BG
Bruce Griffiths
Wed, Mar 15, 2017 10:11 PM
Bob
He stated 0.01Hz EFC tuning range was adequate.
Gave no spec as to how close to nominal frequency is required though.
Bruce
On 16 March 2017 at 10:53 Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
By most modern definitions, “high stability” starts around 1x10^-12 (1 ppt) at a tau of 1 second to
10 seconds. There are $20 eBay OCXO’s that run at that level. With a fundamental crystal you
aren’t going to get to that point.
How much EFC range are you after?
How good a CNC setup do you have?
What kind of temperature test setup do you have?
Simply put, the design approach is a “test over temperature / collect data -> optimize” loop.
Without good frequency vs temperature data, you are flying totally blind. Even on a production
design, this is how it’s done. The parts you fiddle are likely to be odd shaped chunks of metal
that fit here or there.
Bob
On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Gilles Clement clemgill@club-internet.fr wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of 5.184Mhz crystals. Large metallic tanks: HC33U case
Maybe not OCXO grade, but I build a simple oscillator with a 4060 chip
placed in a double oven, and reached 10E-9 short term stability up to 10sec tau.
Not bad, so wondering if I can get better with a more advanced design.
Gilles.
Le 15 mars 2017 à 12:45, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org a écrit :
Hi
Where do you plan on getting an OCXO grade crystal at an odd frequency like
that? Much of the performance of a good OCXO is in the crystal. Doing a proper
design on one is a lot of work. You might think that having a design for 5.000000
MHz would give you a good design for 5.000050 MHz. I have empirical evidence that
this isn’t the case. Many years later, I’m still utterly amazed that this is the way things
work in the crystal business ….( = it’s not just a design issue, it’s also a business decision)
More or less the crystal needs to be:
- Cut specifically to have a turn at a temperature that makes sense for your application.
- A “large blank” design (for it’s frequency)
- In a cold weld package (most of the normal crystals are resistance weld)
- Run through a high vacuum / high temperature process
- Be plated with gold rather than something like silver or aluminum (unless it’s at VHF).
- Have a motional capacitance that makes sense for your EFC range ( normally = minimize)
- Preferably be an SC or modified SC cut.
This is for a high stability part. The list does keep going on for a while, but that should
give you a pretty good idea.
Bob
On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Gilles Clement clemgill@club-internet.fr wrote:
Hi,
So what is the « best » design for DIY a high stability OCVXO ?
I am looking after one, needed for an exotic frequency : 5184kHZ
Thx,
Gilles.
Le 14 mars 2017 à 18:02, Richard (Rick) Karlquist richard@karlquist.com a écrit :
On 3/14/2017 4:03 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Looking at oscillator circuits like the HP10811A will give some idea of some of the additional complexity required for a overtone operation. Dissecting a few ocxos may also be helpful. Some start with a 10MHz crystal and a Colpitts sustaining stage and use a 74HC74 or similar to divide the 10Mhz by 2 and drive the output pin. Even when a sinewave output is required often a CMOS inverter drives the output pin via an LC filter.
Bruce
I don't agree here. The 10811 is not a good tutorial for general oscillator design. Because it is SC cut, it has a complicated
mode suppression network across the base emitter junction to
suppress mode B as well as the fundamental.
The E1983A oscillator uses the same crystal (in a low profile
package). You can read my paper about it and see that I
used a very simple bridged tee oscillator circuit. That is
all you need to select the right overtone and mode.
This is the same circuit that I used at Zeta Labs 40 years
ago to design hundreds of custom VCXO's, up to the 9th
overtone. It simply worked every time, unlike various other
designs that were in use at Zeta.
Around 1985, I got a consulting gig at Equatorial Communications
to redesign their 5th overtone VCXO. Only about half of the
crystals would work in their circuit. They had thousands
of "reject" crystals. I just used my old Zeta circuit and
all the crystals started working again.
Equatorial owned the 10 meter dish that you used to see on
your right going south on 237 just before passing over
Central Expressway in Mountain View.
Rick N6RK
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Bob
He stated 0.01Hz EFC tuning range was adequate.
Gave no spec as to how close to nominal frequency is required though.
Bruce
> On 16 March 2017 at 10:53 Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> By most modern definitions, “high stability” starts around 1x10^-12 (1 ppt) at a tau of 1 second to
> 10 seconds. There are $20 eBay OCXO’s that run at that level. With a fundamental crystal you
> aren’t going to get to that point.
>
> How much EFC range are you after?
>
> How good a CNC setup do you have?
>
> What kind of temperature test setup do you have?
>
> Simply put, the design approach is a “test over temperature / collect data -> optimize” loop.
> Without good frequency vs temperature data, you are flying totally blind. Even on a production
> design, this is how it’s done. The parts you fiddle are likely to be odd shaped chunks of metal
> that fit here or there.
>
> Bob
>
> > On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Gilles Clement <clemgill@club-internet.fr> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have a bunch of 5.184Mhz crystals. Large metallic tanks: HC33U case
> > Maybe not OCXO grade, but I build a simple oscillator with a 4060 chip
> > placed in a double oven, and reached 10E-9 short term stability up to 10sec tau.
> > Not bad, so wondering if I can get better with a more advanced design.
> > Gilles.
> >
> >
> >> Le 15 mars 2017 à 12:45, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> a écrit :
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Where do you plan on getting an OCXO grade crystal at an odd frequency like
> >> that? Much of the performance of a good OCXO is in the crystal. Doing a proper
> >> design on one is a lot of work. You *might* think that having a design for 5.000000
> >> MHz would give you a good design for 5.000050 MHz. I have empirical evidence that
> >> this isn’t the case. Many years later, I’m still utterly amazed that this is the way things
> >> work in the crystal business ….( = it’s not just a design issue, it’s also a business decision)
> >>
> >> More or less the crystal needs to be:
> >>
> >> 1) Cut specifically to have a turn at a temperature that makes sense for your application.
> >> 2) A “large blank” design (for it’s frequency)
> >> 3) In a cold weld package (most of the normal crystals are resistance weld)
> >> 4) Run through a high vacuum / high temperature process
> >> 5) Be plated with gold rather than something like silver or aluminum (unless it’s at VHF).
> >> 6) Have a motional capacitance that makes sense for your EFC range ( normally = minimize)
> >> 7) Preferably be an SC or modified SC cut.
> >>
> >> This is for a high stability part. The list does keep going on for a while, but that should
> >> give you a pretty good idea.
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Gilles Clement <clemgill@club-internet.fr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> So what is the « best » design for DIY a high stability OCVXO ?
> >>> I am looking after one, needed for an exotic frequency : 5184kHZ
> >>> Thx,
> >>> Gilles.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Le 14 mars 2017 à 18:02, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/14/2017 4:03 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looking at oscillator circuits like the HP10811A will give some idea of some of the additional complexity required for a overtone operation. Dissecting a few ocxos may also be helpful. Some start with a 10MHz crystal and a Colpitts sustaining stage and use a 74HC74 or similar to divide the 10Mhz by 2 and drive the output pin. Even when a sinewave output is required often a CMOS inverter drives the output pin via an LC filter.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bruce
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't agree here. The 10811 is not a good tutorial for general oscillator design. Because it is SC cut, it has a complicated
> >>>> mode suppression network across the base emitter junction to
> >>>> suppress mode B as well as the fundamental.
> >>>>
> >>>> The E1983A oscillator uses the same crystal (in a low profile
> >>>> package). You can read my paper about it and see that I
> >>>> used a very simple bridged tee oscillator circuit. That is
> >>>> all you need to select the right overtone and mode.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the same circuit that I used at Zeta Labs 40 years
> >>>> ago to design hundreds of custom VCXO's, up to the 9th
> >>>> overtone. It simply worked every time, unlike various other
> >>>> designs that were in use at Zeta.
> >>>>
> >>>> Around 1985, I got a consulting gig at Equatorial Communications
> >>>> to redesign their 5th overtone VCXO. Only about half of the
> >>>> crystals would work in their circuit. They had thousands
> >>>> of "reject" crystals. I just used my old Zeta circuit and
> >>>> all the crystals started working again.
> >>>>
> >>>> Equatorial owned the 10 meter dish that you used to see on
> >>>> your right going south on 237 just before passing over
> >>>> Central Expressway in Mountain View.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rick N6RK
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> >>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >>>> and follow the instructions there.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> >>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >>> and follow the instructions there.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >> and follow the instructions there.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Wed, Mar 15, 2017 10:51 PM
Hi
Ok, I missed that.
Unless there is also a trimmer cap, the EFC will be >> 0.01Hz if it needs to be
on frequency for any rational amount of time. If the crystals are the typical old fundamentals,
they may age 5 to 10 ppm / year when heated to OCXO temperatures. That’s +/- 25 to +/-
50 Hz just for the first year.
Bob
On Mar 15, 2017, at 6:11 PM, Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz wrote:
Bob
He stated 0.01Hz EFC tuning range was adequate.
Gave no spec as to how close to nominal frequency is required though.
Bruce
On 16 March 2017 at 10:53 Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
By most modern definitions, “high stability” starts around 1x10^-12 (1 ppt) at a tau of 1 second to
10 seconds. There are $20 eBay OCXO’s that run at that level. With a fundamental crystal you
aren’t going to get to that point.
How much EFC range are you after?
How good a CNC setup do you have?
What kind of temperature test setup do you have?
Simply put, the design approach is a “test over temperature / collect data -> optimize” loop.
Without good frequency vs temperature data, you are flying totally blind. Even on a production
design, this is how it’s done. The parts you fiddle are likely to be odd shaped chunks of metal
that fit here or there.
Bob
On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Gilles Clement clemgill@club-internet.fr wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of 5.184Mhz crystals. Large metallic tanks: HC33U case
Maybe not OCXO grade, but I build a simple oscillator with a 4060 chip
placed in a double oven, and reached 10E-9 short term stability up to 10sec tau.
Not bad, so wondering if I can get better with a more advanced design.
Gilles.
Le 15 mars 2017 à 12:45, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org a écrit :
Hi
Where do you plan on getting an OCXO grade crystal at an odd frequency like
that? Much of the performance of a good OCXO is in the crystal. Doing a proper
design on one is a lot of work. You might think that having a design for 5.000000
MHz would give you a good design for 5.000050 MHz. I have empirical evidence that
this isn’t the case. Many years later, I’m still utterly amazed that this is the way things
work in the crystal business ….( = it’s not just a design issue, it’s also a business decision)
More or less the crystal needs to be:
- Cut specifically to have a turn at a temperature that makes sense for your application.
- A “large blank” design (for it’s frequency)
- In a cold weld package (most of the normal crystals are resistance weld)
- Run through a high vacuum / high temperature process
- Be plated with gold rather than something like silver or aluminum (unless it’s at VHF).
- Have a motional capacitance that makes sense for your EFC range ( normally = minimize)
- Preferably be an SC or modified SC cut.
This is for a high stability part. The list does keep going on for a while, but that should
give you a pretty good idea.
Bob
On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Gilles Clement clemgill@club-internet.fr wrote:
Hi,
So what is the « best » design for DIY a high stability OCVXO ?
I am looking after one, needed for an exotic frequency : 5184kHZ
Thx,
Gilles.
Le 14 mars 2017 à 18:02, Richard (Rick) Karlquist richard@karlquist.com a écrit :
On 3/14/2017 4:03 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Looking at oscillator circuits like the HP10811A will give some idea of some of the additional complexity required for a overtone operation. Dissecting a few ocxos may also be helpful. Some start with a 10MHz crystal and a Colpitts sustaining stage and use a 74HC74 or similar to divide the 10Mhz by 2 and drive the output pin. Even when a sinewave output is required often a CMOS inverter drives the output pin via an LC filter.
Bruce
I don't agree here. The 10811 is not a good tutorial for general oscillator design. Because it is SC cut, it has a complicated
mode suppression network across the base emitter junction to
suppress mode B as well as the fundamental.
The E1983A oscillator uses the same crystal (in a low profile
package). You can read my paper about it and see that I
used a very simple bridged tee oscillator circuit. That is
all you need to select the right overtone and mode.
This is the same circuit that I used at Zeta Labs 40 years
ago to design hundreds of custom VCXO's, up to the 9th
overtone. It simply worked every time, unlike various other
designs that were in use at Zeta.
Around 1985, I got a consulting gig at Equatorial Communications
to redesign their 5th overtone VCXO. Only about half of the
crystals would work in their circuit. They had thousands
of "reject" crystals. I just used my old Zeta circuit and
all the crystals started working again.
Equatorial owned the 10 meter dish that you used to see on
your right going south on 237 just before passing over
Central Expressway in Mountain View.
Rick N6RK
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Ok, I missed that.
Unless there is also a trimmer cap, the EFC will be >> 0.01Hz if it needs to be
on frequency for any rational amount of time. If the crystals are the typical old fundamentals,
they may age 5 to 10 ppm / year when heated to OCXO temperatures. That’s +/- 25 to +/-
50 Hz just for the first year.
Bob
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 6:11 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Bob
>
> He stated 0.01Hz EFC tuning range was adequate.
> Gave no spec as to how close to nominal frequency is required though.
>
> Bruce
>> On 16 March 2017 at 10:53 Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> By most modern definitions, “high stability” starts around 1x10^-12 (1 ppt) at a tau of 1 second to
>> 10 seconds. There are $20 eBay OCXO’s that run at that level. With a fundamental crystal you
>> aren’t going to get to that point.
>>
>> How much EFC range are you after?
>>
>> How good a CNC setup do you have?
>>
>> What kind of temperature test setup do you have?
>>
>> Simply put, the design approach is a “test over temperature / collect data -> optimize” loop.
>> Without good frequency vs temperature data, you are flying totally blind. Even on a production
>> design, this is how it’s done. The parts you fiddle are likely to be odd shaped chunks of metal
>> that fit here or there.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Gilles Clement <clemgill@club-internet.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I have a bunch of 5.184Mhz crystals. Large metallic tanks: HC33U case
>>> Maybe not OCXO grade, but I build a simple oscillator with a 4060 chip
>>> placed in a double oven, and reached 10E-9 short term stability up to 10sec tau.
>>> Not bad, so wondering if I can get better with a more advanced design.
>>> Gilles.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Le 15 mars 2017 à 12:45, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Where do you plan on getting an OCXO grade crystal at an odd frequency like
>>>> that? Much of the performance of a good OCXO is in the crystal. Doing a proper
>>>> design on one is a lot of work. You *might* think that having a design for 5.000000
>>>> MHz would give you a good design for 5.000050 MHz. I have empirical evidence that
>>>> this isn’t the case. Many years later, I’m still utterly amazed that this is the way things
>>>> work in the crystal business ….( = it’s not just a design issue, it’s also a business decision)
>>>>
>>>> More or less the crystal needs to be:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Cut specifically to have a turn at a temperature that makes sense for your application.
>>>> 2) A “large blank” design (for it’s frequency)
>>>> 3) In a cold weld package (most of the normal crystals are resistance weld)
>>>> 4) Run through a high vacuum / high temperature process
>>>> 5) Be plated with gold rather than something like silver or aluminum (unless it’s at VHF).
>>>> 6) Have a motional capacitance that makes sense for your EFC range ( normally = minimize)
>>>> 7) Preferably be an SC or modified SC cut.
>>>>
>>>> This is for a high stability part. The list does keep going on for a while, but that should
>>>> give you a pretty good idea.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Gilles Clement <clemgill@club-internet.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> So what is the « best » design for DIY a high stability OCVXO ?
>>>>> I am looking after one, needed for an exotic frequency : 5184kHZ
>>>>> Thx,
>>>>> Gilles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 14 mars 2017 à 18:02, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/14/2017 4:03 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking at oscillator circuits like the HP10811A will give some idea of some of the additional complexity required for a overtone operation. Dissecting a few ocxos may also be helpful. Some start with a 10MHz crystal and a Colpitts sustaining stage and use a 74HC74 or similar to divide the 10Mhz by 2 and drive the output pin. Even when a sinewave output is required often a CMOS inverter drives the output pin via an LC filter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't agree here. The 10811 is not a good tutorial for general oscillator design. Because it is SC cut, it has a complicated
>>>>>> mode suppression network across the base emitter junction to
>>>>>> suppress mode B as well as the fundamental.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The E1983A oscillator uses the same crystal (in a low profile
>>>>>> package). You can read my paper about it and see that I
>>>>>> used a very simple bridged tee oscillator circuit. That is
>>>>>> all you need to select the right overtone and mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the same circuit that I used at Zeta Labs 40 years
>>>>>> ago to design hundreds of custom VCXO's, up to the 9th
>>>>>> overtone. It simply worked every time, unlike various other
>>>>>> designs that were in use at Zeta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Around 1985, I got a consulting gig at Equatorial Communications
>>>>>> to redesign their 5th overtone VCXO. Only about half of the
>>>>>> crystals would work in their circuit. They had thousands
>>>>>> of "reject" crystals. I just used my old Zeta circuit and
>>>>>> all the crystals started working again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Equatorial owned the 10 meter dish that you used to see on
>>>>>> your right going south on 237 just before passing over
>>>>>> Central Expressway in Mountain View.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick N6RK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.