Hello, For my 5cents worth, I also found Fluke 8506A's to be satisfactory
From: acbern@gmx.de
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 9:29 PM
To: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" volt-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] AC Voltage Measurement Standards
J.L.,
it really depends on what level of accuracy you are looking for. The gold
standard obviously is the Fluke 792A. That is probably not an option. The
Fluke 8606 is more on the lower end side (dont get me wrong, compared to
the 792A), it does not really bring much improvements compared to the 3458A
operated in the AC SYNC mode, but maybe it is good enogh for what you want
to do. In that range are also e.g. the R&S ac voltmeters, but their focus
is more in the higher frequency area.
Very good accuracies are achieved by thermal converters (Ballantine...).
You can do DC to AC comparison measurements with a few ppm accuracy. But
measurements are slow, and you need a nanovolt meter.
I personally did the following: I got a Ballantine 1605A transfer
voltmeter. This is comparable to the 792A in a way, except it was much
cheaper. It is automatic, much easier to use than the Fluke 540 and goes up
to I think 100MHz. This can be used for percision calibrations as a working
standard. The calibration of this meter as well as others (e.g. the 3458A
in its AC mode) I am doing with a set of thermal converters (0.5V to 100V).
One of which (10V) has been externally calibrated up to 30MHz, cal of the
others are derived from it. That way I am deriving everything from a very
precisely (few ppm) calibrated 10V TVC. Overall, this saves cost on the
calibration side, allows for high accuracy and measurement speed is good.
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 09. Juli 2014 um 06:20 Uhr
Von: "John Phillips"
An: mitch@vincentelectronics.com, "Discussion of precise voltage
measurement"
Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] AC Voltage Measurement Standards
J. L. ,
I do not know what level you are willing to pay for. I do not work in a
real high end lab but we seem to get by with checking our secondary
standards with a 3458A before and after we send it to gary to be
calibrated. We use our 10 volts and 10K resistor to calibrate the 3458A
before we send it in and then after. We look at the before and after
data
as well to come up with new values for the units. Comes down to using
the
3458A as the primary standard filtered by our history. The different AC
measurement methods in statistical mode can give you a good idea where
your
AC values really are.
I would like to know how that compares with what the extra hardware can
do.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Mitch Van Ochten
mitch@vincentelectronics.com> wrote:
Joe,
I used a Fluke 540 for a while, and also the Fluke 8506A. The Fluke
540 is
MUCH more difficult to use. You need to flip the switch between two
positions rapidly and the results you get depend somewhat on how
"rapidly"
you make the transition. For AC volts the 8506A seems very nice.
Best regards,
mitch
-----Original Message-----
From: volt-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:volt-nuts-bounces@febo.com]
On
Behalf Of J. L. Trantham
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:46 PM
To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement
Subject: [volt-nuts] AC Voltage Measurement Standards
I've been thinking about adding an AC Voltage Measurement Standard to
my
shop.
It would appear that most of these have to do with thermal converters.
Does
anyone have any thoughts about this?
I've been thinking about a Fluke 540B, 8506A, or a collection of A55
Thermal
Converters. I have accurate DC measurement tools and DC standards.
I would appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks in advance.
Joe
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
and follow the instructions there.
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Ben,
Do you have the 4921 Current Shunt Adapter option for the 4920? I have not
found any information on it other than what is listed in the 4920 user's
handbook.
It mentions the unit simulates the impedance of a 540B. The guide says that
the instructions are included with the 4921. Do you happen to have a copy
of that document?
The 4920 user's guide is on the KO4BB website.
Thanks,
Todd
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:17 AM, ben ben@veritechmeasurements.com.au
wrote:
Hello, For my 5cents worth, I also found Fluke 8506A's to be satisfactory