On Aug 17, 2016 09:04, "Peter Reilley" preilley_454@comcast.net wrote:
As a neophyte, I was wondering: rather that trying to discipline an
external
oscillator to create a GPSDO and produce a precise 10 MHz why not
discipline the oscillator
of the GPS receiver itself? This could be done with a varactor diode
across crystal of the
receiver's oscillator. Of course there are the same problems with
trying to servo this
oscillator as there are trying to servo an external oscillator but there
are fewer parts.
It's a very good idea, and is precisely what the Trimble Thunderbolt does
with its 10MHz OCXO that it uses both as a system clock and a 10MHz output.
Cheers!
-Pete
This would only likely be done for a GPS timing receiver, and even then likely only with something like a TCXO.
An ordinary GPS receiver can achieve positional results within modern spec without trimming its internal oscillator, and timing receivers solve the quantization problem by reporting the error rather than eliminating it.
Even if a GPS module had one, it wouldn’t get any better results with a more accurate oscillator, so the manufacturers don’t bother.
On Aug 17, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Pete Stephenson pete@heypete.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016 09:04, "Peter Reilley" preilley_454@comcast.net wrote:
As a neophyte, I was wondering: rather that trying to discipline an
external
oscillator to create a GPSDO and produce a precise 10 MHz why not
discipline the oscillator
of the GPS receiver itself? This could be done with a varactor diode
across crystal of the
receiver's oscillator. Of course there are the same problems with
trying to servo this
oscillator as there are trying to servo an external oscillator but there
are fewer parts.
It's a very good idea, and is precisely what the Trimble Thunderbolt does
with its 10MHz OCXO that it uses both as a system clock and a 10MHz output.
Cheers!
-Pete
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.