time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies

DE
Donald E. Pauly
Fri, Jun 2, 2017 2:04 AM

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html

The lock system on the HP5071 is complex and expensive.  My plan to
improve the HP5061B is to to use a pair of third overtone crystals
running at 91.9 mc and 100 mc.  I have come up with the magic numbers
to lock them together.  This eliminates all multipliers with the
exception of the A4 board. The 12.61 mc synthesizer input presently
wastes half the microwave power produced by the 90 mc input in the
unused lower sideband. Therefore only half the 91.9 mc drive is
required.

Eight bit ECL dividers in one package are available to perform the
necessary lock.  When multiplied by 100 to the cesium resonance line,
the 91.9 mc frequency is a few cycles high so that C field currents
are reasonable. With crystal cuts for zero temperature coefficient at
25°C, it is possible to get along without an oven.  Room temperature
performance at 25°C±5°C is ±15·10^-9.  Oscillator warm up time would
be measured in seconds.

Square wave modulation of variable frequency and amplitude shows
promise for reducing the noise effects of the beam tube.  You can
smoothly change the lock time constant, deviation and frequency.  This
would avoid the big disturbance of the HP5061B when you switch from
OPR to LTC. (OPR=operate with 1 second time constant, LTC=operate with
100 second time constant)

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KV

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html The lock system on the HP5071 is complex and expensive. My plan to improve the HP5061B is to to use a pair of third overtone crystals running at 91.9 mc and 100 mc. I have come up with the magic numbers to lock them together. This eliminates all multipliers with the exception of the A4 board. The 12.61 mc synthesizer input presently wastes half the microwave power produced by the 90 mc input in the unused lower sideband. Therefore only half the 91.9 mc drive is required. Eight bit ECL dividers in one package are available to perform the necessary lock. When multiplied by 100 to the cesium resonance line, the 91.9 mc frequency is a few cycles high so that C field currents are reasonable. With crystal cuts for zero temperature coefficient at 25°C, it is possible to get along without an oven. Room temperature performance at 25°C±5°C is ±15·10^-9. Oscillator warm up time would be measured in seconds. Square wave modulation of variable frequency and amplitude shows promise for reducing the noise effects of the beam tube. You can smoothly change the lock time constant, deviation and frequency. This would avoid the big disturbance of the HP5061B when you switch from OPR to LTC. (OPR=operate with 1 second time constant, LTC=operate with 100 second time constant) πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ WB0KV
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Fri, Jun 2, 2017 5:01 AM

Direct multiplication to 9192 MHz isn't used
by any manufacturer of any atomic clock that I
know of, due to its well known disadvantages.
I can state for a fact that it was summarily
rejected by the designers of the 5060/5061
(Cutler, et al).  In the 5071, I (being the
RF designer) also summarily rejected it.
The architecture that is instead used is indeed
complex and expensive as you say.  It is
also ACCURATE.

Rick

On 6/1/2017 7:04 PM, Donald E. Pauly wrote:

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html

The lock system on the HP5071 is complex and expensive.  My plan to
improve the HP5061B is to to use a pair of third overtone crystals
running at 91.9 mc and 100 mc.  I have come up with the magic numbers
to lock them together.  This eliminates all multipliers with the
exception of the A4 board. The 12.61 mc synthesizer input presently
wastes half the microwave power produced by the 90 mc input in the
unused lower sideband. Therefore only half the 91.9 mc drive is
required.

Eight bit ECL dividers in one package are available to perform the
necessary lock.  When multiplied by 100 to the cesium resonance line,
the 91.9 mc frequency is a few cycles high so that C field currents
are reasonable. With crystal cuts for zero temperature coefficient at
25°C, it is possible to get along without an oven.  Room temperature
performance at 25°C±5°C is ±15·10^-9.  Oscillator warm up time would
be measured in seconds.

Square wave modulation of variable frequency and amplitude shows
promise for reducing the noise effects of the beam tube.  You can
smoothly change the lock time constant, deviation and frequency.  This
would avoid the big disturbance of the HP5061B when you switch from
OPR to LTC. (OPR=operate with 1 second time constant, LTC=operate with
100 second time constant)

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KV


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Direct multiplication to 9192 MHz isn't used by any manufacturer of any atomic clock that I know of, due to its well known disadvantages. I can state for a fact that it was summarily rejected by the designers of the 5060/5061 (Cutler, et al). In the 5071, I (being the RF designer) also summarily rejected it. The architecture that is instead used is indeed complex and expensive as you say. It is also ACCURATE. Rick On 6/1/2017 7:04 PM, Donald E. Pauly wrote: > https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html > > The lock system on the HP5071 is complex and expensive. My plan to > improve the HP5061B is to to use a pair of third overtone crystals > running at 91.9 mc and 100 mc. I have come up with the magic numbers > to lock them together. This eliminates all multipliers with the > exception of the A4 board. The 12.61 mc synthesizer input presently > wastes half the microwave power produced by the 90 mc input in the > unused lower sideband. Therefore only half the 91.9 mc drive is > required. > > Eight bit ECL dividers in one package are available to perform the > necessary lock. When multiplied by 100 to the cesium resonance line, > the 91.9 mc frequency is a few cycles high so that C field currents > are reasonable. With crystal cuts for zero temperature coefficient at > 25°C, it is possible to get along without an oven. Room temperature > performance at 25°C±5°C is ±15·10^-9. Oscillator warm up time would > be measured in seconds. > > Square wave modulation of variable frequency and amplitude shows > promise for reducing the noise effects of the beam tube. You can > smoothly change the lock time constant, deviation and frequency. This > would avoid the big disturbance of the HP5061B when you switch from > OPR to LTC. (OPR=operate with 1 second time constant, LTC=operate with > 100 second time constant) > > πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ > WB0KV > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 2, 2017 12:57 PM

Hi

On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:04 PM, Donald E. Pauly trojancowboy@gmail.com wrote:

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html

The lock system on the HP5071 is complex and expensive.  My plan to
improve the HP5061B is to to use a pair of third overtone crystals
running at 91.9 mc and 100 mc.  I have come up with the magic numbers
to lock them together.  This eliminates all multipliers with the
exception of the A4 board. The 12.61 mc synthesizer input presently
wastes half the microwave power produced by the 90 mc input in the
unused lower sideband. Therefore only half the 91.9 mc drive is
required.

Eight bit ECL dividers in one package are available to perform the
necessary lock.  When multiplied by 100 to the cesium resonance line,
the 91.9 mc frequency is a few cycles high so that C field currents
are reasonable. With crystal cuts for zero temperature coefficient at
25°C, it is possible to get along without an oven.  Room temperature
performance at 25°C±5°C is ±15·10^-9.

I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range ….
With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C after turn on.

Bob

Oscillator warm up time would
be measured in seconds.

Square wave modulation of variable frequency and amplitude shows
promise for reducing the noise effects of the beam tube.  You can
smoothly change the lock time constant, deviation and frequency.  This
would avoid the big disturbance of the HP5061B when you switch from
OPR to LTC. (OPR=operate with 1 second time constant, LTC=operate with
100 second time constant)

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KV


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi > On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:04 PM, Donald E. Pauly <trojancowboy@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html > > The lock system on the HP5071 is complex and expensive. My plan to > improve the HP5061B is to to use a pair of third overtone crystals > running at 91.9 mc and 100 mc. I have come up with the magic numbers > to lock them together. This eliminates all multipliers with the > exception of the A4 board. The 12.61 mc synthesizer input presently > wastes half the microwave power produced by the 90 mc input in the > unused lower sideband. Therefore only half the 91.9 mc drive is > required. > > Eight bit ECL dividers in one package are available to perform the > necessary lock. When multiplied by 100 to the cesium resonance line, > the 91.9 mc frequency is a few cycles high so that C field currents > are reasonable. With crystal cuts for zero temperature coefficient at > 25°C, it is possible to get along without an oven. Room temperature > performance at 25°C±5°C is ±15·10^-9. I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range …. With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C after turn on. Bob > Oscillator warm up time would > be measured in seconds. > > Square wave modulation of variable frequency and amplitude shows > promise for reducing the noise effects of the beam tube. You can > smoothly change the lock time constant, deviation and frequency. This > would avoid the big disturbance of the HP5061B when you switch from > OPR to LTC. (OPR=operate with 1 second time constant, LTC=operate with > 100 second time constant) > > πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ > WB0KV > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
DE
Donald E. Pauly
Fri, Jun 2, 2017 6:09 PM

