I received the Si5340A evaluation board from Digikey on Friday and fired
it up yesterday. I used the SiLabs "ClockBuilder" software to configure
four outputs -- 10 MHz, 15 MHz, 29.999 999 9 MHz, and 144.2 MHz -- all
using the 45 MHz crystal that comes with the EVM. Attached is a phase
noise plot of the 10 MHz and 29.999 999 9 MHz signals. I would say this
isn't too bad! This performance is certainly sufficient for any of the
RF work I have in mind.
The ADEV was another matter -- about 1e-9 at 1 second, working its way
uphill from there. But what do you expect from a bare crystal?
John
Hi
It would be very interesting to see what happens if you sync it up to a 10 MHz input ….
Bob
On Jan 28, 2018, at 7:23 PM, John Ackermann N8UR jra@febo.com wrote:
I received the Si5340A evaluation board from Digikey on Friday and fired it up yesterday. I used the SiLabs "ClockBuilder" software to configure four outputs -- 10 MHz, 15 MHz, 29.999 999 9 MHz, and 144.2 MHz -- all using the 45 MHz crystal that comes with the EVM. Attached is a phase noise plot of the 10 MHz and 29.999 999 9 MHz signals. I would say this isn't too bad! This performance is certainly sufficient for any of the RF work I have in mind.
The ADEV was another matter -- about 1e-9 at 1 second, working its way uphill from there. But what do you expect from a bare crystal?
John
<siLabs5340-test.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
John, what device did you use for the test?
Regards,
Jerry
Jerry Hancock
jerry@hanler.com
(415) 215-3779
On Jan 28, 2018, at 4:23 PM, John Ackermann N8UR jra@febo.com wrote:
I received the Si5340A evaluation board from Digikey on Friday and fired it up yesterday. I used the SiLabs "ClockBuilder" software to configure four outputs -- 10 MHz, 15 MHz, 29.999 999 9 MHz, and 144.2 MHz -- all using the 45 MHz crystal that comes with the EVM. Attached is a phase noise plot of the 10 MHz and 29.999 999 9 MHz signals. I would say this isn't too bad! This performance is certainly sufficient for any of the RF work I have in mind.
The ADEV was another matter -- about 1e-9 at 1 second, working its way uphill from there. But what do you expect from a bare crystal?
John
<siLabs5340-test.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
The reference was a 5 MHz Wenzel ULN and the instrument was a Miles TimePod.
On Jan 28, 2018, 8:13 PM, at 8:13 PM, Jerry Hancock jerry@hanler.com wrote:
John, what device did you use for the test?
Regards,
Jerry
Jerry Hancock
jerry@hanler.com
(415) 215-3779
On Jan 28, 2018, at 4:23 PM, John Ackermann N8UR jra@febo.com
wrote:
I received the Si5340A evaluation board from Digikey on Friday and
fired it up yesterday. I used the SiLabs "ClockBuilder" software to
configure four outputs -- 10 MHz, 15 MHz, 29.999 999 9 MHz, and 144.2
MHz -- all using the 45 MHz crystal that comes with the EVM. Attached
is a phase noise plot of the 10 MHz and 29.999 999 9 MHz signals. I
would say this isn't too bad! This performance is certainly sufficient
for any of the RF work I have in mind.
The ADEV was another matter -- about 1e-9 at 1 second, working its
way uphill from there. But what do you expect from a bare crystal?
John
<siLabs5340-test.png>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.