time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Phase Noise Modeling in SPICE

ED
Eric Drucker
Sun, Oct 22, 2017 9:03 PM

I have done a lot of phase noise modeling using LT SPICE over the years for PLL’s. It will not model the phase noise of the individual devices like VCO’s, dividers, phase detectors. You can input the phase noise profiles of the various devices and it will give the output phase noise of the loop using AC analysis. If you want to model the phase noise of a VCO at the transistor level, you need a harmonic balance program that supports VCO noise modeling. It is very difficult to module the phase noise of dividers, at the transistor level but it can be done. I did a presentation a few years ago at the European Microwave Conference on using CAE to model phase noise in PLL’s.

https://www.slideshare.net/edrucker1/european-microwave-pll-class

Eric Drucker

Agilent (Keysight) Technologies, Retired

I have done a lot of phase noise modeling using LT SPICE over the years for PLL’s. It will not model the phase noise of the individual devices like VCO’s, dividers, phase detectors. You can input the phase noise profiles of the various devices and it will give the output phase noise of the loop using AC analysis. If you want to model the phase noise of a VCO at the transistor level, you need a harmonic balance program that supports VCO noise modeling. It is very difficult to module the phase noise of dividers, at the transistor level but it can be done. I did a presentation a few years ago at the European Microwave Conference on using CAE to model phase noise in PLL’s. https://www.slideshare.net/edrucker1/european-microwave-pll-class Eric Drucker Agilent (Keysight) Technologies, Retired
UR
Ulrich Rohde
Sun, Oct 22, 2017 10:31 PM

Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed you will find under 

 
 
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today
 
Ulrich 
 
In a message dated 10/22/2017 5:53:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, drucker@sonic.net writes:

 
I have done a lot of phase noise modeling using LT SPICE over the years for PLL’s. It will not model the phase noise of the individual devices like VCO’s, dividers, phase detectors. You can input the phase noise profiles of the various devices and it will give the output phase noise of the loop using AC analysis. If you want to model the phase noise of a VCO at the transistor level, you need a harmonic balance program that supports VCO noise modeling. It is very difficult to module the phase noise of dividers, at the transistor level but it can be done. I did a presentation a few years ago at the European Microwave Conference on using CAE to model phase noise in PLL’s.

https://www.slideshare.net/edrucker1/european-microwave-pll-class

Eric Drucker

Agilent (Keysight) Technologies, Retired


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed you will find under      http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today   Ulrich    In a message dated 10/22/2017 5:53:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, drucker@sonic.net writes:   I have done a lot of phase noise modeling using LT SPICE over the years for PLL’s. It will not model the phase noise of the individual devices like VCO’s, dividers, phase detectors. You can input the phase noise profiles of the various devices and it will give the output phase noise of the loop using AC analysis. If you want to model the phase noise of a VCO at the transistor level, you need a harmonic balance program that supports VCO noise modeling. It is very difficult to module the phase noise of dividers, at the transistor level but it can be done. I did a presentation a few years ago at the European Microwave Conference on using CAE to model phase noise in PLL’s. https://www.slideshare.net/edrucker1/european-microwave-pll-class Eric Drucker Agilent (Keysight) Technologies, Retired _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
AK
Attila Kinali
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 6:33 PM

Hi Eric,

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:03:02 -0700
Eric Drucker drucker@sonic.net wrote:

I have done a lot of phase noise modeling using LT SPICE over the years for
PLL’s. It will not model the phase noise of the individual devices like
VCO’s, dividers, phase detectors. You can input the phase noise profiles of
the various devices and it will give the output phase noise of the loop using
AC analysis. If you want to model the phase noise of a VCO at the transistor
level, you need a harmonic balance program that supports VCO noise modeling.
It is very difficult to module the phase noise of dividers, at the transistor
level but it can be done. I did a presentation a few years ago at the
European Microwave Conference on using CAE to model phase noise in PLL’s.

https://www.slideshare.net/edrucker1/european-microwave-pll-class

Is your presentation available as pdf or ppt? (to store for future reference)
Also, do you have any recomendations what to read to learn how to do
such simulations properly?

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

Hi Eric, On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:03:02 -0700 Eric Drucker <drucker@sonic.net> wrote: > I have done a lot of phase noise modeling using LT SPICE over the years for > PLL’s. It will not model the phase noise of the individual devices like > VCO’s, dividers, phase detectors. You can input the phase noise profiles of > the various devices and it will give the output phase noise of the loop using > AC analysis. If you want to model the phase noise of a VCO at the transistor > level, you need a harmonic balance program that supports VCO noise modeling. > It is very difficult to module the phase noise of dividers, at the transistor > level but it can be done. I did a presentation a few years ago at the > European Microwave Conference on using CAE to model phase noise in PLL’s. > > https://www.slideshare.net/edrucker1/european-microwave-pll-class Is your presentation available as pdf or ppt? (to store for future reference) Also, do you have any recomendations what to read to learn how to do such simulations properly? Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
AK
Attila Kinali
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 7:01 PM

Hoi Ulrich,

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While
I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS
is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed
you will find under 
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today

Perfectly timed article! :-)
I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few
questions:

  1. Is it possible to get
    U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141.
    somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues.

