Aha! :)
Hi David,
First few sour points to make sure you got what to expect.
2001's are fairly capable DMMs and I personally dealt with no less than
7pcs of them over last years. Currently I still own four units of same
age as your win (judge from S/N). While they are worse than 2002/3458 in
terms of stability/noise, I would not trade my 2001's to fancy
3446X/34470 meters.
Also 2001 support scan-card addons so you can easily expand DMM with
scanner function, or even nanovolt-preamp if you dedicated enough. I'm
working on nanovolt support with 2001, but that's long story. Some
details with DIY card I covered here: https://xdevs.com/review/ema10/
To get you ready:
1). It's bit tricky to setup and need little bit of time to get familiar
with, but otherwise on par with modern 34470/DMM7510 with bit worse
resistance/current specs. No RS232, so bit more expenses to come for
GPIB interfacing if you don't have that already.
As Todd pointed out already to my repair article, some bits of info are
linked there, as well as firmwares and documentation.
Here's example test log with reading 1mV DC voltage with three meters :
2001,2002,3458. https://xdevs.com/datalog_tcomp/
2001 also using almost exactly same ACV TrueRMS converter as 8.5 Model
2002, so that's good too if you into AC stuff.
I also have thread on EEVBlog:
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/restoration-glory-of-keithley-2001-dmm/
in case you missed it.
4-5) You should update firmware to A08, which I hosted on links above,
if you desire to have meter calibrated by accredited lab, such as
Tektronix service center. Otherwise they might charge you for replacing
simple PLCC ROM. Your digital board is older version, so you tied to
A-version smaller firmwares w/o support of unobtanium nanovolt Keithley
1801 preamp. You will not loose existing calibration on firmware update.
I sent one of 2001's for official cal here in Taiwan, it was 500$ for
full cal with data. Cheaper than 8.5 DMMs but still bit pricey. To do
user calibration you will need very stable 2V, 20V, 20kOhm and 1MOhm
standards. Make sure you have meter running at least for a week before
sending to cal, to get everything stable.
P.S. there is no much point in 8.5th digit from 2001, as it's just down
in noise.
BR,
Illya
Hi Illya:
When I try to view your web page the message is:
Secure Connection Failed
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
Aha! :)
Hi David,
First few sour points to make sure you got what to expect.
2001's are fairly capable DMMs and I personally dealt with no less than 7pcs of them over last years. Currently I
still own four units of same age as your win (judge from S/N). While they are worse than 2002/3458 in terms of
stability/noise, I would not trade my 2001's to fancy 3446X/34470 meters.
Also 2001 support scan-card addons so you can easily expand DMM with scanner function, or even nanovolt-preamp if you
dedicated enough. I'm working on nanovolt support with 2001, but that's long story. Some details with DIY card I
covered here: https://xdevs.com/review/ema10/
To get you ready:
1). It's bit tricky to setup and need little bit of time to get familiar with, but otherwise on par with modern
34470/DMM7510 with bit worse resistance/current specs. No RS232, so bit more expenses to come for GPIB interfacing if
you don't have that already.
As Todd pointed out already to my repair article, some bits of info are linked there, as well as firmwares and
documentation.
Here's example test log with reading 1mV DC voltage with three meters : 2001,2002,3458. https://xdevs.com/datalog_tcomp/
2001 also using almost exactly same ACV TrueRMS converter as 8.5 Model 2002, so that's good too if you into AC stuff.
I also have thread on EEVBlog: http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/restoration-glory-of-keithley-2001-dmm/ in case
you missed it.
4-5) You should update firmware to A08, which I hosted on links above, if you desire to have meter calibrated by
accredited lab, such as Tektronix service center. Otherwise they might charge you for replacing simple PLCC ROM. Your
digital board is older version, so you tied to A-version smaller firmwares w/o support of unobtanium nanovolt Keithley
1801 preamp. You will not loose existing calibration on firmware update.
I sent one of 2001's for official cal here in Taiwan, it was 500$ for full cal with data. Cheaper than 8.5 DMMs but
still bit pricey. To do user calibration you will need very stable 2V, 20V, 20kOhm and 1MOhm standards. Make sure you
have meter running at least for a week before sending to cal, to get everything stable.
P.S. there is no much point in 8.5th digit from 2001, as it's just down in noise.
BR,
Illya
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Try again, I had my clumsy fingers in server console...
25/06/16 0:49, Brooke Clarke пишет:
Hi Illya:
When I try to view your web page the message is:
Secure Connection Failed
Ah, the Keithley 1801 Nanovolt Preamp in combination with the 2001
brings back memories. Although I never got to use either, I remember
the advertisements for them.
I went looking for the Keithley 1801 Nanovolt Preamp on their web page
a couple of years before Tektronix bought them and could not find it.
Your web page says they discontinued it which answers my first
question. Did they replace it with some other integrated product like
the currently produced 2182A Nanovoltmeter?
My last experiment with low noise involved a pair of LT1028s
configured as a standard x1000 differential amplifier with a pair of
LTC1150s correcting their low frequency noise by driving their offset
adjust pins. The next step up would have been a low noise discrete
JFET input stage for lower input bias current but I was working with
low impedance sources so the LT1028s were fine. Three things scared
me about this circuit:
I measured the low frequency noise using a Fluke 8505A by taking DC
voltage measurements and calculating the standard deviation to get the
RMS noise. The numbers I got back were exactly as theory predicted.
The Fluke did not have the AC measurement option and given the low
frequencies involved, it would not have worked for what I was doing
anyway.
Measuring the RMS noise allowed me to adjust the frequency
breakpoint between the LT1028s and the LTC1150s for minimum total
noise. The empirically determined breakpoint was also exactly as
theory predicted.
This x1000 preamplifier could be used to accurately measure the
resistance of low values resistors just from their Johnson noise. At
this point I started to wonder if I was dreaming, living in a
simulation, or unknowingly part of the cast of a horror or science
fiction movie.
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 00:38:49 +0800, you wrote:
...
Also 2001 support scan-card addons so you can easily expand DMM with
scanner function, or even nanovolt-preamp if you dedicated enough. I'm
working on nanovolt support with 2001, but that's long story. Some
details with DIY card I covered here: https://xdevs.com/review/ema10/
...