time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

help reviving Trimble UCCM-LPS GPSDO

WB
Wilko Bulte
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 1:42 PM

hi,

I am currently trying to revive a Trimble UCCM-LPS ex-telco GPSDO.
The model is a 57963-D according to the PCB silkscreen.

Got the board without its OCXO but luckily my stash of surplus I have
discovered a Trimble OCXO labeled 72345-86. Given that that OCXO also has a
label UCCM-LPS it "should work".

Joining the two resulted in:

UCCM >syst:status?


57964-86    serial number  S35DB68332  firmware ver  1.0.0.1-01 Ext
mode

Reference Status __________________________  Reference Outputs


XX Ext Ref  : [LOS]
TFOM    2            FFOM
3
UCCM A Status[OCXO WARMUP]

GPS: [phase:-2.8E-09, settling]

ACQUISITION ...................................................[GPS 1PPS
Valid]
Tracking: 8 ____  Not Tracking: 3 ________  Time


PRN  El  Az  C/N  PRN  El  Az                GPS      13:28:51    23 Dec
2021
15  71 212  37    5  6 195
24  45 272  43    30  7  85                ANT DLY  77 ns
17  28  97  37    19  19 124                Position


13  55 140  38                              MODE    Hold
14  39  58  39
23  33 291  44                              LAT      N  51:xxx
10  17 324  40                              LON      E  5:xxx
12  7 212  34                              HGT              +27.54 m
(MSL)

ELEV MASK  5 deg

Command complete

Unfortunately it never went GPS locked. Longer story short: the pin of the
OCXO that (I think) should produce a Vref for the EFC circuitry produced
some random ~ 266mV.

A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage.
So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died.

Now the question: has anyone a working unit that they can measure the
correct Vref voltage from?

For now I have fitted a 2.5V LM336 vref and I
see the EFC voltage go up and down a bit, with the output freq hovering
around 10MHz (+/- 4mHz roughly).

tia,
Wilko

hi, I am currently trying to revive a Trimble UCCM-LPS ex-telco GPSDO. The model is a 57963-D according to the PCB silkscreen. Got the board without its OCXO but luckily my stash of surplus I have discovered a Trimble OCXO labeled 72345-86. Given that that OCXO also has a label UCCM-LPS it "should work". Joining the two resulted in: UCCM >syst:status? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57964-86 serial number S35DB68332 firmware ver 1.0.0.1-01 Ext mode ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reference Status __________________________ Reference Outputs _______________ XX Ext Ref : [LOS] TFOM 2 FFOM 3 UCCM A Status[OCXO WARMUP] >> GPS: [phase:-2.8E-09, settling] ACQUISITION ...................................................[GPS 1PPS Valid] Tracking: 8 ____ Not Tracking: 3 ________ Time ____________________________ PRN El Az C/N PRN El Az GPS 13:28:51 23 Dec 2021 15 71 212 37 5 6 195 24 45 272 43 30 7 85 ANT DLY 77 ns 17 28 97 37 19 19 124 Position ________________________ 13 55 140 38 MODE Hold 14 39 58 39 23 33 291 44 LAT N 51:xxx 10 17 324 40 LON E 5:xxx 12 7 212 34 HGT +27.54 m (MSL) ELEV MASK 5 deg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Command complete Unfortunately it never went GPS locked. Longer story short: the pin of the OCXO that (I think) should produce a Vref for the EFC circuitry produced some random ~ 266mV. A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage. So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died. Now the question: has anyone a working unit that they can measure the correct Vref voltage from? For now I have fitted a 2.5V LM336 vref and I see the EFC voltage go up and down a bit, with the output freq hovering around 10MHz (+/- 4mHz roughly). tia, Wilko
BK
Bob kb8tq
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 5:14 PM

Hi

It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V

Bob

On Dec 23, 2021, at 8:42 AM, Wilko Bulte wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl wrote:

hi,

I am currently trying to revive a Trimble UCCM-LPS ex-telco GPSDO.
The model is a 57963-D according to the PCB silkscreen.

Got the board without its OCXO but luckily my stash of surplus I have
discovered a Trimble OCXO labeled 72345-86. Given that that OCXO also has a
label UCCM-LPS it "should work".

Joining the two resulted in:

UCCM >syst:status?


57964-86    serial number  S35DB68332  firmware ver  1.0.0.1-01 Ext
mode

Reference Status __________________________  Reference Outputs


XX Ext Ref  : [LOS]
TFOM    2            FFOM
3
UCCM A Status[OCXO WARMUP]

GPS: [phase:-2.8E-09, settling]

ACQUISITION ...................................................[GPS 1PPS
Valid]
Tracking: 8 ____  Not Tracking: 3 ________  Time


PRN  El  Az  C/N  PRN  El  Az                GPS      13:28:51    23 Dec
2021
15  71 212  37    5  6 195
24  45 272  43    30  7  85                ANT DLY  77 ns
17  28  97  37    19  19 124                Position


13  55 140  38                              MODE    Hold
14  39  58  39
23  33 291  44                              LAT      N  51:xxx
10  17 324  40                              LON      E  5:xxx
12  7 212  34                              HGT              +27.54 m
(MSL)

ELEV MASK  5 deg

Command complete

Unfortunately it never went GPS locked. Longer story short: the pin of the
OCXO that (I think) should produce a Vref for the EFC circuitry produced
some random ~ 266mV.

A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage.
So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died.

Now the question: has anyone a working unit that they can measure the
correct Vref voltage from?

For now I have fitted a 2.5V LM336 vref and I
see the EFC voltage go up and down a bit, with the output freq hovering
around 10MHz (+/- 4mHz roughly).

tia,
Wilko


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Hi It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V Bob > On Dec 23, 2021, at 8:42 AM, Wilko Bulte <wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > hi, > > I am currently trying to revive a Trimble UCCM-LPS ex-telco GPSDO. > The model is a 57963-D according to the PCB silkscreen. > > Got the board without its OCXO but luckily my stash of surplus I have > discovered a Trimble OCXO labeled 72345-86. Given that that OCXO also has a > label UCCM-LPS it "should work". > > Joining the two resulted in: > > UCCM >syst:status? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 57964-86 serial number S35DB68332 firmware ver 1.0.0.1-01 Ext > mode > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Reference Status __________________________ Reference Outputs > _______________ > XX Ext Ref : [LOS] > TFOM 2 FFOM > 3 > UCCM A Status[OCXO WARMUP] > >>> GPS: [phase:-2.8E-09, settling] > ACQUISITION ...................................................[GPS 1PPS > Valid] > Tracking: 8 ____ Not Tracking: 3 ________ Time > ____________________________ > PRN El Az C/N PRN El Az GPS 13:28:51 23 Dec > 2021 > 15 71 212 37 5 6 195 > 24 45 272 43 30 7 85 ANT DLY 77 ns > 17 28 97 37 19 19 124 Position > ________________________ > 13 55 140 38 MODE Hold > 14 39 58 39 > 23 33 291 44 LAT N 51:xxx > 10 17 324 40 LON E 5:xxx > 12 7 212 34 HGT +27.54 m > (MSL) > > > > > ELEV MASK 5 deg > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Command complete > > Unfortunately it never went GPS locked. Longer story short: the pin of the > OCXO that (I think) should produce a Vref for the EFC circuitry produced > some random ~ 266mV. > > A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage. > So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died. > > Now the question: has anyone a working unit that they can measure the > correct Vref voltage from? > > For now I have fitted a 2.5V LM336 vref and I > see the EFC voltage go up and down a bit, with the output freq hovering > around 10MHz (+/- 4mHz roughly). > > tia, > Wilko > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
AK
Attila Kinali
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 5:47 PM

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100
Wilko Bulte wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl wrote:

A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage.
So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died.

A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the
first place?

I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing
the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make
it necessary to have an actual reference output.

