time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] LT1016 as a pulse shaper...

HM
Hal Murray
Mon, Mar 5, 2018 12:59 AM

Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz said:

If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly.

What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to
measure PN?

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said: > If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly. What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to measure PN? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Mon, Mar 5, 2018 1:19 AM

Hi

The “best” way to measure phase noise will always be a “that depends” sort of thing. One
pretty darn good way to check noise on any amplifier is to use something like a TimePod.
You use a power splitter and a pretty good source. First you check your TImePod (or whatever)
for floor. You then stick the amp in one leg. You re-measure phase noise (or ADEV). Assuming
it comes up above the previous floor, you have your number for the device. If it does not come
up above the previous floor, you need a different test set.

Bob

On Mar 4, 2018, at 7:59 PM, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:

Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz said:

If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly.

What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to
measure PN?

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The “best” way to measure phase noise will always be a “that depends” sort of thing. One pretty darn good way to check noise on any amplifier is to use something like a TimePod. You use a power splitter and a pretty good source. First you check your TImePod (or whatever) for floor. You then stick the amp in one leg. You re-measure phase noise (or ADEV). Assuming it comes up above the previous floor, you have your number for the device. If it does not come up above the previous floor, you need a different test set. Bob > On Mar 4, 2018, at 7:59 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said: >> If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly. > > What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to > measure PN? > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Mon, Mar 5, 2018 1:32 AM

Since I have a Timepod all that I'd need would be a board that had SMA inputs and outputs with provision for an LC L network to  step up the input if necessary plus an RLC network on the output something like in the attachment.

If one doesnt have a Timepod or equivalent a low noise phase detector will suffice for the noisier sources. An adjustable phase shift network is required to achieve quadrature between the LO (driven directly from the splitter) and the RF input (driven by the DUT output).

The required phase shift adjustment range could perhaps be reduced by using a quadrature hybrid to split the test source instead of a standard splitter. The output of the phase detector is low pass filtered and amplified and fed to a high resolution ADC such as a sound card.

Bruce

 On 05 March 2018 at 13:59 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote:

 Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said:
     If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly.
 What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to
 measure PN?

 --
 These are my opinions. I hate spam.

 _______________________________________________
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
Since I have a Timepod all that I'd need would be a board that had SMA inputs and outputs with provision for an LC L network to step up the input if necessary plus an RLC network on the output something like in the attachment. If one doesnt have a Timepod or equivalent a low noise phase detector will suffice for the noisier sources. An adjustable phase shift network is required to achieve quadrature between the LO (driven directly from the splitter) and the RF input (driven by the DUT output). The required phase shift adjustment range could perhaps be reduced by using a quadrature hybrid to split the test source instead of a standard splitter. The output of the phase detector is low pass filtered and amplified and fed to a high resolution ADC such as a sound card. Bruce > > On 05 March 2018 at 13:59 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said: > > > > > > If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly. > > > > > > What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to > measure PN? > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BK
Bob kb8tq
Mon, Mar 5, 2018 2:17 AM

Hi

Having tried to do these measurements a lot of ways ….. the TimePod makes it very
easy. The ability to get phase noise and ADEV “all at once” is part of it. The ability to
handle a wide range of input levels with minimal degradation is a also part of the why.
The software makes it easy for lazy Bob … a big plus ….

Bob

On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz wrote:

Since I have a Timepod all that I'd need would be a board that had SMA inputs and outputs with provision for an LC L network to  step up the input if necessary plus an RLC network on the output something like in the attachment.

If one doesnt have a Timepod or equivalent a low noise phase detector will suffice for the noisier sources. An adjustable phase shift network is required to achieve quadrature between the LO (driven directly from the splitter) and the RF input (driven by the DUT output).

The required phase shift adjustment range could perhaps be reduced by using a quadrature hybrid to split the test source instead of a standard splitter. The output of the phase detector is low pass filtered and amplified and fed to a high resolution ADC such as a sound card.

Bruce

On 05 March 2018 at 13:59 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote:

Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said:
    If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly.
What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to
measure PN?

--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

<CMOS_PN_test.PNG>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Having tried to do these measurements a lot of ways ….. the TimePod makes it *very* easy. The ability to get phase noise and ADEV “all at once” is part of it. The ability to handle a wide range of input levels with minimal degradation is a also part of the why. The software makes it easy for lazy Bob … a big plus …. Bob > On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > Since I have a Timepod all that I'd need would be a board that had SMA inputs and outputs with provision for an LC L network to step up the input if necessary plus an RLC network on the output something like in the attachment. > > If one doesnt have a Timepod or equivalent a low noise phase detector will suffice for the noisier sources. An adjustable phase shift network is required to achieve quadrature between the LO (driven directly from the splitter) and the RF input (driven by the DUT output). > > The required phase shift adjustment range could perhaps be reduced by using a quadrature hybrid to split the test source instead of a standard splitter. The output of the phase detector is low pass filtered and amplified and fed to a high resolution ADC such as a sound card. > > Bruce > >> >> On 05 March 2018 at 13:59 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: >> >> Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said: >> >>>> >>> If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly. >>> >>>> >> What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to >> measure PN? >> >> -- >> These are my opinions. I hate spam. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > <CMOS_PN_test.PNG>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
E
ewkehren
Mon, Mar 5, 2018 9:22 AM

BruceWisjh I had known about it a week ago and we could have added a board to the A9 order. Next order is probably three weeks away ifIi can help contact me off list     Bert Kehren
Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A
-------- Original message --------From: Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz Date: 3/4/18  8:32 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net, Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LT1016 as a pulse shaper...
Since I have a Timepod all that I'd need would be a board that had SMA inputs and outputs with provision for an LC L network to  step up the input if necessary plus an RLC network on the output something like in the attachment.

If one doesnt have a Timepod or equivalent a low noise phase detector will suffice for the noisier sources. An adjustable phase shift network is required to achieve quadrature between the LO (driven directly from the splitter) and the RF input (driven by the DUT output).

The required phase shift adjustment range could perhaps be reduced by using a quadrature hybrid to split the test source instead of a standard splitter. The output of the phase detector is low pass filtered and amplified and fed to a high resolution ADC such as a sound card.

Bruce

     On 05 March 2018 at 13:59 Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:

     Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz said:

         > >

         If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly.

     >

     What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to
     measure PN?

     --
     These are my opinions. I hate spam.

     _______________________________________________
     time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
     To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
     and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

BruceWisjh I had known about it a week ago and we could have added a board to the A9 order. Next order is probably three weeks away ifIi can help contact me off list     Bert Kehren Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A -------- Original message --------From: Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> Date: 3/4/18 8:32 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LT1016 as a pulse shaper... Since I have a Timepod all that I'd need would be a board that had SMA inputs and outputs with provision for an LC L network to  step up the input if necessary plus an RLC network on the output something like in the attachment. If one doesnt have a Timepod or equivalent a low noise phase detector will suffice for the noisier sources. An adjustable phase shift network is required to achieve quadrature between the LO (driven directly from the splitter) and the RF input (driven by the DUT output). The required phase shift adjustment range could perhaps be reduced by using a quadrature hybrid to split the test source instead of a standard splitter. The output of the phase detector is low pass filtered and amplified and fed to a high resolution ADC such as a sound card. Bruce > >     On 05 March 2018 at 13:59 Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > >     Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> said: > >         > > > >         If I had a suitable PCB board for it I would do the measurement properly. > > > >     > >     What would a suitable board look like and/or what sort of gear do you need to >     measure PN? > >     -- >     These are my opinions. I hate spam. > >     _______________________________________________ >     time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >     To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >     and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.