time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

HP10811 Oscillator Thermal Fuse

DE
Donald E. Pauly
Thu, May 11, 2017 11:42 PM

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/date.html

These oscillators sold for $800 in 1985 or so.  They are on eBay all
working for $250 or more.  Where are all the ones with blown thermal
fuses for $25?  I want to buy.  It would be interesting to have the HP
warranty data for nuisance blows.  The three reported fire preventions
would have paid for the labor on all of the reported nuisance blows.
This is not to excuse the HP design error of picking a thermal fuse
temperature too close to the operating temperature.  Smoke damage
could do thousands of dollars of damage to a HP5061B or and expensive
microwave instrument.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org
Date: Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP10811 Oscillator Thermal Fuse
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com

Hi

A bit in jest:… that compares to 3,957 incidences of open fuses that
had nothing to do with
a thermal runaway. Of those, the majority 3,721 resulted in the 10811
being tossed
in the garbage as “another junker”……(yes, those are estimates, but I’d
bet they are close
based on the number of 10811’s made and how flakey those fuses are).

Bob

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/date.html These oscillators sold for $800 in 1985 or so. They are on eBay all working for $250 or more. Where are all the ones with blown thermal fuses for $25? I want to buy. It would be interesting to have the HP warranty data for nuisance blows. The three reported fire preventions would have paid for the labor on all of the reported nuisance blows. This is not to excuse the HP design error of picking a thermal fuse temperature too close to the operating temperature. Smoke damage could do thousands of dollars of damage to a HP5061B or and expensive microwave instrument. πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ WB0KVV ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> Date: Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP10811 Oscillator Thermal Fuse To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Hi A bit in jest:… that compares to 3,957 incidences of open fuses that had nothing to do with a thermal runaway. Of those, the majority 3,721 resulted in the 10811 being tossed in the garbage as “another junker”……(yes, those are estimates, but I’d bet they are close based on the number of 10811’s made and how flakey those fuses are). Bob
BK
Bob kb8tq
Thu, May 11, 2017 11:51 PM

Hi

The ones that people decided are dead quite literally went into the trash can long long
ago. They never made it into the eBay era. The warranty on the gear was short enough
that nobody thought to send them back. The days of “tear into it and fix it” at the component
level were over long before the 10811 came out. Anybody servicing this gear was on
a strict “sway modules and get it running” set of orders.

Bob

On May 11, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Donald E. Pauly trojancowboy@gmail.com wrote:

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/date.html

These oscillators sold for $800 in 1985 or so.  They are on eBay all
working for $250 or more.  Where are all the ones with blown thermal
fuses for $25?  I want to buy.  It would be interesting to have the HP
warranty data for nuisance blows.  The three reported fire preventions
would have paid for the labor on all of the reported nuisance blows.
This is not to excuse the HP design error of picking a thermal fuse
temperature too close to the operating temperature.  Smoke damage
could do thousands of dollars of damage to a HP5061B or and expensive
microwave instrument.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org
Date: Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP10811 Oscillator Thermal Fuse
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com

Hi

A bit in jest:… that compares to 3,957 incidences of open fuses that
had nothing to do with
a thermal runaway. Of those, the majority 3,721 resulted in the 10811
being tossed
in the garbage as “another junker”……(yes, those are estimates, but I’d
bet they are close
based on the number of 10811’s made and how flakey those fuses are).

Bob


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The ones that people decided are dead quite literally went into the trash can long long ago. They never made it into the eBay era. The warranty on the gear was short enough that nobody thought to send them back. The days of “tear into it and fix it” at the component level were over *long* before the 10811 came out. Anybody servicing this gear was on a strict “sway modules and get it running” set of orders. Bob > On May 11, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Donald E. Pauly <trojancowboy@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-May/date.html > > These oscillators sold for $800 in 1985 or so. They are on eBay all > working for $250 or more. Where are all the ones with blown thermal > fuses for $25? I want to buy. It would be interesting to have the HP > warranty data for nuisance blows. The three reported fire preventions > would have paid for the labor on all of the reported nuisance blows. > This is not to excuse the HP design error of picking a thermal fuse > temperature too close to the operating temperature. Smoke damage > could do thousands of dollars of damage to a HP5061B or and expensive > microwave instrument. > > πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ > WB0KVV > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> > Date: Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:28 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP10811 Oscillator Thermal Fuse > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> > > Hi > > A bit in jest:… that compares to 3,957 incidences of open fuses that > had nothing to do with > a thermal runaway. Of those, the majority 3,721 resulted in the 10811 > being tossed > in the garbage as “another junker”……(yes, those are estimates, but I’d > bet they are close > based on the number of 10811’s made and how flakey those fuses are). > > Bob > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.