time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Secondary phase noise standard & FE405

GH
Gerhard Hoffmann
Sat, Nov 12, 2016 9:24 PM

I have made an experimental secondary phase noise standard, as F.Walls

would call it. In the end, it's inspired by his paper.

There is not much to it. There is a Mini Circuits PSC2-1 splitter that is

fed from an oscillator or other source. The splitter divides it into a

clean output that goes to another SMA.

The other half is to be dirtyfied. It is fed into another PSC2-1 that is

used as a combiner. Its output goes to the signal source analyzer via

a third SMA.

The dirt input is either  a 4th SMA or a noise generator. That is switched

by reed relays. The noise generator consists of a 60 Ohm resistor and

currently 2 LMH6702 stages for +20 and +40 dB. I'm not sure if the

60R really defines the level, but the gain is at least flat from AF

to > 100 MHz. If not yet, it can be made so. I have already a

solid step attenuator so I can get rid of those reed relays.

I checked it this evening with my FE405 osc I bought earlier this year

and that has enjoyed a good month of continuous running by now.

I observed

  1. that the FEI delivers only 3.5 dBm

  2. that there are lots of birdies far out.    Is that normal, maybe
    from the DDS?

The addition of the noise reference lines seems to work properly.

oscillator:

<
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824608092/in/album-72157662535945536/

Later this evening I'll add the pic of the tin box. I need a USB cable...

:-)  Gerhard

I have made an experimental secondary phase noise standard, as F.Walls would call it. In the end, it's inspired by his paper. There is not much to it. There is a Mini Circuits PSC2-1 splitter that is fed from an oscillator or other source. The splitter divides it into a clean output that goes to another SMA. The other half is to be dirtyfied. It is fed into another PSC2-1 that is used as a combiner. Its output goes to the signal source analyzer via a third SMA. The dirt input is either a 4th SMA or a noise generator. That is switched by reed relays. The noise generator consists of a 60 Ohm resistor and currently 2 LMH6702 stages for +20 and +40 dB. I'm not sure if the 60R really defines the level, but the gain is at least flat from AF to > 100 MHz. If not yet, it can be made so. I have already a solid step attenuator so I can get rid of those reed relays. I checked it this evening with my FE405 osc I bought earlier this year and that has enjoyed a good month of continuous running by now. I observed 1. that the FEI delivers only 3.5 dBm 2. that there are lots of birdies far out. Is that normal, maybe from the DDS? The addition of the noise reference lines seems to work properly. oscillator: < https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824608092/in/album-72157662535945536/ > low calibration line: < https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824607162/in/album-72157662535945536/ > high calibration line: < https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824607552/in/album-72157662535945536/ > Later this evening I'll add the pic of the tin box. I need a USB cable... :-) Gerhard
BC
Bob Camp
Sat, Nov 12, 2016 10:52 PM

Hi

Yes, the FE-405 uses a DDS and a cleanup. Inside the cleanup loop the DDS spurs come
straight through. Since the FE-405 compensates for all sorts of things, the DDS moves
around a lot. Even a one bit change on a DDS will move spurs around. With an ever changing
DDS, you have an ever changing forest of “stuff” on the output.

Not the best thing for a “standard” …..

Bob

On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Gerhard Hoffmann dk4xp@arcor.de wrote:

I have made an experimental secondary phase noise standard, as F.Walls

would call it. In the end, it's inspired by his paper.

There is not much to it. There is a Mini Circuits PSC2-1 splitter that is

fed from an oscillator or other source. The splitter divides it into a

clean output that goes to another SMA.

The other half is to be dirtyfied. It is fed into another PSC2-1 that is

used as a combiner. Its output goes to the signal source analyzer via

a third SMA.

The dirt input is either  a 4th SMA or a noise generator. That is switched

by reed relays. The noise generator consists of a 60 Ohm resistor and

currently 2 LMH6702 stages for +20 and +40 dB. I'm not sure if the

60R really defines the level, but the gain is at least flat from AF

to > 100 MHz. If not yet, it can be made so. I have already a

solid step attenuator so I can get rid of those reed relays.

I checked it this evening with my FE405 osc I bought earlier this year

and that has enjoyed a good month of continuous running by now.

I observed

  1. that the FEI delivers only 3.5 dBm

  2. that there are lots of birdies far out.    Is that normal, maybe from the DDS?

The addition of the noise reference lines seems to work properly.

oscillator:

< https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824608092/in/album-72157662535945536/ >

low calibration line:

< https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824607162/in/album-72157662535945536/ >

high calibration line:

< https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824607552/in/album-72157662535945536/ >

Later this evening I'll add the pic of the tin box. I need a USB cable...

:-)  Gerhard


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Yes, the FE-405 uses a DDS and a cleanup. Inside the cleanup loop the DDS spurs come straight through. Since the FE-405 compensates for all sorts of things, the DDS moves around a lot. Even a one bit change on a DDS will move spurs around. With an ever changing DDS, you have an ever changing forest of “stuff” on the output. Not the best thing for a “standard” ….. Bob > On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> wrote: > > I have made an experimental secondary phase noise standard, as F.Walls > > would call it. In the end, it's inspired by his paper. > > > There is not much to it. There is a Mini Circuits PSC2-1 splitter that is > > fed from an oscillator or other source. The splitter divides it into a > > clean output that goes to another SMA. > > The other half is to be dirtyfied. It is fed into another PSC2-1 that is > > used as a combiner. Its output goes to the signal source analyzer via > > a third SMA. > > > The dirt input is either a 4th SMA or a noise generator. That is switched > > by reed relays. The noise generator consists of a 60 Ohm resistor and > > currently 2 LMH6702 stages for +20 and +40 dB. I'm not sure if the > > 60R really defines the level, but the gain is at least flat from AF > > to > 100 MHz. If not yet, it can be made so. I have already a > > solid step attenuator so I can get rid of those reed relays. > > > I checked it this evening with my FE405 osc I bought earlier this year > > and that has enjoyed a good month of continuous running by now. > > I observed > > 1. that the FEI delivers only 3.5 dBm > > 2. that there are lots of birdies far out. Is that normal, maybe from the DDS? > > > The addition of the noise reference lines seems to work properly. > > oscillator: > > < https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824608092/in/album-72157662535945536/ > > > low calibration line: > > < https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824607162/in/album-72157662535945536/ > > > high calibration line: > > < https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/30824607552/in/album-72157662535945536/ > > > Later this evening I'll add the pic of the tin box. I need a USB cable... > > :-) Gerhard > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
GH
Gerhard Hoffmann
Sun, Nov 13, 2016 7:55 AM

Am 12.11.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Bob Camp:

Hi

Yes, the FE-405 uses a DDS and a cleanup. Inside the cleanup loop the DDS spurs come
straight through. Since the FE-405 compensates for all sorts of things, the DDS moves
around a lot. Even a one bit change on a DDS will move spurs around. With an ever changing
DDS, you have an ever changing forest of “stuff” on the output.

I would not expect a lot of dynamics after a month of cont. power up.
And the spurs
do not move and they don't average away, at least not within my limits
of boredom.

The PLL bandwidth seems to be 50 Hz, so the forest from 100KHz to 5MHz is
far out. That seems somewhat weird and raised doubt together
with the power level being out of spec.

Not the best thing for a “standard” …..

I've tried to kill 2 birds with one stone. The FE405 had collected dust for
months and still was mostly untested.

The oscillator is not part of the "standard"; I could have used a BVA or
a maser by just plugging in. I just needed a centre frequency with a
few dBm for the E5052B to lock on.

