time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Interfacing of 74ALVC divider chain to ADF4350 output (yet another low jitter sine-to-logic thread ; ) )

YO
Yuri Ostry
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 8:52 PM

Hello,

Trying to make low-PN fine tuning step synth for experiments in HF
range from the parts I have on hand. Looks like the best I can do is
to add extra dividers to chinese ADF4350 board from eBay that was used
in the past and now is collecting dust on the shelf.

But interfacing of 74ALVC flip-flop input to a ADF output in a 160-260 MHz
range is not so easy question for me, especially taking low jitter
requirements into account. Maybe someone can share tested working solution that
will not add too much noise and will be more or less stable with
temperature variations?

--
Sincerely,
Yuri, UA3ATQ/KI7XJ                          mailto:yuri@ostry.ru

Hello, Trying to make low-PN fine tuning step synth for experiments in HF range from the parts I have on hand. Looks like the best I can do is to add extra dividers to chinese ADF4350 board from eBay that was used in the past and now is collecting dust on the shelf. But interfacing of 74ALVC flip-flop input to a ADF output in a 160-260 MHz range is not so easy question for me, especially taking low jitter requirements into account. Maybe someone can share tested working solution that will not add too much noise and will be more or less stable with temperature variations? -- Sincerely, Yuri, UA3ATQ/KI7XJ mailto:yuri@ostry.ru
AK
Attila Kinali
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 9:25 PM

On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 23:52:50 +0300
Yuri Ostry yuri@ostry.ru wrote:

But interfacing of 74ALVC flip-flop input to a ADF output in a 160-260 MHz
range is not so easy question for me, especially taking low jitter
requirements into account. Maybe someone can share tested working solution that
will not add too much noise and will be more or less stable with
temperature variations?

CMOS signals get a bit iffy when going over 100MHz. You will probably
have to build your own board for the divider. I don't think it would
be reliable without it. As for interfacing the ADF4350 output, you will
need to use the differential output to cross the board-to-board gap.
On the divider board use a differential pair to convert the signal
to proper CMOS levels. You can use the one in the TADD2 or TICC
as an example how to do it. Make sure the f_t of the transistors
is high enough and that you give them enough current to work with.
Keep all wires on the divider board short and remove all planes
underneath the circuit, safe for the (closed) ground plane on the
bottom layer, in order to minimize stray capacitance.

Alternatively, use something like an SY89874 as first divider
stage  to get down to a more managable frequency range, then
continue with your ALVC dividers.

		Attila Kinali

--
You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
facts that needs altering.  -- The Doctor

On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 23:52:50 +0300 Yuri Ostry <yuri@ostry.ru> wrote: > But interfacing of 74ALVC flip-flop input to a ADF output in a 160-260 MHz > range is not so easy question for me, especially taking low jitter > requirements into account. Maybe someone can share tested working solution that > will not add too much noise and will be more or less stable with > temperature variations? CMOS signals get a bit iffy when going over 100MHz. You will probably have to build your own board for the divider. I don't think it would be reliable without it. As for interfacing the ADF4350 output, you will need to use the differential output to cross the board-to-board gap. On the divider board use a differential pair to convert the signal to proper CMOS levels. You can use the one in the TADD2 or TICC as an example how to do it. Make sure the f_t of the transistors is high enough and that you give them enough current to work with. Keep all wires on the divider board short and remove all planes underneath the circuit, safe for the (closed) ground plane on the bottom layer, in order to minimize stray capacitance. Alternatively, use something like an SY89874 as first divider stage to get down to a more managable frequency range, then continue with your ALVC dividers. Attila Kinali -- You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor
YO
Yuri Ostry
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 10:38 PM

Hello,

Thank you for your reply!

Monday, July 31, 2017, 0:25:19, Attila Kinali wrote:

A> Alternatively, use something like an SY89874 as first divider
A> stage to get down to a more managable frequency range, then
A> continue with your ALVC dividers.

