time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Machining some aluminum help!

J
jimlux
Thu, May 18, 2017 6:53 PM

On 5/18/17 11:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote:

I'm very dubious that you need a tapped 4-40 hole to be threaded any deeper
than 0.25". If you work with the machinist I'm sure you can come up with
some reasonable spec that does not require a bottoming tap and will save
you a lot of money.

The rule of thumb is that if you get 3-5 threads fully engaged that's
good - so at 40 threads/inch, 5 threads is 1/8" Drill the hole a bit
more than 1/4" deep (approx), tap the first 3/16" inch (so you can use a
regular old tap), blow the chips out afterwards, use fasteners that are
the right length.

Is the number of fasteners for mechanical strength, for RF sealing,
thermal transfer, or what? You might be able to get by with fewer
fasteners if you use a conductive elastomer gasket (or even copper foil
tape which deforms when you screw the lid down).

5 fasteners in 5" is spacing them a bit less than an inch apart.
Even in Aluminum, your threads are probably stronger than your fastener.

Threads			Fastener	

Engaged Length 0.125 in Engaged Length
TPI 40 TPI
Diameter 0.112 in Diameter
mean Diam 0.0995 in Root Diam 0.087 mean Diam
Engaged area 0.0391 sq in Area 0.00594 Engaged area
Load 200 lb Load
Shear stress 5,119 psi 33,644 Shear stress
Ultimate strength 42 ksi ultimate 74 Ultimate strength
Shear Strength 24,249 psi proof 55,000 Shear Strength
Safety factor 4.74 Safety factor 1.63 Safety factor

Aluminum			Steel	

I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap the
walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material
and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move
towards welding/brazing rather than machining.

Tim N3QE

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, cdelect@juno.com wrote:

Hi,

I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long.

I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep.

This is for a Rubidium project.

The local machine shop want's $360.00!!!!

Anyone have a machining setup that could do the work a bit cheaper?

If not I'll give it a try myself.

Please contact me off list.

Thanks!

Corby Dawson


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

On 5/18/17 11:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: > I'm very dubious that you need a tapped 4-40 hole to be threaded any deeper > than 0.25". If you work with the machinist I'm sure you can come up with > some reasonable spec that does not require a bottoming tap and will save > you a lot of money. > The rule of thumb is that if you get 3-5 threads fully engaged that's good - so at 40 threads/inch, 5 threads is 1/8" Drill the hole a bit more than 1/4" deep (approx), tap the first 3/16" inch (so you can use a regular old tap), blow the chips out afterwards, use fasteners that are the right length. Is the number of fasteners for mechanical strength, for RF sealing, thermal transfer, or what? You might be able to get by with fewer fasteners if you use a conductive elastomer gasket (or even copper foil tape which deforms when you screw the lid down). 5 fasteners in 5" is spacing them a bit less than an inch apart. Even in Aluminum, your threads are probably stronger than your fastener. Threads Fastener Engaged Length 0.125 in Engaged Length TPI 40 TPI Diameter 0.112 in Diameter mean Diam 0.0995 in Root Diam 0.087 mean Diam Engaged area 0.0391 sq in Area 0.00594 Engaged area Load 200 lb Load Shear stress 5,119 psi 33,644 Shear stress Ultimate strength 42 ksi ultimate 74 Ultimate strength Shear Strength 24,249 psi proof 55,000 Shear Strength Safety factor 4.74 Safety factor 1.63 Safety factor Aluminum Steel > I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap the > walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material > and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move > towards welding/brazing rather than machining. > > Tim N3QE > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, <cdelect@juno.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long. >> >> I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep. >> >> This is for a Rubidium project. >> >> The local machine shop want's $360.00!!!! >> >> Anyone have a machining setup that could do the work a bit cheaper? >> >> If not I'll give it a try myself. >> >> Please contact me off list. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Corby Dawson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
J
jimlux
Thu, May 18, 2017 7:03 PM

On 5/18/17 11:53 AM, jimlux wrote:

On 5/18/17 11:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote:

I'm very dubious that you need a tapped 4-40 hole to be threaded any
deeper
than 0.25". If you work with the machinist I'm sure you can come up with
some reasonable spec that does not require a bottoming tap and will save
you a lot of money.

Fixing the table formatting

             Threads            Fastener

Engaged Length    0.125 in
TPI                  40
Diameter          0.112 in
mean Diam        0.0995 in    Root Diam    0.087 in
Engaged area    0.0391 sq in  Area      0.00594 sq in
Load                200 lb
Shear stress      5,119 psi    Stress      33,644 psi
Ultimate strength    42 ksi    ultimate        74 ksi
Shear Strength  24,249 psi    proof      55,000 psi
Safety factor      4.74        Safety factor    1.63

                 Aluminum            Steel
On 5/18/17 11:53 AM, jimlux wrote: > On 5/18/17 11:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: >> I'm very dubious that you need a tapped 4-40 hole to be threaded any >> deeper >> than 0.25". If you work with the machinist I'm sure you can come up with >> some reasonable spec that does not require a bottoming tap and will save >> you a lot of money. Fixing the table formatting > > Threads Fastener > Engaged Length 0.125 in > TPI 40 > Diameter 0.112 in > mean Diam 0.0995 in Root Diam 0.087 in > Engaged area 0.0391 sq in Area 0.00594 sq in > Load 200 lb > Shear stress 5,119 psi Stress 33,644 psi > Ultimate strength 42 ksi ultimate 74 ksi > Shear Strength 24,249 psi proof 55,000 psi > Safety factor 4.74 Safety factor 1.63 > > Aluminum Steel > >
CA
Chris Albertson
Thu, May 18, 2017 9:36 PM

It would be easy to re-design the job for cheaper machining..  Do you
really need to tap the holes?  You might use self taping screws.  Id the
would work then you can do the work yourself with just a hand drill.

OK it you must use machine threads and they must be #4 size try "rivets"
these work like pop rivets but leave a hollow thread insert in the hole
that will take screws.  Takes all of 5 seconds to install a thread hole.

Think again about threading aluminum.  It is not very strong, it would be
easy for an end user to strip the #4 threads.  Better to use the rivet or
other steel thread insert.    Even native nuts  installed with flush rivets
is better

So try self threading screws first them go to threaded inserts, you could
install 100 4-40 inserts in one hour using just hand tools.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:54 AM, cdelect@juno.com wrote:

Hi,

I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long.

I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep.

This is for a Rubidium project.

The local machine shop want's $360.00!!!!

Anyone have a machining setup that could do the work a bit cheaper?

If not I'll give it a try myself.

Please contact me off list.

Thanks!

Corby Dawson


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

It would be easy to re-design the job for cheaper machining.. Do you really need to tap the holes? You might use self taping screws. Id the would work then you can do the work yourself with just a hand drill. OK it you must use machine threads and they must be #4 size try "rivets" these work like pop rivets but leave a hollow thread insert in the hole that will take screws. Takes all of 5 seconds to install a thread hole. Think again about threading aluminum. It is not very strong, it would be easy for an end user to strip the #4 threads. Better to use the rivet or other steel thread insert. Even native nuts installed with flush rivets is better So try self threading screws first them go to threaded inserts, you could install 100 4-40 inserts in one hour using just hand tools. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:54 AM, <cdelect@juno.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long. > > I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep. > > This is for a Rubidium project. > > The local machine shop want's $360.00!!!! > > Anyone have a machining setup that could do the work a bit cheaper? > > If not I'll give it a try myself. > > Please contact me off list. > > Thanks! > > Corby Dawson > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
CA
Chris Albertson
Thu, May 18, 2017 9:41 PM

Yes, generally when something is expensive to manufacture it is because the
designer was not thinking about costs.  A design with 40 size "tiny" thread
holes in just not cost-effective.  A redesign could save hours work.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Tim Shoppa tshoppa@gmail.com wrote:

I'm very dubious that you need a tapped 4-40 hole to be threaded any deeper
than 0.25". If you work with the machinist I'm sure you can come up with
some reasonable spec that does not require a bottoming tap and will save
you a lot of money.

I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap the
walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material
and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move
towards welding/brazing rather than machining.

Tim N3QE

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, cdelect@juno.com wrote:

Hi,

I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long.

I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep.

This is for a Rubidium project.

The local machine shop want's $360.00!!!!

Anyone have a machining setup that could do the work a bit cheaper?

If not I'll give it a try myself.

Please contact me off list.

Thanks!

Corby Dawson


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

Yes, generally when something is expensive to manufacture it is because the designer was not thinking about costs. A design with 40 size "tiny" thread holes in just not cost-effective. A redesign could save hours work. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm very dubious that you need a tapped 4-40 hole to be threaded any deeper > than 0.25". If you work with the machinist I'm sure you can come up with > some reasonable spec that does not require a bottoming tap and will save > you a lot of money. > > I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap the > walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material > and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move > towards welding/brazing rather than machining. > > Tim N3QE > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, <cdelect@juno.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long. > > > > I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep. > > > > This is for a Rubidium project. > > > > The local machine shop want's $360.00!!!! > > > > Anyone have a machining setup that could do the work a bit cheaper? > > > > If not I'll give it a try myself. > > > > Please contact me off list. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Corby Dawson > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
AZ
Andy ZL3AG
Thu, May 18, 2017 11:12 PM

Or go for thicker wall aluminium tube, oversized endplates and long bolts or threaded rods running the entire length down the outside of the tube so you're clamping both ends in one operation. No tapping required. Simples!

