time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

sine to square wave circuits - performance data?

MS
Mark Sims
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 3:21 PM

Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications.

My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate.


I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough

input power) compared to even an LT1016.

Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications. My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate. ---------------- > I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough input power) compared to even an LT1016.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 8:51 PM

Hi

On Oct 4, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Mark Sims holrum@hotmail.com wrote:

Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications.

That’s not the case for broadband phase noise or for close in jitter. The issue with the older
AC parts is the crummy lead frame pinout. Setting them up so they did not oscillate was not
as easy as it should have been. More modern single gate packages no long have those issues.

There is always an … except … If you do a “feedback resistor” bias, forget about any sort of
fast gate. Bias it with two resistors on the input and it should be fine. If the second resistor blows
your budget then yes, it’s a issue.

Bob

My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate.


I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough

input power) compared to even an LT1016.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi > On Oct 4, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications. That’s not the case for broadband phase noise or for close in jitter. The issue with the older AC parts is the crummy lead frame pinout. Setting them up so they did not oscillate was not as easy as it should have been. More modern single gate packages no long have those issues. There is always an … except … If you do a “feedback resistor” bias, forget about any sort of fast gate. Bias it with two resistors on the input and it should be fine. If the second resistor blows your budget then yes, it’s a issue. Bob > > My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate. > > ---------------- > >> I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough > input power) compared to even an LT1016. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 9:11 PM

Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry.

Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly.

Bruce

 On 05 October 2017 at 04:21 Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote:

 Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications.

 My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate.

 ----------------
     I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough
     input power) compared to even an LT1016.

     _______________________________________________
     time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
     To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
     and follow the instructions there.
Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry. Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly. Bruce > > On 05 October 2017 at 04:21 Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications. > > My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate. > > ---------------- > > > > > > I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough > > input power) compared to even an LT1016. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > >
AK
Attila Kinali
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 9:14 PM

On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 15:21:45 +0000
Mark Sims holrum@hotmail.com wrote:

My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can
implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate.

I am not sure whether you meant that the feedback resistor adds hysteresis
to the squarer gate, but it does the exact opposite: it reduces hysteresis.
And that's exactly the point: less hysteresis means less jitter.
And as a nice side effect, it acts as a control loop to keep the output
duty cycle close to 50%.

			Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 15:21:45 +0000 Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> wrote: > My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can > implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate. I am not sure whether you meant that the feedback resistor adds hysteresis to the squarer gate, but it does the exact opposite: it reduces hysteresis. And that's exactly the point: less hysteresis means less jitter. And as a nice side effect, it acts as a control loop to keep the output duty cycle close to 50%. Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
AK
Attila Kinali
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 9:17 PM

On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:51:23 -0400
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

There is always an … except … If you do a “feedback resistor” bias,
forget about any sort of fast gate. Bias it with two resistors on the
input and it should be fine. If the second resistor blows your budget
then yes, it’s a issue.

A relatively easy way around this is to replace the feedback resistor
by an R-C-R filter with a low enough corner frequency.

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:51:23 -0400 Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > There is always an … except … If you do a “feedback resistor” bias, > forget about any sort of fast gate. Bias it with two resistors on the > input and it should be fine. If the second resistor blows your budget > then yes, it’s a issue. A relatively easy way around this is to replace the feedback resistor by an R-C-R filter with a low enough corner frequency. Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
AK
Attila Kinali
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 9:18 PM

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:11:37 +1300 (NZDT)
Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz wrote:

Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry.

Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly.

Do you know what the mechanism is, that increases jitter in this case?

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:11:37 +1300 (NZDT) Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry. > > Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly. Do you know what the mechanism is, that increases jitter in this case? Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 9:33 PM

Substrate currents biasing on parasitic devices in  junction isolated process?
If so, then silicon on insulator CMOS may not exhibit the effect.
Bruce

On 05 October 2017 at 10:18 Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:11:37 +1300 (NZDT)
Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz wrote:

Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry.

Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly.

Do you know what the mechanism is, that increases jitter in this case?

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

Substrate currents biasing on parasitic devices in junction isolated process? If so, then silicon on insulator CMOS may not exhibit the effect. Bruce > On 05 October 2017 at 10:18 Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:11:37 +1300 (NZDT) > Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > > Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry. > > > > Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly. > > Do you know what the mechanism is, that increases jitter in this case? > > Attila Kinali > -- > It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All > the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no > use without that foundation. > -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
BK
Bob kb8tq
Wed, Oct 4, 2017 10:33 PM

Hi

The other issue could be that no diode ever operates instantaneously ….

Bottom line is indeed that clipping in protection diodes is not a good idea. External
diodes …. who knows ….

Bob

On Oct 4, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz wrote:

Substrate currents biasing on parasitic devices in  junction isolated process?
If so, then silicon on insulator CMOS may not exhibit the effect.
Bruce

On 05 October 2017 at 10:18 Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:11:37 +1300 (NZDT)
Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz wrote:

Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry.

Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly.

Do you know what the mechanism is, that increases jitter in this case?

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The other issue could be that no diode ever operates instantaneously …. Bottom line is indeed that clipping in protection diodes is not a good idea. External diodes …. who knows …. Bob > On Oct 4, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > Substrate currents biasing on parasitic devices in junction isolated process? > If so, then silicon on insulator CMOS may not exhibit the effect. > Bruce >> On 05 October 2017 at 10:18 Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:11:37 +1300 (NZDT) >> Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> wrote: >> >>> Just avoid current flowing in the input protection circuitry. >>> >>> Once the protection circuit is activated the jitter increases significantly. >> >> Do you know what the mechanism is, that increases jitter in this case? >> >> Attila Kinali >> -- >> It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All >> the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no >> use without that foundation. >> -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
GH
Gerhard Hoffmann
Thu, Oct 5, 2017 2:58 AM

Am 05.10.2017 um 00:33 schrieb Bob kb8tq:

Hi

The other issue could be that no diode ever operates instantaneously ….

Bottom line is indeed that clipping in protection diodes is not a good idea. External
diodes …. who knows ….

And when it clips, it provides a low impedance connection
between the input and the power supply. Nobody knows
the recovery time.

Gerhard

Am 05.10.2017 um 00:33 schrieb Bob kb8tq: > Hi > > The other issue could be that no diode ever operates instantaneously …. > > Bottom line is indeed that clipping in protection diodes is not a good idea. External > diodes …. who knows …. > And when it clips, it provides a low impedance connection between the input and the power supply. Nobody knows the recovery time. Gerhard
TK
Tom Knox
Thu, Oct 5, 2017 4:29 AM

Thomas Knox
Sr Test and Measurement Engineer
Ascent Concepts and Technology
4475 Whitney Place
Boulder Colorado 80305
1-303-554-0307
actast@hotmail.com


From: time-nuts time-nuts-bounces@febo.com on behalf of Mark Sims holrum@hotmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 9:21 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] sine to square wave circuits - performance data?

Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications.

My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate.


I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough

input power) compared to even an LT1016.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Thomas Knox Sr Test and Measurement Engineer Ascent Concepts and Technology 4475 Whitney Place Boulder Colorado 80305 1-303-554-0307 actast@hotmail.com ________________________________ From: time-nuts <time-nuts-bounces@febo.com> on behalf of Mark Sims <holrum@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 9:21 AM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] sine to square wave circuits - performance data? Wenzel says an HC device tends to work better than an AC device in squarer applications. My calibrator board has a place for the feedback resistor so that I can implement the second LPRO circuit (or add hysteresis to the squarer gate. ---------------- > I find it interesting that a simple 74AC04 performs so well (given enough input power) compared to even an LT1016. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.