time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Question on LH

HM
Hal Murray
Wed, Dec 7, 2016 10:42 PM

Mark has explained previously on the list, but it is actually kind of
convoluted.  The command to set the position does not accept enough numeric
precision to accurately set the position which was determined from
long term averaging...

What does the chop-off translate to in terms of distance?

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

chris@chriscaudle.org said: > Mark has explained previously on the list, but it is actually kind of > convoluted. The command to set the position does not accept enough numeric > precision to accurately set the position which was determined from > long term averaging... What does the chop-off translate to in terms of distance? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.