On 19/05/2017, at 6:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote:

I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap the
walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material
and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move
towards welding/brazing rather than machining.

Tim N3QE

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, cdelect@juno.com wrote:

Hi,

I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long.

I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep.

This is for a Rubidium project.

Or go for thicker wall aluminium tube, oversized endplates and long bolts or threaded rods running the entire length down the outside of the tube so you're clamping both ends in one operation. No tapping required. Simples! On 19/05/2017, at 6:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: > I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap the > walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material > and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move > towards welding/brazing rather than machining. > > Tim N3QE > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, <cdelect@juno.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long. >> >> I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep. >> >> This is for a Rubidium project. >>
AZ
Andy ZL3AG
Thu, May 18, 2017 11:13 PM

Why are my eyes watering?

On 19/05/2017, at 5:03 AM, Bob Darlington wrote:

I had
to soak my cavity ring in nitric acid for a month to get the tap out.

Why are my eyes watering? On 19/05/2017, at 5:03 AM, Bob Darlington wrote: > I had > to soak my cavity ring in nitric acid for a month to get the tap out. >
KW
Ken Winterling
Thu, May 18, 2017 11:24 PM

Andy,

Although this is a hydraulic cylinder, this is along the lines of what you
described.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 19:18 Andy ZL3AG via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
wrote:

Or go for thicker wall aluminium tube, oversized endplates and long bolts
or threaded rods running the entire length down the outside of the tube so
you're clamping both ends in one operation. No tapping required. Simples!

On 19/05/2017, at 6:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote:

I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap

the

walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material
and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move
towards welding/brazing rather than machining.

Tim N3QE

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, cdelect@juno.com wrote:

Hi,

I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long.

I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep.

This is for a Rubidium project.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Ken
WA2LBI

Sent from one of my mobile devices

Andy, Although this is a hydraulic cylinder, this is along the lines of what you described. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 19:18 Andy ZL3AG via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > > > Or go for thicker wall aluminium tube, oversized endplates and long bolts > or threaded rods running the entire length down the outside of the tube so > you're clamping both ends in one operation. No tapping required. Simples! > > > > > On 19/05/2017, at 6:16 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: > > > I bet you went to 0.25" wall square tubing only because you want to tap > the > > walls for 4-40. Alternative designs can let you use much thinner material > > and a very different flange on the ends, but the costs will likely move > > towards welding/brazing rather than machining. > > > > Tim N3QE > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, <cdelect@juno.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a square aluminum tube 5" X 5" with a .25" wall it's 8 1/2" long. > >> > >> I need 20 holes in each end tapped for 4/40 and 1/2" deep. > >> > >> This is for a Rubidium project. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Ken WA2LBI Sent from one of my mobile devices
CA
Chris Albertson
Thu, May 18, 2017 11:48 PM

So the goal is not to attach end plates, that is the solution. The real
goal is a sealed container that can be re-opened.    I suggest a trip to
the plumbing supply store.    Why not just use screw-on end caps

It you need it sealed 4-40 screw are not able to provide any reasonable
clamping force.  The weak link is the aluminum threads.  You need enough
force to deform the gasket material and those little screws are not going
to do it.

If you need a gas tight chamber, look at plumbing parts.  They make
screw-on end caps with both make and female threads.

There is also a system for brazing alumni that work almost as well as
celiac welding and you can do it with a propane lumber's torch.  They sell
the rods at Harbor Freight.

Why not post a specification (enclose with x,y,z inside dimension,
water/gas tight/ ends on one end,....) and ask people for ideas on the
lowest cost way to make that using simple tools.

There are SO MANY solutions, one is double sided, coper clad PCB material.
You can cut it with a wood saw and then solder the panels together to make
a box.  I find that I can solder brass screws to copy PCB material and
make thread posts or studs.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Andy ZL3AG via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:

Why are my eyes watering?

On 19/05/2017, at 5:03 AM, Bob Darlington wrote:

I had
to soak my cavity ring in nitric acid for a month to get the tap out.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

So the goal is not to attach end plates, that is the solution. The real goal is a sealed container that can be re-opened. I suggest a trip to the plumbing supply store. Why not just use screw-on end caps It you need it sealed 4-40 screw are not able to provide any reasonable clamping force. The weak link is the aluminum threads. You need enough force to deform the gasket material and those little screws are not going to do it. If you need a gas tight chamber, look at plumbing parts. They make screw-on end caps with both make and female threads. There is also a system for brazing alumni that work almost as well as celiac welding and you can do it with a propane lumber's torch. They sell the rods at Harbor Freight. Why not post a specification (enclose with x,y,z inside dimension, water/gas tight/ ends on one end,....) and ask people for ideas on the lowest cost way to make that using simple tools. There are SO MANY solutions, one is double sided, coper clad PCB material. You can cut it with a wood saw and then solder the panels together to make a box. I find that I can solder brass screws to copy PCB material and make thread posts or studs. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Andy ZL3AG via time-nuts < time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > > Why are my eyes watering? > > On 19/05/2017, at 5:03 AM, Bob Darlington wrote: > > > I had > > to soak my cavity ring in nitric acid for a month to get the tap out. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
J
jimlux
Fri, May 19, 2017 12:13 AM

On 5/18/17 2:36 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

It would be easy to re-design the job for cheaper machining..  Do you
really need to tap the holes?  You might use self taping screws.  Id the
would work then you can do the work yourself with just a hand drill.

