SC
Stewart Cobb
Fri, Feb 16, 2018 6:31 PM
FYI, Antcom and AeroAntenna are two manufacturers of high-quality
American-made GPS / GNSS antennas. Antcom's datasheets are confusing to
read, and AeroAntenna hides theirs behind a customer-login barrier, so most
of eBay doesn't know exactly what they are. This means that good antennas
are often available cheap.
For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
Several other AT2775 antennas are on eBay for under $200. Any of these
would be excellent for time-nut purposes.
IMHO, Glonass coverage is not useful for precision timing. If you don't
have a good enough antenna installation to get continuous GPS coverage,
you're not really doing precision timing. If you are getting continuous GPS
coverage, Glonass doesn't add anything.
Disclaimer: I have no relationship to either company mentioned, other than
previously being a satisfied customer of both companies. I have no
connection to any sales currently listed on eBay.
Cheers!
--Stu
FYI, Antcom and AeroAntenna are two manufacturers of high-quality
American-made GPS / GNSS antennas. Antcom's datasheets are confusing to
read, and AeroAntenna hides theirs behind a customer-login barrier, so most
of eBay doesn't know exactly what they are. This means that good antennas
are often available cheap.
For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
Several other AT2775 antennas are on eBay for under $200. Any of these
would be excellent for time-nut purposes.
IMHO, Glonass coverage is not useful for precision timing. If you don't
have a good enough antenna installation to get continuous GPS coverage,
you're not really doing precision timing. If you are getting continuous GPS
coverage, Glonass doesn't add anything.
Disclaimer: I have no relationship to either company mentioned, other than
previously being a satisfied customer of both companies. I have no
connection to any sales currently listed on eBay.
Cheers!
--Stu
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Feb 16, 2018 6:47 PM
Hi
Well, the interesting point about Glonass timing is that it is independent of the
GPS empire. Galileo is another independent time source. Running a GPSDO
linked to each one would let you inter-compare the time from each of them.
Indeed I would guess that Galileo would do pretty well. Reports to date on
Glonass have not been encouraging. It still might be interesting to do. Once
Furuno releases the Galileo firmware, one of the Opus 7 based devices should
be able to run each of them. uBlox or some of the others would also do the
same thing.
Bob
On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Stewart Cobb stewart.cobb@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, Antcom and AeroAntenna are two manufacturers of high-quality
American-made GPS / GNSS antennas. Antcom's datasheets are confusing to
read, and AeroAntenna hides theirs behind a customer-login barrier, so most
of eBay doesn't know exactly what they are. This means that good antennas
are often available cheap.
For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
Several other AT2775 antennas are on eBay for under $200. Any of these
would be excellent for time-nut purposes.
IMHO, Glonass coverage is not useful for precision timing. If you don't
have a good enough antenna installation to get continuous GPS coverage,
you're not really doing precision timing. If you are getting continuous GPS
coverage, Glonass doesn't add anything.
Disclaimer: I have no relationship to either company mentioned, other than
previously being a satisfied customer of both companies. I have no
connection to any sales currently listed on eBay.
Cheers!
--Stu
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Well, the interesting point about Glonass timing is that it is independent of the
GPS empire. Galileo is another independent time source. Running a GPSDO
linked to each one would let you inter-compare the time from each of them.
Indeed I would *guess* that Galileo would do pretty well. Reports to date on
Glonass have not been encouraging. It still might be interesting to do. Once
Furuno releases the Galileo firmware, one of the Opus 7 based devices should
be able to run each of them. uBlox or some of the others would also do the
same thing.
Bob
> On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Stewart Cobb <stewart.cobb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, Antcom and AeroAntenna are two manufacturers of high-quality
> American-made GPS / GNSS antennas. Antcom's datasheets are confusing to
> read, and AeroAntenna hides theirs behind a customer-login barrier, so most
> of eBay doesn't know exactly what they are. This means that good antennas
> are often available cheap.
>
> For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
> dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
> and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
> bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
>
> Several other AT2775 antennas are on eBay for under $200. Any of these
> would be excellent for time-nut purposes.
>
> IMHO, Glonass coverage is not useful for precision timing. If you don't
> have a good enough antenna installation to get continuous GPS coverage,
> you're not really doing precision timing. If you are getting continuous GPS
> coverage, Glonass doesn't add anything.
>
> Disclaimer: I have no relationship to either company mentioned, other than
> previously being a satisfied customer of both companies. I have no
> connection to any sales currently listed on eBay.
>
> Cheers!
> --Stu
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
W
Wes
Fri, Feb 16, 2018 6:51 PM
On 2/16/2018 11:31 AM, Stewart Cobb wrote:
...
For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
...
Look out for the shipping charge.
On 2/16/2018 11:31 AM, Stewart Cobb wrote:
> ...
>
> For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
> dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
> and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
> bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
...
Look out for the shipping charge.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Feb 16, 2018 6:58 PM
Hi
A full blown choke ring antenna is a pretty big heavy gizmo. That said,
yes indeed, some shipping charges are insane.
Bob
On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:51 PM, Wes wes@triconet.org wrote:
On 2/16/2018 11:31 AM, Stewart Cobb wrote:
...
For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
Hi
A full blown choke ring antenna is a pretty big heavy gizmo. That said,
yes indeed, some shipping charges are insane.
Bob
> On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:51 PM, Wes <wes@triconet.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/16/2018 11:31 AM, Stewart Cobb wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
>> dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
>> and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
>> bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
> ...
>
> Look out for the shipping charge.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
GE
Gary E. Miller
Fri, Feb 16, 2018 7:49 PM
Yo Bob!
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:47:24 -0500
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Reports to date on Glonass have not been encouraging.
I have been testing position accuracy lately on a self contained u-blox
8 with built-in antenna supposedly GLONASS capable. I write a Python
script to selectively enable GLONASS and GALILEO over GPS.
All figures below are rough averages.
Typically, with one particular GPS, in one particular spot, it gives a
CEP(50) of 10 feet.
Enable GLONASS and that worsens to 24 feet. After about a minute the
u-blox rejects all the GLONASS, that have good SNR, and the CEP(50)
drops back to normal.
Enable GALILEO and CEP(50) improves to 6 feet. And stays that way.
So be sure to enable GALILEO in your GPS and disable GLONASS.
Also note: the passband of GALILEO is technically the same as GPS, but
has more energy at the edges. Some GPS antennas cut it a little close
and hurt GALILEO performance.
RGDS
GARY
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
Yo Bob!
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:47:24 -0500
Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
> Reports to date on Glonass have not been encouraging.
I have been testing position accuracy lately on a self contained u-blox
8 with built-in antenna supposedly GLONASS capable. I write a Python
script to selectively enable GLONASS and GALILEO over GPS.
All figures below are rough averages.
Typically, with one particular GPS, in one particular spot, it gives a
CEP(50) of 10 feet.
Enable GLONASS and that worsens to 24 feet. After about a minute the
u-blox rejects all the GLONASS, that have good SNR, and the CEP(50)
drops back to normal.
Enable GALILEO and CEP(50) improves to 6 feet. And stays that way.
So be sure to enable GALILEO in your GPS and disable GLONASS.
Also note: the passband of GALILEO is technically the same as GPS, but
has more energy at the edges. Some GPS antennas cut it a little close
and hurt GALILEO performance.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Feb 16, 2018 11:50 PM
Hi
Part of the issue with Glonass is the accuracy of the datum. It can be used
for navigation and timing. It’s best to use it stand alone. Survey a location
that is specific to it’s datum and then lock the module into timing mode. Don’t
try to run with a GPS survey as your location.
All that said, still not encouraging.
Bob
On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:49 PM, Gary E. Miller gem@rellim.com wrote:
Yo Bob!
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:47:24 -0500
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Reports to date on Glonass have not been encouraging.
I have been testing position accuracy lately on a self contained u-blox
8 with built-in antenna supposedly GLONASS capable. I write a Python
script to selectively enable GLONASS and GALILEO over GPS.
All figures below are rough averages.
Typically, with one particular GPS, in one particular spot, it gives a
CEP(50) of 10 feet.
Enable GLONASS and that worsens to 24 feet. After about a minute the
u-blox rejects all the GLONASS, that have good SNR, and the CEP(50)
drops back to normal.
Enable GALILEO and CEP(50) improves to 6 feet. And stays that way.
So be sure to enable GALILEO in your GPS and disable GLONASS.
Also note: the passband of GALILEO is technically the same as GPS, but
has more energy at the edges. Some GPS antennas cut it a little close
and hurt GALILEO performance.
RGDS
GARY
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Part of the issue with Glonass is the accuracy of the datum. It *can* be used
for navigation and timing. It’s best to use it stand alone. Survey a location
that is specific to it’s datum and then lock the module into timing mode. Don’t
try to run with a GPS survey as your location.
All that said, still not encouraging.
Bob
> On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:49 PM, Gary E. Miller <gem@rellim.com> wrote:
>
> Yo Bob!
>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:47:24 -0500
> Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>
>> Reports to date on Glonass have not been encouraging.
>
> I have been testing position accuracy lately on a self contained u-blox
> 8 with built-in antenna supposedly GLONASS capable. I write a Python
> script to selectively enable GLONASS and GALILEO over GPS.
>
> All figures below are rough averages.
>
> Typically, with one particular GPS, in one particular spot, it gives a
> CEP(50) of 10 feet.
>
> Enable GLONASS and that worsens to 24 feet. After about a minute the
> u-blox rejects all the GLONASS, that have good SNR, and the CEP(50)
> drops back to normal.
>
> Enable GALILEO and CEP(50) improves to 6 feet. And stays that way.
>
> So be sure to enable GALILEO in your GPS and disable GLONASS.
>
> Also note: the passband of GALILEO is technically the same as GPS, but
> has more energy at the edges. Some GPS antennas cut it a little close
> and hurt GALILEO performance.
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
> gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
>
> Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
> "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
J
jimlux
Sat, Feb 17, 2018 1:47 AM
On 2/16/18 10:47 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
Well, the interesting point about Glonass timing is that it is independent of the
GPS empire. Galileo is another independent time source. Running a GPSDO
linked to each one would let you inter-compare the time from each of them.
Indeed I would guess that Galileo would do pretty well. Reports to date on
Glonass have not been encouraging. It still might be interesting to do. Once
Furuno releases the Galileo firmware, one of the Opus 7 based devices should
be able to run each of them. uBlox or some of the others would also do the
same thing.
However, if you're going to post process data using something like
Gipsy-X, they have "better estimates" of the time base for all the
systems, so you can get a combination. I suppose when you process you
tell it which one is your favorite base, and it adjusts to that.
On 2/16/18 10:47 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
> Hi
>
> Well, the interesting point about Glonass timing is that it is independent of the
> GPS empire. Galileo is another independent time source. Running a GPSDO
> linked to each one would let you inter-compare the time from each of them.
> Indeed I would *guess* that Galileo would do pretty well. Reports to date on
> Glonass have not been encouraging. It still might be interesting to do. Once
> Furuno releases the Galileo firmware, one of the Opus 7 based devices should
> be able to run each of them. uBlox or some of the others would also do the
> same thing.
>
However, if you're going to post process data using something like
Gipsy-X, they have "better estimates" of the time base for all the
systems, so you can get a combination. I suppose when you process you
tell it which one is your favorite base, and it adjusts to that.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sat, Feb 17, 2018 1:33 PM
Hi,
A complicating factor with GLONASS is the frequency separation of the
satellites which causes several aspects of calibration issues.