  2. How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors?
    As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have
    often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters
    look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality.

  3. What about the ADS approach do you not like?

  4. What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it?

Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general)
performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations
I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account
which I deemed the ones dominating.

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

Hoi Ulrich, On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400 Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While > I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS > is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed > you will find under  > http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today Perfectly timed article! :-) I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few questions: 1) Is it possible to get U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141. somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues. 2) How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors? As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality. 3) What about the ADS approach do you not like? 4) What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it? Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general) performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account which I deemed the ones dominating. Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
DD
Dave Daniel
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 7:26 PM

With respect to your first question, I subscribe to MWJ and, after a
modest amount of looking on the web, find that the MWJ archives seem to
go back only as far as 2002. I was unable to locate a copy of the 1988
paper elsewhere on the web, which seems strange. Perhaps someone out
there has a paper copy and can scan it. I would also imagine that a
paper copy could be located in some university library.

But then, you have probably already been down those same paths.

DaveD

On 10/27/2017 1:01 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:

Hoi Ulrich,

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While
I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS
is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed
you will find under
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today

Perfectly timed article! :-)
I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few
questions:

  1. Is it possible to get
    U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141.
    somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues.

  2. How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors?
    As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have
    often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters
    look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality.

  3. What about the ADS approach do you not like?

  4. What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it?

Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general)
performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations
I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account
which I deemed the ones dominating.

		Attila Kinali

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

With respect to your first question, I subscribe to MWJ and, after a modest amount of looking on the web, find that the MWJ archives seem to go back only as far as 2002. I was unable to locate a copy of the 1988 paper elsewhere on the web, which seems strange. Perhaps someone out there has a paper copy and can scan it. I would also imagine that a paper copy could be located in some university library. But then, you have probably already been down those same paths. DaveD On 10/27/2017 1:01 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > Hoi Ulrich, > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400 > Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > >> Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While >> I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS >> is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed >> you will find under >> http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today > Perfectly timed article! :-) > I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few > questions: > > 1) Is it possible to get > U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141. > somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues. > > 2) How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors? > As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have > often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters > look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality. > > 3) What about the ADS approach do you not like? > > 4) What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it? > > > Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general) > performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations > I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account > which I deemed the ones dominating. > > Attila Kinali --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
UR
Ulrich Rohde
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 8:46 PM

yes, where to ?
 
In a message dated 10/27/2017 3:26:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, kc0wjn@gmail.com writes:

 
With respect to your first question, I subscribe to MWJ and, after a
modest amount of looking on the web, find that the MWJ archives seem to
go back only as far as 2002. I was unable to locate a copy of the 1988
paper elsewhere on the web, which seems strange. Perhaps someone out
there has a paper copy and can scan it. I would also imagine that a
paper copy could be located in some university library.

But then, you have probably already been down those same paths.

DaveD

On 10/27/2017 1:01 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:

Hoi Ulrich,

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While
I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS
is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed
you will find under
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today

Perfectly timed article! :-)
I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few
questions:

  1. Is it possible to get
    U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141.
    somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues.

  2. How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors?
    As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have
    often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters
    look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality.

  3. What about the ADS approach do you not like?

  4. What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it?

Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general)
performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations
I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account
which I deemed the ones dominating.

Attila Kinali


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

yes, where to ?   In a message dated 10/27/2017 3:26:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, kc0wjn@gmail.com writes:   With respect to your first question, I subscribe to MWJ and, after a modest amount of looking on the web, find that the MWJ archives seem to go back only as far as 2002. I was unable to locate a copy of the 1988 paper elsewhere on the web, which seems strange. Perhaps someone out there has a paper copy and can scan it. I would also imagine that a paper copy could be located in some university library. But then, you have probably already been down those same paths. DaveD On 10/27/2017 1:01 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > Hoi Ulrich, > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400 > Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > >> Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While >> I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS >> is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed >> you will find under >> http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today > Perfectly timed article! :-) > I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few > questions: > > 1) Is it possible to get > U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141. > somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues. > > 2) How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors? > As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have > often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters > look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality. > > 3) What about the ADS approach do you not like? > > 4) What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it? > > > Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general) > performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations > I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account > which I deemed the ones dominating. > > Attila Kinali --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
AK
Attila Kinali
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 8:55 PM

Hoi Ulrich

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:46:20 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

yes, where to ?

Wie wäre es an meine Emailadresse (nimmt alles bis 20MB)?
Ich könnte es dann für den Rest der Mailingliste auf meinen
Webserver stellen.

Gruess
Attila Kinali

--
You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
facts that needs altering.  -- The Doctor

Hoi Ulrich On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:46:20 -0400 Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > yes, where to ? Wie wäre es an meine Emailadresse (nimmt alles bis 20MB)? Ich könnte es dann für den Rest der Mailingliste auf meinen Webserver stellen. Gruess Attila Kinali -- You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor
UR
Ulrich Rohde
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 8:56 PM

See below .....
 
In a message dated 10/27/2017 3:02:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, attila@kinali.ch writes:

 
Hoi Ulrich,

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While
I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS
is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed
you will find under 
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today

Perfectly timed article! :-)
I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few
questions:

  1. Is it possible to get
    U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141.YES  
    somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues.

  2. How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors?
    As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have
    often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters
    look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality.See my math derivation in 
    The Design of Modern Microwave Oscillators for Wireless... - Google Scholar

  3. What about the ADS approach do you not like? Not enough information about the math used ... possible shortcuts to be fast 

  4. What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it?Ansoft Serenade Desktop  Program 

Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general)
performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations
I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account
which I deemed the ones dominating. It is typically an approximation 

Attila Kinali

It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

See below .....   In a message dated 10/27/2017 3:02:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, attila@kinali.ch writes:   Hoi Ulrich, On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:31:33 -0400 Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > Eric has done a lot of excellent work, I know his presentations . While > I do no always agree with the ADS approach and use my own software the ADS > is a very good all-round CAD microwave CAD tool. More on the topic addressed > you will find under  > http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29151-noise-analysis-then-and-today Perfectly timed article! :-) I did not have time to go through all the references yet, but I have a few questions: 1) Is it possible to get U. L. Rohde, A. M. Pavio and R. A. Pucel, “Accurate Noise Simulation of Microwave Amplifiers Using CAD,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 130-141.YES   somewhere? MWJ is pretty bad when it comes to accessing old issues. 2) How do you come up with accurate noise models/parameters for the transistors? As far as I can tell, the spice models provided by the manufacturers have often only a very crude approximation of what the real noise parameters look like (if any at all) and have to be corrected to match reality.See my math derivation in  The Design of Modern Microwave Oscillators for Wireless... - Google Scholar 3) What about the ADS approach do you not like? Not enough information about the math used ... possible shortcuts to be fast  4) What is your own software? And would it be possible to get access to it?Ansoft Serenade Desktop  Program  Side note: I do not fully understand how spice (or CAE software in general) performs noise simulation, hence I do not trust it. So the simulations I do are kind of syntetic that only take certain noise sources into account which I deemed the ones dominating. It is typically an approximation  Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
UR
Ulrich Rohde
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 9:04 PM

Will get it to you next week.
 
It was a fundamental paper, the ever first one ever to prove to be able  evaluate the correct noise performance (against measured data) of such an amplifier. It included all distributed elements a correct FET noise model.
 
You can find a shorter version in :
 

Wiley: RF / Microwave Circuit Design for Wireless Applications, 2nd Edition - Ulrich L. Rohde, Matthias Rudolph
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/27/2017 4:55:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, attila@kinali.ch writes:

 
Hoi Ulrich

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:46:20 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

yes, where to ?

Wie wäre es an meine Emailadresse (nimmt alles bis 20MB)?
Ich könnte es dann für den Rest der Mailingliste auf meinen
Webserver stellen.

Gruess
Attila Kinali

--
You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Will get it to you next week.   It was a fundamental paper, the ever first one ever to prove to be able  evaluate the correct noise performance (against measured data) of such an amplifier. It included all distributed elements a correct FET noise model.   You can find a shorter version in :   Wiley: RF / Microwave Circuit Design for Wireless Applications, 2nd Edition - Ulrich L. Rohde, Matthias Rudolph       In a message dated 10/27/2017 4:55:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, attila@kinali.ch writes:   Hoi Ulrich On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:46:20 -0400 Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > yes, where to ? Wie wäre es an meine Emailadresse (nimmt alles bis 20MB)? Ich könnte es dann für den Rest der Mailingliste auf meinen Webserver stellen. Gruess Attila Kinali -- You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
AK
Attila Kinali
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 9:14 PM

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:55:06 +0200
Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:46:20 -0400
Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

yes, where to ?

Wie wäre es an meine Emailadresse (nimmt alles bis 20MB)?
Ich könnte es dann für den Rest der Mailingliste auf meinen
Webserver stellen.

Ooops... that was intended for Ulrich directly.
Sorry for the noise.

		Attila Kinali

--
You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common.
They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to
fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the
facts that needs altering.  -- The Doctor

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:55:06 +0200 Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:46:20 -0400 > Ulrich Rohde via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > > > yes, where to ? > > Wie wäre es an meine Emailadresse (nimmt alles bis 20MB)? > Ich könnte es dann für den Rest der Mailingliste auf meinen > Webserver stellen. Ooops... that was intended for Ulrich directly. Sorry for the noise. Attila Kinali -- You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alters their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering. -- The Doctor