Luciano,
The TX and choke and filter caps were removed as I had envisioned I would
have to re-mount the A1 and A7 in their location.
However with some judicious movement of the mounting holes I was able to
squeeze them in close
to their original spots.
The 5065 chassis was removed and inserted into a chassis from an HP
8405A. (just used the side panels
and the rear panel.)
I'll post a schematic of the new C-field supply next week. It consists of
two LM299AH in series feeding
a string consisting of a 2.4K, 1k, 1K and a 1K low TC pot. A switch
allows you to short out one or both of the 1K resistors as a coarse
adjustment. All resistor are 1PPM.
Fixing the 20Volt and the C-field temperature contributions allowed me to
isolate the optical units changes
due to temp.
The resistor thermistor combo I mentioned would be taped to the optical
unit and compensate it only.
It would be in series with the C-field coil.
Not needed in my unit but thought that others might want to try it rather
than getting as complex as I have.
Yes the active baro and temp circuit would be an alternative for a unit
without my mods.
attached are PIX of the enclosed optical unit and the front panel.
Cheers,
Corby
Hi Corby,
about the C field ten turn pot you write is a low TC pot. Normally a good Vishay pot is 20 PPM/C, This is in conflict with the 1PPM resistors ad voltage reference.
What kind of pot do you have used?
http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/427/533534-768216.pdf
Luciano
timeok
Da "time-nuts" time-nuts-bounces@febo.com
A time-nuts@febo.com
Cc
Data Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:37:57 -0800
Oggetto [time-nuts] HP5065A C-field mods and optical unit mods
Luciano,
The TX and choke and filter caps were removed as I had envisioned I would
have to re-mount the A1 and A7 in their location.
However with some judicious movement of the mounting holes I was able to
squeeze them in close
to their original spots.
The 5065 chassis was removed and inserted into a chassis from an HP
8405A. (just used the side panels
and the rear panel.)
I'll post a schematic of the new C-field supply next week. It consists of
two LM299AH in series feeding
a string consisting of a 2.4K, 1k, 1K and a 1K low TC pot. A switch
allows you to short out one or both of the 1K resistors as a coarse
adjustment. All resistor are 1PPM.
Fixing the 20Volt and the C-field temperature contributions allowed me to
isolate the optical units changes
due to temp.
The resistor thermistor combo I mentioned would be taped to the optical
unit and compensate it only.
It would be in series with the C-field coil.
Not needed in my unit but thought that others might want to try it rather
than getting as complex as I have.
Yes the active baro and temp circuit would be an alternative for a unit
without my mods.
attached are PIX of the enclosed optical unit and the front panel.
Cheers,
Corby
Luciano wrote:
about the C field ten turn pot you write is a low TC pot. Normally a good Vishay pot is 20 PPM/C, This is in conflict with the 1PPM resistors ad voltage reference.
In the schematic Corby posted, the potentiometer (used as a variable
resistor) makes up a very small part of the total resistance of the
series string, so the overall tempco is dominated by the tempcos of the
fixed resistors (2.4k to 4.4k 1ppm/ C, depending on trim). The pot will
increase the overall tempco a little bit, but not anywhere near 20ppm.
Best regards,
Charles
Hi Charles,
what you refer is the resistance relation referred to the LM299 source around 14VDc but you have to consider
the tuning range of the pot, in the original HP5065A is 2E10-9.
Of course, it depends on the setting value of the variable resistance, but you have to consider a possible variation of 20PPM/c on 2E10-9.
Regards
Luciano
timeok
Da "time-nuts" time-nuts-bounces@febo.com
A time-nuts@febo.com
Cc
Data Tue, 21 Nov 2017 06:31:25 -0500
Oggetto Re: [time-nuts] HP5065A C-field mods and optical unit mods
Luciano wrote:
about the C field ten turn pot you write is a low TC pot. Normally a good Vishay pot is 20 PPM/C, This is in conflict with the 1PPM resistors ad voltage reference.
In the schematic Corby posted, the potentiometer (used as a variable
resistor) makes up a very small part of the total resistance of the
series string, so the overall tempco is dominated by the tempcos of the
fixed resistors (2.4k to 4.4k 1ppm/ C, depending on trim). The pot will
increase the overall tempco a little bit, but not anywhere near 20ppm.
Best regards,
Charles
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Luciano wrote:
what you refer is the resistance relation referred to the LM299 source around 14VDc but you have to consider
the tuning range of the pot, in the original HP5065A is 2E10-9.
Of course, it depends on the setting value of the variable resistance, but you have to consider a possible variation of 20PPM/c on 2E10-9.
No, you don't. The tempco that matters is the aggregate tempco of the
series string. Only a very small portion of the string voltage appears
across the pot, so a 20ppm tempco of that small part will cause a much
smaller change in overall tempco of the series string.
Perhaps Corby will tell us what value the pot is, and then you can
calculate the aggregate tempco of the string at various pot settings and
see for yourself.
Charles
What is the effect of the C-field coil dimension tempco?
At some point this will surely dominate overthe coil current tempco.
Bruce
On 22 November 2017 at 09:16 Charles Steinmetz <csteinmetz@yandex.com> wrote:
Luciano wrote:
what you refer is the resistance relation referred to the LM299 source around 14VDc but you have to consider
the tuning range of the pot, in the original HP5065A is 2E10-9.
Of course, it depends on the setting value of the variable resistance, but you have to consider a possible variation of 20PPM/c on 2E10-9.
No, you don't. The tempco that matters is the aggregate tempco of the
series string. Only a very small portion of the string voltage appears
across the pot, so a 20ppm tempco of that small part will cause a much
smaller change in overall tempco of the series string.
Perhaps Corby will tell us what value the pot is, and then you can
calculate the aggregate tempco of the string at various pot settings and
see for yourself.
Charles
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
In message 1159987519.5777361.1511296831768@webmail.xtra.co.nz, Bruce Griffit
hs writes:
What is the effect of the C-field coil dimension tempco?
I have not been able to measure it.
The C-coil is located thermally close to the temperature controlled
parts of the physics package.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Charles,
Imagine having a source and fixed resistors with TC equal to zero.
The current variation of the coil varies between 2.5 and 6 mA.
In addition, the relationship between current and frequency variation of the HP5065A is not linear.
If the pot is short-circuit, the current is 6 mA and the overall TC is that of the imaginary generator ie zero, in our real case 1ppm / C (source+fixed resistors).
So the pot TC is completely irrelevant.
When the pot is fully inserted the current will be 2.5mA, so the total current variation is 3.5mA.
The whole thefull range of pot resistance generates a 3.5mA current variation. This variation generates a frequency fine adjustment of 2E-9.
As a result, the influence of the pot TC is directly correlated to the current stability with a nonlinear frequency variation between zero and X in the range of 6- 2.5mA.
Or not?
best regards,
Luciano
timeok
Da "time-nuts" time-nuts-bounces@febo.com
A "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Cc
Data Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:16:36 -0500
Oggetto Re: [time-nuts] HP5065A C-field mods and optical unit mods
Luciano wrote:
what you refer is the resistance relation referred to the LM299 source around 14VDc but you have to consider
the tuning range of the pot, in the original HP5065A is 2E10-9.
Of course, it depends on the setting value of the variable resistance, but you have to consider a possible variation of 20PPM/c on 2E10-9.
No, you don't. The tempco that matters is the aggregate tempco of the
series string. Only a very small portion of the string voltage appears
across the pot, so a 20ppm tempco of that small part will cause a much
smaller change in overall tempco of the series string.
Perhaps Corby will tell us what value the pot is, and then you can
calculate the aggregate tempco of the string at various pot settings and
see for yourself.
Charles
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.