volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

fluke 731b battery pack

OE
Orin Eman
Wed, Aug 3, 2016 9:30 PM

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David davidwhess@gmail.com wrote:

I looked at the schematic and is seems feasible without excessive
effort.  Either the existing simple series preregulator can be
modified or replaced allowing it to both charge the battery (through a
blocking diode) and power the instrument or a completely separate
power charging circuit can be added in parallel.

The existing charging circuit is in parallel with the pre-regulator; they
are separated by CR5 and CR6 and the pre-regulator/battery outputs are
combined by CR8 and CR9.  The only problem with the existing circuit is
with a fresh, strong, fully charged battery pack, charging pulses will leak
past CR8 with only R1/C1 to filter them.

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David <davidwhess@gmail.com> wrote: > > I looked at the schematic and is seems feasible without excessive > effort. Either the existing simple series preregulator can be > modified or replaced allowing it to both charge the battery (through a > blocking diode) and power the instrument or a completely separate > power charging circuit can be added in parallel. > The existing charging circuit _is_ in parallel with the pre-regulator; they are separated by CR5 and CR6 and the pre-regulator/battery outputs are combined by CR8 and CR9. The only problem with the existing circuit is with a fresh, strong, fully charged battery pack, charging pulses will leak past CR8 with only R1/C1 to filter them.
D
David
Wed, Aug 3, 2016 10:11 PM

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:30:33 -0700, you wrote:

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David davidwhess@gmail.com wrote:

I looked at the schematic and is seems feasible without excessive
effort.  Either the existing simple series preregulator can be
modified or replaced allowing it to both charge the battery (through a
blocking diode) and power the instrument or a completely separate
power charging circuit can be added in parallel.

The existing charging circuit is in parallel with the pre-regulator; they
are separated by CR5 and CR6 and the pre-regulator/battery outputs are
combined by CR8 and CR9.  The only problem with the existing circuit is
with a fresh, strong, fully charged battery pack, charging pulses will leak
past CR8 with only R1/C1 to filter them.

Ah, I did not see that A1S1A is the same as switch A1S1B; I am used to
seeing a little dashed line connecting all of the elements of a single
switch.  I guess that goes along with the symbol they used for
constant current diode CR10 which I have not seen in a long time.

Anyway, the changes I suggested still apply.  Actually, using a
battery which accepts a constant voltage charge simplifies the
requirements.

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:30:33 -0700, you wrote: >On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David <davidwhess@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I looked at the schematic and is seems feasible without excessive >> effort. Either the existing simple series preregulator can be >> modified or replaced allowing it to both charge the battery (through a >> blocking diode) and power the instrument or a completely separate >> power charging circuit can be added in parallel. > >The existing charging circuit _is_ in parallel with the pre-regulator; they >are separated by CR5 and CR6 and the pre-regulator/battery outputs are >combined by CR8 and CR9. The only problem with the existing circuit is >with a fresh, strong, fully charged battery pack, charging pulses will leak >past CR8 with only R1/C1 to filter them. Ah, I did not see that A1S1A is the same as switch A1S1B; I am used to seeing a little dashed line connecting all of the elements of a single switch. I guess that goes along with the symbol they used for constant current diode CR10 which I have not seen in a long time. Anyway, the changes I suggested still apply. Actually, using a battery which accepts a constant voltage charge simplifies the requirements.
TM
Tom Miller
Wed, Aug 3, 2016 10:52 PM

If they are integrated with the device, the manufacturer must certify they
have tested the device and proved it can not cause a fire. If you change the
NiCd battery to a LiFe system, you will fail that requirement. When you
ship, you must certify there is no hazmat item in your package. There is a
minimum Wh capacity allowed but I am not sure what it is. Not much from
memory.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David" davidwhess@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" volt-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] fluke 731b battery pack

Does that restriction apply to batteries which are integrated with a
device?  I thought it only applied to separate cells.

On Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:20:00 -0400, you wrote:

I like the LiFe idea except for the restrictions on shipping by air or
USPS.

That shouldn't be too much of a problem for most that have access to a
local
cal lab.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

If they are integrated with the device, the manufacturer must certify they have tested the device and proved it can not cause a fire. If you change the NiCd battery to a LiFe system, you will fail that requirement. When you ship, you must certify there is no hazmat item in your package. There is a minimum Wh capacity allowed but I am not sure what it is. Not much from memory. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <davidwhess@gmail.com> To: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" <volt-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] fluke 731b battery pack > Does that restriction apply to batteries which are integrated with a > device? I thought it only applied to separate cells. > > On Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:20:00 -0400, you wrote: > >>I like the LiFe idea except for the restrictions on shipping by air or >>USPS. >> >>That shouldn't be too much of a problem for most that have access to a >>local >>cal lab. > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
CB
Christopher Brown
Thu, Aug 18, 2016 5:33 PM

If even with a fully charged pack the batt charge side gets high enough
to feed into the ref you need to check the current value of the current
limiting resistor in the charge circuit.

Don't have the exact details in my head at the moment (was about 3 years
ago) but in both of my 731Bs that resistor had dropped in value by more
than a little and was floating the batteries at a higher voltage.  I
replaced with a correct value over-rated metal film type and no more
issue, max floating voltage for ~ C/20 maint to the pack is below cutoff.

If it is climbing high enough compared to the other feed, then resistors
have drifted and the batt circuit is running to hot or the filter AC ->
ref supply is running too low.

On 8/3/16 13:30, Orin Eman wrote:

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David davidwhess@gmail.com wrote:

I looked at the schematic and is seems feasible without excessive
effort.  Either the existing simple series preregulator can be
modified or replaced allowing it to both charge the battery (through a
blocking diode) and power the instrument or a completely separate
power charging circuit can be added in parallel.

The existing charging circuit is in parallel with the pre-regulator; they
are separated by CR5 and CR6 and the pre-regulator/battery outputs are
combined by CR8 and CR9.  The only problem with the existing circuit is
with a fresh, strong, fully charged battery pack, charging pulses will leak
past CR8 with only R1/C1 to filter them.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

If even with a fully charged pack the batt charge side gets high enough to feed into the ref you need to check the current value of the current limiting resistor in the charge circuit. Don't have the exact details in my head at the moment (was about 3 years ago) but in both of my 731Bs that resistor had dropped in value by more than a little and was floating the batteries at a higher voltage. I replaced with a correct value over-rated metal film type and no more issue, max floating voltage for ~ C/20 maint to the pack is below cutoff. If it is climbing high enough compared to the other feed, then resistors have drifted and the batt circuit is running to hot or the filter AC -> ref supply is running too low. On 8/3/16 13:30, Orin Eman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David <davidwhess@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I looked at the schematic and is seems feasible without excessive >> effort. Either the existing simple series preregulator can be >> modified or replaced allowing it to both charge the battery (through a >> blocking diode) and power the instrument or a completely separate >> power charging circuit can be added in parallel. >> > > > The existing charging circuit _is_ in parallel with the pre-regulator; they > are separated by CR5 and CR6 and the pre-regulator/battery outputs are > combined by CR8 and CR9. The only problem with the existing circuit is > with a fresh, strong, fully charged battery pack, charging pulses will leak > past CR8 with only R1/C1 to filter them. > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >