Values of kT at 25°C (298 K) Units kT = 4.11×10−21 _J_
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule) kT = 4.114 pN⋅nm kT = 9.83×10−22 cal
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie) kT = 25.7 meV
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron-volt) Related quantities kT/hc = 200 cm-1 kT/e = 25.7 mV
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volt) RT = kT ⋅ NA
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro's_number) = 2.479 kJ⋅mol-1
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule_per_mole) u = 0.593 kcal⋅mol−1
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilocalorie_per_mole) h (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant)
/kT = 0.16 ps (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picosecond)
In a message dated 8/11/2016 7:02:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
john@miles.io writes:
Right, I'm speaking specifically of L(f). The device being driven by the
oscillator doesn't care about the NF of the driver stage, only what a PN
analyzer would measure at the output jack.
For any 50-ohm source, the practical L(f) floor is -177 dBm/Hz - the
carrier power in dBm. No oscillator with an output of 0 dBm can be quieter than
-177 dBc/Hz at any offset, but an oscillator that puts out +20 dBm could
approach -197 dBc/Hz.
Given a proverbial black box containing a +17 dBm oscillator that measures
-195 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, the interesting question is, "What's in the box?"
There could be a passive resonator that's shaving off the broadband noise
after the last active stage without contributing additive noise of its own.
Another possibility might be cross-spectral collapse due to correlated
thermal noise from the splitter.
-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of KA2WEU--
measurements
NO, the maximum possible noise dynamic range is ( 177 + Pout) [dBm]
Transistor large signal NF ( dB),
the signal to noise ration is dimensionless !!!!
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.