I know they have changed operational aspects which have reduced
uncertainty significantly. This is also something that have been worked
at with the GPS system continuously.
It's a bowl of mixed issues.
However, the more systems and the more bands we use, the better we get
at finding discrepancies and mitigate them. The "all" system and
frequencies is however still very expensive.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 02/16/2018 07:47 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
Well, the interesting point about Glonass timing is that it is independent of the
GPS empire. Galileo is another independent time source. Running a GPSDO
linked to each one would let you inter-compare the time from each of them.
Indeed I would guess that Galileo would do pretty well. Reports to date on
Glonass have not been encouraging. It still might be interesting to do. Once
Furuno releases the Galileo firmware, one of the Opus 7 based devices should
be able to run each of them. uBlox or some of the others would also do the
same thing.
Bob
On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Stewart Cobb stewart.cobb@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, Antcom and AeroAntenna are two manufacturers of high-quality
American-made GPS / GNSS antennas. Antcom's datasheets are confusing to
read, and AeroAntenna hides theirs behind a customer-login barrier, so most
of eBay doesn't know exactly what they are. This means that good antennas
are often available cheap.
For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
Several other AT2775 antennas are on eBay for under $200. Any of these
would be excellent for time-nut purposes.
IMHO, Glonass coverage is not useful for precision timing. If you don't
have a good enough antenna installation to get continuous GPS coverage,
you're not really doing precision timing. If you are getting continuous GPS
coverage, Glonass doesn't add anything.
Disclaimer: I have no relationship to either company mentioned, other than
previously being a satisfied customer of both companies. I have no
connection to any sales currently listed on eBay.
Cheers!
--Stu
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi,
A complicating factor with GLONASS is the frequency separation of the
satellites which causes several aspects of calibration issues.
I know they have changed operational aspects which have reduced
uncertainty significantly. This is also something that have been worked
at with the GPS system continuously.
It's a bowl of mixed issues.
However, the more systems and the more bands we use, the better we get
at finding discrepancies and mitigate them. The "all" system and
frequencies is however still very expensive.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 02/16/2018 07:47 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
> Hi
>
> Well, the interesting point about Glonass timing is that it is independent of the
> GPS empire. Galileo is another independent time source. Running a GPSDO
> linked to each one would let you inter-compare the time from each of them.
> Indeed I would *guess* that Galileo would do pretty well. Reports to date on
> Glonass have not been encouraging. It still might be interesting to do. Once
> Furuno releases the Galileo firmware, one of the Opus 7 based devices should
> be able to run each of them. uBlox or some of the others would also do the
> same thing.
>
> Bob
>
>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Stewart Cobb <stewart.cobb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> FYI, Antcom and AeroAntenna are two manufacturers of high-quality
>> American-made GPS / GNSS antennas. Antcom's datasheets are confusing to
>> read, and AeroAntenna hides theirs behind a customer-login barrier, so most
>> of eBay doesn't know exactly what they are. This means that good antennas
>> are often available cheap.
>>
>> For example, any AeroAntenna whose part number starts with "AT2775" is a
>> dual-frequency L1/L2 GPS antenna. AT2775-42 is a near-survey-grade antenna,
>> and one of them is available right now (item 263500294711) at a starting
>> bid of $20, after expiring yesterday with no bids at $25.
>>
>> Several other AT2775 antennas are on eBay for under $200. Any of these
>> would be excellent for time-nut purposes.
>>
>> IMHO, Glonass coverage is not useful for precision timing. If you don't
>> have a good enough antenna installation to get continuous GPS coverage,
>> you're not really doing precision timing. If you are getting continuous GPS
>> coverage, Glonass doesn't add anything.
>>
>> Disclaimer: I have no relationship to either company mentioned, other than
>> previously being a satisfied customer of both companies. I have no
>> connection to any sales currently listed on eBay.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> --Stu
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>