Absolutely ! But not with 2N3904 but rather with a http://cache.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/BFG135.pdf?pspll=1 In a message dated 10/30/2016 3:27:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com writes: Does your text provide a good discussion of the implications of operating with large signals?

You mentioned suitable transistor availablity being an increasing problem and I have run across that myself. Do you expect Qualcomm's aquisition of NXP to have an impact? NXP is currently the best source I have for fast complementary pairs or even just fast PNPs. On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:06:19 -0400, you wrote: >Absolutely ! But not with 2N3904 but rather with a > >http://cache.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/BFG135.pdf?pspll=1 > >>In a message dated 10/30/2016 3:27:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>scott.j.stobbe@gmail.com writes: >> >>Does your text provide a good discussion of the implications of operating >>with large signals?