aphid1@comcast.net said:
My applications were broadband. If I remember correctly, aggressive
bandwidth limiting can cause phase shift problems due to temperature
changes unless one is careful in the design of the filter.
Does anybody ovenize amplifiers and filters to avoid that problem?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
Hi
If you have the money, almost anything can be (and has been) done. It’s rare to find a
real world application where this kind of thing is considered cost effective. Fancy
radar systems are about the only thing that comes to mind. Radar of
this sort is always high cost / low volume.
Bob
On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:
aphid1@comcast.net said:
My applications were broadband. If I remember correctly, aggressive
bandwidth limiting can cause phase shift problems due to temperature
changes unless one is careful in the design of the filter.
Does anybody ovenize amplifiers and filters to avoid that problem?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
On 10/24/2017 11:10 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
aphid1@comcast.net said:
My applications were broadband. If I remember correctly, aggressive
bandwidth limiting can cause phase shift problems due to temperature
changes unless one is careful in the design of the filter.
Does anybody ovenize amplifiers and filters to avoid that problem?
This problem came up in the design of the 5071A.
I elected to avoid narrowband filters by using
some tricks described in my FCS paper of about
25 years ago. I didn't find it necessary to ovenize
the output section.
By contrast, the 5061 had numerous narrow band filters
that were problematical.
Rick N6RK
On 10/24/17 11:54 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
If you have the money, almost anything can be (and has been) done. It’s rare to find a
real world application where this kind of thing is considered cost effective. Fancy
radar systems are about the only thing that comes to mind. Radar of
this sort is always high cost / low volume.
Deep Space Network stations or other applications (VLBI) where the
measurement uncertainty is like ADEV = 1E-12 in 1000 seconds. There's a
whole analysis of the temperature effects on the fiber optic
distribution components, for instance - and they're buried 2 meters down.
At "billions of dollars in 1960/1970" I think DSN fits in Bob's high
cost/low volume bucket.
Bob
On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:
aphid1@comcast.net said:
My applications were broadband. If I remember correctly, aggressive
bandwidth limiting can cause phase shift problems due to temperature
changes unless one is careful in the design of the filter.
Does anybody ovenize amplifiers and filters to avoid that problem?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:12:24 -0700
"Richard (Rick) Karlquist" richard@karlquist.com wrote:
This problem came up in the design of the 5071A.
I elected to avoid narrowband filters by using
some tricks described in my FCS paper of about
25 years ago. I didn't find it necessary to ovenize
the output section.
For those looking for the paper:
http://www.karlquist.com/FCS92.pdf
Attila Kinali
--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson