time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] The home time-lab

FG
Francis Grosz
Tue, Jul 26, 2016 5:01 PM

Jim,

 IIRC, the IBM 360 mod 91 was one that used a MG set.  I think it also

required chilled distilled water for cooling.  Those were indeed the
days of "Big Iron".

     Francis Grosz

Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:04:58 -0700
From: jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] The home time-lab
Message-ID: ec93c0e5-8f49-05e3-7042-917c179d594d@earthlink.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 7/25/16 6:55 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi

If you go back far enough in time …. there is another alternative:

    Big rectifier bank, turning AC into DC, often off of multiple

phases or sources.

    Big DC motor running into a fairly large flywheel.

    AC generator (or in some cases DC generators) running off of the

shaft

    A tuning fork (yes state of the art timing) based control on the

AC output frequency

    A saturated reactor control loop on the generator side, same

thing on the motor side.

Wonderfull stuff. State of the art UPS for your shipboard computer in

  1. Ear muffs anyone?

Bob

we had a system like this to turn 60 Hz into 50 Hz with a toothed belt
drive between synchronous motor and synchronous generator.  It whined..
"Satan's Siren" is what we called it.

IBM mainframes used a similar scheme but I can't remember the details.

Jim, IIRC, the IBM 360 mod 91 was one that used a MG set. I think it also required chilled distilled water for cooling. Those were indeed the days of "Big Iron". Francis Grosz >Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:04:58 -0700 >From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> >To: time-nuts@febo.com >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] The home time-lab >Message-ID: <ec93c0e5-8f49-05e3-7042-917c179d594d@earthlink.net> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >On 7/25/16 6:55 AM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > If you go back far enough in time …. there is another alternative: > > Big rectifier bank, turning AC into DC, often off of multiple phases or sources. > > Big DC motor running into a fairly large flywheel. > > AC generator (or in some cases DC generators) running off of the shaft > > A tuning fork (yes state of the art timing) based control on the AC output frequency > > A saturated reactor control loop on the generator side, same thing on the motor side. > > Wonderfull stuff. State of the art UPS for your shipboard computer in 1962. Ear muffs anyone? > > Bob >we had a system like this to turn 60 Hz into 50 Hz with a toothed belt >drive between synchronous motor and synchronous generator. It whined.. >"Satan's Siren" is what we called it. > >IBM mainframes used a similar scheme but I can't remember the details. >
AC
albertson.chris@gmail.com
Wed, Jul 27, 2016 12:08 AM

I remember the 91. The MG Produced 400Hz power. It is easier to build a linear power supply as it would use smaller transformers and need less filtering

The chilled water cooling was not the best idea because when they had to power down water would condense  on the insides and they would have to wait for it to dry befor powering up

The CDC 6600 in the other room used freon and did not have that problem. You could power cycle it in maybe 15 minutes

But a water cool machine had tons of cold water inside after the power is removed

Bothe were antiques when I used them in early 80s

On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Francis Grosz fgrosz@otiengineering.com wrote:

Jim,

 IIRC, the IBM 360 mod 91 was one that used a MG set.  I think it also

required chilled distilled water for cooling.  Those were indeed the
days of "Big Iron".

     Francis Grosz

Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:04:58 -0700
From: jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] The home time-lab
Message-ID: ec93c0e5-8f49-05e3-7042-917c179d594d@earthlink.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 7/25/16 6:55 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi

If you go back far enough in time

. there is another alternative:

   Big rectifier bank, turning AC into DC, often off of multiple

phases or sources.

   Big DC motor running into a fairly large flywheel.

   AC generator (or in some cases DC generators) running off of the

shaft

   A tuning fork (yes state of the art timing) based control on the

AC output frequency

   A saturated reactor control loop on the generator side, same

thing on the motor side.

Wonderfull stuff. State of the art UPS for your shipboard computer in

  1. Ear muffs anyone?

Bob

we had a system like this to turn 60 Hz into 50 Hz with a toothed belt
drive between synchronous motor and synchronous generator.  It whined..
"Satan's Siren" is what we called it.

IBM mainframes used a similar scheme but I can't remember the details.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I remember the 91. The MG Produced 400Hz power. It is easier to build a linear power supply as it would use smaller transformers and need less filtering The chilled water cooling was not the best idea because when they had to power down water would condense on the insides and they would have to wait for it to dry befor powering up The CDC 6600 in the other room used freon and did not have that problem. You could power cycle it in maybe 15 minutes But a water cool machine had tons of cold water inside after the power is removed Bothe were antiques when I used them in early 80s > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Francis Grosz <fgrosz@otiengineering.com> wrote: > > Jim, > > IIRC, the IBM 360 mod 91 was one that used a MG set. I think it also > required chilled distilled water for cooling. Those were indeed the > days of "Big Iron". > > Francis Grosz > > >> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:04:58 -0700 >> From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> >> To: time-nuts@febo.com >> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] The home time-lab >> Message-ID: <ec93c0e5-8f49-05e3-7042-917c179d594d@earthlink.net> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > >> On 7/25/16 6:55 AM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> If you go back far enough in time > . there is another alternative: >> >> Big rectifier bank, turning AC into DC, often off of multiple > phases or sources. >> >> Big DC motor running into a fairly large flywheel. >> >> AC generator (or in some cases DC generators) running off of the > shaft >> >> A tuning fork (yes state of the art timing) based control on the > AC output frequency >> >> A saturated reactor control loop on the generator side, same > thing on the motor side. >> >> Wonderfull stuff. State of the art UPS for your shipboard computer in > 1962. Ear muffs anyone? >> >> Bob > >> we had a system like this to turn 60 Hz into 50 Hz with a toothed belt >> drive between synchronous motor and synchronous generator. It whined.. >> "Satan's Siren" is what we called it. >> >> IBM mainframes used a similar scheme but I can't remember the details. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.