All I want is some known phase noise reference reference lines
for my private phase detector experiments. Recalibating the
phase detector by modulating oscillators on different frequencies
is no fun if you change the Schottkies every 2 minutes.

regards, Gerhard

Am 12.11.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Bob Camp: > Hi > > Yes, the FE-405 uses a DDS and a cleanup. Inside the cleanup loop the DDS spurs come > straight through. Since the FE-405 compensates for all sorts of things, the DDS moves > around a lot. Even a one bit change on a DDS will move spurs around. With an ever changing > DDS, you have an ever changing forest of “stuff” on the output. I would not expect a lot of dynamics after a month of cont. power up. And the spurs do not move and they don't average away, at least not within my limits of boredom. The PLL bandwidth seems to be 50 Hz, so the forest from 100KHz to 5MHz is far out. That seems somewhat weird and raised doubt together with the power level being out of spec. > Not the best thing for a “standard” ….. I've tried to kill 2 birds with one stone. The FE405 had collected dust for months and still was mostly untested. The oscillator is not part of the "standard"; I could have used a BVA or a maser by just plugging in. I just needed a centre frequency with a few dBm for the E5052B to lock on. All I want is some known phase noise reference reference lines for my private phase detector experiments. Recalibating the phase detector by modulating oscillators on different frequencies is no fun if you change the Schottkies every 2 minutes. regards, Gerhard
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Nov 13, 2016 1:10 PM

Hi

On Nov 13, 2016, at 2:55 AM, Gerhard Hoffmann dk4xp@arcor.de wrote:

Am 12.11.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Bob Camp:

Hi

Yes, the FE-405 uses a DDS and a cleanup. Inside the cleanup loop the DDS spurs come
straight through. Since the FE-405 compensates for all sorts of things, the DDS moves
around a lot. Even a one bit change on a DDS will move spurs around. With an ever changing
DDS, you have an ever changing forest of “stuff” on the output.

I would not expect a lot of dynamics after a month of cont. power up. And the spurs
do not move and they don't average away, at least not within my limits of boredom.

The PLL bandwidth seems to be 50 Hz, so the forest from 100KHz to 5MHz is
far out. That seems somewhat weird and raised doubt together
with the power level being out of spec.

The spurs you need to watch are under 50Hz. They are the ones from the DDS. The higher
stuff is from the microprocessor.

Bob

Not the best thing for a “standard” …..

I've tried to kill 2 birds with one stone. The FE405 had collected dust for
months and still was mostly untested.

The oscillator is not part of the "standard"; I could have used a BVA or
a maser by just plugging in. I just needed a centre frequency with a
few dBm for the E5052B to lock on.

All I want is some known phase noise reference reference lines
for my private phase detector experiments. Recalibating the
phase detector by modulating oscillators on different frequencies
is no fun if you change the Schottkies every 2 minutes.

regards, Gerhard


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi > On Nov 13, 2016, at 2:55 AM, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> wrote: > > Am 12.11.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Bob Camp: >> Hi >> >> Yes, the FE-405 uses a DDS and a cleanup. Inside the cleanup loop the DDS spurs come >> straight through. Since the FE-405 compensates for all sorts of things, the DDS moves >> around a lot. Even a one bit change on a DDS will move spurs around. With an ever changing >> DDS, you have an ever changing forest of “stuff” on the output. > I would not expect a lot of dynamics after a month of cont. power up. And the spurs > do not move and they don't average away, at least not within my limits of boredom. > > The PLL bandwidth seems to be 50 Hz, so the forest from 100KHz to 5MHz is > far out. That seems somewhat weird and raised doubt together > with the power level being out of spec. The spurs you need to watch are under 50Hz. They are the ones from the DDS. The higher stuff is from the microprocessor. Bob > >> Not the best thing for a “standard” ….. > I've tried to kill 2 birds with one stone. The FE405 had collected dust for > months and still was mostly untested. > > The oscillator is not part of the "standard"; I could have used a BVA or > a maser by just plugging in. I just needed a centre frequency with a > few dBm for the E5052B to lock on. > > All I want is some known phase noise reference reference lines > for my private phase detector experiments. Recalibating the > phase detector by modulating oscillators on different frequencies > is no fun if you change the Schottkies every 2 minutes. > > regards, Gerhard > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.