Hi
On Jul 13, 2017, at 11:06 PM, William H. Fite omniryx@gmail.com wrote:
Did I put my foot in it? It was a sincere question.
No I don’t think you did. If I implied otherwise, I’m sorry for the imprecision
of what I wrote. I’m not at all sure of what one would see. I’m only guessing
that the result will be observable.
Bob
On Thursday, July 13, 2017, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
I think we are both taking it as a given that the eclipse’s impact on the
ionosphere will
be “visible” even with a fairly simple setup. I guess that might qualify
for a very loose
definition of the term “hypothesis” in my case. I can’t speak for Tom.
Bob
On Jul 13, 2017, at 6:24 PM, William H. Fite <omniryx@gmail.com
javascript:;> wrote:
Tom, are some specific hypotheses being tested or is this purely
exploratory?
Bill
On Thursday, July 13, 2017, Tom Van Baak <tvb@leapsecond.com
javascript:;> wrote:
The trick is to just run the timing receiver in all-in-view mode
collecting 1PPS data against your house standard as usual, but also
capture
all the binary message(s) where the per-SV Az/El/SNR and phase residuals
are reported. This allows you to re-create the individual "1PPS" from
each
SV used in the timing solution. Or maybe just use the RINEX data. This
is
what I was referring to in the CORS reference to Brooke.
It would be "cheating" to know the eclipse path ahead of time and mine
the
data for confirmation. Instead I dare you to blindly mine the GPS data
for
all of August and then make a bold claim when and where the eclipse was,
like capturing a trace through a cloud chamber. Having done all that you
can "look in the back of the book" for the actual eclipse path to see
how
right you were.
/tvb
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob kb8tq" <kb8tq@n1k.org javascript:; javascript:;>
To: "Tom Van Baak" <tvb@leapsecond.com javascript:; javascript:;>;
"Discussion of
precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB & Eclipse
Hi
If one perhaps knew the path of the eclipse in advance and had a GPS
timing receiver that
could be set somehow to look at a single satellite….. all one would need
is a means of comparing
the output to a stable reference to possibly observe something
interesting.
More or less: You know the path of eclipse roaring along bashing the
ionosphere. You can (maybe)
pick a sat who’s signal traverses that region while getting to your
location during the eclipse. Yes, it’s
not original science. It might still be fun.
Bob
On Jul 13, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Tom Van Baak tvb@LeapSecond.com wrote:
Brooke,
Nice set of links. Thanks. There's a poster here with an overview:
Moses-Eclipse_Research_CEDAR_Poster.pdf
Is there a study based on GPS observations?
It will all be there for free in CORS. It's just a matter of mining the
data.
Apparently this is done a lot. Here are some random examples of what
can
be done. Pretty amazing.
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/2005_01_ION_NTM_Ionosphere.pdf
http://www.gps.gov/cgsic/smg/2004/smith.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1006.3565.pdf
Google for a subset of words like: CORS Ionosphere Monitoring Analysis
Modeling TEC
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 1:35 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] WWVB & Eclipse
Hi:
There's a massive experiment relating to the strength of WWVB and a
transmitter in Dixon California.
wp/2017/07/12/a-massive-atmospheric-experiment-is-
planned-for-august-solar-eclipse/?utm_term=.4d7101b869f6
http://eng.umb.edu/~eclipsemob/index.php <http://eng.umb.edu/%
7Eeclipsemob/index.php>
2017_IES_Liles.pdf
This article says Dixon may transmit at 55.1 and 135.95 kHz.
The EclipseMob receiver works with a smart phone acting as an SDR. as
well as the source of it's position and the
date-time of observation.
There is a parallel study based on ham radio WSPRNet and Reverse
Beacon
Network.
Is there a study based on GPS observations?
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
William H Fite, PhD
Independent Consultant
Statistical Analysis & Research Methods
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
William H Fite, PhD
Independent Consultant
Statistical Analysis & Research Methods
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I have a CSI MBX-3 DGPS beacon receiver that I have been playing around
with lately. It works quite well and I have a very basic shell of a
program written in python to control it and get some basic performance
details of it's MF receiver but so far still trying to get anything out
of the binary RTCM data stream.
At the least I will be able to collect beacon signal strength and SNR.
Of course the data shows the expected diurnal variation. At the very
least I will be able to monitor this aspect of the effect of eclipse
before, during, and after.
I would like to be able to extract the data within binary data stream
and am slowly working my way the RTKLIB apps in an effort to do so. My
objective is peripherally related to time nuttery but more so directed
towards radio propagation and space weather.
If anyone has already gone down this path, please point me in the right
direction.
There is an interesting project run through the University of New
Brunswick called CHAIN - Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network. CHAIN
uses high data rate GNSS Ionospheric Scintillation and Total electron
content monitors plus advanced digital ionosondes to collect their data.
cheers, Graham ve3gtc
On 2017-07-13 21:52, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Also DGPS stations logging:
https://www.hfunderground.com/board/index.php/board,32.0.html
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi:
There's a massive experiment relating to the strength of WWVB and a
transmitter in Dixon California.
http://eng.umb.edu/~eclipsemob/index.php
http://eng.umb.edu/%7Eeclipsemob/index.php
http://www.hamsci.org/sites/default/files/publications/2017_IES_Liles.pdf
This article says Dixon may transmit at 55.1 and 135.95 kHz.
The EclipseMob receiver works with a smart phone acting as an SDR. as well
as the source of it's position and the date-time of observation.
There is a parallel study based on ham radio WSPRNet and Reverse Beacon
Network.
http://hamsci.org/
Is there a study based on GPS observations?
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
Yo Graham!
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 01:04:05 +0000
Graham planophore@aei.ca wrote:
I have a CSI MBX-3 DGPS beacon receiver that I have been playing
around with lately.
Is this the programming manual for what you have?
but so far still trying to
get anything out of the binary RTCM data stream.
You no longer need a GPS to get the RTCM data, it is available in
real time on the internet. Of course it is more fun to get it off
your GPS.
You just need an ntrip client:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Networked_Transport_of_RTCM_via_Internet_Protocol
I would like to be able to extract the data within binary data stream
and am slowly working my way the RTKLIB apps in an effort to do so.
[...]
If anyone has already gone down this path, please point me in the
right direction.
I have worked on the gpsd RTCM and NTRIP code.
Feel free to contact me off list if yuo think I can be helpful.
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin