time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Thermal impact on OCXO

BS
Bob Stewart
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 1:56 AM

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

Bob - AE6RV
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? Bob - AE6RV  ----------------------------------------------------------------- AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info
BS
Bob Stewart
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 2:25 AM

OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency.

Bob
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

  From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>

To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

Bob - AE6RV
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency. Bob  ----------------------------------------------------------------- AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? Bob - AE6RV  ----------------------------------------------------------------- AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
J
jimlux
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 4:33 AM

On 11/4/16 6:56 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

most oscillators exhibit some degree of hysteresis - the mechanical
mounting puts stresses on the crystal, if nothing else.

On 11/4/16 6:56 PM, Bob Stewart wrote: > In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal? IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? > most oscillators exhibit some degree of hysteresis - the mechanical mounting puts stresses on the crystal, if nothing else.
BC
Bob Camp
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 12:15 PM

Hi

You have a first order, second order and third order coefficient to the temperature rate dependance
on a crystal.  Since the second order term is a square, it does not care about the sign of the
rate.

Bob

On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

Bob - AE6RV

AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi You have a first order, second order and third order coefficient to the temperature rate dependance on a crystal. Since the second order term is a square, it does not care about the sign of the rate. Bob > On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: > > In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal? IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? > > Bob - AE6RV > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
SS
Scott Stobbe
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 3:54 PM

Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency
and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from
nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast

  • nominal the phase integrates up/down.

It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the
xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain,
time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the
phase error.

On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher
frequency than it does at a lower frequency.

Bob

AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

   From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net <javascript:;>>

To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement <
time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;>
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature
around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to
40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp
over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same
frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase
difference?

Bob - AE6RV

AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down. It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error. On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: > OK, never mind. I see the obvious. Phase changes faster at a higher > frequency than it does at a lower frequency. > > Bob > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info > > From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net <javascript:;>> > To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement < > time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>> > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM > Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO > > In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature > around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to > 40C all else being equal? IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp > over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same > frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase > difference? > > Bob - AE6RV > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;> > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;> > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BS
Bob Stewart
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 4:15 PM

Hi Scott and Bob and others,
I keep telling myself that I won't get involved with the temperature problem, and yet for some reason I keep going down that rabbit hole.  It seems to me that it's one thing to correct well enough to stay on frequency within some degree of accuracy, and yet another to try to also correct for phase.  The reality is that what I have is good enough for now.  At 12 hours of holdover, I'm usually a bit over 1uS out of phase.  Maybe I could better that, but I think I'll need a lot more understanding of the impact of aging vs temperature before I can get there.

Bob -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

  From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com>

To: Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down.
It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error.

On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency.

Bob
 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info

      From: Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net
 To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM
 Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

Bob - AE6RV
 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Scott and Bob and others, I keep telling myself that I won't get involved with the temperature problem, and yet for some reason I keep going down that rabbit hole.  It seems to me that it's one thing to correct well enough to stay on frequency within some degree of accuracy, and yet another to try to also correct for phase.  The reality is that what I have is good enough for now.  At 12 hours of holdover, I'm usually a bit over 1uS out of phase.  Maybe I could better that, but I think I'll need a lot more understanding of the impact of aging vs temperature before I can get there. Bob ----------------------------------------------------------------- AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> To: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down. It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error. On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency. Bob  ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------ AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info       From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>  To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement <time-nuts@febo.com>  Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM  Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? Bob - AE6RV  ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------ AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info ______________________________ _________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ______________________________ _________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 4:54 PM

Hi

Remember - most holdover specs also include a delta temperature (like 40 to 70C) during the
holdover period ….

Bob

On Nov 5, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

Hi Scott and Bob and others,
I keep telling myself that I won't get involved with the temperature problem, and yet for some reason I keep going down that rabbit hole.  It seems to me that it's one thing to correct well enough to stay on frequency within some degree of accuracy, and yet another to try to also correct for phase.  The reality is that what I have is good enough for now.  At 12 hours of holdover, I'm usually a bit over 1uS out of phase.  Maybe I could better that, but I think I'll need a lot more understanding of the impact of aging vs temperature before I can get there.

Bob -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

  From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com>

To: Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down.
It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error.

On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency.