I think it will be easier (faster and cheaper) to get ADF4351 chip
and replace it on that board, getting two more divider stages inside synth
chip. Pinout is the same, if memory serve me correctly. AD is easier
to get here compared to exotic Micrel clock buffer.

Looks like there will be no such "quick and dirty" way with 4350.

--
Best regards,
Yuri                          mailto:yuri@ostry.ru

Hello, Thank you for your reply! Monday, July 31, 2017, 0:25:19, Attila Kinali wrote: A> Alternatively, use something like an SY89874 as first divider A> stage to get down to a more managable frequency range, then A> continue with your ALVC dividers. I think it will be easier (faster and cheaper) to get ADF4351 chip and replace it on that board, getting two more divider stages inside synth chip. Pinout is the same, if memory serve me correctly. AD is easier to get here compared to exotic Micrel clock buffer. Looks like there will be no such "quick and dirty" way with 4350. -- Best regards, Yuri mailto:yuri@ostry.ru
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 10:46 PM

Use an LTC6957 the CMOS output of which has its PN specified at frequencies up to 300MHz.

Virtually any discrete circuit replacement with similar performance will require a higher voltage and dissipate more power.

Bruce

 On 31 July 2017 at 09:25 Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote:

 On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 23:52:50 +0300
 Yuri Ostry <yuri@ostry.ru> wrote:
     But interfacing of 74ALVC flip-flop input to a ADF output in a 160-260 MHz
     range is not so easy question for me, especially taking low jitter
     requirements into account. Maybe someone can share tested working solution that
     will not add too much noise and will be more or less stable with
     temperature variations?
 CMOS signals get a bit iffy when going over 100MHz. You will probably
 have to build your own board for the divider. I don't think it would
 be reliable without it. As for interfacing the ADF4350 output, you will
 need to use the differential output to cross the board-to-board gap.
 On the divider board use a differential pair to convert the signal
 to proper CMOS levels. You can use the one in the TADD2 or TICC
 as an example how to do it. Make sure the f_t of the transistors
 is high enough and that you give them enough current to work with.
 Keep all wires on the divider board short and remove all planes
 underneath the circuit, safe for the (closed) ground plane on the
 bottom layer, in order to minimize stray capacitance.

 Alternatively, use something like an SY89874 as first divider
 stage to get down to a more managable frequency range, then
 continue with your ALVC dividers.

 Attila Kinali

 --
 You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
 They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
 fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
 facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor

 _______________________________________________
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
Use an LTC6957 the CMOS output of which has its PN specified at frequencies up to 300MHz. Virtually any discrete circuit replacement with similar performance will require a higher voltage and dissipate more power. Bruce > > On 31 July 2017 at 09:25 Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 23:52:50 +0300 > Yuri Ostry <yuri@ostry.ru> wrote: > > > > > > But interfacing of 74ALVC flip-flop input to a ADF output in a 160-260 MHz > > range is not so easy question for me, especially taking low jitter > > requirements into account. Maybe someone can share tested working solution that > > will not add too much noise and will be more or less stable with > > temperature variations? > > > > > > CMOS signals get a bit iffy when going over 100MHz. You will probably > have to build your own board for the divider. I don't think it would > be reliable without it. As for interfacing the ADF4350 output, you will > need to use the differential output to cross the board-to-board gap. > On the divider board use a differential pair to convert the signal > to proper CMOS levels. You can use the one in the TADD2 or TICC > as an example how to do it. Make sure the f_t of the transistors > is high enough and that you give them enough current to work with. > Keep all wires on the divider board short and remove all planes > underneath the circuit, safe for the (closed) ground plane on the > bottom layer, in order to minimize stray capacitance. > > Alternatively, use something like an SY89874 as first divider > stage to get down to a more managable frequency range, then > continue with your ALVC dividers. > > Attila Kinali > > -- > You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. > They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to > fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the > facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >