Ulf, What level of jitter would you consider acceptable? Try PL133-37, I am using it for sinewave shaping on some of designs - including my 30ps pulser. Leo On 3 Mar 2018, at 21:56, time-nuts-request@febo.com wrote: > From: Ulf Kylenfall <ulf_r_k@yahoo.com> > > Gentlemen, > I have so far been using LT1016 as a pulse shaper and also whenever I needed toconvert a sine wave into TTL Logic levels. Some hysteresis and all the decouplingand layout precautions as recommended by LT. > Are there any similar or better alternatives out there that could be usedthat would provide lower jitter and that are less expenceive? > Ulf Kylenfall > SM6GXV

 On 04 March 2018 at 22:34 Leo Bodnar <leo@leobodnar.com> wrote:

 Ulf,

 What level of jitter would you consider acceptable?

 Try PL133-37, I am using it for sinewave shaping on some of designs - including my 30ps pulser.

 Leo

 On 3 Mar 2018, at 21:56, time-nuts-request@febo.com wrote:

     From: Ulf Kylenfall <ulf_r_k@yahoo.com>

     Gentlemen,
     I have so far been using LT1016 as a pulse shaper and also whenever I needed toconvert a sine wave into TTL Logic levels. Some hysteresis and all the decouplingand layout precautions as recommended by LT.
     Are there any similar or better alternatives out there that could be usedthat would provide lower jitter and that are less expenceive?
     Ulf Kylenfall
     SM6GXV

 _______________________________________________
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

Somewhat worse than an LTC6957 particularly at low offset frequencies. Either that or the manufacturers PN noise measurement method doesn't work well at low offsets. Bruce > > On 04 March 2018 at 22:34 Leo Bodnar <leo@leobodnar.com> wrote: > > Ulf, > > What level of jitter would you consider acceptable? > > Try PL133-37, I am using it for sinewave shaping on some of designs - including my 30ps pulser. > > Leo > > On 3 Mar 2018, at 21:56, time-nuts-request@febo.com wrote: > > > > > > From: Ulf Kylenfall <ulf_r_k@yahoo.com> > > > > Gentlemen, > > I have so far been using LT1016 as a pulse shaper and also whenever I needed toconvert a sine wave into TTL Logic levels. Some hysteresis and all the decouplingand layout precautions as recommended by LT. > > Are there any similar or better alternatives out there that could be usedthat would provide lower jitter and that are less expenceive? > > Ulf Kylenfall > > SM6GXV > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >