AM, Artek Manuals wrote: >> R >> >> Is what your seeing a harmonic (2nd? 3rd?) or a spur i.e what frequency >> is the "harmonic" ? >> >> How are you measuring this ? (Spectrum analyzer ? make/model?) >> >> More importantly and at the risk of displaying my naivety, what is the >> application that you are using the 10MHz source to feed and why if this >> harmonic is 60db down (or even only 40db down, the quoted spec) why >> would one care? What is the predicted error you will get in your >> application as a result? >> > > One application that needs low harmonic content is where you are measuring the harmonic generating (or lack thereof) of a downstream component. > > I have an application where we're measuring the performance of a RF chain followed by a digitizer. An easy test is to feed in a nice sine wave (at a frequency that is NOT a submultiple of the samplerate) and look for harmonics in the power spectrum of the sampled data stream. > > the first time we ran the test (using a Keysight 33622 signal generator) we saw significant 2nd and 3rd harmonics (50-60 dB down, but easily detectable). A quick review of the data sheet.. Oh, the signal generator spec is only -43 dBc for frequencies above 10 MHz. So even a pretty expensive signal generator still has “loud” harmonics if judged at the -60 dbc level …. > > Another case where low harmonic content is when doing two tone IMD tests - if the sources have significant harmonic content, you might be seeing intermod between the harmonics of the source, rather than intermods between the fundamental of the source. Which is one of the reasons a lot of IMD test setups have a variety of filters in them. > > For 10 MHz, you can get minicircuits filters for 10.7 MHz that are fairly wideband and work pretty well... about 20-30 dB of harmonic suppression per filter I'd use the low pass flavor > > SBP-10.7 > loss at 20MHz is 26.84 > loss at 40MHz is 41.22 > loss at 50MHz is 46 > est loss at 30 is 35? > > SLP-10.7 > loss at 10 is 0.65 spec > loss at 20 is 31.35 spec measured -33 > loss at 30 measured -60 > loss at 34 is 47.26 spec > loss at 40 measured -77 > loss at 67.5 is 69.85 spec These also are a pretty common item on eBay, at ham fest, and in your typical RF junk box. 10.7 MHz IF filter cans can fairly easily be tuned down to 10 MHz to custom roll bandpass filters. Bob > > > > Yeah, they might have a significant tempco, but you're running all this stuff in an underground lair with small temperature variations, right? It only looks like a small volcano from the outside. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.