OK it you must use machine threads and they must be #4 size try "rivets"
these work like pop rivets but leave a hollow thread insert in the hole
that will take screws.  Takes all of 5 seconds to install a thread hole.

Think again about threading aluminum.  It is not very strong, it would be
easy for an end user to strip the #4 threads.  Better to use the rivet or
other steel thread insert.    Even native nuts  installed with flush rivets
is better

Interestingly enough, for 4-40 hardware, the screws fail before the
aluminum does.  The area of the thread engagement is quite a bit larger
than the cross section of the fastener that is not thread.

For large fasteners, where the thread depth is a smaller fraction of the
fastener diameter, this may not be the case (as anyone who has stripped
the threads on an aluminum cylinder head with a steel sparkplug will
know, in a deep and visceral way).

On 5/18/17 2:36 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: > It would be easy to re-design the job for cheaper machining.. Do you > really need to tap the holes? You might use self taping screws. Id the > would work then you can do the work yourself with just a hand drill. > > OK it you must use machine threads and they must be #4 size try "rivets" > these work like pop rivets but leave a hollow thread insert in the hole > that will take screws. Takes all of 5 seconds to install a thread hole. > > Think again about threading aluminum. It is not very strong, it would be > easy for an end user to strip the #4 threads. Better to use the rivet or > other steel thread insert. Even native nuts installed with flush rivets > is better Interestingly enough, for 4-40 hardware, the screws fail before the aluminum does. The area of the thread engagement is quite a bit larger than the cross section of the fastener that is not thread. For large fasteners, where the thread depth is a smaller fraction of the fastener diameter, this may not be the case (as anyone who has stripped the threads on an aluminum cylinder head with a steel sparkplug will know, in a deep and visceral way).
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, May 19, 2017 12:19 AM

On May 18, 2017, at 8:13 PM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 5/18/17 2:36 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

It would be easy to re-design the job for cheaper machining..  Do you
really need to tap the holes?  You might use self taping screws.  Id the
would work then you can do the work yourself with just a hand drill.

OK it you must use machine threads and they must be #4 size try "rivets"
these work like pop rivets but leave a hollow thread insert in the hole
that will take screws.  Takes all of 5 seconds to install a thread hole.

Think again about threading aluminum.  It is not very strong, it would be
easy for an end user to strip the #4 threads.  Better to use the rivet or
other steel thread insert.    Even native nuts  installed with flush rivets
is better

Interestingly enough, for 4-40 hardware, the screws fail before the aluminum does.  The area of the thread engagement is quite a bit larger than the cross section of the fastener that is not thread.

There are a lot of variables involved. Run the screws in and out of the aluminum a number of times and
the holes will fail first ….There are other gotchas as well.

Bob

For large fasteners, where the thread depth is a smaller fraction of the fastener diameter, this may not be the case (as anyone who has stripped the threads on an aluminum cylinder head with a steel sparkplug will know, in a deep and visceral way).


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

> On May 18, 2017, at 8:13 PM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > > On 5/18/17 2:36 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> It would be easy to re-design the job for cheaper machining.. Do you >> really need to tap the holes? You might use self taping screws. Id the >> would work then you can do the work yourself with just a hand drill. >> >> OK it you must use machine threads and they must be #4 size try "rivets" >> these work like pop rivets but leave a hollow thread insert in the hole >> that will take screws. Takes all of 5 seconds to install a thread hole. >> >> Think again about threading aluminum. It is not very strong, it would be >> easy for an end user to strip the #4 threads. Better to use the rivet or >> other steel thread insert. Even native nuts installed with flush rivets >> is better > > Interestingly enough, for 4-40 hardware, the screws fail before the aluminum does. The area of the thread engagement is quite a bit larger than the cross section of the fastener that is not thread. There are a lot of variables involved. Run the screws in and out of the aluminum a number of times and the holes will fail first ….There are other gotchas as well. Bob > > For large fasteners, where the thread depth is a smaller fraction of the fastener diameter, this may not be the case (as anyone who has stripped the threads on an aluminum cylinder head with a steel sparkplug will know, in a deep and visceral way). > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.