time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: DIY Low offset Phase Noise Analyzer (Erik, Kaashoek)

DB
Dave B
Mon, Jul 11, 2022 7:24 PM

On 11/07/2022 08:30, time-nuts-request@lists.febo.com wrote:

I also measured a Marconi 2022 signal generator and it was possible to
lock but the phase noise was terrible with strong factional PLL spurs.

Indeed, those signal generators are renown for having "some rather
interesting" spectral content...
Around, above and often well below the "desired" signal!

Not entirely surprising though, if you look at the block diagram of one
such.

Regards to All.

Dave G0WBX(G8KBV)

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open source software:

On 11/07/2022 08:30, time-nuts-request@lists.febo.com wrote: > I also measured a Marconi 2022 signal generator and it was possible to > lock but the phase noise was terrible with strong factional PLL spurs. Indeed, those signal generators are renown for having "some rather interesting" spectral content... Around, above and often well below the "desired" signal! Not entirely surprising though, if you look at the block diagram of one such. Regards to All. Dave G0WBX(G8KBV) -- Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open source software:
AP
Alex Pummer
Tue, Jul 12, 2022 2:41 AM

yes there are much better signal generators out there, that frequency
doubler tuning circuit is for religious people only -- you need to be
able to believe, that it could work
73
KJ6UHN
Alex

On 7/11/2022 12:24 PM, Dave B via time-nuts wrote:

On 11/07/2022 08:30, time-nuts-request@lists.febo.com wrote:

I also measured a Marconi 2022 signal generator and it was possible to
lock but the phase noise was terrible with strong factional PLL spurs.

Indeed, those signal generators are renown for having "some rather
interesting" spectral content...
Around, above and often well below the "desired" signal!

Not entirely surprising though, if you look at the block diagram of
one such.

Regards to All.

Dave G0WBX(G8KBV)

yes there are much better signal generators out there, that frequency doubler tuning circuit is for religious people only -- you need to be able to believe, that it could work 73 KJ6UHN Alex On 7/11/2022 12:24 PM, Dave B via time-nuts wrote: > On 11/07/2022 08:30, time-nuts-request@lists.febo.com wrote: >> I also measured a Marconi 2022 signal generator and it was possible to >> lock but the phase noise was terrible with strong factional PLL spurs. > > Indeed, those signal generators are renown for having "some rather > interesting" spectral content... > Around, above and often well below the "desired" signal! > > Not entirely surprising though, if you look at the block diagram of > one such. > > Regards to All. > > Dave G0WBX(G8KBV) > > >
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Jul 12, 2022 4:02 AM

Hi

There are a very small number of signal generators that might
help when measuring phase noise on a good source. The “rest
of them” are very much in the “don’t bother” category. Just which
one is in the “maybe” category depends a lot on your frequency
of interest. None of them seem to be very affordable …. wonder
why :) :) :)

Do useful ones pop up from time to time? Sure they do. They might
require a bit of work to get going. Thanks very much to those who
make them available.

Bob

On Jul 11, 2022, at 6:41 PM, Alex Pummer via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

yes there are much better signal generators out there, that frequency doubler tuning circuit is for religious people only -- you need to be able to believe, that it could work
73
KJ6UHN
Alex

On 7/11/2022 12:24 PM, Dave B via time-nuts wrote:

On 11/07/2022 08:30, time-nuts-request@lists.febo.com wrote:

I also measured a Marconi 2022 signal generator and it was possible to
lock but the phase noise was terrible with strong factional PLL spurs.

Indeed, those signal generators are renown for having "some rather interesting" spectral content...
Around, above and often well below the "desired" signal!

Not entirely surprising though, if you look at the block diagram of one such.

Regards to All.

Dave G0WBX(G8KBV)


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi There are a very small number of signal generators that *might* help when measuring phase noise on a good source. The “rest of them” are very much in the “don’t bother” category. Just which one is in the “maybe” category depends a lot on your frequency of interest. None of them seem to be very affordable …. wonder why :) :) :) Do useful ones pop up from time to time? Sure they do. They might require a bit of work to get going. Thanks very much to those who make them available. Bob > On Jul 11, 2022, at 6:41 PM, Alex Pummer via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > yes there are much better signal generators out there, that frequency doubler tuning circuit is for religious people only -- you need to be able to believe, that it could work > 73 > KJ6UHN > Alex > > On 7/11/2022 12:24 PM, Dave B via time-nuts wrote: >> On 11/07/2022 08:30, time-nuts-request@lists.febo.com wrote: >>> I also measured a Marconi 2022 signal generator and it was possible to >>> lock but the phase noise was terrible with strong factional PLL spurs. >> >> Indeed, those signal generators are renown for having "some rather interesting" spectral content... >> Around, above and often well below the "desired" signal! >> >> Not entirely surprising though, if you look at the block diagram of one such. >> >> Regards to All. >> >> Dave G0WBX(G8KBV) >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
EK
Erik Kaashoek
Tue, Jul 12, 2022 3:53 PM

I'm struggling with the noise floor.
First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with
shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with
1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz
was still -140dBc/Hz
The setup was simplified to this schematic:
http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG
The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into
the differential audio output .
Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference?
Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is
clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony?

I'm struggling with the noise floor. First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output . Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference? Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony?
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Jul 12, 2022 4:17 PM

Hi

If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often microphonic.
The X7R versions are typically the best “high C” types. NPO’s normally are
completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps should be ok, but
who knows.

Roughly speaking, 1 nV / Hz should be low enough to not matter. Since all
these specs are “typical” one never knows quite what this or that part may
be doing. You should see a drop putting in a 1 nV in place of a 5 nV.

Bob

On Jul 12, 2022, at 7:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek erik@kaashoek.com wrote:

I'm struggling with the noise floor.
First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz
The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG
The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output .
Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference?
Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony?

Hi If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often microphonic. The X7R versions are typically the best “high C” types. NPO’s normally are completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps should be ok, but who knows. Roughly speaking, 1 nV / Hz should be low enough to not matter. Since all these specs are “typical” one never knows quite what this or that part may be doing. You *should* see a drop putting in a 1 nV in place of a 5 nV. Bob > On Jul 12, 2022, at 7:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek <erik@kaashoek.com> wrote: > > I'm struggling with the noise floor. > First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz > The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG > The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output . > Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference? > Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony? > >
LJ
Lux, Jim
Tue, Jul 12, 2022 5:53 PM

On 7/12/22 8:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

I'm struggling with the noise floor.
First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with
shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with
1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz
was still -140dBc/Hz
The setup was simplified to this schematic:
http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG

What's the noise contribution of the resistors? V = sqrt(4kTRB)

51 ohms  is sqrt (4 * 1.38E-23 * 300 * 51) = 0.9 nV/sqrt(Hz)  100 ohms
is ~1.4 nV/sqrt(Hz)

What kind of op amp? what's the current noise vs the voltage noise?  -
you might low voltage noise, but high current noise, and that current
noise across the input impedance can turn into surprisingly high voltage
noise at the output.

The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into
the differential audio output .
Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference?
Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing
is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony?

My guess would be a parasitic capacitance between circuit and housing.
changing the distance changes the C.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

On 7/12/22 8:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: > I'm struggling with the noise floor. > First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with > shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with > 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz > was still -140dBc/Hz > The setup was simplified to this schematic: > http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG What's the noise contribution of the resistors? V = sqrt(4*k*T*R*B) 51 ohms  is sqrt (4 * 1.38E-23 * 300 * 51) = 0.9 nV/sqrt(Hz)  100 ohms is ~1.4 nV/sqrt(Hz) What kind of op amp? what's the current noise vs the voltage noise?  - you might low voltage noise, but high current noise, and that current noise across the input impedance can turn into surprisingly high voltage noise at the output. > The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into > the differential audio output . > Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference? > Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing > is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony? My guess would be a parasitic capacitance between circuit and housing. changing the distance changes the C. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >
SC
Stephen C. Menasian
Tue, Jul 12, 2022 8:28 PM

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:17:33 -0800
Bob kb8tq via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

Hi

If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often
microphonic. The X7R versions are typically the best “high C” types.
NPO’s normally are completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps
should be ok, but who knows.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Actually X7Rs are quite bad. Z5Us, also. Both are piezoelectric. I don't
use them any more except for power supply bypass in non-critical
supplies. As a part of a precision temperature controller project
(microKelvin), I needed to select capacitors for low microphonics.
The ceramic types mentioned above are the worst offenders; but
several other types (certain film types included) show some microphonic
activity.

Best to evaluate every capacitor type by charging to 10 Volts, or so, AC
coupling to an audio amplifier/sensitive oscilloscope/or other and tapping
to see if noise is produced.

Stephen Menasian

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:17:33 -0800 Bob kb8tq via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > Hi > > If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often > microphonic. The X7R versions are typically the best “high C” types. > NPO’s normally are completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps > should be ok, but who knows. > _________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com Actually X7Rs are quite bad. Z5Us, also. Both are piezoelectric. I don't use them any more except for power supply bypass in non-critical supplies. As a part of a precision temperature controller project (microKelvin), I needed to select capacitors for low microphonics. The ceramic types mentioned above are the worst offenders; but several other types (certain film types included) show some microphonic activity. Best to evaluate every capacitor type by charging to 10 Volts, or so, AC coupling to an audio amplifier/sensitive oscilloscope/or other and tapping to see if noise is produced. Stephen Menasian
RK
Richard Karlquist
Wed, Jul 13, 2022 11:16 PM

More excellent comments from Bob, this time about microphonic
capacitors.

It is interesting to note that the LT3042/LT3045 data sheets

recommend a Murata GJ831CR61E106KE83L ceramic capacitor because it is:

  1. Low microphonic

and

  1. Has a relatively small loss of capacitance due to DC voltage being
    applied

The amount of capacitance needed is prohibitively high to consider NPO.

This part is listed as "Not Recommended for New Design" at Digikey, but

they have over 24,000 in stock.  See URL:

https://www.eetimes.com/murata-low-profile-capacitors-reduce-acoustic-noise/#:~:text=Murata's%20GJ8%20series%20of%20multi,consumer%20and%20industrial%20electronics%20applications.

I see that on the Eval PCB's they use Samsung CL31A106MBHNNNE.  Digikey
has over 1 million of these in stock.

No info about how good they are.

--

Rick Karlquist
N6RK

On 2022-07-12 09:17, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote:

Hi

If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often microphonic.
The X7R versions are typically the best "high C" types. NPO's normally are
completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps should be ok, but
who knows.

Roughly speaking, 1 nV / Hz should be low enough to not matter. Since all
these specs are "typical" one never knows quite what this or that part may
be doing. You should see a drop putting in a 1 nV in place of a 5 nV.

Bob

On Jul 12, 2022, at 7:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek erik@kaashoek.com wrote:

I'm struggling with the noise floor.
First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz
The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG
The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output .
Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference?
Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony?


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

More excellent comments from Bob, this time about microphonic capacitors. It is interesting to note that the LT3042/LT3045 data sheets recommend a Murata GJ831CR61E106KE83L ceramic capacitor because it is: 1. Low microphonic and 2. Has a relatively small loss of capacitance due to DC voltage being applied The amount of capacitance needed is prohibitively high to consider NPO. This part is listed as "Not Recommended for New Design" at Digikey, but they have over 24,000 in stock. See URL: https://www.eetimes.com/murata-low-profile-capacitors-reduce-acoustic-noise/#:~:text=Murata's%20GJ8%20series%20of%20multi,consumer%20and%20industrial%20electronics%20applications. I see that on the Eval PCB's they use Samsung CL31A106MBHNNNE. Digikey has over 1 million of these in stock. No info about how good they are. -- Rick Karlquist N6RK On 2022-07-12 09:17, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote: > Hi > > If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often microphonic. > The X7R versions are typically the best "high C" types. NPO's normally are > completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps should be ok, but > who knows. > > Roughly speaking, 1 nV / Hz should be low enough to not matter. Since all > these specs are "typical" one never knows quite what this or that part may > be doing. You *should* see a drop putting in a 1 nV in place of a 5 nV. > > Bob > >> On Jul 12, 2022, at 7:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek <erik@kaashoek.com> wrote: >> >> I'm struggling with the noise floor. >> First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz >> The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG >> The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output . >> Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference? >> Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony? > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
GE
glen english LIST
Thu, Jul 14, 2022 12:51 AM

generally the ceramic 'soft-termination' types are quiet. steer clear of
really Hi-k types like Y5V and Z5U.

anything other than CoG and NP0 are going to be like varactors, but that
wont matter so much IF you choose a nice high voltage. X7R are ok,
X5R....for PLLs if you choose something with heaps of voltage headroom.

If NPO gets too big, then I use solid tantalum capacitors in slow  PLLs,
(as the plastic MKT just get too big for my applications)....  but give
them heaps of voltage headroom - at least 3 x what the use voltage will
be....... they get much (current) noisier the higher the voltage on
them..  noise is in 10s of pA/root Hz. varies in mfr....

my 2c.

On 14/07/2022 9:16 am, Richard Karlquist via time-nuts wrote:

More excellent comments from Bob, this time about microphonic
capacitors.

It is interesting to note that the LT3042/LT3045 data sheets

recommend a Murata GJ831CR61E106KE83L ceramic capacitor because it is:

  1. Low microphonic

and

  1. Has a relatively small loss of capacitance due to DC voltage being
    applied

The amount of capacitance needed is prohibitively high to consider NPO.

This part is listed as "Not Recommended for New Design" at Digikey, but

they have over 24,000 in stock.  See URL:

https://www.eetimes.com/murata-low-profile-capacitors-reduce-acoustic-noise/#:~:text=Murata's%20GJ8%20series%20of%20multi,consumer%20and%20industrial%20electronics%20applications.

I see that on the Eval PCB's they use Samsung CL31A106MBHNNNE.  Digikey
has over 1 million of these in stock.

No info about how good they are.

--

Rick Karlquist
N6RK

On 2022-07-12 09:17, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote:

Hi

If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often microphonic.
The X7R versions are typically the best "high C" types. NPO's normally are
completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps should be ok, but
who knows.

Roughly speaking, 1 nV / Hz should be low enough to not matter. Since all
these specs are "typical" one never knows quite what this or that part may
be doing. You should see a drop putting in a 1 nV in place of a 5 nV.

Bob

On Jul 12, 2022, at 7:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek erik@kaashoek.com wrote:

I'm struggling with the noise floor.
First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz
The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG
The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output .
Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference?
Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony?


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

--
Glen English
RF Communications and Electronics Engineer

CORTEX RF

Pacific Media Technologies Pty Ltd trading as Cortex RF

ABN 40 075 532 008

PO Box 5231 Lyneham ACT 2602, Australia.
au mobile : +61 (0)418 975077

generally the ceramic 'soft-termination' types are quiet. steer clear of really Hi-k types like Y5V and Z5U. anything other than CoG and NP0 are going to be like varactors, but that wont matter so much IF you choose a nice high voltage. X7R are ok, X5R....for PLLs if you choose something with heaps of voltage headroom. If NPO gets too big, then I use solid tantalum capacitors in slow  PLLs, (as the plastic MKT just get too big for my applications)....  but give them heaps of voltage headroom - at least 3 x what the use voltage will be....... they get much (current) noisier the higher the voltage on them..  noise is in 10s of pA/root Hz. varies in mfr.... my 2c. On 14/07/2022 9:16 am, Richard Karlquist via time-nuts wrote: > More excellent comments from Bob, this time about microphonic > capacitors. > > It is interesting to note that the LT3042/LT3045 data sheets > > recommend a Murata GJ831CR61E106KE83L ceramic capacitor because it is: > > 1. Low microphonic > > and > > 2. Has a relatively small loss of capacitance due to DC voltage being > applied > > The amount of capacitance needed is prohibitively high to consider NPO. > > This part is listed as "Not Recommended for New Design" at Digikey, but > > they have over 24,000 in stock. See URL: > > https://www.eetimes.com/murata-low-profile-capacitors-reduce-acoustic-noise/#:~:text=Murata's%20GJ8%20series%20of%20multi,consumer%20and%20industrial%20electronics%20applications. > > > I see that on the Eval PCB's they use Samsung CL31A106MBHNNNE. Digikey > has over 1 million of these in stock. > > No info about how good they are. > > -- > > Rick Karlquist > N6RK > > On 2022-07-12 09:17, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote: > >> Hi >> >> If you have any ceramic capacitors in the mix, they are often microphonic. >> The X7R versions are typically the best "high C" types. NPO's normally are >> completely non-microphonic. Other non-ceramic caps should be ok, but >> who knows. >> >> Roughly speaking, 1 nV / Hz should be low enough to not matter. Since all >> these specs are "typical" one never knows quite what this or that part may >> be doing. You *should* see a drop putting in a 1 nV in place of a 5 nV. >> >> Bob >> >>> On Jul 12, 2022, at 7:53 AM, Erik Kaashoek <erik@kaashoek.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm struggling with the noise floor. >>> First tests where done with a 5nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp. Noise floor with shorted mixer output at 10kHz was -140dBc/Hz. Then I tried with 1nV/sqrt(Hz) opamp, but that made no difference, noise floor at 10kHz was still -140dBc/Hz >>> The setup was simplified to this schematic: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/SSPNA.JPG >>> The REF_buffer creates a virtual ground, the Audio_LNA amplifies into the differential audio output . >>> Why did the lower noise opamp not make a difference? >>> Also the setup is acting like a nice microphone. Tapping the housing is clearly audible. Which component may be causing the microphony? >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com -- Glen English RF Communications and Electronics Engineer CORTEX RF Pacific Media Technologies Pty Ltd trading as Cortex RF ABN 40 075 532 008 PO Box 5231 Lyneham ACT 2602, Australia. au mobile : +61 (0)418 975077
EK
Erik Kaashoek
Fri, Jul 15, 2022 3:09 PM

After adding an additional 20dB gain stage the measurements became a bit
cleaner and the noise floor without a DUT connected became flatter.  Due
an extra capacitor in the audio path there is some increased drop off
below 5Hz.

As it was impossible to change the scale of the FFT program used you
have to subtract 40dB from all measured noise levels!!!!!

Noise level of the PNA without DUT connected :
http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_baseline.JPG
This is NOT the noise of the internal DOCXO as without a DUT connected
the mixer can not produce any output. Its just the noise of the first
mixer output opamp, which happen to be at least 10dB better than any
measured DUT.

CTI OCXO: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_OCXO.JPG
AR60 Rubidium: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_Rb.JPG

10MHz reference output of a Rigol SG:
http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_Rigol_10MHz.JPG
10MHz generated by the same Rigol:
http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_Rigol.JPG
The elevated noise floor due to the DDS is clearly visible.

And the reason why I build the PNA:
Cheap Chinese TCXO: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_TCXO.JPG

Next step is conversion to triple supply

After adding an additional 20dB gain stage the measurements became a bit cleaner and the noise floor without a DUT connected became flatter.  Due an extra capacitor in the audio path there is some increased drop off below 5Hz. As it was impossible to change the scale of the FFT program used you have to subtract 40dB from all measured noise levels!!!!! Noise level of the PNA without DUT connected : http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_baseline.JPG This is NOT the noise of the internal DOCXO as without a DUT connected the mixer can not produce any output. Its just the noise of the first mixer output opamp, which happen to be at least 10dB better than any measured DUT. CTI OCXO: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_OCXO.JPG AR60 Rubidium: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_Rb.JPG 10MHz reference output of a Rigol SG: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_Rigol_10MHz.JPG 10MHz generated by the same Rigol: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_Rigol.JPG The elevated noise floor due to the DDS is clearly visible. And the reason why I build the PNA: Cheap Chinese TCXO: http://athome.kaashoek.com/time-nuts/PNA/PN_TCXO.JPG Next step is conversion to triple supply