And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference
externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever
is inside that needs this reference voltage?

		Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100 Wilko Bulte <wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl> wrote: > A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage. > So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died. A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the first place? I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make it necessary to have an actual reference output. And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever is inside that needs this reference voltage? Attila Kinali -- The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" There are things we don't understand and things we always wonder about. And that's why we do research. -- Kobayashi Makoto
AT
Andy Talbot
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 5:51 PM

I've always assumed this is because they need to know the reference is
clean and under the OCXO manufacturer's control if it's to meet specs.  If
the user had to supply the reference there's no knowing how clean it is.

Andy
www.g4jnt.com

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 17:47, Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100
Wilko Bulte wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl wrote:

A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC

voltage.

So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died.

A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the
first place?

I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing
the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make
it necessary to have an actual reference output.

And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference
externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever
is inside that needs this reference voltage?

                     Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

I've always assumed this is because they need to know the reference is clean and under the OCXO manufacturer's control if it's to meet specs. If the user had to supply the reference there's no knowing how clean it is. Andy www.g4jnt.com On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 17:47, Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100 > Wilko Bulte <wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC > voltage. > > So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died. > > A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the > first place? > > I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing > the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make > it necessary to have an actual reference output. > > And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference > externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever > is inside that needs this reference voltage? > > Attila Kinali > > -- > The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" > There are things we don't understand and things we always > wonder about. And that's why we do research. > -- Kobayashi Makoto > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send > an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there. >
AK
Attila Kinali
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 5:57 PM

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:14:48 -0500
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V

A quick google lead me to this forum post:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1325/

Looks like the Vref is supposed to be 2.5V

		Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:14:48 -0500 Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V A quick google lead me to this forum post: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1325/ Looks like the Vref is supposed to be 2.5V Attila Kinali -- The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" There are things we don't understand and things we always wonder about. And that's why we do research. -- Kobayashi Makoto
WB
Wilko Bulte
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 5:58 PM

On 23 Dec 2021, at 18:47, Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100
Wilko Bulte wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl wrote:

A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage.
So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died.

A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the
first place?

I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing
the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make
it necessary to have an actual reference output.

Well, an external disciplining circuit might make good use of a oven stabilised reference, at least that is what I assume?

Disciplining circuit uses Vref from the OCXO for a DAC that in turn drives the EFC of the OCXO.

No doubt someone will correct me if that is a wrong assumption :-)

And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference
externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever
is inside that needs this reference voltage?

Well, currently I have a 2.5V Vref externally connected. No smoke as of yet

Wilko

        Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

> On 23 Dec 2021, at 18:47, Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100 > Wilko Bulte <wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage. >> So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died. > > A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the > first place? > > I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing > the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make > it necessary to have an actual reference output. Well, an external disciplining circuit might make good use of a oven stabilised reference, at least that is what I assume? Disciplining circuit uses Vref from the OCXO for a DAC that in turn drives the EFC of the OCXO. No doubt someone will correct me if that is a wrong assumption :-) > And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference > externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever > is inside that needs this reference voltage? Well, currently I have a 2.5V Vref externally connected. No smoke as of yet Wilko > > Attila Kinali > > -- > The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" > There are things we don't understand and things we always > wonder about. And that's why we do research. > -- Kobayashi Makoto > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
AK
Attila Kinali
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 5:59 PM

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:57:10 +0100
Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:14:48 -0500
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V

A quick google lead me to this forum post:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1325/

Looks like the Vref is supposed to be 2.5V

Ooops.. stupid me linked to the wrong page (too many tabs open)

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1300/

Sorry about that.

		Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:57:10 +0100 Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:14:48 -0500 > Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > > > It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V > > A quick google lead me to this forum post: > https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1325/ > > Looks like the Vref is supposed to be 2.5V Ooops.. stupid me linked to the wrong page (too many tabs open) https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1300/ Sorry about that. Attila Kinali -- The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" There are things we don't understand and things we always wonder about. And that's why we do research. -- Kobayashi Makoto
WB
Wilko Bulte
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 6:03 PM

On 23 Dec 2021, at 18:58, Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:14:48 -0500
Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V

A quick google lead me to this forum post:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1325/

Looks like the Vref is supposed to be 2.5V

For the Symmetricom UCCM or for the Trimble?

These UCCM are form-fit-function compatible but that does not mean the circuits are the same. Or the OcXO.

Samsung also produced UCCM, of which I have 2, both working fine. Again different circuits, different GPS etc.

Wilko

        Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

> On 23 Dec 2021, at 18:58, Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:14:48 -0500 > Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > >> It’s a pretty good bet that the Vref is 5V > > A quick google lead me to this forum post: > https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/a-look-at-my-symmetricom-gpsdo-(ocxo-furuno-receiver)/1325/ > > Looks like the Vref is supposed to be 2.5V For the Symmetricom UCCM or for the Trimble? These UCCM are form-fit-function compatible but that does not mean the circuits are the same. Or the OcXO. Samsung also produced UCCM, of which I have 2, both working fine. Again different circuits, different GPS etc. Wilko > > Attila Kinali > -- > The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" > There are things we don't understand and things we always > wonder about. And that's why we do research. > -- Kobayashi Makoto > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 6:08 PM

Hi

The main reason OCXO’s have a Vref is that an ovenized
voltage source is likely to be more stable over temperature
than what you can easily buy and mount on a PCB.

The gotcha is the common ground found on most OCXO’s.
Putting the oven current through that ground makes keeping
the Vref (and the EFC) well behaved a bit of a chore. For various
reasons OEM’s have a hard time dealing with multiple grounds
that have multiple purposes ….

Bob

On Dec 23, 2021, at 12:47 PM, Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100
Wilko Bulte wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl wrote:

A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage.
So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died.

A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the
first place?

I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing
the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make
it necessary to have an actual reference output.

And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference
externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever
is inside that needs this reference voltage?

		Attila Kinali

--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Hi The main reason OCXO’s have a Vref is that an ovenized voltage source is likely to be more stable over temperature than what you can easily buy and mount on a PCB. The gotcha is the common ground found on most OCXO’s. Putting the oven current through that ground makes keeping the Vref (and the EFC) well behaved a bit of a chore. For various reasons OEM’s have a hard time dealing with multiple grounds that have multiple purposes …. Bob > On Dec 23, 2021, at 12:47 PM, Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:42:27 +0100 > Wilko Bulte <wilko.bulte@xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> A quick experiment learned that the OCXO freq responds to the EFC voltage. >> So, looks like the Vref circuit in the OCXO has died. > > A stupid side question: Why do have OCXO a Vref output in the > first place? > > I can see that some form of reference might make stabilizing > the power in the crystal easier, but that still wouldn't make > it necessary to have an actual reference output. > > And related to that: Would supplying the voltage reference > externally, in case of a broken Vref output, work for whatever > is inside that needs this reference voltage? > > Attila Kinali > > -- > The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" > There are things we don't understand and things we always > wonder about. And that's why we do research. > -- Kobayashi Makoto > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
EB
ed breya
Thu, Dec 23, 2021 7:16 PM

Many of the older VTOCXOs have the internal reference voltage accessible
simply to use them stand-alone. A remote adjustment pot could be fed
from the reference, and set the fine tuning voltage, without needing any
other support from the system. Nowadays we typically tune from PLLs, and
such, and providing a stable reference is nearly trivial, but way back,
having a good reference right from the unit itself was (and still is) a
handy feature.

Ed

Many of the older VTOCXOs have the internal reference voltage accessible simply to use them stand-alone. A remote adjustment pot could be fed from the reference, and set the fine tuning voltage, without needing any other support from the system. Nowadays we typically tune from PLLs, and such, and providing a stable reference is nearly trivial, but way back, having a good reference right from the unit itself was (and still is) a handy feature. Ed