On 2016-08-18 10:00 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Ed,
Thats quite the challenge and yes the carbon resistors must be about 50
years old now. So questioning them is reasonable. I have a c so take my
next comment with caution.
The oscillator is a small circuit and then it runs to buffers and
multipliers and stuff.
That's one of the differences between the 2.5 and the 2.5x models. The
2.5 only has 2.5 MHz and lower outputs so no multipliers. Hopefully, the
other circuit blocks are more or less the same.
Lots of parts of every type. Maybe it makes sense to isolate and measure
just the oscillator circuit to see how it behaves without all of the other
stuff. Also there were various regulators in that can.
Yes, noise on the internal voltage regulator would affect everything. I
might replace all the Ta capacitors 'just because', but beyond that,
divide and conquer makes a lot of sense.
Ed
Lots of possibilities for trouble. But also worth the effort to figure it out.
Great old oscillators.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Ed Palmered_palmer@sasktel.net wrote:
I picked up a Sulzer 2.5 (not 2.5A or 2.5B or 2.5C) oscillator and 5P
power supply. It's working, but the AlDev at low tau is poor. After a few
days of operation the AlDev @ 1sec. is only 1e-10. It's not the power
supply. I'm running under 'AC fail' conditions with a lab power supply
standing in for the batteries. This bypasses almost everything in the
power supply. Eventually, I plan to replace the batteries with lead-acid
and replace the circuit board with an improved circuit.
So, I'll be opening up the oscillator to see what's what. My first 'usual
suspect' will be the Ta capacitors, but I'm wondering about all those
carbon composition resistors. Should I be looking at a wholesale
replacement with metal film? Maybe just in the oscillator and AVC areas?
Are there any other known trouble spots with these oscillators?
I haven't been able to find any info on the 2.5. The manuals and
schematics for the 5A and the 2.5B/C are some help, but the 2.5 is very
different from the 2.5B/C. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ed