attila@kinali.ch said:
You can already get 24bit DAC's off the shelf from TI (DAC1282). I do not
know how stable they are in reality. ...
There are 2 markets for DACs and ADCs. I'll call them DC and RF, but the RF
goes down to audio.
In the DC market, the data sheet talks about linearity and usually covers
temperature stability.
In the RF market, the data sheet has Fourier transform plots when the input
is a clean sine wave or pair of sine waves. Think software radios, radar or
spread spectrum. The usual one term summary is ENOB: Effective Number of
Bits.
In the RF market, nobody cares about temperature drift.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
Hal wrote:
There are 2 markets for DACs and ADCs. I'll call them DC and RF, but the RF
goes down to audio.
In the DC market, the data sheet talks about linearity and usually covers
temperature stability.
* * *
In the RF market, nobody cares about temperature drift.
By far the largest market for 16+ bit converters (both ADC and DAC) is
digital audio. Virtually all current audio converters use sigma-delta
("one-bit") conversion with huge oversampling rates. For a variety of
reasons, these are quite well suited to the requirements of digital
audio, but they all have serious shortcomings WRT DC performance,
tempco, absolute accuracy, and the dreaded idle tones (Google for more
than you could read in a lifetime).
Fortunately, the sheer volume of this market means that you can get
really excellent audio (and audio-like) performance for very reasonable
cost. Unfortunately, it tempts designers to misuse the inexpensive
audio chips for general DAQ tasks (for example, the many glorified,
DC-coupled, "DAQ" PC sound cards and "instrument on a board" products
available today).
Best regards,
Charles