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html

If we build this circuit it would be a bench model not designed to be
inside a hot chassis.  It would be able to lock ± 5° C of 25° C.  My
idea of an oven is to keep the crystal and oscillator at 25° C ±0.001
°C with 60 second warm up/cool down time.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org
Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com

Hi

I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range ….
With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C
after turn on.

Bob

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html If we build this circuit it would be a bench model not designed to be inside a hot chassis. It would be able to lock ± 5° C of 25° C. My idea of an oven is to keep the crystal and oscillator at 25° C ±0.001 °C with 60 second warm up/cool down time. πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ WB0KVV ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:57 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Hi I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range …. With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C after turn on. Bob
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 2, 2017 7:07 PM

Hi

If you are going to use an oven, it’s better to run it at the turn temperature of
the crystal. That would put you above 50C for an AT and a bit higher still for an SC.

Bob

On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Donald E. Pauly trojancowboy@gmail.com wrote:

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html

If we build this circuit it would be a bench model not designed to be
inside a hot chassis.  It would be able to lock ± 5° C of 25° C.  My
idea of an oven is to keep the crystal and oscillator at 25° C ±0.001
°C with 60 second warm up/cool down time.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org
Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com

Hi

I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range ….
With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C
after turn on.

Bob


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi If you are going to use an oven, it’s better to run it at the turn temperature of the crystal. That would put you above 50C for an AT and a bit higher still for an SC. Bob > On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Donald E. Pauly <trojancowboy@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html > > If we build this circuit it would be a bench model not designed to be > inside a hot chassis. It would be able to lock ± 5° C of 25° C. My > idea of an oven is to keep the crystal and oscillator at 25° C ±0.001 > °C with 60 second warm up/cool down time. > > πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ > WB0KVV > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> > Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:57 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > > Hi > > I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range …. > With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C > after turn on. > > Bob > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
DE
Donald E. Pauly
Fri, Jun 2, 2017 7:19 PM

A cut at that angle has no turn over temperature. The zero temperature
coefficient point is 25°.  Its temperature coefficient everywhere else is
positive.

On Friday, June 2, 2017, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

If you are going to use an oven, it’s better to run it at the turn
temperature of
the crystal. That would put you above 50C for an AT and a bit higher still
for an SC.

Bob

On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Donald E. Pauly <trojancowboy@gmail.com

javascript:;> wrote:

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html

If we build this circuit it would be a bench model not designed to be
inside a hot chassis.  It would be able to lock ± 5° C of 25° C.  My
idea of an oven is to keep the crystal and oscillator at 25° C ±0.001
°C with 60 second warm up/cool down time.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org javascript:;>
Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <

Hi

I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range ….
With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C
after turn on.

Bob


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/

mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.

A cut at that angle has no turn over temperature. The zero temperature coefficient point is 25°. Its temperature coefficient everywhere else is positive. On Friday, June 2, 2017, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > Hi > > If you are going to use an oven, it’s better to run it at the turn > temperature of > the crystal. That would put you above 50C for an AT and a bit higher still > for an SC. > > Bob > > > On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Donald E. Pauly <trojancowboy@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/105566.html > > > > If we build this circuit it would be a bench model not designed to be > > inside a hot chassis. It would be able to lock ± 5° C of 25° C. My > > idea of an oven is to keep the crystal and oscillator at 25° C ±0.001 > > °C with 60 second warm up/cool down time. > > > > πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ > > WB0KVV > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org <javascript:;>> > > Date: Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:57 AM > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Versus HP5071 Cesium Line Frequencies > > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement < > time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>> > > > > Hi > > > > I would suggest you check a few real crystals over the 20 to 40C range …. > > With all the “stuff” in a 5061, it will change (rise) at least 10C > > after turn on. > > > > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;> > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > >