time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Oscillator Phase Noise: A 50-Year Review

K
KA2WEU@aol.com
Sat, Aug 6, 2016 11:30 AM

Good morning,

yes I saw the reference  but he did not point out what it was or  function,
This paper is more about people and events and very little since  .......

Ulrich

In a message dated 8/6/2016 2:26:54 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
michaeljwouters@gmail.com writes:

On Sat,  Aug 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
time-nuts@febo.com  wrote:

Leeson produced a somewhat random selection of papers ,  omitting

important

things like the sapphire based best in the word .  This was not even
referenced  .

The reference [145] at the  end of the sentence that mentions sapphire
oscillators also discusses a  hybrid photonic-microwave oscillator that
incorporates a room-temperature  sapphire oscillator so I think he
tried to cover both subjects with that  single reference.

The paper has a misleading title. It suggests that it  is a history of
the last 50 years, when it is about events roughly 50 years  ago. The
abstract makes this clear though. So I didn't really expect to  read
much about developments past  1970.

Cheers
Michael

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM,  KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

Some of  the cited references are poor, modern non-linear mathematic is

kind

of omitted . After all the oscillator  phase noise  speculation, I would
have really liked to see at last a reference  about the most modern
measurements  techniques and it validation.  How do you calibrate a phase

noise test

system.

Leeson  produced a somewhat random selection of papers , omitting

important

things like the sapphire based best in the word . This was not even
referenced  .

I think he is really out of it  .

73 de N1UL

In a message  dated 8/5/2016 7:11:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
john@miles.io  writes:

Very selected and incomplete  references and the equally  important
question
of measurements strangely not  covered

73 de N 1  UL

I suppose he could  write an equally-lengthy article on measurements

alone,

but leaving out the  post-1970s history entirely was a  little
disappointing.  It was strange  to hit "ctrl-f Rohde"  and see only one

reference in the

bibliography.  Same for  "Hewlett."  "Rubiola" brings up one hit (but no
citations)  and  "Stein" brings up none at all.

-- john,  KE5FX
Miles Design  LLC


time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow  the  instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the  instructions there.

Good morning, yes I saw the reference but he did not point out what it was or function, This paper is more about people and events and very little since ....... Ulrich In a message dated 8/6/2016 2:26:54 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, michaeljwouters@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > Leeson produced a somewhat random selection of papers , omitting important > things like the sapphire based best in the word . This was not even > referenced . The reference [145] at the end of the sentence that mentions sapphire oscillators also discusses a hybrid photonic-microwave oscillator that incorporates a room-temperature sapphire oscillator so I think he tried to cover both subjects with that single reference. The paper has a misleading title. It suggests that it is a history of the last 50 years, when it is about events roughly 50 years ago. The abstract makes this clear though. So I didn't really expect to read much about developments past 1970. Cheers Michael On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:34 AM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > Some of the cited references are poor, modern non-linear mathematic is kind > of omitted . After all the oscillator phase noise speculation, I would > have really liked to see at last a reference about the most modern > measurements techniques and it validation. How do you calibrate a phase noise test > system. > > Leeson produced a somewhat random selection of papers , omitting important > things like the sapphire based best in the word . This was not even > referenced . > > I think he is really out of it . > > 73 de N1UL > > > > In a message dated 8/5/2016 7:11:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > john@miles.io writes: > >> >> Very selected and incomplete references and the equally important >> question >> of measurements strangely not covered >> >> 73 de N 1 UL >> > > I suppose he could write an equally-lengthy article on measurements alone, > but leaving out the post-1970s history entirely was a little > disappointing. It was strange to hit "ctrl-f Rohde" and see only one reference in the > bibliography. Same for "Hewlett." "Rubiola" brings up one hit (but no > citations) and "Stein" brings up none at all. > > -- john, KE5FX > Miles Design LLC > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.