I thought there was kind of a rule about EXCLUDING sats on or near the
horizon...
Clay Autery, KY5G
On 6/20/2017 8:27 AM, "Björn Gabrielsson" wrote:
Hi Thorbjörn,
To bad this particula antenna has surrounding buildings (and maybe trees)
that mask low elevation satellites.
--
Björn
Hi Bryan:
The first data on tectonic plate movement came from the Latitude Observatories. The Longitude problem was solved fairly
quickly by Harrison's clocks but the uncertainty of an observatories latitude because of wobble of the pole took much
longer and was addressed by a hand full of Latitude Observatories all at 39 deg 8 min North, and I'm lucky to have one
in my town.
http://www.prc68.com/I/UkiahObs.shtml
Note this is more like an extremely accurate surveying instrument than a telescope for star watching. We will be having
star parties since it's summer and the sky here is dark enough to see the Milky way.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
-------- Original Message --------
I have wondered how geologists are able to measure tectonic plate movements in the earths surface to a couple cm's when the sensors from what I see/read they are nothing more than sensors in concrete boxes?. I believe they use various technologies such as Very Long Baseline Interferometryhttp://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/structure/dynamicearth/plates_move/active_tectonics/vlbi.htm (VLBI) and Satellite Laser Ranginghttp://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/structure/dynamicearth/plates_move/active_tectonics/slr1.htm (SLR)
All fascinating stuff....
-=Bryan=-
From: time-nuts time-nuts-bounces@febo.com on behalf of Thorbjørn Pedersen Thorbjorn.Pedersen@ikm.no
Sent: June 19, 2017 9:42 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Antenna on Tower.
http://www.sp.se/en/index/resources/GNSS/Sidor/default.aspx
[http://www.sp.se/sv/index/resources/GNSS/PublishingImages/pelare.jpg]http://www.sp.se/en/index/resources/GNSS/Sidor/default.aspx
GNSS-equipment - SPhttp://www.sp.se/en/index/resources/GNSS/Sidor/default.aspx
www.sp.se
GNSS-equipment RISE has equipment for GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) for applications in Time and Frequency, Positioning and Atmospheric Studies.
Have a look at the best receiving antenna I know about.
The tower must have cooling tubes coiled around it because of the sun heating one side will make it bend away from the sun, and turn this way all day.
The cable and doom is also temperature controlled.
Best Regards
Thorbjørn W. Pedersen
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
time-nuts Info Page - American Febo Enterpriseshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
www.febo.com
time-nuts is a low volume, high SNR list for the discussion of precise time and frequency measurement and related topics. To see the collection of prior postings to ...
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:29:24 -0700
Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
I have wondered how geologists are able to measure tectonic plate
movements in the earths surface to a couple cm's when the sensors from
what I see/read they are nothing more than sensors in concrete boxes?. I
believe they use various technologies such as Very Long Baseline
Interferometryhttp://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/structure/dynamicearth/plates_move/active_tectonics/vlbi.htm (VLBI)
and Satellite Laser Ranginghttp://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/structure/dynamicearth/plates_move/active_tectonics/slr1.htm (SLR)
The first "proofs" for plate tectonics were not related to ranging
and movement at all. They were based on evidence burried in the ground:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Geophys/platevid.html
I don't know when the first proof using longitude measurments was made,
but it must have been fairly recent (i'd say last 100 years at most)
as pretty stable clocks were needed. Probably at least quartz
or maybe even atomic clocks.
Modern tectonic movement measurements are mostly based on GPS.
Even using a simple L1 C/A only receiver, one can achieve sub-cm
accuracy if phase data is recorded over several hours and post-processed.
Using an L1/L2 receiver, compensating for all those "tiny" effects
and averaging over a few days should result in sub-mm differences over
quite long baselines.
Side note:
Solid earth tides are in the order of 20-50cm vertical and 10-30cm horizontal.
(if i remember correctly)
The first data on tectonic plate movement came from the Latitude
Observatories. The Longitude problem was solved fairly
quickly by Harrison's clocks but the uncertainty of an observatories
latitude because of wobble of the pole took much
longer and was addressed by a hand full of Latitude Observatories all at 39
deg 8 min North, and I'm lucky to have one
in my town.
http://www.prc68.com/I/UkiahObs.shtml
Note this is more like an extremely accurate surveying instrument than a
telescope for star watching. We will be having
star parties since it's summer and the sky here is dark enough to see the
Milky way.
These telescopes are called zenith telescopes and could only be moved
in one plane. This telescope is transit instrument and the modern version
of the mural circle. Transit instruments are used to measure when a star
passes through the north-south line/plane. This can then be used to
define local time. The modern variants of the zenith telescopes are used
by the IERS to measure siderial time and compare it to TAI/UTC.
The transit instruments in Greenwich defined the 0 meridian. Hence
every time the instrument got upgraded by a better one, the meridian
moved a bit.
One thing I still haven't understood is, how these transit instruments
were "calibrated" and placed exactly on a north-south line.
All fascinating stuff....
Definitely!
Attila Kinali
--
You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor
Hi Attila:
I have a web page devoted to finding true North.
http://www.prc68.com/I/North.shtml
There are many ways. Here's on that uses the north star.
The first step is to sight the North Star (assuming you are in the Northern hemisphere.
But the North star currently is at:
dec: +89°15' 51"
R.A.: 2h 31m 49s
This means that when the sidereal time is 2h 31m 49s it's exactly North and then again after 12:00:00 hours sidereal
time pass it's again exactly North. Any star can be used with this method, but the closer the star is to 90 deg dec
the better from a geometry perspective.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
One thing I still haven't understood is, how these transit instruments
were "calibrated" and placed exactly on a north-south line.
All fascinating stuff....
Definitely!
Attila Kinali