With roof mounted antenna practical issuers are important.

1. Do birds like to tech on it, they will it then can find a way to stand
   on top of it.  They poop on whatever they perch on.
2. Same with snow in some places
3. Can you route the lead wire down the mast?  Some antenna mount to a
   pipe flange allowing coax to be completely inside a metal cover.  The wire
   will last a LONG time if it is not exposed to the elements
4. easy way to attach a ground clamp.
5. with a pole mount one can extend the height of the antenna as far up as
   you like.

It is not hard at all to find a high gain GPS antenna that is inside a
pointed radome.  Mine is a helix type but I think a good modern patch
inside a pointed radome would work as well.  Practical issues dominate
unless you want to go up on the roof now and then.  I put the antenna up
and figure it is good for the life of the building, decades of not thinking
about it I hope.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Russ Ramirez russ.ramirez@gmail.com
wrote:

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

I bought a Gilsson marine antenna and an 8 port amplified splitter on eBay. The antenna is mounted on the roof of my garage, where it has visibility easily down to 20 degrees except to the North where there is an obstruction (but that doesn’t matter). The coax is 10 meters of whatever came with the antenna. My reception with this setup is as close to ideal as I’ve ever heard of. At the moment, gpsmon on my NTP server shows 5 satellites with 50+ SNR, another 5 with 40+ and one at 22 (7 degrees elevation).

Your problem will be Birds and Debris, it is flat and you will have interruptions and phase shifts.

Did you not understand why we use pointed antennas for timing and fixed installations.

Respectfully as Always, Dennis, KV4WM@ARRL.NET, & Senior Fellow IEEE

 A US Navy Nuclear Submarine Veteran

“GOD bless America, One Nation under GOD”

REMEMBER: "It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
of the Amateur that holds the license"

“Electricity is really just organized lightning.”
― George Carlin

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Nick Sayer via time-nuts
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:58 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Best replacement for Trimble Bullet antenna

I bought a Gilsson marine antenna and an 8 port amplified splitter on eBay. The antenna is mounted on the roof of my garage, where it has visibility easily down to 20 degrees except to the North where there is an obstruction (but that doesn’t matter). The coax is 10 meters of whatever came with the antenna. My reception with this setup is as close to ideal as I’ve ever heard of. At the moment, gpsmon on my NTP server shows 5 satellites with 50+ SNR, another 5 with 40+ and one at 22 (7 degrees elevation).

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

No, I guess I didn’t.

That said, our cats seem to be doing a good job discouraging any birds, and I can see the antenna mornings when I go out to the car and there’s been no debris problem I’ve been able to detect.

If it were required, I’d suspect it would be fairly easy to 3D print a pointy hat from radio-transparent plastic.

Hi

Ummm …. errrr …. radio transparent plastic. You want to avoid making a
lens that distorts the paths over the antenna so it’s not just an issue of transparent.
You also want it to be “clear” (non distorting). You need it to be stable in terms of UV,
humidity and temperature. The guys who made the antenna didn’t have it quite so tough,
they could design the cover as part of what determined the pattern of the antenna.

The short list of what your low cost printer will handle:

PLA
ABS
PETG

If it is really low cost, it will only handle the first one. All are a bit of a
disaster at 1.5 GHz. PLA likely will not hold up outdoors, let alone do well at RF.
The other two are poor at RF.

The longer list on a higher priced printer:

Nylon
Polycarbonate
HIPS
Flexable’s

The last two are out right from the start. One dissolves in water, the other has no structural integrity. Nylon is hydroscopic
and not all that great at 1.5 GHz. For what ever reason the polycarbonate that they sell also is a bit hydroscopic. It also is
quite challenging to print unless you have a very fancy printer.

Certainly not an easy thing to do.

Bob

At work I have access to an industrial one that (I am told) uses lasers to harden a liquid... something. I'm not a plastic expert. We use that stuff for outdoor enclosures and it is UHF transparent, at least to some degree (it would have to be given our use case). I used it once to make a couple of wall mount J1772 fake inlets to hold our car charging plugs. Those have survived outdoors without any issues. At some point in need to repaint them, as the native color is battleship grey, and the white paint is starting to wear off.

If Tupperware made something conical, I'd chose that in a hurry. It may not have a great deal of UV staying power, but "microwave safe" implies good RF performance. I've used that solution to quickly weatherproof home brew stuff before.

Even if whatever the cap is made of isn't perfectly RF clear, I've certainly got S/N margin for some attenuation, even if it isn't uniform. I would posit that as long as it's performance doesn't alter over time scales shorter than a few minutes that the impact would be immeasurable - certainly compared to the ionosphere's.

I probably won't bother, though, as we don't seem to have bird trouble and it doesn't snow here in Silicon Valley. If it were an unattended installation, that might change things.

Sent from my iPhone

Hi

Regardless of material the gotcha is that the plastic has a dielectric constant. That turns it into a lens and moves the phase center.
If the phase center moves with sat angle, you get a different path length based on angle. That messes up your solution, even
for timing. Do you care about the amount it messes things up? This is Time Nuts …. There are indeed documents out there that
discuss the problems people have had putting radomes over GPS antennas.

Bob