Thank you,

      Peter

Hello Lars, Just out of curiosity I yesterday put just the first thirty days (like in > the pdf mentioned below) and let Excel calculate the logarithmic function. > If I extrapolate that to 10 years it seems that the drift would be > 6E-13/day but as can be seen in the aging graph it was more like ten times > higher. > I'm not very good with Excel, but this curve-fitting function sounds very useful. Could you please tell me how it's done? Thank you, Peter

 Thank you,

      Peter

Hi As mentioned earlier in this thread. The function that has been used in several posts isn’t the right log function. The proper fit is to ln(bt+1) Bob > On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:36 PM, Peter Vince <petervince1952@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Lars, > > Just out of curiosity I yesterday put just the first thirty days (like in >> the pdf mentioned below) and let Excel calculate the logarithmic function. >> If I extrapolate that to 10 years it seems that the drift would be >> 6E-13/day but as can be seen in the aging graph it was more like ten times >> higher. >> > > I'm not very good with Excel, but this curve-fitting function sounds very > useful. Could you please tell me how it's done? > > Thank you, > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.