Bob


AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info

   From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>

To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

Bob - AE6RV


AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Remember - most holdover specs also include a delta temperature (like 40 to 70C) during the holdover period …. Bob > On Nov 5, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: > > Hi Scott and Bob and others, > I keep telling myself that I won't get involved with the temperature problem, and yet for some reason I keep going down that rabbit hole. It seems to me that it's one thing to correct well enough to stay on frequency within some degree of accuracy, and yet another to try to also correct for phase. The reality is that what I have is good enough for now. At 12 hours of holdover, I'm usually a bit over 1uS out of phase. Maybe I could better that, but I think I'll need a lot more understanding of the impact of aging vs temperature before I can get there. > > Bob ----------------------------------------------------------------- > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info > > From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> > To: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:54 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO > > Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down. > It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error. > > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: > > OK, never mind. I see the obvious. Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency. > > Bob > ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------ > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info > > From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> > To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM > Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO > > In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal? IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? > > Bob - AE6RV > ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------ > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info > ______________________________ _________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > ______________________________ _________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BS
Bob Stewart
Sat, Nov 5, 2016 5:39 PM

Hi Bob,
Ugh!  40C to 70C is not something I plan to deal with.  If I were selling to a commercial market, that would be a different story.  But at my price point, not gonna happen.  But it does bring up the point that I need to have some sort of idea of what I'm willing to manage.

Bob -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

  From: Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org>

To: Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

Hi

Remember - most holdover specs also include a delta temperature (like 40 to 70C) during the
holdover period ….

Bob

On Nov 5, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

Hi Scott and Bob and others,
I keep telling myself that I won't get involved with the temperature problem, and yet for some reason I keep going down that rabbit hole.  It seems to me that it's one thing to correct well enough to stay on frequency within some degree of accuracy, and yet another to try to also correct for phase.  The reality is that what I have is good enough for now.  At 12 hours of holdover, I'm usually a bit over 1uS out of phase.  Maybe I could better that, but I think I'll need a lot more understanding of the impact of aging vs temperature before I can get there.

Bob -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

      From: Scott Stobbe scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com
To: Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down.
It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error.

On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net wrote:

OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency.

Bob
  ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info

      From: Bob Stewart bob@evoria.net
  To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement time-nuts@febo.com
  Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM
  Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO

In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference?

Bob - AE6RV
  ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Bob, Ugh!  40C to 70C is not something I plan to deal with.  If I were selling to a commercial market, that would be a different story.  But at my price point, not gonna happen.  But it does bring up the point that I need to have some sort of idea of what I'm willing to manage. Bob ----------------------------------------------------------------- AE6RV.com GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info From: Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> To: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO Hi Remember - most holdover specs also include a delta temperature (like 40 to 70C) during the holdover period …. Bob > On Nov 5, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: > > Hi Scott and Bob and others, > I keep telling myself that I won't get involved with the temperature problem, and yet for some reason I keep going down that rabbit hole.  It seems to me that it's one thing to correct well enough to stay on frequency within some degree of accuracy, and yet another to try to also correct for phase.  The reality is that what I have is good enough for now.  At 12 hours of holdover, I'm usually a bit over 1uS out of phase.  Maybe I could better that, but I think I'll need a lot more understanding of the impact of aging vs temperature before I can get there. > > Bob ----------------------------------------------------------------- > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info > >      From: Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com> > To: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net>; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 10:54 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO > > Sounds like you already realized this. Phase is the integral of frequency and the derivative of phase (phase rate) is frequency. So if you go from nominal frequency - slow - nominal or equivalently nominal frequency - fast - nominal the phase integrates up/down. > It would be a little more complicated for an ocxo since it is servoing the xo temperature, you would need to know the disturbance rejection (gain, time constant for a simple Pi controller) to try and feedfoward correct the phase error. > > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> wrote: > > OK, never mind.  I see the obvious.  Phase changes faster at a higher frequency than it does at a lower frequency. > > Bob >  ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------ > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info > >      From: Bob Stewart <bob@evoria.net> >  To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> >  Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 8:56 PM >  Subject: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO > > In the general case, is the impact of changing the ambient temperature around an OCXO from, say, 40C to 41C the same as changing it from 41C to 40C all else being equal?  IOW, if I somehow have the same temperature ramp over the same time period in both directions, will I wind up with the same frequency and phase, or will the frequency revert but at some phase difference? > > Bob - AE6RV >  ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------ > AE6RV.com > > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ GFS-GPSDOs/info > ______________________________ _________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > ______________________________ _________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.